UK: Husband 'who drove wife to suicide' is 'unfairly accused' because case against him is based on 'agenda' that women who say they've been abused 'must be telling the truth', court hears

Outrageous_Glove_467 · 2026-04-08T16:52:45+00:00

This is the same country where the police told me it was my fault for being abused as a child, then told me women don’t abuse children, despite my mother being my abuser.

The same country where I was told by doctors I’m not allowed help for my trauma because that help is only available to women. The same country that covers up any abuse that I (and other men) suffer because it might make a woman look like a bad person.

In the uk, it is pre determined that the male is the abusive one in domestic violence cases. If the women is the violent one, the case is abandoned like what happened in my case.

I’m leaning on this guy being innocent.

jessi387 · 2026-04-08T16:20:59+00:00

And what ….. when men kill themselves, women have nothing to do with it ?

Cuz if this is a precedent they want to set, there’s a lot of women who should be going to jail.

Smeg-life · 2026-04-08T17:06:01+00:00

'Ms Thorne asked how Trybus was 'supposed to answer the allegations of a ghost from 10 years ago'.'

That's the other issue, now its prove yourself innocent.

Massive_Teach_5166 · 2026-04-08T18:25:05+00:00

The premise here is default male culpability and default female victimhood. If an accusation of "historical abuse" from a decade ago - with zero hard evidence, no cross-examination of the deceased (just a diary!), and pure hearsay is enough to charge a man with essentially causing a death, then the justice system is dead.

We have a statistically proven epidemic of male suicides directly linked to family court destruction, financial ruin, false allegations, and parental alienation by ex-wives. The number of women criminally charged with "driving their husbands to suicide" in those thousands of cases? Zero.

Perfect_Sir4820 · 2026-04-08T17:21:04+00:00

The right to cross-examine your accuser in court dates back to Roman times. If their case is relying solely on hearsay evidence then it should be thrown out.

rabel111 · 2026-04-08T23:24:27+00:00

The ultimate atribution of responsibility to men.

If this case succeeds, every man will be responsible for the happiness and mental health of his female partner. Is she depressed? Is she self harming? Is she dissatisfied? Its the man's fault. If there are any consequences to her 'unhappiness' then the man will be punished, not the poor woman.

Not based on evidence, just on gossip and one person's characterisation of a relationship. The woman's acts of unhappiness, self harm, depression, anxiety, suicide, now become irrefutable evidence of a man's violence.

Educational_Sound188 · 2026-04-08T18:03:36+00:00

Many women blackmail their husbands that they will commit suicide if they don't get what they want. Women like her die out of their own spite and resentment.

Itsdickyv · 2026-04-08T22:51:33+00:00

“The court had previously heard that IF the dates were correct in her diary, the final three days before she died LOOKED as if they had been removed.”

That “if” is doing a lot of heavy lifting. And note they can’t conclusively state the dates were accurate, or that the days had definitively been removed.

It’s also skipping over one very obvious issue as well - if there is material that could be considered evidentiary of prolonged abuse (which it seems the diary is), why specifically remove the last three days over destroying the whole thing?

The evidence is so sketchy here…

daymitjim · 2026-04-08T16:33:20+00:00

Justice isn't profitable.
Letting women do pretty much whatever they want, continuing to vote extreme left and possible breeding with foreigners, is.

It isn't only misandry for no reason, it is misandry in the service of something, and our biology and evolutionary functioning allows this to be exploited.
The world is a big global potential market, and the market powers want it to open.
The plutocrats wants to do away with nation borders and individual law and judicial zones and local self-governance, and the "separation of powers" principle.
There will be unification of powers, centralization.
There will be a global government and a global market, or there will be nothing.
And there will be no where to run to, nowhere to hide.
This is the migration to end all migration, and the men of the West and their descendants will pay for it, only to be written out of their own history books.

This industrial scale enforced misandry only happens in the West, and it is not for no reason.
Nothing happens for no reason, and one must always look at the financial incentives.

To see anyone push back on the "believe all women" train, is almost unbelievable.
Did someone suddenly for no reason decide that overt evil was bad?
This has already done unbelievable irreversible damage to our civilization.
If this evil is pulled back on now, it is because it has already achieved what it set out to do, and they can now afford the appearance of being reasonable, so they minimize the pendulum swing, the inevitable reaction.

JamesGoldeneye64 · 2026-04-08T23:22:51+00:00

I hate unclear articles like this, so badly written.😡 It seems to skip the most important part on how they come to the conclusion why he would be guilty exactly.

FluidWrangler3666 · 2026-04-08T17:25:44+00:00

it looks like dailymail.co.uk is banned here can anyone tell me what's in the article?

ShabbyJerking · 2026-04-09T07:08:41+00:00

Another instance of "original sin" towards the male

UniversalCraftsman · 2026-04-09T15:31:08+00:00

In Austria a man was recently sentenced, because his wife died while mountain climbing.

Comments