TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

10 out of 11 Scholarships are EXCLUSIVELY for Women.

combs1945a

May 18, 2022
1275 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://misandrytoday.com/10-out-of-11-scholarships-are-reserved-for-women/
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title 10 out of 11 Scholarships are EXCLUSIVELY for Women.
Author

combs1945a

Upvotes 1275
Comments 127
Date May 18, 2022 5:09 AM UTC
(4 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/us5dd4/10_out_of_11_scholarships_are_exclusively_for/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/10-out-of-11-scholarships-are-exclusively-for.1119529
https://theredarchive.com/post/1119529
Top posts by combs1945a

Men Pay Almost All Net Taxes

116 upvotes
May 8, 2022
/r/MensRights

Male Sexual Liberation Right Here

113 upvotes
July 17, 2023
/r/MensRights

More Women Commit Rape Than Men. It's Called Forced To Penetrate

106 upvotes
August 7, 2023
/r/MensRights

Forced to Penetrate Not CDC Rape Statistics

66 upvotes
April 5, 2024
/r/MensRights

Kevin Samuels Just Died of a Heart Attack @56.

57 upvotes
May 6, 2022
/r/MensRights

Judicial Watch Wins Against Govt Push For Mandating Sex Discrimination.

52 upvotes
June 1, 2022
/r/MensRights

Women Over 45 are 41% of Antidepressant Users

41 upvotes
May 9, 2022
/r/MensRights

Every Man Should Read The Misandry Bubble Once A Year

40 upvotes
May 20, 2022
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]Drougen 225 points226 points227 points 4 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

You also get benefits for women owned businesses. My friend owned a construction company well, technically his wife does 🙄

Society these days is so insane

[–]banmebanmenot 160 points161 points162 points 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

You’re telling me. My ex wife tried to pick my son up after months of no contact. I told her to eat a dick. She tried to kill herself 2 days later. I’m convinced I saved my sons life.. get this tho, the court is still considering giving her some sort of custody. They’re gonna have to take me to jail before I leave my son alone with that crazy bitch.

[–]fiercealmond 46 points47 points48 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Sorry to hear you're going through that, man. I'm in the same boat, my ex hasn't seen her daughter in 7 years. Stay strong.

Do people seem to give almost no care about what you and your kid are going through? That's the attitude I come across more than any other. Seems like if we were single mothers people would be throwing help and money our way...

[–]banmebanmenot 35 points36 points37 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Yea. They’re encouraging her to change and literally pushing the legal bounds of their reach trying to help her. They haven’t helped me with shit. They even tried to send me to the courthouse to file to PAY child support. I looked at them and said, ‘you all are outside your fucking heads’. Obviously I didn’t go.

[–]MBV-09-C 29 points30 points31 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The court system needs to get torn a new one tbh, how the hell is anyone going to sit there with a straight face and say that the parent that actually takes care of the kid should be paying child support, to the parent that doesn't even have custody of the child?

[–]fiercealmond 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yep. I've even had to deal with my father taking custody of my daughter because he believed I was "too strict" and needed to be nicer because "well you know she already lost her mom." Dealt with a few years of my family and my exs parents making decisons without even asking me while my daughter had no bedtime, no structure, getting cavities.. but obviously a single dad can't do it. People's attitudes towards us are absolutely fucked. It's not like I wasn't around either, I literally lived with them and he still managed to get custody by starting a fight with me and then claiming I was violent (he had a cop friend give him advice on how to get custody.) The idea that I knew what my own child needed was completely foreign to everyone I thought cared about me.

[–]Drougen 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Jfc, sorry to hear you have to go through that broham :(

[–]Yowilkat 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not strictly a men's thing, but an older female friend of mine had custody of a great granddaughter while the mother was jailed for dui (drugs, not alcohol). When the mother got out, she got full custody despite repeated cases she had filed (and won) against the mother, proving her unfit. Mothers get priority under the system, period. Its completely irrational

[–]throwaway3569387340 31 points32 points33 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I know someone who owns his business with his wife. It was a 51%/49% split as he started the business years ago and transferred ownership to her over time. A couple of years ago they went through the process to reverse the ownership giving her 51% as he's older and starting to transition towards semi-retirement.

Something unexpected happened. Their revenues almost doubled overnight because of the companies that will prefer female and minority owned suppliers now. So that's nice...

