thoughts on 'redpill' yt vids

Background_Local1685 · 2022-12-28T04:04:16+00:00

If 80 percent of women go for 20% it’s bound to share or be single . That’s the philosophy he based it off if large group of women want 1 man the guy can be picky say he wants more or the women goes off while he gets the next and next. But if she shares then she’ll be with a rare guy. My take is if you want someone you either meet their standards or just leave. If someone wants multiple partners you leave or accept .

kkat02 · 2022-12-28T01:30:43+00:00

I could write on and on about how this was the result of feminism and the sexual revolution, but I digress.

I don’t watch those videos with the intent to implement their techniques. I believe this is what happens when the red pill community doesn’t root their foundation in Christ. A healthy relationship is NOT where a man provides for a women but cheats and lies, and a women is passive and submissive to being abused by a man living in sin. A healthy relationship is a man who takes care of his wife and family, is loyal, and is a leader for him family. In return the wife cares for her home and listens to her husband, not out of fear but with respect.

hissyyfit1 · 2022-12-28T05:52:57+00:00

My take is that most of these people are full of shit, to put it bluntly. We’re not supposed to moralize on here so I’m not going to overtly pass judgement on those who have open relationships or whatever, but in my personal opinion, I hope this dynamic dies out soon and becomes increasingly less socially acceptable. I went on Pearly Things’ channel and the first vid is “modern women fear competition.” Sorry for cursing, but NO SHIT. EVERYONE does. Why the hell do people think there are so many bitter men and so-called incels out there? Men know how cold the dating market. Why would any sane woman want to experience the same, or fear competition while in a relationship???

What also bothers me is that many of these content creators will criticize regular open/poly relationships, but as long as it follows a convoluted RP set of rules, then suddenly it’s okay.

First of all, RPW teaches that you should probably seek out a man with a mix of alpha and beta tendencies if you want a normal, traditional relationship. One of the most important reasons is so that you’re not with a man who has a million options and wants to choose from those options. A lot of men (and women) at the tippy top of the food chain have the whole world to browse through, at least anecdotally, and we can see this with celebrities for example, so I’m assuming that’s who these content creators are talking about. If they’re failing to mention this critical point or they’re encouraging this behavior across the board, then they’re just grifters looking to create shocking content. I hate it :)

Secondly, I think what I realized is this sub and 99% of the attention whoring “trad RP” content creators on social media are NOT the end-all-be-all (although this sub is infinitely more helpful than anything out there, I kid you not). You have to follow your own path. So research as much as you want out of RPW, pick which aspects you like about it, and remember that even if you see something outrageous like what you pointed out, it shouldn’t shake your world. These internet people shouldn’t dictate your world view or relationship.

Increasingly, I’ve found myself giving the advice to stay away from men who are newly aware of RP since RP is different to the goals of RPW. A lot of the newer guys have, like, really warped, repulsive views to a woman who wants a husband, marriage, family, etc, without the addition of a mistress on the side lol. My boyfriend knows about this stuff but part of the reason I respect him so much is that he never had to follow some RP guide or watch RP content to be a strong, successful, loving leader for his family and me. For your own sanity, don’t watch these videos as much and do NOT go on the male RP sub.

breemakin · 2022-12-28T21:00:30+00:00

Any RP content created for men (especially those YouTube videos that use a lot of emotionally charged language) should be taken with a truckload of salt.

People like Kevin Samuels, Andrew Tate, etc are making money by putting down women and spouting negative views against women - and it works! The low value men eat that shit up because they’re angry and looking for somewhere to place their blame.

Remember, high value men wouldn’t spend their time sitting online all day purchasing Andrew Tate “personal development” programs.

Protocol_Apollo · 2022-12-28T00:52:58+00:00

Welcome to the disregulated sexual market place, please enjoy your stay.

I don't think that any woman should have to if she wants to but it surprised me a lot.

Some of this shit is said for entertainment/not to be taken literally. Will every viewer/commenter on that video go through or even be in the position where women are loyal but he isn’t? Probably not.

(I assume this is what you mean and not plates/plating stage, because in that case, yes, women are sharing men. By default).

However, the overreaching sentiment is valid. Women don’t have to share men, if they shoot lower. The higher they shoot, the more likely they will have to.

Guys are like cars. Each band/level comes with their pros and cons.

A Toyota. Aka average man. Attainable. Reliable. Will always be their for you. Will this man make demands like sharing him? No. He’s a Toyota. Will you catch him with other girls? Or even texting them? No. He just comes from work and watches football.

Cons: it’s a Toyota. It’s cheap. Anyone can have it. Nobody cares about it. It’s not special. Nobody is dying to be with a Toyota.

A Lamborghini man.

Pros: it’s a lambo. It’s expensive, barely anyone can have it . Everyone is jealous of you. People would die to have one.

Cons: reliability. Hard to attain. Can’t expect the pros of a Toyota from it.

You know he’s with other women but you turn a blind eye since you get his time and resources, those hoes don’t.

Mercedes/BMW man. The middle. In between lambo and Toyota. Encompasses both pros of Toyota and Lamborghini, but to smaller extent.

