At the superficial level, we see feminism spreading exponentially and sporadically on a day to day basis. All different types of people: men, women, betas, chucks & cucks, have their own views and beliefs on what feminism is, how it affects them directly or indirectly. The trend found in the fundamentals of feminism ideology is that “women can too”! But then you stop and start to ask yourself, “what is it that defines a man and what is it that defines a woman?”. The most surface level and beginner level thinking is saying that “man have penis, women have pussy....man like pussy, women like penis”. If you’re anywhere at or above the level of autistic, you will note and understand these differences. Thinking a little bit more about it, and actually implementing your own level of intellect onto a given idea; most will note that “men are stronger physically than women..... men are more aggressive than women.... women are better babysitters than men.... women are better at caring for someone than men.... women are better film actors than men, etc”, it can be eventually concluded that women are good at some things while bad at others; and this same conclusion is complementarily applied to men.

Let’s add some biology. Superficial known facts: men have testosterone, women have estrogen (further thinking —>) men have more testosterone than women (—>) men have 70-80% more testosterone than women (—>) women have 5-10 times more estrogen than men (on average ) (—>) testosterone and estrogen induce different physiological and psychological traits (—>) more of one than the other will cause differences. This thought process can be extended as well as dissected a lot more in depth, but simple scientific statistics and superficial level thinking concludes that the human brain’s reaction to different substances produces distinctive differences.

Feminism’s imperatives is that either A) science is wrong (the more inadvertent and contentious approach) or B) science is right, but who cares (the more pretentious approach). The similarities in both imperatives is congruent to that of a rejection of biological nature. The more underlying issue and the reason for the existence of feminism to begin with is a reaction to a failed acknowledgment of the man and woman complement. In other words, a male that is 80% male (presents traits that are 80% of his accepted biology) will attract a female that has also done the same (80% accepted of her female biology). We look for those that are our opposites; those that complement our evident deficiencies. When men show women that they can be like them and vice versa, we are demonstrating a rejection of biological nature. The outcome of this demonstration is feminism for the women (“we can be like men too”) and beta, homosexual, MGTOW, purple pill, black pill, and all the rest of it for the men (“women make our rules!”).

Those who accept biological nature for what it is; in other words accept just the main difference on male and female hormonal levels will find that putting the key in the lock is a lot easier. The more masculine you are, the more feminine females you will attract. The more accepting you are of your biological nature; the better your life will be as you will capitalize on your predetermined biological code/ mission. Be understanding and advised of your strengths and weaknesses and capitalize on those coherently. Life will get a lot easier when you accept what you have already been given, and use those things to your advantage; not reject them and try to live your life antagonistically to your nature.