[–]Drougen 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I wasn't aware other companies preferred dealing with female and minority owned as well, I'm assuming they somehow benefit if they do? 🙄

[–]throwaway3569387340 14 points15 points16 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

DEI credit.

[–]jy856905 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

absolutely for construction. people put women in charge all the time for the government wbe money and behind the scene it's always the same

[–]the2xstandard 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

WOSB is a license to print money.

[–]Drougen 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Can you explain how it works? Or is there somewhere that explains the benefits?

[–]the2xstandard 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

https://www.sba.gov/federal-contracting/contracting-assistance-programs/women-owned-small-business-federal-contracting-program

Each year the federal government mandates that a certain percentage/dollar amount of contracts MUST be awarded to WOSB. This gives them preferential treatment during the procurement process and it also allows them to go after 'set-aside' contracts and 'sole-source' contracts on the basis of gender alone.

In practice, lets say I am company M and they are company W (for obvious reasons). We are both bidding on the same contract to provide goods/services to the US Govt (DOD/DHS/etc.). My price is 50k, theirs is 60k. Product is the same, services are the same. Clearly my bid is of better value to the government. Easy win, right? WRONG! Even though their price is 20% higher they will STILL win the contract because they consider women to be 'disadvantaged' and they are desperate to award it to satisfy their quotas.

My competitors exploit this all the time. Many of them list the company under their wives (just like your example above) who literally do NONE of the work or day to day management of the company just so they can tick the right boxes on the bid submission form.

So basically if you're a WOSB you can increase your profit margins easily 10% and still murder your competition when bidding on Federal Acquisition projects.

[–]laundry_writer -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

If women were not priced out of the economy we wouldn't need women-only scholarships.

[–]Drougen 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Priced out? Bro you literally get hired on to places just for being a woman...

[+]laundry_writer 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly. Dumb companies invented these scholarships to make up for the exclusion they invented in the first place.

[–]odysseytree 243 points244 points245 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

66% in colleges, 90% reserved scholarships and gender quota in hiring and yet still claims inequality.

[–]ElegantAdvice 82 points83 points84 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Dumbest shit ever

[–]GivePuppiesBazookas[🍰] 45 points46 points47 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh, it gets dumber, because then these specific women complain more than any other group of women that guys are not good enough for them (because they base it off money).

It's simple, get treated better (acceptance), be given more for nothing (female specific scholarships), then complain no one is on your level and claim the victim of the brutal dating world you apparently have absolutely zero control in. Profit.

[–]little_jimmy_jackson 23 points24 points25 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

it's just a quick way to tell if you're standing in front of a smart woman or a dumb woman. Does she espouse feminist nonsense?

[–]combs1945a[S] 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's called DIE: Diversity, Inclusivity, and Equity. It's about giving money and opportunity to only their tribe of people.

[–]SnooJokes1401 242 points243 points244 points 4 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Man, women 10x more likely to get scholarships but still become feminists?

[–]Johnathan_wickerino 153 points154 points155 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Don't underestimate someone's ability to victimize themselves.

[–]NohoTwoPointOh 37 points38 points39 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You lose all of that asymmetric power if you adopt those radical concepts like agency and accountability.

[+]Devadander -41 points-40 points-39 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

looks around this sub

[–]Johnathan_wickerino 16 points17 points18 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's true in some sense I didn't say a woman's ability. But, give men a space to talk about their suffering too

[–]Antanarau 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If you really looked around this sub you would know that what you spit is the finest bull since the annual bull shitting festival of 1788.
I mean, you literally commented this under article that out of 11 scholars only 1 would be a man (that's literally a 10:1 ratio) , like, at least read the title or smthng?

[–]bilgediver 23 points24 points25 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Its because the scholarships aren't degree related.

They get scholarships for Genderqueer and Feminist studies.

[–]MRA_TitleIX 26 points27 points28 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Man, women 10x more likely to get scholarships

Not true. This is only data on gendered scholarships. It doesn't include overall scholarships. In general, women have a 7 point lead on getting federal aid, and a 2 point lead on other aid.

Schools get away with this if the "overall effect" of their scholarships is balanced.

This was good data, bad journalism.