Is something of value, can be reliable, some people glance when you’re with it.

Cons: encompasses the cons of the other cars but to smaller extent.

He may not be seeing other women where your only option is to turn a blind eye, but he might get odd texts from one of his plates or coworkers.

Special but not that special. Brings some attention but not much. Better than a Toyota, worse than a lambo.

Women don’t have to share a man. If that’s their number one priority, then they need to aim a little bit lower. It’s a scale, I’d say.

The more you prioritise that, the less you can prioritise value. A Toyota for example. Clear pros, clear disadvantages.

The more you prioritise value, the less you can prioritise not sharing. A Lamborghini for example. Clear pros, clear disadvantages.

Something 50-50. A Mercedes for example. Can be best of both worlds. Or worst.

So, what car do you want?

Constant-Feature-328 · 2022-12-28T00:48:01+00:00

Hey!

Kevin Samuels mentions the reality that if you get with a top 1% man he can exercise options, but it does not mean he will. Remember you can also get an average man and they be more faithful.

Responsib1lty · 2022-12-28T13:45:45+00:00

women do largely share the men rn w/ hook up culture. 20% of men having relations with 80% of the women is the few being shared by the many.

on-the-level, an average man and women shouldnt share each other as disease and babies can happen. on-the-level there wouldnt be any sharing required cuz it was probably arduous to get a single girl in the first place.

dressedindignity · 2022-12-28T03:26:57+00:00

A man is designed to spread his seed- to desire variety. When he has a lot of opportunities throwing themselves at him because of his higher value (not him putting time and effort into pursuing or wooing the woman like a lower value man would have to), and he tells you he wants to enjoy this reward once in awhile (no lying or hiding it from you) it’s a lot different from being a scummy cheater. If you’re his favorite woman- the one who gets his money, energy, attention, and time- why does it matter if a random hoe gets his physical “meat” in her for a night? She doesn’t get the last name, title, children, love etc. Like imagine how empty and meaningless that is for a woman just to get sex from a man? Then realize you can’t be jealous of women who are only valued for their bodies because they look good but put out for men who have no intention of committing. And if it’s a moral issue- these women are willing participants- as long as the man isn’t “selling her a dream” (a la Fresh from Fresh and Fit 🙄)- she’s only a victim of her poor choices. I don’t think it’s really sharing your man unless he wants actual relationships with other women.

AutoModerator · 2022-12-27T23:12:39+00:00

Title: thoughts on 'redpill' yt vids

Full text: So I have been watching a lot of homemaker videos to motivate me and just because it's very refreshing, during me watching a video a Kevin Samuels video popped up and I decided to watch it. A few of his videos later I watch one where he's telling women to share men, I was shocked on this yet so many men in the comments were agreeing with this behavior. The more I looked into supposed redpill' vids men were promoting sharing men, even pearly things (if that's her name). I'm not sharing no man and I don't think that any woman should have to if she wants to but it surprised me a lot. What are your takes on this particular subject?

^{This is the original text of the post and this is an automated service}

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

RedPillDad · 2022-12-29T04:48:17+00:00

Female Agenda is Hookups ➔ Dates ➔ Boyfriend ➔ Fiancé ➔ Husband. Maximum commitment.

Male Agenda is Hookups ➔ Plates ➔ Main ➔ Exclusive (when older). Maximum sex, minimum commitment.

Few men are capable of pulling off the Male Agenda, and those are the guys are typically of such high value that women are willing (reluctantly) to share him.

Women have a duel mating strategy. They hookup with Chads for the Alpha seed and will date the Provider Guy for the Beta need (resources). They would love to lock down a Chad, but he's on the Male Agenda.

Average men align themselves with the Female Agenda, desperately offering their time, attention and full commitment. They crave the girlfriend experience.

Advanced_Bar_673 · 2023-01-10T17:53:23+00:00

I think too, one of the reasons concepts like these (sharing a man) stresses most women is because we innately KNOW the female prerogative is to attain a real relationship out of the HMV she is hooking up with, even if he thinks it's just a casual one and done. And no matter how secure a woman feels about being "the one" for her man, we certainly don't want to deal with some random hookup texting him, him taking her to dinner, buying her flowers... all those things women desire ongoing (the dating/ wooing stage) is now what he is doing for another woman in order to bed her.

Because unless he is paying an escort for an efficient encounter, most likely there will still have to be a certain level of chasing and time invested in order to sleep with this hook up.

Time and energy and novelty he could be allocating to his #1.

So, I think it's because we know most women too would eventually want a relationship with this hvm, that causes added insecurity about incorporating casual sex hookups in a relationship.

Title	thoughts on 'redpill' yt vids
Author	kokoremu
Upvotes	25
Comments	42
Date	December 27, 2022 11:12 PM UTC (3 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/RedPillWomen
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/RedPillWomen/comments/zwtd8u/thoughts_on_redpill_yt_vids/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/RedPillWomen/thoughts-on-redpill-yt-vids.1145535 https://theredarchive.com/post/1145535

Comments