The fact that men work harder jobs and longer hours to earn more money is well established, and is the basis of the earnings gap.
From what I can tell, there are two narratives that tend to frame this problem, both in an opposite manner from the other. I don't think they're mutually exclusive and I'd go as far as to say that both of them have an element of truth.
Narrative 1: Men are lazy around the house and aren't interested in doing chores or taking care of their kids. This forces women to perform these tasks, which often effects their careers.
Narrative 2: Many men would love to stay home more but women actively select for men who work more and earn more money. Presumably this is because of either hypergamy or because women are actively trying to secure a lifestyle where they can stay home with their kids.
There are a couple of studies that back up narrative 2:
This one says that there is a clear preference for women to chose men who earn more money. It debunks the idea that women help their husbands earn more money by "taking care of them" at home. Married men earn more money simply because women are interested in marrying those men.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0003122418784909?journalCode=asra&
This one I found on r/FeMRADebates claims that when there are fewer men around to support women financially, women are more likely to work for a living. They also go after traditional high earning jobs that men tend to do. This makes it look like it's a choice that they make after the option of marrying a wealthy man is no longer viable. In particular, this effect is most pronounced among less attractive woman. Which indicates that attractive women who are still able to secure a high earning husband chose to stay home or work easier jobs.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22468947
There are other studies I could post on this topic but I'm more interested in what other people think than I am trying to argue this position. The idea that women take advantage of men to work less is something of an elephant in the room that a lot of people don't like to acknowledge. And while I think there's some truth to it, I also don't think that it's the only factor at play.
[–]azazelcrowley 15 points16 points17 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]Oncefa2left-wing male advocate[S] 9 points10 points11 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]azazelcrowley 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]cromulent_weasel 2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Oncefa2left-wing male advocate[S] 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]cromulent_weasel 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]webernicke 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]warpedsight2 points [recovered] (10 children) | Copy Link
Only financially? read these two links and make your own conclusions: https://www.artofmanliness.com/articles/the-3-ps-of-manhood-a-review/https://secularpatriarchy.wordpress.com/2013/10/18/why-chivalry-is-an-unconditional-male-duty/
[–]Nath43673 4 points5 points6 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[+]warpedsight1 points [recovered] (8 children) | Copy Link
MRAs to a certain extent isn't a group think, so it's popular among the "red-pilled" and neo-masculinity, as well as the tradcons. The average MRA still buys into gender roles to a large extent, so even if they think it's harmful they still see it as necessary/normal. I don't know whether this site is popular with MRAs or not but sites that are popular with MRAs also spread this message including goodmen project and pragerU. "God, that Art Of Manliness piece was hard going for me" if you're thinking that was bad then you should totally not read this: http://worshippingyourwife.blogspot om/2010/09/guest-post-wife-worship-female_24.html you will smash your keyboard in a fit of rage.
btw what do you make of r/rolereversal ?
[–]Nath43673 2 points3 points4 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[+]warpedsight1 points [recovered] (6 children) | Copy Link
"traditional manliness or "being a real man" was weaponised as a means to explain my homosexuality" me too! . . . , but I still have a "weakness" for a few types of masculine "butch" fictional women such as Revy ( Black Lagoon) https://66.media.tumblr.com/822699ca2b7704879c51afcb141bb619/tumblr_mjjyn7OJIg1qf2huro1_500.gifv and Pharah (Overwatch) https://www.deviantart.com/monorirogue/art/Pharah-Do-not-drop-weights-619475073
When I was I child, my parents used to tell me that if I didn't act like a real man, girls wouldn't like me, I didn't see a problem there, since every girl someone would tell me was "hot" I wouldn't be interested in.
My first crushes were on fictional "masculine" girls (including Rei Ayanami from Neon Genesis Evangelion), since I didn't know exactly what "gay" meant back then (about 14) I assumed it was just liking masculine-looking people ...long story short: the so called heteronormativity in society made it impossible to find any examples of gay relationships in media much less saying you were one , so I just sticked to liking masculine women, here is where my instictive repulsion toward "feminine" women as well as my interest in role reversal/masculine women stemmed from (and my the tendency to complain about the abysmal lack of them, and how "superior" they are when compared to feminine women)
BTW here are the "best" parts of that page: "... his only happiness is to see me happy. Which I am. When done, I told his to return to his chores. It gives me “butterflies” in my belly when I tell him that...",
"...The guys wait till us girls start to eat and they take what is left over..."
