~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
TheAndredal
[–]SCROTAL-SACK 230 points231 points232 points 6 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link
Overweight women are hurting men's marriage prospects
[–]Lethn 35 points36 points37 points 6 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
LOL!
[–]Bobtoddwilliams1234 42 points43 points44 points 6 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
I just like how the article tactically but sneakily admits that they believe that all women are gold diggers. that women are only interested and we'll see men because women aren't really marrying you they're marrying your wallet
to be fair I don't believe that that's actually true I think that Love actually does exist. And there are plenty of women out there who would stand by their man even through hard times. but it's interesting that the article author either believes that not to be the case or is admitting that at least a large enough percentage of women are only interested in the money that it's actually a problem.
Realistically any woman who will only marry you for their your money isn't really marrying you at all. She's marrying your bank account. You just come with the deal. And it's not so much a marriage of love as much as a financial business decision. Could even be a business merger.
Those women should be avoided. They're nothing but trouble and would abandon you at the first sign that something gets rough. It's much cheaper and much less risk could just hire a hot hooker for the night. For enough money she'll even tell you she loves you. And you don't have to marry her or deal with any of the other crap.
if you're going to marry someone you have it's just important that she loves you as it is that you love her.
[–]PsychoPhilosopher 16 points17 points18 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
We don't have to take such an extreme interpretation.
We can be a bit more nuanced and subtle and tie this to a point about Men's Rights rather than saying "Women Suck".
Women demand men have jobs and incomes. True.
And that could be a 'gold digging' motivation. That's a valid interpretation, that these women want a rich boy to pay their way. It's got some advantages, it fits the data clearly, doesn't require a lot of extra steps.
But if we want, we can go a little deeper. We can point to Male Disposability and say that women, like men, want partners who are socially approved. Nice and universal, easy to swallow.
So then, the reason women want men with jobs and incomes is that men aren't valued by our culture unless they have those things.
We hear plenty about attractive men getting into casual relationships with plenty of women regardless of income - Starving Artist is a stereotype but it's one with a rich history of real exemplars.
Which suggests women actually do like those men, and are capable of falling in love with men who aren't meal tickets.
But our culture doesn't accept that, and looks down on men who work non-traditionally and the women who love them.
That interpretation gives us a bit more of a lever to attack real issues faced by men.
[–]NohoTwoPointOh 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
We can point to Male Disposability and say that women, like men, want partners who are socially approved. Nice and universal, easy to swallow.
And what is the main pillar of the afforementioned social approval? Money.
This is like arguing that the American Civil War was about state's rights and not slavery. Sure. Technically this is true. But was was the right in question? The right to own slaves.
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
when women marry for money..."he's so interesting and such a leader."
[–]Hillfolk6 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I would argue that few people are willing to make a decision to spend their life with someone and start a family with them when they can't assist in creating a home stable enough for that to happen. A broke person tends to make a poor spouse. Kinda why most marriage failures are money related.
[–]DJ-Roukan 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Well, I personally do not blame women. Sure, bad woman and gold diggers, but truth be told, women are more confused than we are assumed to be. They are being lied to, deceived, sold a bill of goods (like their career matters to men when dating), and they are only now starting to see the reality of their blind allegiance to feminism and it's false promises.
This particular bit of trash article, written by a feminist? It is trying to blame men, but it is just pointing out another of the many double standards that exist today, and attempting to continue to promulgate the blame and the lies. We want women to achieve, but still hold men to the money standard. Treat women as equals, but pay for dates...then child support to her and her child. Do not discriminate, but then sign up for the male only draft. Be the victim, be called the oppressor. We cripple their earnings, discriminate against them, then blame them for not making enough to support the needs of a woman.
Point is that the people that caused the problem are the last one's to be writing about it, and especially how to fix it. That is how men are being lead around by the nose, and why the issue exists in the first place...these types outright lying to us all.
It is why the MRM exists, why MGTOW exists, why this board exists, and why everything we do needs to exist.
This is exactly what this geocentric society of entitlement is doing to it's men as it spirals us down into the abyss...and we, once again, are being called to save it...by fighting this time, our own society that we have spent over two hundred years dying to serve and protect.
We call that FUBAR.