[–]goinsouth85 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Thank you! That was my immediate thought - there is bias, but not as much as the headline suggests. No purpose is served by exaggerating. Have an award - it’s all I had

[–]MRA_TitleIX 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's still a point worth noting. There is an element that goes beyond the funding rules (think Title ix + some hoops) that schools often miss. If a state runs the school, then the 14th Amendment applies.

The moment they classify people by sex they need a justification that survives intermediate scrutiny (it might be strict, I forget which). Thats for the decision making process. A far stricter standard called "exceedingly persuasive justification" is applied to the outcome. The choice to look is scrutinized, the outcome is strictly scrutinized and must have a damn good justification. Makes sense right?

A state school offering such an imbalance of scholarships to the overrepresented gender is likely in violation. It doesn't matter that the overall effect is balanced. They can't justify violation of the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause when the gender it supports is over represented and performing the best. While it might not violate funding rules explicitly, it violates the 14th Amendment, which in turn will violate funding rules.

All schools must have be balanced in impact. State schools must also have an exceedingly persuasive justification regardless.

Idk if that makes sense. Feel free to ask questions. Not a lawyer, just passionate as fuck. I'm considering going back to school for this if I find myself in a position to do so.

[–]combs1945a[S] 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Absolutely, it's called the in group bias.

[–]BeatYoDickNotYoChick 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Why would they dismantle and not perpetuate the system that grants them privileges?

[–]BeastlyDecks 147 points148 points149 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I think this article shows, that out of the gender specific/exclusive scholarships, 10 out of 11 are exclusively for women. Which is a different statement than the title suggests.

[–]Balages 49 points50 points51 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It sounds worse tbh, even with the 60/40 ratio women get 10/11 of the scholarships

[–]MRA_TitleIX 15 points16 points17 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They are also more likely to graduate on time, or at all. Assuming all other factors equal, their cost barrier is lower.

[–]lildil37 20 points21 points22 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This is a huge difference from what the title suggests.

[–]BeastlyDecks 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, your skepticism should always be high with publications that are showing you news perfectly in line with their own worldview. It's great that this publication makes their own worldview publicly known by name alone, so due credit for that. Misleading title? Not so noble.

[+]Nadallion 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yea I suspected that.

Articles like this serve to enrage men and give people false talking points which hurts them when they debate in the future. No doubt the author of this article and owner of this website did this on purpose to attract page views, capitalizing off of male rage. Kind of pathetic.

[–]chaveznieves 113 points114 points115 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I knew this was a thing but I had no idea how blatantly biased these scholarships are and how egregious the gap in the numbers is. Combine this with the studies that show how men are graded much lower for the same quality of work in elementary and high school... society is really doing everything they can to keep men from succeeding and push women into avenues for success... completely undeservedly. This makes me fucking sick.

[–]combs1945a[S] 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's a tort waiting to happen. You think Title IX settlements were expensive.

[–]Shadowdragon409 35 points36 points37 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I had no idea this website was a thing.

When did it go up? It's pretty cool.

[–]combs1945a[S] 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's been out for about 4 years

[–]Balages 16 points17 points18 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Damn patriarchy!

[–]TheeBattleMedic 14 points15 points16 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

In my degree for animation the teacher is constantly telling the girls about a female animator scholarship and im here like cool I don’t get shit but yeah the title is misleading

[–]combs1945a[S] 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

If you are in CO, TX, CA, NY, KS, AL, or FL. I know lawyers that would take your case for disparate Impact and a violation of 1983 federal law.

[–]TheeBattleMedic 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I’m actually in NY

[–]combs1945a[S] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Does Reddit have a DM function? If your interested, I have attorneys around the clit ur that do lawfaire. I

[–]TheeBattleMedic 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think they do but I doubt I’ll actually take legal action. I do appreciate it

[–]GivePuppiesBazookas[🍰] 24 points25 points26 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I posted a list of all scholarships on I forget what sub, clearly showed women had about 10x the cash and triple the number of scholarships available. In fact, I even took the extra step to add up the single mother ones alone... a woman can MAKE about 100K in cash after paying for school from just scholarships (there are none for single fathers).

