I messaged the mods for permission to make a response post to this post, posted yesterday.

A few things bothered me about that post.

  1. It faked quotes. The title is "Girl on OKCupid subreddit keeps telling herself that she's attracted to betas - and then learns that her "perfect, amazing" boyfriend is a RedPiller".

    I never once used the word perfect (nor did anyone else), although the post twice quotes me as calling my SO perfect. I did use the word amazing, but only to describe a date night. My SO treats me wonderfully, but he's not perfect - neither am I, or anyone else. I'm far from in love, it's only been a couple months. Cherry picking is hard to avoid on subs, but you shouldn't make things up.

  2. Those exaggerations were used to create a false narrative. I wasn't devastated by finding out my "'perfect, amazing' boyfriend" read red pill. I mentioned in the post that the advice in that post isn't bad. It's great to appreciate your value and build confidence. The advice there worked - I liked his profile, we went out and wound up dating exclusively.

    The reasoning is concerning. Why improve yourself because women are irrational and need a leader? Improve yourself because you're a human with a life that shouldn't be wasted. Tease because you know she can take it and you appreciate her comebacks. Don't neg because you've perceived some threat to your manhood.

    The one ideal that does bother me is the idea that guys should "be manlyTM ", as though "manly" has a single definition: get ripped, get sexed, don't trust women with vulnerability. Define it yourself, and be confident about it. I don't care if your hobby is DOTA or the violin, as long as it makes you happy and doesn't take over your life.

  3. The biggest issue with the post is its point: "RedPill is not just about getting big muscles and ramming some chick up the cervix. It's about understanding the nature of the world - that nature contains both alpha and beta traits that you must use in balance if you want a long-term relationship."

Everyone has alpha and beta traits. That ratio is different in everyone.

I like this ratio as it is in my SO. I don't want it to change, because I like that he's dorky and cries at nostalgic movies and gives me sweet compliments and asks me for advice and lets me test nail polish on him.

That doesn't mean that I dislike his big social circle, how hard he works at school, his sense of humor, his passion for music, his honesty, or his self-confidence.

Yeah, I probably wouldn't like a guy at either extreme. And yeah, I wish he'd come with me to the gym because it's a hobby of mine (as mentioned in the thread, I go every day). Just like I'm sure he wishes I liked watching football or could sing. It's not a deal breaker.

If having both alpha and beta traits makes you a red piller, then I'm attracted to red pillers - no one else exists.

Edit: Also, though we see each other every day and hang out with each other's friends, we haven't used the terms "boyfriend" or "girlfriend" officially because it's been 2.5 months since we met. Chill, guys! :)