"...In the past, men were always required to work 12 hours a day in hard labor 6 days a week. Farmers worked in their fields and barns from early morning till late at night 7 days a week to provide for their wives and children. You have the comfort of your wife's home to continue your work before you need to go to bed. Why are men in our society reluctant to do their job?..."
"...It is the role of men to always protect women. In dangerous situations, men will put others at risk to protect a woman. In history men always went to war to protect women. World War I was the last war where they tried to protect civilian death. In the Civil War, over 500,000 men died and only 50 women. These 50 women who died were too many; it would have been acceptable if thousands more men died if it meant the 50 women didn't have to. Women should at any and all costs be protected from harm."
[–]Nath43673 2 points3 points4 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[+]warpedsight1 points [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link
"...I probably like Toji..." he was handsome for sure, but I liked that guy with the white hair Kaworu Nagisa more , it was probably the first time I saw any homoromantic stuff in my life. (btw have you read any yaoi?)
"do you think that it affected the way you see yourself in terms of masculinity?" other than me tending to prefer gender-neutral clothes, it affected in a way that even though I act "masculine" naturally it made me self consciously not want to do it as to not conform to all these expectations from me... like I answered in a previous post : " Masculinity is a word used to manipulate gullible men into serving as working mules and meatshields, there is a big difference between standing up for yourself and your ideals and "masculinity"
btw when you wrote "traditional manliness or "being a real man" was weaponised as a means to explain my homosexuality" was it in the sense of "the manliest thing you can do is to sleep with another man"?
[–]Nath43673 3 points4 points5 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[+]warpedsight1 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
Btw 2 questions: 1) when did you discover you were gay? I started to think I was bisexual only at 16, and discovered I strongly preferred men only at 212) "...just some bara.." do these count as bara? if yes count me in: https://e-hentai.org/g/1587222/803a55bea9/ , https://e-hentai.org/g/1457516/89c05e2866/
[–]Nath43673 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Nath43673 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TC1827 10 points11 points12 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]C0dey 4 points5 points6 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]heimdahl81 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TC1827 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]C0dey 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Melthengylf 4 points5 points6 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]TC1827 4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Melthengylf 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]cromulent_weasel1 points [recovered] (13 children) | Copy Link
If the man is the primary earner then sure he's being 'taken advantage of' financially. But I don't think that's the right way to look at things.
BOTH parents are making sacrifices for the good of what we call in our family 'the house'. We are both acting as stewards doing the things that need to be done. Sometimes that means going out to work all day. Sometimes it means doing an extra load of laundry because a kid puked all over them in the night.
The flipside of that is that the primary caregiver (who is overwhelmingly a woman) nukes their own career by being a stay at home parent.
[–]Oncefa2left-wing male advocate[S] 8 points9 points10 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[+]cromulent_weasel1 points [recovered] (11 children) | Copy Link
No, it's a real legitimate cost of removing yourself from the workforce for many years.
Why the fuck is it important to blame women for shared problems? I'm struggling to see how that it is a constructive response to have.
Absolutely, and the reverse is true too. In an overwhelmingly heterosexual society, it makes perfect sense that people adopt markers that they think the opposite sex finds attractive.
[–]Oncefa2left-wing male advocate[S] 7 points8 points9 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[+]cromulent_weasel1 points [recovered] (9 children) | Copy Link
What do you think 'the alternative' is?
[–]Oncefa2left-wing male advocate[S] 7 points8 points9 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]cromulent_weasel 1 point2 points3 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]Oncefa2left-wing male advocate[S] 5 points6 points7 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]cromulent_weasel -1 points0 points1 point (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]SchalaZeal01 2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Oncefa2left-wing male advocate[S] 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Melthengylf 0 points1 point2 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]Strikester101 3 points4 points5 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]Melthengylf -1 points0 points1 point (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]Oncefa2left-wing male advocate[S] 7 points8 points9 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]Strikester101 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Strikester101 2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Melthengylf 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Strikester101 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Melthengylf 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Oncefa2left-wing male advocate[S] 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Melthengylf 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link