I was downvoted to hell and got about 20 messages saying I was sexist and hate women. All I did was provide a source and did math...... :/

[–]combs1945a[S] 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

People have a hard time with the red pill. They think men are the predictors while they can't ever reheated the fact they we are a country with multigenerational culture raised exclusively by women. Hence, 90% of teachers are women and 80% of children are raised by single moms. And single motherhood is a career choice.

https://misandrytoday.com/single-moms-on-welfare-make-more-than-60000-a-year/

[–]cbnyc0 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You must have forgotten to say, “This can’t be right, can it? Is this real?! WTF”

[–]Relativity_Star10538 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hiring processes in colleges heavily favor women as well. That goes for faculty as well as administrators.

[–]want-to-say-this 14 points15 points16 points 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

I stopped applying when realizing I’d meet every requirement but the one that mattered.

[–]combs1945a[S] 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

I thought gender was a social constrict

[–]want-to-say-this 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Only when it negatively impacts not men.

[–]combs1945a[S] -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

What a lovely hat filled statement. Who hurt you?

[–]want-to-say-this 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It’s what the article essentially points out. Scholarship for women. Not for men. So men need not apply. Because it’s the reality. Clothed in aggressive article is truth.

[–]want-to-say-this 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You are incorrect

[–]combs1945a[S] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

How so

[–]want-to-say-this 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It says men get basically 10% of scholarships. Women get 90% do you not understand the article you posted?

[–]knucklz74 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

They wonder why men's suicide is so high

[–]combs1945a[S] 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

They don't wonder why it is so high. It is by design.

[–]knucklz74 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Trueee shit. The feminist movement even has a movement to ONLY ABORT MALES. They are TERRORIST plain and simple. Nothing more nothing less

[–]combs1945a[S] 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Don't worry, soon they will push for post birth abortions. This is really about a culture that is so immoral and gynocentric, it blows your mind.

[–]knucklz74 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Very true

[–]test90001 37 points38 points39 points 4 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Title is misleading. The majority of scholarships are open to everyone. Of the few that are restricted by gender, 10 out of 11 are exclusively for women.

Let's focus on getting the facts straight rather than spreading clickbait.

[+]PigTenis -10 points-9 points-8 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Be pro equality create gender specific scholarships

Choose one and make your choice wisely, sexists are not welcome here.

[–]test90001 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Choose one what? Your quote is not from my message.

[–]PigTenis -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

The fact that women only scholarships exist is unequality in itself, you downplay that ("hey most are unisex") while behaving like you have some moral high ground.

I just called you a sexist and a hypocrite, if its still not clear for you.

[–]test90001 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

All I said was that the title is misleading. I don't really care what you call me. My statement is factually accurate.

[–]cbnyc0 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No, not quite.

Creating a targeted scholarship in response to actual inequality is admirable.

However, the inequality a lot of these things seem to be responding to is inequality recognized in the 1950s, called out in the 60s and 70s, and corrected in the 80s and 90s. So, what they’re complaining about has been fixed for 20+ years.

It seems to be more of a fad than responding to an actual need now. Straw-woman scholarships, if you will. Politics and social posturing.

[–]doskei -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

HAAAAAAaaaaaahahahaha sexists are the only people welcome here.

Hoo boy thanks for the laugh.

[–]combs1945a[S] -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Read the data, while scholarships were technically open to everyone in 1930, only one gender and one race received them.

What this research shows is that only one gender gets scholarships in reality. Not is the very definition of Desperate Impact.

[–]TraehNoil -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It’s gender bias either way, how can you defend that? This isn’t clickbait.

[–]test90001 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's clickbait because the title misrepresents the reality. The reality is that only a few percent of scholarships are exclusively for women. But a headline like "3% of scholarships are exclusively for women" wouldn't get the same amount of clicks.

[–]Turbulent-Sorbet9125 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

and the one remaining is for?

[–]DirtAndGrass 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

while this is a serious issue, i think articles written this way only hurt the cause.

There are typos, references aren't really provided and misinterpreted, the link to save services doesn't discuss much about the study/methodology, and only includes the worst ~30% of schools.

I believe work like this hurts in the long run, as it doesn't lend itself to being taken seriously

[–]combs1945a[S] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You know schools keep this data hidden on purpose. There would be no way to get all the data without a court order on every college in the USA. You have to go for a sample size. 10% is generally considered a valid sample size.

[–]DirtAndGrass 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The site referenced that did some sort of primary research showed the results from only the worst offenders, they stated this! The article just made up their own statistics, based on a undefined study, that only showed and discussed the most significant cases.

[–]ImJustHereForCorn 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Here's something kinda fucked up, you guys ready?