[–]NoNoise9374 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You wrote all of this and only got 1 upvote 😂🤣
[–]bakedpotato486 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Realistically any woman who will only marry you for their your money isn't really marrying you at all. She's marrying your bank account. You just come with the deal.
Interesting that you put it this way, because she doesn't divorce your bank account, she divorces you from your bank account.
[–]techtesh 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Someone call me I wanna upvote but he has 69 updoots
[+][deleted] -23 points-22 points-21 points 6 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
Please man, men are fat too.
[–]Lethn 34 points35 points36 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Men don't have an army of people and media outlets defending them being overweight and shaming women who aren't attracted to fat men.
[–]Bobtoddwilliams1234 14 points15 points16 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I would love to see ad campaigns hi companies like Abercrombie using fat male models instead of hot young bodybuilders to show that you don't need to look like Arnold Schwarzenegger. But they won't do that.
[–]Lethn 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link
I wouldn't want that in the slightest we shouldn't encourage obesity, either extreme is bad. Men who have abs have to maintain a ridiculous lifestyle in order to keep that figure and so do models then on the opposite end and it's all these unhealthy eating habits that cause obesity, it really isn't difficult to understand.
Eat some fucking vegetables once in awhile and find something fun to do that helps you lose weight. The piss take with feminists is when they try and do 'normal' body types it's still technically obese we've become so unhealthy as a society on both ends of the spectrum we've forgotten what 'normal' is.
[–]GenealogyFan772 points 6 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
Eh, once you have the abs, you don't necessarily have to maintain a ridiculous lifestyle. Put you definitely have to put in a good bit of hard work!
[–]Lethn 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Oh I know, but I'm talking about professional models and bodybuilders etc. which is what most people compare that sort of thing to. I do encourage people to go and check out their diet and exercise routines, they will be quickly put off.
Not only is a guy with abs going to have the most boring diet ever they'll also be incredibly tedious to hang out with because fitness will be their whole life. Obviously they might have hobbies and so on but for the most part their whole life has to revolve around their body.
[–]DJ-Roukan 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
Not the point.
it was sarcastic, a comeback to an attack, not an attack itself.
It was pointing out that any wrong that women do, any deficiency that a woman may have, is excused...while blaming men even for something that has been done to them, not that they have done.
He was demonstrating that we will, in what is suppose to be an equal society, where men are no longer supposed to be held to finances as proof of manhood we still do. Yet, you fell into the trap (as we have all been taught to) that in a society where women are not suppose to be held to standards of beauty, people will quickly leap to defend them when such is even mentioned in parody, yet continue to do so to men.
You have unwittingly demonstrated the exact problem, falling upon visceral conditioning, but don't mistake my comment for something it is not. I don't blame you for that. Other's might, but that too is hypocritical as we are all conditioned to that, so jumping on one person that may cite such is as defeating as the article itself. You explain, educate, not attack.
If you are male, I want you here. If you are female, I want you here even more...because no one here is clean in all this, and we are all learning.
[–]Boocehop 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I looked at her profile and she definitely fits the 14 y/o white girl picture.
[–][deleted] 57 points58 points59 points 6 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
As if men as walking wallets. What the fuck, man?
[–][deleted] 43 points44 points45 points 6 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
Lmao it’s honestly hilarious. Title should be:
“Men working 40 hour work weeks to provide for their families is no longer enough for egotistical feminists. Women are strong and independent and men should financially support their independency.”
[–][deleted] 18 points19 points20 points 6 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
It talks about women marrying less educated men. Who gives a fuck, though? I have friends who make more than me (2 grad degrees) and they’re electricians/welders/plumbers. Their jobs are even recession proof.
Edit: Not flexing on the education. Just pointing out that education doesn’t always mean greater earning potential.
[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
If people had to marry other people with the same education level we might as well just make a caste system of uneducated, high school educated, bachelors, masters, and PhD. That would be a very interesting world to live in.
[–][deleted] 12 points13 points14 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
So, we can basically infer that the woman who wrote this article is classist as fuck. Judging men on their earnings, education, and job. Pathetic.
[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
“Felt cute, might objectify men to their salary later idk.”
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I mean, that was basically why most women went to college a couple generations ago. They wanted to look well learned and educated, and to find a husband of a particular social caste who would provide for them.
[–]PsychoPhilosopher 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It certainly doesn't mean greater value.
Especially with degree mills churning out overeducated numpties with heads full of buzzwords from a purely superficial understanding of a narrow perspective on a handful of issues and absolutely zero creativity or imagination about how to apply theory.
[–]Bobtoddwilliams1234 10 points11 points12 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Women are strong and independent but they need you man to vote for them for no other reason than being a woman because they can't hold up policy-wise to a male opponent
they're all so strong and independent but they need you to constantly support them
[–][deleted] 79 points80 points81 points 6 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link
Nothing new, the most entitled group of people on the planet are our women of western culture.
They’ve had it too easy for so long
[–]Lethn 45 points46 points47 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I'm inclined to agree, there's something seriously wrong with them if they think they're entitled to my money.
[–]Bobtoddwilliams1234 16 points17 points18 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
It's not just money and they think they're entitled to everything. Studies found when analyzing things like the wage Gap that women in Western culture are less likely to choose college majors that make money versus women in more oppressed cultures in the middle East. so unless you're going to try to claim that somehow a country like America is more oppressive to women than a country that won't even let them Drive can you just shows that when they have freedom to choose and they don't have anything to prove they end up choosing jobs and careers that don't pay as much. But then they complain and demand they be paid more. I'm not saying that they should be oppressed but it is pretty accurate. The people that fight hardest for actual the quality of the people that are oppressed
[–]__pulsar 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
so unless you're going to try to claim that somehow a country like America is more oppressive to women than a country that won't even let them Drive
They're trying to do exactly that. The media was recently pushing a "study" that concluded America is ranked 110th (!! LOL) in the world when it comes to women's equality. They're batshit insane.
[–]RagingHardBull 14 points15 points16 points 6 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link
Women of ALL cultures are entitled. Yes, even in the arab world it is very good to be a woman.
[+]Spicy-AC-of-Tesla -6 points-5 points-4 points 6 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
/s?
[–]RagingHardBull 16 points17 points18 points 6 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
No, there is not /s. Arabic women are very privileged too. For example, in Saudi Arabia women can work and it is legally solely her money. Whereas legally all money the man makes is his money. A man has a legal obligation to provide for his wife, under punishment.
Truth is society is built by men and women. It is very hard for women to be oppressed because they compromise more than half society. It is simply a different culture. For example, referencing SA again when they made it legal for women to drive it was women who protested it. Because that would then give an excuse to give them greater responsibility they did not want.
[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Bullshit. I'm one of them.
Laws are very heavily skewed in favour of women. Including religious laws in Islam.
[–]RagingHardBull 8 points9 points10 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yes, that is what I said. It is very good to be a woman in all cultures.
[–]Spicy-AC-of-Tesla 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Out of curiosity, how are religious laws favourable to Muslim women?
[–][deleted] 15 points16 points17 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Men pay for everything even if their wives out earn them. Women can burn all their money if they want or shop with it and her husband can't say anything whatsoever.
Men pay a dowry when they marry women.
Men are heads of the household in theory. Women are the 'Queens of the house' and men are ordered to comply with them since we're supposed to take into account their emotions and how easily upset they get.
You can't marry another wife without the express permission of the first or all the others before them.
Men are always the ones in war. Even on the battlefield you can't harm women (and children and the elderly), but they're mentioned first of all.
You can take female slaves and concubines at the time when war was allowed - but you have to take care of them like your wives and sacrifice for them in the exact same way as your actual spouses.
You can't take decisions without excluding your wife or wives and must please all of them however possible with your final decision.
I know people are envious of the polygyny (not polygamy as no woman can have more than one husband) Islam allows, but it's not the paradise you think. Marriage halves men's rights and doubles their responsibilities. You'll be better off with a harem shown in fantasy films and porn where the women will actually serve and obey you as shown in fantasies. Not condoning or condemning this, but there are men and women who dream about being in one or part of one. More power to you. Just don't convert.
There are other examples which are too long to list. Google is your friend.
[–]TC1827 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Ex-Muslim. Can confirm all the above. Would like to add that polygamy means that "lower status" men don't get to be loved
Exactly. I believe in God but I might become agnostic soon.
Lower status men will have to kill themselves for love.
[–]Spicy-AC-of-Tesla 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Very interesting, indeed. Do you happen to have a source for the driving bit or the law around money?
[+]Purpleburglar -9 points-8 points-7 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
I cannot agree with that; there may be some advantages but muslim women remain heavily oppressed in many ways and Asian women (especially SE asian) tend to work their asses off equally. Japan and Korea may be a different story but there is a heavy western influence there.
[–]RagingHardBull 21 points22 points23 points 6 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link
Are you kidding me? Let's talk about south east asian women. In Malaysia women get their own parking spots. No men allowed. In Singapore men must serve in the army (under punishment of jail). Women are not required to and get a 2 year head start on their career.
Later on, the men are then judged on that career and must earn more than the women. Singapore has a gendered family law that confiscates assets from men. It is not even trying to be neutral. It is gendered in the actual the law.
In China, it is damn near impossible for a man to get married unless he has bought a house. A house that is about 30x his salary on average.
No, women are privileged in Asia too. You must live in the West to have these misconceptions.
[–]Purpleburglar -3 points-2 points-1 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I see your point. I think Singapore and Malaysia are particular in a similar way to Japan and Korea, due to the size, nature of their wealth and western influence (particularly Singapore). To be honest, I was thinking more about countries like Philippines, Thailand or Indonesia. I get that maybe they still have advantages there, but to call them entitled (especially in the same way as western women) might be a little much. It's true though, while I have spent some time in China, Thailand and Indonesia, I'm not well versed in the laws there. I'm Swiss, where we also have a male-only military or civil service that gives women a one year head start.
The point that it is very good to be a woman in the Arab world however, I donno, I'd rather be born a man over there. Maybe women are looked after and don't work, but they also don't have any freedom in that respect. Feel free to correct me if you think I'm wrong, I'm not looking for an argument.
[+]Bobtoddwilliams1234 -7 points-6 points-5 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Okay there might be some advantages in certain areas. And I'm not totally up-to-date with Malaysia or Singapore laws but there are plenty of countries where women aren't even allowed to drive. Or rather not allowed to walk out in public without a male escort. Or they can be stoned in the streets for the crime of BEING raped
I don't care if those countries also give them their own parking spot so don't make them served in the military. It's not freedom. and any rational person would be will agree that they could trade their own parking spot for the freedom to work in the workforce. Where the freedom to walk outside on their own
Stuff the girls should always be to make sure that a group of people isn't depressed. What they do after that is their own choice
[–]RagingHardBull 7 points8 points9 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That is not south east asia. You are talking middle eastern. FYI, I do not think there are any middle eastern countries where women cannot drive. The only one I am aware of was SA, which has since reversed that position.
It is true the SA guardianship system is not good. However, that is not all middle eastern countries. However, in SA, yes, I would not want to a woman. On the other hand, I would not want to be a man either. The cultural system of SA puts both genders on a leash from my perspective as someone westernized.
[–][deleted] 29 points30 points31 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
The self entitlement of western women is mind boggling
[–]TheAndredal[S] 8 points9 points10 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
why should we marry when women can enslave men for 18 years plus alimony
[–]FormedBoredom 27 points28 points29 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
They literally have to make everything about them, it's mind numbing.
[–]Bobtoddwilliams1234 18 points19 points20 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Remember when Hillary said that women were the people who suffer most from war because men died?
[–][deleted] 18 points19 points20 points 6 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
https://nypost.com/2019/09/06/broke-men-are-hurting-american-womens-marriage-prospects/
[–]functious 38 points39 points40 points 6 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
The worst part of that article is where it says ' Some ladies are even starting to date down in order to score a forever partner '. As though that's a bad thing? Surely that is completely inevitable outcome if your goal is parity between genders in pay.
[–][deleted] 17 points18 points19 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
And it's even a desirable outcome if you dislike 'income inequality' for the high earning people to partner with the lower earning people and produce middle class families.
[–]functious 18 points19 points20 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yeah, it's also not exactly a new thing since men have always been willing marry/date down. It only seems like an alien concept because the type of people who write these articles are only capable of seeing anything from a female perspective.
[–]neverserve 9 points10 points11 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
See: hypergamy, and Briffault's law. Women almost always date up, and men date down because they think with their little head instead of their big one. Why else would a taller, stronger, richer man be with a shorter, weaker poorer woman? Here's a taste of equality, ladies. Enjoy the decline :)
[–]TC1827 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Men have been dating down forever. It is time women did the same. Equality goes both ways
[–]NecroHexr 19 points20 points21 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
This is a joke that just writes itself. I mean, there is just so many things wrong with this, so many great points we can argue from the title itself, that all you can really do is just cry with laughter. That this is the world we live in, and there is nothing we can do.
[–]Gfeeny 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Most men say there’s nothing they can do and then go fuck a fat chick off tinder a day later. There’s a lot of things men can do and it starts with sex imo. We have to control that part of ourselves if change will ever actually happen
[–]apeironman 32 points33 points34 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
"Women who won't put out are hurting American men's marriage prospects."
Hey, if we can be resource objects they can be sex objects. Seems fair to me. It's just galling that they can get away with being so overt about it. Gotta admit, I'm kinda envious.
[–]Bobtoddwilliams1234 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Honestly that's how I view it. If they want to be prostitutes. if they're only marrying you for your money then it's a business decision and it's a financial transaction rather than marriage. They're offering you marriage and sex in exchange for money. That's a financial transaction. Which means that they should be expected and practically obligated to fulfill their end of the business transaction. If they don't want to remain hot and they don't want to put out whenever the required in there not fulfil their end of the transaction.
That's what you call defaulting on a contract. I mean if they marry you for your money. Then they shouldn't be able to complain if you treat them like you own them. they're treating themselves like a product to be purchased so they shouldn't be really complaining when a man treats them like an object since they treated themselves like an objec
I want to point out that it's not all women. Not advocating for a 1950s style thing. Plenty of women are not like that. but for ones that are that should be how they do things.
[–][deleted] 14 points15 points16 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Great post. Can’t even come up with a witty retort. The dissonance hurts my brain!
[–]neveragoodtime 13 points14 points15 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
So the true victims of homelessness are the women who he can’t give a home to?
[–]TheAndredal[S] 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
excactly!
[–]Vance87 12 points13 points14 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Western women: strong and independent and capable but also completely reliant on a man’s money for marriage??
[–]TheAndredal[S] 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
well summed up
[–]imNagoL 10 points11 points12 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Seems like everything is our fault nowadays, according to the media
[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
In particular Straight white men
[–]notacrackheadofficer 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Also baby boomers, who are widely assumed to all be uneducated Southern white rural males over 75, who are all very wealthy, from working on Wall Street in Alabama.
[–]HRCAndTrumpBothSuck 9 points10 points11 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
First we made too much money, and now we don't make enough? Christ, pick a fucking lane.
[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Women tend to prefer to marry 'up'. As women themselve move 'up' the number of men above them decreases. Throw into the mix the damage caused by pound me too and 3rd wave feminism and you can see why women think there aren't enough good men. Men conversely are simply becoming aware of the risk they are undertaking by engaging with women at all in today's society.
[–]matt_the_raisin 8 points9 points10 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Ironically the non-broke men are probably the one's saving money by going dutch, and THAT's probably "bad for women" too.
and that's sexist according to them
[–]Lion_amongst_gods 24 points25 points26 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Women are the primary victims of men being broke. They lose their alimony, child support and allowances to it.
-Hillary Radfem Clinton.
[–]BoatsNThots 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I’m not broke I just put 20% into 401k and 10% into company stock program and live within my means of that.
[–]NerdGuyLol 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
World ends, women most affected
[–]rabel111 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Research has shown repeatedly that some women (frequently feminists) see marriage as a short cut to wealth and status. These women almost always marry up in status, preferring men who are able to provide for their avarice and nascissism.
This latest study merely confirms previous reseach, showing these vocal feminists are upset that the "marry up" game has become more difficult as their female privilege becomes more dominant. As more of the effect of the war on boys in education filters through to the eligible males market, the sqwarking with get louder, and the femsplaining man bashing more vicious.
well isn't this just Hypergamy?
[–]Daddycool303 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Is this article saying women exchange sex for money? fascinating. So marriage is long term contract with a signing bonus,guaranteed money and a no cut clause. Until the women demands a trade, that is.
[–]sphinx2626 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Im really starting to believe women in the west no longer actually want love or men. I make pretty good money. Have assets but the dating pool around me is filled with guys who work in tech so they drawf my salary. Guess Ill date foreign, cause I cannot see myself settling down with an American women and having any success anymore.
[–]TC1827 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
So:
Historically, privileged women didn’t work. Poor women still had to to survive. It was considered the ideal for a woman to stay home but for many it wasn’t an option.
And even if a woman did stay at home that doesn’t mean they spent time with the kids. Chinese women often left their infants alone in the house while they worked the fields.
[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
All men on Earth incinerated, women the primary victims
[–]bkrugby78 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Clearly this must be fake news because of that pesky Wage Gap and all.
[–]notacrackheadofficer 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Women getting child support hope that their baby daddy gets every promotion and raise at their job, over every female. Lol
[–]Evilcon21 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Well shame love isn’t what’s cracked up to be. Especially now if some women rather have the money instead of a man that they could love. Shows how shallow some people are
[–]TC1827 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
"Women who refuse to marry down, at a time when women have more oppurtunities than men, are hurting American men's marriage prospects"
Fixed the Headline
[–]TheAndredal[S] 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
good point
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Oh wow women can't find their prince charming that doesn't exist because of unrealistic beliefs, blame it on men because that some how makes sense right guys, right?
[–]rationalthought314 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Women having to pay for their own drinks? Misogyny!
[–]The_crow_from_heaven 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Oh dear lord fuck my life
[–]TC1827 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
"Non-Virgin women are hurting American men's marriage prospects"
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Women are dumb
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]SCROTAL-SACK 230 points231 points232 points (20 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lethn 35 points36 points37 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]Bobtoddwilliams1234 42 points43 points44 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]PsychoPhilosopher 16 points17 points18 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]NohoTwoPointOh 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Hillfolk6 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DJ-Roukan 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]NoNoise9374 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]bakedpotato486 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]techtesh 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] -23 points-22 points-21 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lethn 34 points35 points36 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Bobtoddwilliams1234 14 points15 points16 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lethn 4 points5 points6 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]GenealogyFan772 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Lethn 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DJ-Roukan 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Boocehop 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 57 points58 points59 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 43 points44 points45 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 18 points19 points20 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 12 points13 points14 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PsychoPhilosopher 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Bobtoddwilliams1234 10 points11 points12 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 79 points80 points81 points (18 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lethn 45 points46 points47 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Bobtoddwilliams1234 16 points17 points18 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]__pulsar 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]RagingHardBull 14 points15 points16 points (14 children) | Copy Link
[+]Spicy-AC-of-Tesla -6 points-5 points-4 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]RagingHardBull 16 points17 points18 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]RagingHardBull 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Spicy-AC-of-Tesla 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 15 points16 points17 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]TC1827 5 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Spicy-AC-of-Tesla 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]Purpleburglar -9 points-8 points-7 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]RagingHardBull 21 points22 points23 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Purpleburglar -3 points-2 points-1 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]Bobtoddwilliams1234 -7 points-6 points-5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]RagingHardBull 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 29 points30 points31 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]TheAndredal[S] 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]FormedBoredom 27 points28 points29 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Bobtoddwilliams1234 18 points19 points20 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 18 points19 points20 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]functious 38 points39 points40 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 17 points18 points19 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]functious 18 points19 points20 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]neverserve 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TC1827 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NecroHexr 19 points20 points21 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Gfeeny 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]apeironman 32 points33 points34 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Bobtoddwilliams1234 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 14 points15 points16 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]neveragoodtime 13 points14 points15 points
(1 child) | Copy Link
[–]TheAndredal[S] 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Vance87 12 points13 points14 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]TheAndredal[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]imNagoL 10 points11 points12 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]notacrackheadofficer 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]HRCAndTrumpBothSuck 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]matt_the_raisin 8 points9 points10 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]TheAndredal[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lion_amongst_gods 24 points25 points26 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BoatsNThots 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NerdGuyLol 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]rabel111 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]TheAndredal[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Daddycool303 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]sphinx2626 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TC1827 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]bkrugby78 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]notacrackheadofficer 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Evilcon21 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TC1827 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]TheAndredal[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]rationalthought314 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]The_crow_from_heaven 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TC1827 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link