What's more important, for a woman to have a low N count, or just that it be lower than yours?

TheGreasyPole · 2018-09-28T11:51:52+00:00

Frankly, I’m not sure you can separate the two concepts.

You may as well wrote the definition of “low n” as “a lower N than mine”.

This is why incels are so hung open on finding virgins, while more experienced men define low n as low single digits, and even more experienced men as mid single digits etc etc.

I don’t think you’ll be able to successfully disentangle “objectively low N” from “what I consider subjectively low N in reference to my personal N”.

Aaren_Augustine · 2018-09-28T06:24:15+00:00

Its like a business. It's not really about how many 'jobs' you've had. I'd be more interested in if you've ever cheated another business, how many times you got fired or rage quit. I'd want to know if you were fucking unpleasant to work with and if you were amenable or had a good work ethic.

abaxeron · 2018-09-28T07:30:19+00:00

Nothing. Carousel-hopping is a symptom. The disease is power imbalance.

Gravel_Roads · 2018-09-28T20:19:53+00:00

I think obsessing over N-counts is madness. My partner is allowed to have had a life before me.

Whodunnit88 · 2018-09-28T04:38:49+00:00

For me to be attracted to her and for her to be attracted to me. N count is irrelevant.

[deleted] · 2018-09-28T06:44:46+00:00

Low n.

PieceBringer · 2018-09-28T15:44:07+00:00

I could be married but if I found out my wife had a three some my attention would die immediatelly

Pope_Lucious · 2018-09-28T06:22:50+00:00

For her to be hot and not a bitch

wtknight · 2018-09-28T13:19:55+00:00

Mine is already low, so this question is fairly irrelevant for me. In my mind, it's just more important for it to be low because my views on N count have more to do with finding someone whose personality matches mine and who has a similar view of relationships and sex. I don't buy the whole argument that you can't trust any woman in a relationship who has a high N count, although there do seem to be some studies out there that state that there is a correlation for both women and men with high N counts.

Merger-Arbitrage · 2018-09-28T05:57:26+00:00

For what?

Casual sex = irrelevant.

LTRs = I'd say no more than slightly higher (by 1 or 2) than the median (this covers like 70% of women) for her age group (when considering 18-30 year olds).

I'm using the CDC definition of partners for hetero women: oral (given or received), vaginal (received) and anal (received).

AutoModerator · 2018-09-28T03:52:04+00:00

Attention!

You can post off topic/jokes/puns as a comment to this Automoderator message.
For "CMV" and "Question for X" Threads: Parent comments that aren't from the target group will be removed, along with their child replies.
If you want to agree with OP instead of challenging their view or if the question is not targeted at you, post it as an answer to this comment.
OP you can choose your own flair according to these guidelines., just press Flair under your post!

Thanks for your cooperation and enjoy the discussion!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

hammerhaunts · 2018-09-28T03:56:17+00:00

For me those are the same

[deleted] · 2018-09-28T10:26:49+00:00

What does N stand for anyway?

[deleted] · 2018-09-28T18:17:13+00:00

Depends on how much money she makes

TheBookOfSeil · 2018-09-28T20:52:22+00:00

I don’t think anyone can have lower than zero, so just a low n-count, please.

ConnorGracie · 2018-09-29T10:21:27+00:00

Low irrespective of mine.

Title	What's more important, for a woman to have a low N count, or just that it be lower than yours?
Author	Eartherry
Upvotes	5
Comments	55
Date	September 28, 2018 3:52 AM UTC (7 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/PurplePillDebate
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/9jjovn/whats_more_important_for_a_woman_to_have_a_low_n/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/PurplePillDebate/whats-more-important-for-a-woman-to-have-a-low-n.260671 https://theredarchive.com/post/260671

Comments