Not only are whites now a minority in America, well they are a minority in the entire population of the world, but men are also a minority in America compared to women. Not to mention more women go on to college and do better in schools.

Yet Title 9 will never be used for men.

[–]combs1945a[S] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It is disparate impact. If you have a person who is male affected by title IX in TX, CO, LS, CA, AL, FL, or NY. I have attorneys that would be interested.

The answer to all this WOKE Feminist BS, is Lawfare.

[+]gamerlololdude 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

hey man, you can still apply to them. they can’t prove what’s a woman.

[–]TangledGoatsucker 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm so sick of this shit.

[–]snoodletuber 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hard to believe the article with the amount of grammatical errors in it. Doesn’t seem professionally done.

[–]Destroyeroyer2 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This article is really misleading, this is just sex specific scholarships, not all scholarships in general

[+]banmebanmenot1 points 4 years ago [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link

Equality is bullshit. Women really are all the same, they want their cake and to eat it too. This whole ‘movement’ was bullshit from the tip. They want the benefits of being a man and woman, all while not being held accountable for their toxic and narcissistic character traits. It’s gonna take a very special lady for me to settle down again. I’ll stick to casual dating before settling again.

[–]GltyUntlPrvnInncnt 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

These kind of sexist generalizations help nobody. Women most definitely are not all the same. There are asshole people, men and women.

[–]banmebanmenot 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yea sure, they’re out there. They’re only spread so thin you gotta hire a PI to find them.

[–]combs1945a[S] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What that is simply shocking

[–]combs1945a[S] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You go girl

[–]Mecami 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

My friend’s dad’s friend is head of a research team for a local university. This was in like 2018 or so, but due to a diversity program got assigned 2 women (unqualified, but diversity). He said they didn’t just not do their job right but actively inhibited their research. He complained about it all the time. That’s that I guess…

[–]combs1945a[S] -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I bet he was shown the door for an ISM or and IST.

[–]NerdCrush 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Convenient they don't link the study.

Almost like it's complete bullshit.

[–]PhatJohny 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's almost like it literally links the study.

https://www.saveservices.org/equity/scholarships/

[–]AdobiWanKenobi 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wow I’m so surprised /s

[–]Tweapodok33 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

They lead in pretty much every measure. Higher high school and college graduation turnout, more scholarships 10x over, and the big one they’ve been harping on for years: pay. If they’re under 35 they actually earn about 8% more on average than their male peers.

They have nothing left to attack us over (at least not legitimately). They’ve gained absurd advantages in every possible regard. They get more financial benefits; they get better education; they get catered to by teachers; they get high paying, non-labor jobs at much higher rates; they get more time off; they get more options for federal and state aide; they win 90% of custody cases and 5 out of 6 alimony cases; they get lighter sentences for the same crimes; they make up 25% of homeless people and a mere 7% of workplace fatalities; they literally live longer than us on average, by about 5 years.

And despite all of that, they are less happy overall than they’ve been in 50 years, and somehow we are still marked as the Great Oppressor.

[–]combs1945a[S] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Can you help me find research that women get 90% of custody. I can't find the data for that.

[–]Tweapodok33 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Here’s an article

So I was off, it’s actually 80%, not 90%, and it’s been slowly trending downward, which is good, but it’s still quite lopsided.

[–]dboxcar 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

An August study from 2019 of 215 universities found that female applicants literally had an 11 to 1 ratio of scholarships.

Couple things;

  • 11 to 1 ratio would mean it'd be 11/12, not 10/11. You dumb fucks.

  • The headline of the article isn't even backed up in the article itself, let alone being true. The article references gender-exclusive scholarships, not all scholarships. You dumb fucks.

  • Men's rights are a serious issue; things like being socialized to emotionally self-destruct, unrealistic body and social standards, issues of divorce/childrearing, men getting sexually/physically assaulted, mental health, etc. It's deceitfully spiteful drivel like this that makes men's rights look like a sham movement.

[–]PhatJohny 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How is it spiteful drivel to look at studies on scholarship distribution.

[+]boxsterguy -27 points-26 points-25 points 4 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Incorrect conclusion. A better description would be "10 out of 11 sex-specific scholarships are for women", as the study only compared female-specific vs. male-specific scholarships. It completely ignores non-sex-specific scholarships, which dwarf single-sex scholarships entirely.

(also, while I saw no mention of it, I suspect they're intentionally excluding sports-based scholarships, else the male-only numbers would be significantly higher due to the higher participation and popularity of male university sports (read: football and basketball))

[–]XenoX101 39 points40 points41 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's a fair point but unfortunately it doesn't make the argument any better, when we know that women are in fact more college educated than men. Because if the goal is to resolve gender inequality in colleges, we should see the reverse - the majority of sex-specific scholarships being for men. Or at the very least, an even split or close to. There is no justification for virtually all sex specific scholarships to be given to women.

[–]Fearless-File-3625 28 points29 points30 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Non sex specific are for everyone. There is no point in comparing that.

[+]boxsterguy -13 points-12 points-11 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

But that means "10 out of 11" is misleading at best and really just outright arguing. Especially since the solution isn't more male-specific scholarships but instead fewer sex-specific scholarships at all.

[–]combs1945a[S] 22 points23 points24 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Women are 51% of the population. In a double blind they would get 5 or 6 out of 11, not 10. In addition there is a federal call called 1983 that specifically forbids any federal funds to go to any program based on any form of discrimination be that race, creed, or gender.

Handing out 95%of scholarships is bla tangly illegal in a gynocentric society that hates men.

[–]Fearless-File-3625 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I guess you are technically right but everyone knows what they mean by the title.

And yes fewer for women, and more for men, since women are majority in unis.

[–]miroku000 16 points17 points18 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You would think that but actually college sports scholarships are almost evenly given out to men and women.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1120037/college-sport-scholarships-by-gender/

I would guess it might be a requirement of title IX which prohibits gender discrimination in sports in a very separate but equal kind of way.

[–]combs1945a[S] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This simply shows that women claim it is a man's world where in fact it is a complete woman's world.

[+]bubbybyrd -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Ah yes incredibly bias website with no reputable source

[–]PhatJohny 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It literally links the study.

[+]bubbybyrd -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

And yet the article title is still very misleading; saying that 10 of 11 scholarships are RESERVED for women when they are actually comparing male exclusive scholarships to female exclusive scholarships.

When the reality is that 99% of scholarships are not gender dependant at all. This website is trash and it wants you to believe in false truths.

Also, the reference isn't a study. It's just a website with their own data, that we have no way to know if it's correct or not because there was no peer review or citations.

[–]PhatJohny 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The article says that.

Are you alright? Need to vent?

[+]Leicageek -11 points-10 points-9 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

This simply isn’t true…

[–]combs1945a[S] 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Do you have data to prove it. Sounds like cognitive dissonance.

[+]Leicageek -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wow.. that’s funny. I got downvoted for just disagreeing.. ok. Here just a quick search in sports alone “College sports scholarships are available to students at the top of their respective sports and can help them with college tuition fees which otherwise run into the tens of thousands of U.S. dollars. Overall, there were almost 152 thousand sports scholarships available to students in 2020/21, with over 3,000 more scholarships available to male athletes than female athletes. Football alone accounted for over 27,000 scholarships in this year.” This is stats from the NCAA so there’s no direct bias. That may just be for sports, but sports is the number one contributor to scholarships in the US. Down vote me if you want. But getting info direct from a site called Misandry.com. Shows it’s bias.

[–]slai47 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

So many are required to give some money to men though so young men, apply and you might get money. But yeah, scholarships should be for all, not some.

[–]combs1945a[S] 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The problem is that the university system has been captured by WOKE Feminist Communist who don't want men in the collegia system. That is why nearly 75% of college acceptance is female.

[–]needs_grammarly 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

does the title apply everywhere? like 10 of my homeboys aren't going to college? it has to be nuanced somehow

[–]MrElderwood 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm not american, but isn't that illegal under Title IX?

[–]StatisticianMajor62 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

And there are still organizations that help women get into college

[–]combs1945a[S] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well, if colleges were merit based, would they get in?

[–]detrydis 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The other one being for people of color?

[–]combs1945a[S] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Every person has color. Every person is equal. To imply persons of color, implies that other are "less than" and they need more consideration. That is a very racist construct.

[–]detrydis 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Gotcha, right. Of course, we’re all colorblind. I forgot. Still. There are scholarships for black people, right? Oh and how do you feel about the term BIPOC?

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter