This is a throwaway for a few reasons. I'm going to use a few terms that pretty firmly tie uniquely back to my career as a behavioral science researcher, but whatever.

What are my qualifications to tell you that you're probably fucking up?
1. Research career in behavioral science.
2. I can use math few have seen and cite research everyone should see to explain myself.
3. Married to a 10, also in behavioral science, who puts out twice a day and lets me fuck around with other girls, but doesn't fuck around herself.

You're fucking up
First matter: you probably came to the seduction community to learn scripts and roles. In Chess, the masters play the first 10 or so turns by rote. That is, it's well understood exactly how both players should respond to any legal opening move. The middle of the game is more than simple pattern recognition, but the end returns to rote closings. Humans are not Chess. While you're probably used to a small set of greetings, the fact is that any imaginable utterance or action can possibly be used to a greet another person. When you see something like this, you can see why true versatility trumps an opening for which most opponents are unprepared. You're not the only PUA and as the knowledge and methods become more widespread, the "book of openings" is increasingly well-known to players on the other side of our adversarial game. The traditional informational advantage is steadily being lost.

Second matter: treating "shit tests" as a challenge-response system is moronic. You have this link on the right that's essentially a table of replay attacks on authentication requests. The inherent strength of this strategy is that you have known valid responses to known challenges for which a successful response is available. In other words, it's just a matter of time before you're presented with an unusual challenge and are better served attacking the authentication system rather than gaming in.

Third matter: Why the hell would you let someone else dictate your values and principles to you? Seriously, think about that for a moment. You've made a goal of changing who you are in order to...what...get more pussy? Have more fun getting pussy? Even the most cursory glance at the happiness literature gives the lie to these goals. They're classic examples of the "hedonic treadmill" the literature tells us to avoid if we want to be happy. So, in other words, you're gutting yourself in order to become less lastingly happy. Congrats.

Okay, so what do you suggest?
Externally valid empathy. Go to Amazon and buy these two books if you haven't already: Influence by Cialdini and What Every Body is Saying by Navarro. The point here is that if you can read people and read them quickly, you can gently probe which of the techniques in Influence produce the most desirable responses. Moreover, Influence highlights techniques that paradoxically cause the mark to like the manipulator more. You don't have to change a thing about who you are to learn these frameworks or apply them. Both books are well-rooted in the academic literature. Once you've read each book 2-3 times, you won't need lines or roles.

Getting their attention in the first place. Pick a fight or do an unasked favor she has no experience refusing. Influence tells us that one of the most insidious techniques is the reciprocity principle. The idea that concessions not only trigger inappropriately large and disproportionate concessions, but also liking.

Construct knowledge. I know you came here looking for pussy, but the fact is that you'll eventually find a pussy worth keeping. Hint: keep it. I mentioned the happiness literature above, and if you read through that rather brief article, you'll learn that sustainable happiness comes from three things: giving/receiving gratitude, exercise, and challenging work. A fulfilling relationship, in theory, provides that bidirectional gratitude. Here's where the math comes in. You're stuck ensuring the stability of a system, complete with rejection of disturbances and outlets for undesirable energy. One of the offshoots of converse Lyapunov is the idea that you can take what you learned in Influence about what stabilizes behaviors in people and what you learned in What Every Body is Saying about how they express discomfort (read: Lyapunov energy), and say that you're going to build an energy well. Think of a beach ball in a well. Like the one from The Ring...or something. You're going to use techniques that dig a deep well and avoid doing things that make the inside of the well windy. Between the two of those, the ball should stay in the well. That said, every girl's well is different and you're going to have to become a specialist in spelunking her. This means not getting lazy with the reading or the influencing.

Eliminate the adversarial nature of the game. Hand her the books too. It sounds stupid, but there's nothing more "alpha" than practicing being alpha together. Take the adversarial nature out of the game, and make it cooperative. Who knows, maybe you'll make a hobby of working together to get straight girls to eat her out? By the time she's willing to read a 200-page book on your say-so, she's already hooked by the commitment principle.