TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Female OKCupid users find 80% of males to have below-average attractiveness

[deleted]

December 28, 2013
109 upvotes
/r/TheRedPill
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Female OKCupid users find 80% of males to have below-average attractiveness
Author

[deleted]

Upvotes 109
Comments 101
Date December 28, 2013 8:16 PM UTC
(12 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/1tw81c/female_okcupid_users_find_80_of_males_to_have/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/female-okcupid-users-find-80-of-males-to-have.231933
https://theredarchive.com/post/231933
Red Pill terms in post
the red pill

Comments

[–]cobalt172850 points 12 years ago* [recovered] (8 children) | Copy Link

If there is one example of how feminism has ruined relations between men and women, its okcupid.

1.) Fatties that reply "very selectively"

2.) Almost all the girls are bi sexual or whatever the fuck

3.) Almost no 8's or above

[–]DEVi4TION 8 points9 points10 points 12 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

There are TONS of 8s 9s and 10s bro Okcupid just doesn't show you until enough girls have voted you into the "attractive" category. Yes, Okcupid is divided for hot people and ugly people.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is true. A few days/weeks after you set up your profile and start sending/receiving messages as well as profile ratings from other users, you'll receive an e-mail from OkCupid telling you "Congratulations, you're attractive" or some such if you fit in that category.

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours -1 points0 points1 point 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, I get all the Hambeasts and buffarillas, and no I am not bad looking, I am however very muscular, and under six feet.

[–][deleted] 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Around here its desperate hamplanets, single moms, and sluts looking for hookups. Attractive women almost never have heard of it.

[–]Hobo-With-A-Shotgun 5 points6 points7 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The green/yellow/red 'selectivity' notes are only there to indicate how many messages someone has gotten. It has nothing to do with how often someone actually replies, it is there to try and discourage people from sending any more messages and to consider others instead, as that user is obviously commanding a lot of attention from others.

[–]gg_s 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Interesting. Can you cite a source for that?

[–]LMS_THEORY_ 23 points24 points25 points 12 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

IT'S ALL ABOUT LOOKS

ACQUIRE AESTHETICS

looks, money, & status

[–]trias_e8 points9 points10 points 12 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Should be noted that it's all about looks (and what you put in your income bracket and job description) on okcupid where there is basically no chance to have any personality or game. Elsewhere it's 50/50.

[–]luxury_banana 8 points9 points10 points 12 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

It's still all the same in the bar/club/party and other meat market scene. The difference between the guy who gets a lot of play and the guy who goes home with only his right hand for company or if he's lucky a girl who's still there at closing is almost entirely aesthetics.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 12 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

No. I am average and I can pull attractive girls. Online there's no chance but in person I have enough game.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Personally, I think you rate yourself 'average' but in reality you're probably above average attractiveness. I know tons of guys who do this, you wouldn't be much different.

[–]sushisection 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Do you regularly work out? Not average if you do

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I work out during the first six months and not much during the second half of the year. I am 6'2 190 but I have a good amount of fat and a baby face. I just pull girls with my confidence I guess.

[–]sushisection 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol and because you are tall and not fat.... you aren't average dude, stop lying to yourself

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ditto. Hardly get a reply online, but in person this short guy can talk em into almost anything.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points 12 years ago* (8 children) | Copy Link

Not really so simple, because men rate women with a normal bell curve distribution of attractiveness. But women are attracted to just 20% of the men on OkCupid. You can try to get into the top 20%, but most can't.

[–]LMS_THEORY_ 19 points20 points21 points 12 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I'm hell bent on becoming that top 20% even if I now I won't achieve that level

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Go for it.

[–]CyricYourGod 6 points7 points8 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A good enough photographer, a stylist and some muscle tone/weight loss can make any person look good. If you got to the point where you had good enough photos to blow away the women, you should also have the confidence to beat them on ground game.

[–]TheSonofLiberty 4 points5 points6 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

good on ya mate

[–]andreasvastolorde 4 points5 points6 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

that's the spirit.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

because its related to height, thats why you can try but most can't, its not something you can change.

[–]puah8r 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It really is that simple. EVERYONE (Men and Women) want to marry top 20%, difference is men just have testosterone which makes us settle in the short term.

[–]General_Fear 21 points22 points23 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

80%? I am not surprised. That is because women have impossible standards. To your typical woman, you have to have Bill Gates money with Brad Pitt looks. Anything else is settling.

Then these women hit the wall. Those same guys who were below average start looking good when women become desperate to get married.

[–]Exactly_what_I_think 14 points15 points16 points 12 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

http://blog.okcupid.com has good raw data approach to it.

There is a male/female attractiveness by age AKA The Wall. Photo annalists by smiling/not (straight men should not smile) demo of the love females have for dark triad types.

