TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Women were always the privileged gender

Remarkable-Rate-9688

October 2, 2024
476 upvotes
/r/MensRights

https://www.wokefather.com/editors-picks/how-society-historically-privileged-women-and-still-does/

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Women were always the privileged gender
Author

Remarkable-Rate-9688

Upvotes 476
Comments 69
Date October 2, 2024 3:07 PM UTC
(1 year ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1fuifts/women_were_always_the_privileged_gender/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/women-were-always-the-privileged-gender.1531855
https://theredarchive.com/post/1531855
Red Pill terms in post
feminism
Top posts by Remarkable-Rate-9688

Woman sentenced the same as man who she falsely accused

3320 upvotes
December 20, 2024
/r/PussyPassDenied

No bond for woman accused of posing as 14-year-old, molesting students

1586 upvotes
January 16, 2025
/r/PussyPassDenied

Florida mother gets 21 life sentences for sex crimes against her own children

1136 upvotes
January 10, 2025
/r/PussyPassDenied

Despite the stereotype that men cheat, more, study finds women are more likely to cheat

1030 upvotes
September 20, 2024
/r/MensRights

3 Zimbabwe women who faked being sexually assaulted and tortured jailed for 20 years

943 upvotes
February 3, 2025
/r/PussyPassDenied

Man falsely accused of rape confronts his accuser years later; shares their chat where she confessed

656 upvotes
February 7, 2025
/r/PussyPassDenied

Actually, girls don't outperform boys in school or behave better. They just get special treatment for the same behaviors/academic abilities or worse. They are treated like an older child's younger sibling

634 upvotes
October 2, 2024
/r/MensRights

Women, not men make up the majority of child abuse perpetrators

609 upvotes
September 8, 2024
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]Educational_Offer837 226 points227 points228 points 1 year ago (31 children) | Copy Link

Gynocentrism is so deeply ingrained in this dumb fucking society that when people see a man being forced to go to war, work, provide and protect and then a woman staying comfy at home doing nothing while her husband brings her money like he's a slave, almost ALL of them will do some fucked up mental gymnastics to arrive at the conclusion that the prvileged one is the man and the opressed one is the woman. Seeing everyone deny something as evident as this is fucking desperating.

[–][deleted] 91 points92 points93 points 1 year ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I've said it a million times.

If women:

  • were 95% of workplace and 99% of combat deaths,

  • paid 76% of taxes and 85% of child support,

  • lived six years less,

  • had prison sentences 53% longer,

  • and were 80% of violent crime victims,

they would lose their God-damned minds. Even a single one of the above would put feminists on the streets shrieking and marching.

[–][deleted] 28 points29 points30 points 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The tears would fill canals.

[–]peripheralpill 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (2 children) | Copy Link

can you source your stats? immediately, i'm unsure of where you acquired the information that men are 95% of the workplace.

and most of these, particularly the final one, are easily explained through a basic understanding of sociology and history, something the article cites to appear knowledgeable and ignores in favor of propaganda meant to appeal to and sate people exactly like those present in this thread

men and women both have societal issues that have changed over time, but this sort of ahistorical malarkey seeks only to divide us, and from this comment section, it's working

[–]Inevitable-Sock1124 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (1 child) | Copy Link

As a mother of both sexes I'm sure it is at least 95%. My son works construction..it is dangerous and the guys often take shortcuts on OSHA rules about safety if they don't think they will get caught. He sees female workers almost never unless it is office staff. 

Although the one recent death was in fact a female carpenter.

You don't have alot of women choosing to be linemen and Alaska fishers. Men are absolutely on the more dangerous jobs. Those jobs pay more because they are inherently more dangerous. 

[–]Idkjustgotquestions 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And why do you think that is? Women get assaulted regularly in these dangerous fields 

[–]AndreasDasos 70 points71 points72 points 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And remember, we have a culture of violence against women even though hitting a women is unthinkable in the mainstream and 3-4 times as many men get murdered but no one gives a shit.

[–]Sitheral 28 points29 points30 points 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yup. Its no different from the beehive really but at least bees don't fucking lie to themselves about it.

[–]Grand-Juggernaut6937 19 points20 points21 points 1 year ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Neither side were slaves. It’s not accurate to say that women were slaves that were chained to the kitchen, and it’s not accurate to say men were slaves to their wives.

In the past men got a fair trade off in exchange for their labor. You’d be respected by your community and could choose to be the leader of the household after you meet their needs.

The only reason they look like slaves in retrospect is because that trade is gone for us. We’re expected to work and comply to our wives’ demands under any and all circumstances, and in return we simply don’t get punished by them or society.

[–]Educational_Offer837 22 points23 points24 points 1 year ago (6 children) | Copy Link

It’s not accurate to say that women were slaves that were chained to the kitchen

Women weren't slaves by being in the kitchen, they were (and still are) privileged for it. A grown ass woman having to spend just a few minutes washing dishes and cooking and then she has the rest of the day to do whatever she wants? If that's not privilege then I don't know what is, and this is all assuming they even do those chores instead of just using a dishwasher and buying processed food.

and it’s not accurate to say men were slaves to their wives.

It is A LOT more accurate to say that than to say women were slaves, having the pressure to work your ass off and provide your wife with money and resources and in the meantime she can ruin your life with a false accusation whenever she wants, and if there's a war they send you to die and not her? Yeah, that sounds a whole lot like slavery to me.

In the past men got a fair trade off in exchange for their labor. You’d be respected by your community and could choose to be the leader of the household after you meet their needs.

No, just no... a man doing all of the work while her wife just stays home being a parasite is not a "fair trade off", that's gynocentric slave mentality. It would be truly fair if she worked too instead of acting like a spoiled brat who expects to have everything handed to her.

The only reason they look like slaves in retrospect is because that trade is gone for us. We’re expected to work and comply to our wives’ demands under any and all circumstances, and in return we simply don’t get punished by them or society.

You're missing the point, that trade ALWAYS favoured women at the expense of men's suffering, now it's just more visible because of social media and feminism which makes sure those privileges for women endure. My grandfather didn't get a fair trade having to work his ass off all day in corn fields around dangerous machinery only to be received by a bitchy wife who did nothing but complain and now acts like a victim because she used to cook for the children she herself decided to have, for example, not to mention the amount of old guys that regret getting married, so much for a "fair trade". I don't know about you, but I don't find that shit tolerable by any means and it's time everyone starts thinking this way.

[–]missnoirenani 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There were actual slaves for most of America’s history, and afterwards they reinstated slavery through black codes. Black women always had to work and for others and were the women who had to endure rape, multination, murder and just horrible treatment in general at hands of men and White women. White women are the same as they were a hundred years ago. Black women have no woman privilege, or privilege at all. Cant even have basic protection of any sort. White women are placed in positions of power over non rich men, men of color and all other women. And men give them this privilege and then try and group black women into white women, as if we have had any say in anything. We suffer at the hands of white women more than anyone else

[–]Grand-Juggernaut6937 -1 points0 points1 point 1 year ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Physical labor wasn’t suffering then though. Most men, even in this generation, would happily provide labor in exchange for being respected and loved from their families.

For many people that was the ideal outcome. If both spouses were working the labor is equal, but there’s also no gradient of respect.

Transitionary perhaps but it was not enslavement.

[–]Educational_Offer837 3 points4 points5 points 1 year ago (1 child) | Copy Link

  Physical labor wasn’t suffering then though

I have no idea what you mean by this, physical labor was and still is pure and utter shit that no one wants to do because it's tiring, uncomfortable and dangerous, and it was always imposed on men because we're seen as second class citizens.

Most men, even in this generation, would happily provide labor in exchange for being respected and loved from their families.

"Most men" were brainwashed by the women who raised them and put gynocentric ideas in their heads, and it's very doubtful that they were happy about being sent to do all of the tough work like slaves, they just did it because they were forced to. And that exchange is a lie, no woman who truly loves her husband will allow him to work like a dog while she stays home polishing her nails. I mean, the only resemblance I find with this kind of relationship is the one of master and slave, the master being the woman and the slave being the man, it's obvious. It's like you're saying "Most black people, even in this generation, would happily provide labor in exchange for being respected and loved from their masters", it's the same thing.

For many people that was the ideal outcome. If both spouses were working the labor is equal, but there’s also no gradient of respect.

Again, that outcome is only "ideal" in the twisted fucking minds of people raised by gynocentrism. And the gradient of respect is non existent if the woman sees the man as a slave whose only utility is to work and provide for her.

[–]Desperate_Coat_5244 -1 points0 points1 point 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Men weren’t forced to do anything. They literally set up the system that way. 

[+][deleted] -10 points-9 points-8 points 1 year ago (1 child) | Copy Link

monetary dependence on your husband (or wife for that matter) is not privilege. it is a trap. being forced in a trap is not privilege.

[–]dudester3 3 points4 points5 points 1 year ago (1 child) | Copy Link

"In the past men got a fair trade..."

Yep, in the past.

[–]Educational_Offer837 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No, men never got a fair trade, not now and neither back then.

[–]Fun_Routine_6548 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

True Words. This generación is done...

[–]peripheralpill 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (1 child) | Copy Link

hey, do you have any data about these claims? the bureau of labor says more than half of the workforce is women, but that could be a lie.

are you including housework and child rearing in the sitting home and doing nothing, for the women who don't have *actual* jobs, i mean.

[–]Inevitable-Sock1124 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Women do more than make half the workforce. Men tend to do more dangerous jobs though. 

[–]LegendairyMooCow -1 points0 points1 point 1 year ago (1 child) | Copy Link

“Stays at home doing nothing” sounds more along the lines of what men do. A lot of men are lazy pieces of shit: Can’t Clean, cook, hell even bathe themselves. Also, what do y’all protect anyways, your masculinity? lol. Go back to work, y’all make more anyways. 

[+]BoogieJones10 -1 points0 points1 point 1 year ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Me when I lie and whine about things that aren’t real

[+]Jake0024 -13 points-12 points-11 points 1 year ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Feminism would say the man has more power (he has all the income), and the benefits women receive (not having a job) are a product of ambivalent (specifically, benevolent) sexism

The idea that all sexism is bad for women and good for men doesn't exist in feminism.

[–]pbj_sammichez 12 points13 points14 points 1 year ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Your last sentence is... the exact opposite of truth. The idea that men benefit from sexism that harms women is the core tenet of modern feminism. I'm not saying it's correct, that's just how they see things. Viewing society through that lens is what leads to feminists hating men with their particular brand of nonchalance. They just assume men are not good people unless they are taught to be good. Of course, they believe women have some intrinsic goodness that we male savages lack. Understanding that is fundamental to understanding how feminists have convinced themselves that they are morally correct. The people who try to scream, "Gender doesn't matter!" sure are quick to throw judgment and aspersions at an entire gender.

To expand on this, you imply that some sexism must harm men. Who is responsible for this sexism? Well it must be from other men. If women are sexist, it's only because they have internalized the patriarchy. The men are sexist because... well... men are just sexist, okay? The underlying implication is that men have spoiled everything to the core via patriarchy. We men are responsible for everything bad in the world, and women can wash their hands of it. It's convenient and self-serving (for women), but it's not a valid view of reality.

[–]Jake0024 -3 points-2 points-1 points 1 year ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It's literally not. See for example the link I just posted.

[–]pbj_sammichez 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Lol you post the Wikipedia link to benevolent sexism and act like it's profound. Believe it or not, even a male savage like me can read between the lines to see that all the language and talking points exist to demonize men and boys while being able to claim that's not what is happening. That's the plausible deniability I was talking about - feminists weaponize language in a way that is shockingly similar to fascist movements throughout history. Just like the Christian right wing in America likes to say that being hateful to the LGBT community is "protecting their children," feminists will blame societal ills on the patriarchy as a proxy for men and their influence.

Can you really not see that? I mean, come on, u/Jake0024 you're clearly a man with a username like that. There is no way you're a basic bitch feminist with a room-temperarure IQ, thinking you'd stroll over and own some MRA incels. Learn to argue, then come back after you grow a 2nd functioning brain cell. Now I have to go. We adults have work in the morning. I'm sure you have school.

[–]Jake0024 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You didn't even get the title right.

[–][deleted] 56 points57 points58 points 1 year ago* (13 children) | Copy Link

Water is wet

[–]CompetitiveOffer5339 22 points23 points24 points 1 year ago (4 children) | Copy Link

The sky is blue 

[–][deleted] 15 points16 points17 points 1 year ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Fire is hot

[–]CompetitiveOffer5339 3 points4 points5 points 1 year ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The grass is brown.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points 1 year ago (1 child) | Copy Link

As a kid I thought it was green

[–]CompetitiveOffer5339 4 points5 points6 points 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Real, we all know only magical grass is green.

[–]PeonSupremeReturns 7 points8 points9 points 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Some people need to be reminded of that fact periodically.

[–]CarefulSection6157 8 points9 points10 points 1 year ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Boys have penises

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 1 year ago (5 children) | Copy Link

and girls have vaginas

[–]DevilishRogue 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It's not a toomah!

[–]CarefulSection6157 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's a roomah!

[–]TheNatureGrandpa -1 points0 points1 point 1 year ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Some have penises now.

[–]CarefulSection6157 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If it is a dildo, then maybe

[–]TheNatureGrandpa -1 points0 points1 point 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No, flesh & blood apparently..

[–]Igualdad23M 24 points25 points26 points 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The article is worth reading however there's something I'd like to point out.

Society was always ginocentric, therefore all the roles the author pointed out were meant to, overall, benefit women.

All those "oppressive" roles women had to face were actually beneficial in THAT HISTORICAL MOMENT.

This is why at the very moment the material conditions changed (for example we transitioned from the industrial age where "work" meant working 16h per day in a factory inhaling toxic steam and getting lung cancer when you get old to the modern economic age based on tertiary where work is much more comfortable and less dangerous) society updated women's role to fit to the new material conditions. Another example is the anticoncep pill, feminism claim that the creation of the anticoncep pill was the backbone of the female sexual revolution. Which is just stupid. If society didn't want to women to have any kind of free sexual life, society would have just banned the anticoncep pill in the first place. Society didn't do so, because society always wanted women to be as free as possible, mean while men still don't have any type of reproductive right whatsoever, no matter how much we ask for it (paper abortion)

If society wanted to oppress women just for the shake of doing it, now women would still have all the restrictions they had. Society would had told them: "SHUT UP BITCH" slapped them in the face and threw them away. (Which is btw what we as men are told anytime we try to speak up for our rights)

Society was always willing to provide protection and care to women, and that means women stand in a much better social position than men. Anytime women face any disadvantage or issue, society is willing to fix it. This is not the case for men. Because when it comes to men, that willingness doesn't exist, and that's why women who were born in the same year than you have rights that you don't have.

[–]SaltSpecialistSalt 29 points30 points31 points 1 year ago* (13 children) | Copy Link

Gynocentrism stems from the biological reality that women are the bottleneck for reproduction. This applies to all animal species as well. Any species or group that fails to prioritize the well-being of females struggles to reproduce effectively. As a man, I understand the societies tendency to be gynocentric; however, what bothers me is the feminist mentality to adopt victim mindset while simultaneously benefiting from the privileges associated with being female.

[–]Educational_Offer837 18 points19 points20 points 1 year ago (1 child) | Copy Link

  1. If I'm stranded on an island with a feminist I will push her to the crocodiles to save myself, same if a woman even dares touching me, I will disfigure her face, and there's not a single "insctinct" that prevents me from doing so.

  2. People have sex mostly with no intention of reproducing, this is why condoms exist, and that's also why women get abortions. It seems humans don't give a fuck about reproduction so much after all

  3. If you give me a group of 10 babies, 5 boys and 5 girls, and I raise the boys treating them like society normally treats girls and viceversa (meaning, I would tell the girls things like "you don't hit men" and I would believe any accusations the boys made against the girls, while also imposing the provider and protector roles on the girls), those boys would be treated exactly like girls are treated normally in our shitty gynocentric society

Basically, all of this means that gynocentrism comes from culture and not some evolutionary bullshit, and with comments like yours you do nothing but perpetuating it, because the only thing we need to end this shit is to be willing to treat men and women equally but FOR REAL, and we won't achieve that with these stupid fucking comments justifying that men are treated like shit just for being men.

[–]Igualdad23M 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Holy fucking shit, ostia puta, there we go again with this bullshit biologist ginocentric theory.

Look I know that you are defending this theory as a response to the "the world is a patriarchy" feminist theory.

But that theory is completely flawed.

Yes one man could impregnate thousands of women, could but won't, this is a scenario is not gonna happen. Is technically possible but won't happen because the homo sapiens is a monogamous specie and reproduce (mostly) in 1 to 1 scenario. 1 man impregnates 1 woman.

And btw this is why men and women are born in a similar ratio. According to the "men are bullshit theory" 1 men should be born for every 1000, instead of 500 male and 500 female. 1 male vs 1000 female it would be the optical male to female birth ratio. So that man can impregnate 1000 women but guess what? That's not what's gonna happen. If you do so. What you will get is just 1 woman impregnated because that's how we work as a monogamous specie.

[–]Educational_Offer837 4 points5 points6 points 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not to mention that when humans fuck they do it almost always with no intention of reproducing, and there's an entire multi million dollar industry that exists thanks to this (condoms, contraconceptives, etc). Good to see I'm not the only one who is tired of people using this evolutionary bullshit as an excuse (which is not even true) to justify gynocentrism, and the most worrying part is that a lot of people in this subreddit, which supposedly supports men, believe in this shit

[–]SaltSpecialistSalt -2 points-1 points0 points 1 year ago (1 child) | Copy Link

you are all wrong. you are constructing a straw man argument using large discrepancies as 1 to 1000 ratio. of course it cannot happen. in reality even 1 to 2 ratio is a very significant discrepancy meaning half of the male population is not needed biologically. and no, humans were never pure monogamous. simple biological facts such as birth ratio is skewed towards more male births or that there is more female genetic diversity in human dna shows that throughout human history significant amount of men did not get a chance to reproduce. and those who did, usually mated with more than one women

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/sep/24/women-men-dna-human-gene-pool

[–]Sorrowoverdosen 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Delusional misandrist propaganda.

[–]SidewaysGiraffe 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Why does it bother you? It's just a more pronounced version of the same impulse.

[–]Sorrowoverdosen -5 points-4 points-3 points 1 year ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Nope, female biological privilege cause they give a life is still a part of misandrist discourse and lowquality attempts into biology. In primal societies/tribes/whatever the real bottleneck was the amount of food the men can provide. You cant have an anime harem even after returning to monkey - you would be eaten by big cats or your harem would die of starvation.

[–]SaltSpecialistSalt 5 points6 points7 points 1 year ago (2 children) | Copy Link

if what you said were true there would be no such thing as gynocentrism, male expendability, or woman are wonderful effect. you mention of harem, do you realize that for a man to have more than 1 women available to him another men has to remain single or more possibly die ? polygamy is actually a direct result of male disposability. history and current state of the society contradicts all your points

[–]Sorrowoverdosen -3 points-2 points-1 points 1 year ago (1 child) | Copy Link

There were no such a thing as male expendability when humans evolved. Every single man was a food and safety provider and valued member of the tribe. Its a misandrist myth.

There were a very limited polygamy, cause every woman gave birth to a big number of kids since her very young age, and the men historically married younger women, even if this younger means just 2-3 years (but gap could be a way biiiiiger), it still means there were more women brides than men husbands at every singular moment. Never heard of old maids?

Return to Monke is actually more like male power fantasy, not some misandrist social-darwinist bullshit even some MRA claim.

[–]PLM_coae 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Most people who push this crap don't realize that polygamy was always something that only the very richest 2-10 men in a civilization could afford, the kings. And it was ussually only like 3-5 women, 20 in the rarer and more extreme cases, but not 1000.

[–]PLM_coae 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Exactly, who the fuck would be providing all those women with the needs to survive? 1 man can't do enough work to provide for 1000 women.

[–]Inevitable-Sock1124 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

When all you did was go stick a spear in a mammoth it was a little different.   Why would one man want 1000 women? It would have taken my husband more than a year to have sex with each one even once.  How many guys can do 3x a day every day? 

[–]Silver-Expert-3682 8 points9 points10 points 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I hate society.

[–]LCGiftingWisdom 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago (3 children) | Copy Link

It’s basically this. They are favored because they are on average physically vulnerable. Men are not favored because they are on average not physically vulnerable. They basically carry the same value as a child. We can science this all day but the basics is they are the “children” “we” need to protect, hence the global patience with sometimes more life threatening behavior (hitting people with bowling balls, stabbing, bagging heads to concrete, etc.). It’s when the context of sex gets thrown in is when weird shit starts popping off. Think of it (and this will sound “misogynistic” but it not cap) kinda like your the father to a child. They scream, “it’s a child”. They complain, “it’s a child”. They say they are oppressed, “it’s just a child, they don’t get it”. That’s all. For what it’s worth, both men and women are just and good and completely shitty equally, we all just focus on the shitty more.

[–]missnoirenani 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Only white women are seen and viewed this way

[+][deleted] -3 points-2 points-1 points 1 year ago (1 child) | Copy Link

"children" yeah ok.

but ur last comment is right but mras dont agree lol

[–]LCGiftingWisdom 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

We are all grown, just speaking metaphorically. Still sucks in the man’s side but who you “saving”? The kid that fell of their bike or the guy that just feel down some stairs? Hopefully both but you get my point.

[–]skllyskullstyle 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I knew it!!! I knew this was always the truth! I always knew people were wrong about society always opressing women without looking at the evidence. They just said that because it made them feel better. But I always knew better!

I know it was always the opposite!

[–]peripheralpill 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

you knew it based on what?

> They just said that because it made them feel better.

but that's not at all what you're doing, because you've been armed from information from wokefather.com

[–]AmuseDeath 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

https://i.imgur.com/YnBrMsS.jpeg

Male Privilege

[–]Imwastingmytime_ 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I just want to say to all the men who are reading this this world is truly sickening it really just did a 180 on how society treated men I’m sorry if I’m ignorant in the history of men’s right and whatnot but I just have to tell you as a 19 year old girl I have a lot of empathy for all of you and I care about you all deeply I hope God can heal your trauma and sadness truly the world we live in has never been so evil you can all see it clearly because it’s all against you guys I wish I could hug all of you because I’ve read a lot of posts and videos about how it’s like to live in todays world as a man and truly my heart breaks seeing how much pain you all go through never do anything drastic and harm yourselves you are all beautiful in the way God created you and his love for you will never stop please believe in Jesus and be connected with your creator he’s waiting for all of you to speak to him and repent he’s using me to speak to all of you he wants a relationship and he will never stop loving you to all the men out there reading this I mean it with my whole heart ♥️ Anyone who is reading this message I will tell you something important that suddenly people will go missing and it’ll be framed as if it was a alien abduction but it wasn’t once this happens people will panic most children will be gone and once this happens you have to repent to God he loves us and he wants me to tell you all the truth because you don’t know how bad things are gonna get once this happens get a bible anywhere and read book of revelations it’ll explain everything that’ll happen don’t be scared because once you repent to Jesus he won’t forsake you you have to tell others about Jesus because they’re as scared as you all are and confused tell them what just happened and explain to them about it and if you have to die for Jesus do it don’t be scared of death once you have Jesus with you and read your bible take this message seriously it’s God trying to get you all to him because his eternal love is too strong for his message to not be heard

[–]disappointing-trash 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Bump

[–]atemyballstoday 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's a stupid claim

[–]UnusualEnd5249 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

you can't be serious? 🤣🤣

[–]missnoirenani 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

White women. And white women only.

[+][deleted] -10 points-9 points-8 points 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

yes because reproductive slavery is true privilege

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter