hello and happy new year from r/mgtow. as a regular contributor at mgtow, I can attest that we get trolled and infiltrated a lot. I have usually been willing to discuss mgtow or most anything else with people from different perspectives. something that almost invariably happens in these discussions is that the other person will attribute some characteristic or motivation to me and tell me that my having said characteristic or motivation invalidates the legitimacy of my statements.

if, for example, I say anything about child support enforcement, I will be accused of sleeping around out of wedlock. but if i say anything about divorce law, i will be accused of being divorced. if i say anything about hook up culture, i will be accused of being involuntarily celibate. and if i say anything about culturally accepted ideas about men, i will be accused of being asexual.

so promiscuity, monogamy, inceldom, and volceldom are all things that invalidate the opinion of any man who exhibits them. I've been similarly called liberal/conservative/libertarian/anarchist/apolitical/fascist/Nazi/commie as well as wealthy/upper middle class/working class/poor/not entered into workforce yet and also young/old/middle aged and also highly educated/high school diploma/completely retarded and so on. i eventually had to come up with a word for this, cunterrogation.

my question is, what characteristic could a man have that would not automatically disqualify anything he says?