[–]EvanDeadlySins 4 points5 points6 points 12 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

How about a good old fashioned smirk, or a cheeky grin?

[–]Exactly_what_I_think 15 points16 points17 points 12 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

From what I remember best pics for guys is doing something (demonstrating value) and ignoring the camera.

[–]Exactly_what_I_think 4 points5 points6 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/the-4-big-myths-of-profile-pictures/

http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/my-best-face/

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

So what's with the dude playing the guitar? Why is he rated so low?

[–]Exactly_what_I_think 5 points6 points7 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Looking at the camera bad lighting looks staged.

http://cdn.okcimg.com/blog/mybestface/BestFace3.png from http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/my-best-face/

[–][deleted] 23 points24 points25 points 12 years ago* (12 children) | Copy Link

80/20 rule confirmed?

Examples of OKCupid images that women rate as below-average in attractiveness:

http://cdn.okcimg.com/blog/your_looks_and_inbox/chriscoyne.jpg

http://cdn.okcimg.com/blog/your_looks_and_inbox/crudder.jpg

http://cdn.okcimg.com/blog/your_looks_and_inbox/sammy.jpg

http://cdn.okcimg.com/blog/your_looks_and_inbox/mkrohn.jpg

[–][deleted] 22 points23 points24 points 12 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

How is the guy in the second picture below average? That's weird imo.

[–]explabhor 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Low height if I had to guess.

[–][deleted] 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yeah cause musicians get no pussy ever (lol)

[–]Crackerjacksurgeon 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Only musicians with status.

[–]DanReggins 7 points8 points9 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

White women do not like blond men. (Which sucks, because it's not like we're super common)

I find that wearing a beard, coloring my hair darker (which Elvis did!), and going after Asians to help.

[+][deleted] -10 points-9 points-8 points 12 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Not sure what those pictures are meant to mean in the context of your post, most of them ARE below average in attractiveness.

I'd say 3 of the 4 are less attractive than me, and i'm less attractive than average.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Not sure if you are humble bragging by saying you are more attractive than 3/4 of those guys even though you consider yourself less than attractive, or you are selling yourself short by thinking you are less than average even though you are more attractive than 3/4 of them. At least 3/4 in those pictures can be considered average in my opinion.

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well I'd post a photo but in reality I'd like to keep my online and offline identities entirely unrelated to each other.

Perhaps i have a strange view of what constitutes average, i dont know, but I'd have said the only one above average there is number 2.

1 would be good looking with some minor tweaks, but right now he looks kind of... Odd. 3 and 4 are just a bit ugly, sorry.

[–]trias_e5 points6 points7 points 12 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

1 and 2 are obviously above average in attractiveness. 3 is probably average. 4 is below average.

[–]bludnthunder 10 points11 points12 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

4 is only below average because of the old man glasses and shit eating grin. I don't think many people could pull that off well regardless of how attractive they are.

[–][deleted] 12 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]nerdyfitnessguy 5 points6 points7 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I completely agree, but that's just what women do in our society, on- or offline. There can't be one scale for "with makeup" and one for "without makeup. "

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's funny bc something as simple as eye-liner or mascara and nothing else can make a lot of difference on a girl's appearance. No wonder "mascara" is spanish for "mask".

[–]Kimjungillestt 6 points7 points8 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

When I go and hit on a girl this is exactly what I try and think and tell myself before approaching. "She's only hot because of make up, that's her only defense, you got this!"

[–]MahlerNinth 10 points11 points12 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Perhaps this is the Ricardian 80/20 principle, but it may also say something more about how much beta behavior there is from men on these sites, and how entitled even the fattest and ugliest women are.

There are a lot of unattractive men and women on sites like OKC. The unattractive men get low ratings on attractiveness.

But the unattractive women, whether we're talking ugly single moms, hamplanets, angry entitled feminazis, etc, still get high star ratings and messages from the most pathetic betas. Doesn't matter how gross, unwashed, unshaven, or obese they are - there are still men on OKC who will let standards drop enough to give them a high rating, and message them.

The ugliest, most hideous women though will still not consider most of those men worthy of her, and will only wait for the 6'1, in-shape doctor or banker to message her. And finally when he doesn't, (say it with me)... "there are just no good men out there!"

[–]AllYouCanEatRedPills 11 points12 points13 points 12 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Which proves that women are collectively irrational.

It's mathematically impossible for 80% of anything to be below average.

Average = right in the middle @ 50%

[–]fuck_your_downvoting 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Technically if you're talking about medians, yes. But most people take average to be the mean, which although mathematically incorrect is the reality of the situation.

However because this study only looks at attractive vs unattractive, which would be a boolean value, and they're not actually giving more attractive people higher ratings just a different one, then in this case yes, the mean will also be in the centre of a data series.

Sorry. It's been ages since exams and I don't know why this shit is still in my head.

[–]Fatalis89 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Actually both are mathematically correct, as both are a type of mathematical average. The mode is also a type of average.

Mean has simply become more associated with the word average over time because it is the most used.

[–]fuck_your_downvoting 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, what I meant was that most people assume that average explicitly means mean, which frustrates me to no end when people start spouting off about science and statistics. I'm just being pedantic.

[–]AllYouCanEatRedPills 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

It's a similar internal fallacy to the studies that show that 85% of people consider themselves above average in any given category. It's not actually possible for them all to be right.

It's not an individual fallacy (I'm sure they genuinely believe this), but a collective one.

To actually know would require coordinating data with everyone else and seeing where your results lie. Most people never do this.

[–]ilike2partyhowaboutu 4 points5 points6 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I bet if men started dating women who didn't wear ANY makeup we'd see a huge shift in these numbers.

[–]SSTUPNC 5 points6 points7 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

SNS at its finest. It should also note that 80% of males on OKCupid are objectively of higher value than 80% of the women on the site.

OKCupid is like dumpster diving for fucks.

Six Nine Syndrome (SNS)

A common theme on ROK is the modern entitled female. Never has this been more apparent, in my opinion, than the last 15 years or so. Females generally seem to have the attitude that simply having a pair of tits somehow entitles them to a certain brand of treatment, as well as giving them the right to treat others a certain way. Essentially they feel they have the right to conduct themselves like complete bitches, often acting as if you are lucky to be in their presence, let alone speak to them. If you are so lucky and (in their mind) proven worthy, she may actually touch your dick. An even bigger problem exists as well, that being that females who really don’t carry the physical or intellectual credentials to even justify such attitude portray themselves as if they were 9s instead of the actual 6s they are. I call it the Six Nine Syndrome, or SNS.

Whose fault is this? I go with 50/50 blame here. If men are treating you like a 9 your whole life, you are going to believe it on some level. It starts with their fathers making them feel like a princess their entire lives, regardless of how they behave or carry themselves. Even more it is the fault of the blue pill beta males so thirsty for female attention they bestow upon these “exalted ones” endless, unwarranted accolades and handouts in the hope that one day she will just maybe, MAYBE allow you to text her or even bless you with her company. Now the women need to exercise some rational judgment here and should realize they really don’t need to act this way, and in most cases simply do not warrant such attention. Dude just wants his dick wet… period…. get over it. There are 30 more chicks in this bar alone that can fill the task. You are not that special, Beyonce.

One Of A Million.

[–]hamstercide 6 points7 points8 points 12 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

So why do they keep messaging types they consider unattractive? Beta providers? Self-selection of broken women on OKCupid?

http://cdn.okcimg.com/blog/your_looks_and_inbox/Female-Messaging-Curve.png

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points16 points 12 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Poor self-esteem, profile matches, risk adverse to rejection of asking hotter guys out, fuck who knows, the point is only 20% truly give the alpha tingles. Many guys do the same thing, they will ask out a 7-8 over an 8-9 simply because they'd rather undershoot than overshoot and miss. They also don't want to deal with all the shit testing. Women are much more passive, they wait to be selected most of the time. The frequency of male messaging is no doubt much higher in total messages.

[–]jkonine 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They want to interact with people that they feel they have a chance with/dont have to put any effort to bag?

I dunno.

[–]trias_e 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Both men and women seek out people with lower attractiveness for long-term relationships.

http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/magazines/allwoman/Men-prefer-to-marry-less-attractive-women--study

[–]RedFlagsAreGood 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

From what I can tell, the graph you mention is just for first messages. There are other graphs that appear to be for message replies and overall messages received which show a distribution closer to what you would expect.

So why does the graph you posted look so different? Attractive women who are getting attention from men they like don't send first messages because they don't need to. Those who aren't getting attention from men they like will find someone they think is in their league and send a message.

tl;dr: They're women from the lower half of the attractiveness curve taking what they can get.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's simple. Validation.

[–][deleted] 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]ilike2partyhowaboutu 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Online game is looking at the data and making use of it.

[–]TRP Vanguard: "Dark Triad Expert"IllimitableMan 11 points12 points13 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Fuck looks I can talk my way into pussy. Unlike women we're more than a bag of bones. HAH. Fuck what they say. Look at what they do. Girls will fuck anyone WHO DOESN'T GIVE A FUCK and tells them what the fuck is up. Real talk.

If you're a male 9 or 10 then don't even open your mouth, show a muscle and fuck her, different attraction switch.

[–]Beast66 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol ok bro.

[–]mrpoopistan 6 points7 points8 points 12 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

One thing I think needs noted here:

Online dating filters for people who are already fucking their dating lives up. These are the people who weren't doing well in real life and now they think there's a made-to-order system that will bring them the perfect mate.

Online dating is designed to fail and it does.

I don't think there's a ton of TRP wisdom to be gained from online dating simply because OLD is so fatally flawed that no real knowledge can arise from it.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Part of the problem is it's free. Match.com is much better.

[–]mrpoopistan 6 points7 points8 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I've heard this claim and I refuse to believe it. I struggle to see how winnowing a set of broken people down to the ones so desperate to pay could help.

[–][deleted] 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

less flakes? people are usually more likely to take it seriously if their paying

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This just shows female hypergamy in action, really. I would say it's less about feminism and more about unbridled hypergamy.

[–]afropuffs 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is just the high-ass expectations of women. When they steadily approach the wall, their standards get lower, and lower.

This youtube video talks briefly about this OKCupid finding (at the 5:00 mark for those who don't wish to watch the whole video). Thankfully, there are a (very) few women like this who call out women/feminists on their bullshit.

[–]10J18R1A 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Meh. Show me the income correlation. A woman will date a Hobbit with status.

[–]andreasvastolorde -3 points-2 points-1 points 12 years ago (26 children) | Copy Link

I'm an honest to god 8-9 and I've gotten no play on there. Fucking phenomenal.

[–]Ethan47 16 points17 points18 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Then your profile straight sucks bro. I'm in a shitty okc City. I receive 1-2 msgs a week from girls ranging from 5-7. 7 works for me, so that's like 1 a month.

Know how to game their algorithm - put your account on 'hold' then come back after a couple weeks, you will be the first profile appearing on girls' screens.

Likewise, delete and re-upload a pic. This counts as new content and again you will be the top profile.

[–]troll_bot_v1 3 points4 points5 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is gold. Commenting to save it.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's weird. I don't even get profile views unless I send out messages.

[–]trpill 8 points9 points10 points 12 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

Post pics then

You're seriously hamstring

Check this guys posting history, he is a "trans man" aka a woman in that wants a man's body

How can you be a 9 man if you're a woman?

[–]andreasvastolorde -2 points-1 points0 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I think every man knows that manhood isn't inherent, it's earned.

[–]trpill 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

it has has nothing to do with it.

you don't have a dick, the jaw structure, the brow structure, the brain structure

gender isn't a construction

i don't have any problems with trans people, just don't delude yourself and lie to us, saying you're a "9/10 man"

It's like an elephant claiming he's a very attractive peacock, and wondering why the peahens aren't into him.

[–][deleted] 12 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]andreasvastolorde 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

The difference between us is that you're white. Maybe your skin is an advantage.

[–]Ethan47 8 points9 points10 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

are you that tall? also a huge advantage.

[–]fuck_your_downvoting 3 points4 points5 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Women are racist man. So maybe to you, or someone of your race you're an 8 or 9. But to a white woman, they don't care if you're the Tom Cruise of ethnicities, you're sitting in the mediocre pool.

[–]andreasvastolorde -3 points-2 points-1 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

No, 'man'. White people are the virus of this earth and you're clearly one.

[–]fuck_your_downvoting 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

no? what do you mean?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago* (7 children) | Copy Link

Maybe it's the way you're taking the photo or the setting of the photo itself.

[–][deleted] 12 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]andreasvastolorde -1 points0 points1 point 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Definitely not.

[–]Psionx0 7 points8 points9 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Pics or it's not true.

[–]zorrotypeoutfit 5 points6 points7 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The narcissist doth protest too much, methinks.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I agree. Maybe you should stop cheesing so much on your pictures and give off the brooding mysterious vibe by being serious. Women are more attracted to pictures of the latter.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There is statistical evidence that supports this.

[–]andreasvastolorde 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Maybe. lol

[–]salami_inferno 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I doubt you're an actual 8-9 and fail to gain the attention of woman. You'd have to be a serious bitch to fuck up with those looks. I'm guessing you think you're far more attractive than you actually are, everybody does. Either you provide a photo or I'll assume you're closer to average.

[–]OKJaded -3 points-2 points-1 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm 5'9", have no game (it only seems to happen on accident), have been beta (alpha only on accident) and still had sex with a new woman almost every other night via OKC when I was trying. It just became kind of boring and wasn't fulfilling anymore.

[–]andreasvastolorde -3 points-2 points-1 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think people need to realize just how fucked up men's self image is. Yeah, women may be objects but what are guys? Told everything about us is gross. Wtf.

[–]alfabro91 -3 points-2 points-1 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Women are more attracted to personality/alpha provider traits than physical beauty so a random picture on a website doesn't do much for them. Men are almost purely attracted to physical beauty and are designed to want to fuck the majority of women to secure the future of our species.

Shocking news.

[–]SSTUPNC 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"alpha provider"

[+]iEatSnakes -30 points-29 points-28 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Of all the data points cited in the article you pick that one. Nice cherry picking, asshole.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter