You gotta see this one. Headline: feminist decides objectivity isnt objective enough. NEW idea for objectivity: whatever feminists say is true.

actanonverba8 · 2013-09-25T06:01:07+00:00

"Ladies and Gentleman of the jury. You could stop at run-of-the-mill old-fashioned justice by convicting my client for bank robbery based on the videotape, fingerprints, and ten eyewitnesses. But, I think you´re better than that.

I think, instead, you´ll elect to take my client at her word. I think you´re gonna find her innocent. I think you´re gonna find her innocent, ladies and gentleman of the jury, because simple justice is not enough for you. You demand more. You demand strong justice."

No matter how unfair and sexist feminist can be, I just have to give them credit for their chutzpah. They will stoop to the lowest of the low, all while keeping a straight face.

PlayMeWhile · 2013-09-25T07:14:21+00:00

Brought to you by the same sparklingly intelligent mind that finally revealed to us the ugly truth that Newton's Principia Mathematica is a RAPE MANUAL.

xeribulos · 2013-09-25T08:09:33+00:00

It has been some time since I came upon an idea/concept I could not understand (I read a lot). I reread the article several times now, additionally I looked at some papers discussing this "idea" and I still do not understand. Can someone ELI5 please?

JayBopara · 2013-09-25T07:01:58+00:00

Good find. This is just insane. So if something is based on evidence and reality - well, sorry, according to the feminazi that is just not true. It is not objective. Therefore we have to discriminate our objective thinking, and make it bias, and then, hey presto, we have "strong objectivity".

Insane, truly insane. There's a great thesis to be written on how utterly insane and bigoted feminism is.

MechPlasma · 2013-09-25T10:21:03+00:00

Standpoint epistemologies require stronger standards for objectivity in the analysis of knowledge. The conventional standard of objectivity is considered too weak to act as a tool for feminism and other social movements. The subject of knowledge must therefore be considered an object of knowledge from the perspective of scientific method. Knowledge and the biases affecting it must be equally judged by the scientific community and located in social history.

What does this even mean? I have absolutely no idea!

notnotnotfred · 2013-09-25T13:21:41+00:00

when you try to make the statement, "women have different ways of knowing" look like it makes sense, this is what you get.

5th_Law_of_Robotics · 2013-09-25T14:39:54+00:00

Strong objectivity is a term first used by standpoint feminist Sandra Harding to describe research that starts from the experiences of those who have traditionally been left out of the production of knowledge

Wow. If the person stating it affects the validity of the claim then you aren't dealing with objective truth.

poloppoyop · 2013-09-25T14:13:08+00:00

War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is Strength

bunker_man · 2013-09-25T10:05:12+00:00

At the bottom "This feminist related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it."

Ah, that Wikipedia. Advancing objectivity and knowledge by giving feminists their own little fiefdom and allowing them to designate certain articles as being theirs.

rapey_raperson · 2013-09-25T07:00:34+00:00

Sorry, but it sounds like gobbledygook. At first I thought it was a short-hand draft someone was working on that accidentally was published. But I researched a bit, and this is an actual thing, and is only discussed in conjunction with women's studies type stuff. Big surprise; ethereal thinking like this flourishes in the academic world. Ignore it, otherwise you're just feeding the trolls.

CharlesAlivio · 2013-09-25T15:13:29+00:00

They are as bad as early communists, with a whole new bullshit vocabulary.

2013-09-25T18:38:32+00:00

STRONG Objectivity = Subjectivity

-The Feminist Handbook

MRMRising · 2013-09-25T21:43:58+00:00

The conventional standard of objectivity is considered too weak to act as a tool for feminism and other social movements.

Code word; "We don't like what the study says, so, were just gonna bin it, and sprinkle pixie dust instead."

Sandlicker · 2013-09-25T22:40:48+00:00

This is actually pretty insulting to everyone, but particularly to female scientists.

ZimbaZumba · 2013-09-25T05:22:35+00:00

I have no premises or logic to connect them if I had any. I simply know. ZUmmm.....

bunker_man · 2013-09-25T17:02:32+00:00

I read this link on "Strong Objectivity" when it was first posted 12 hours ago. Now it redirects to an article on "Bias" and the article on "Strong Objectivity" is gone.

R2-D2sDad · 2013-09-25T19:21:12+00:00

Wait a minute!… If patriarchy has that much influence on knowledge, which again is connected with language (i.e. terms, defnitions etc.) reziprocal, her very own concept of objectivity (as a woman that was more or less subtly enslaved by men-made means of manipulation) is the result of patriarchy. That must lead her to the conclusion that her thoughts are men-made bullshit altogether. That again is shit from same bulls ass and… Damn! Seems like a problem of reference.

But who am I to analyze her thoughts with my penis-powered hogwash?

Mythandros · 2013-09-25T19:39:55+00:00

What a farce.

This "female" if you can ACTUALLY call her that, is so deluded that she lives in a world of her own creation.

This wiki is offensive to all of my senses and sensibilities.

Title	You gotta see this one. Headline: feminist decides objectivity isnt objective enough. NEW idea for objectivity: whatever feminists say is true.
Author	bunker_man
Upvotes	109
Comments	55
Date	September 25, 2013 4:14 AM UTC (12 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1n2ycf/you_gotta_see_this_one_headline_feminist_decides/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/you-gotta-see-this-one-headline-feminist-decides.1162978 https://theredarchive.com/post/1162978

Comments