Casual sex ruins women's ability to have serious monogamous relationships

2020-10-17T17:05:43+00:00

Eh maybe it doesn't, but it definitely ruins my desire to have a serious relationship with her 🤷‍♂️

a14deadpool · 2020-10-17T17:36:11+00:00

Hahaha incels and nice guys trying to cope and hate promiscuity hahaha.

Mrs_Drgree · 2020-10-17T17:29:20+00:00

It's funny that's it's always men who say this.

12112019 · 2020-10-17T22:41:58+00:00

Look man this trad fantasy is over, this society is all about everyone for themselves, given that women are the way they are, and it not going to change, what are you planing to do about it?

tiposk · 2020-10-17T16:56:48+00:00

True that! Them bitches should get off that 10/10 cock and settle for yours while they pretend that nothing better than a 5/10 exists out there.

wtknight · 2020-10-17T17:19:19+00:00

Women are usually slutty during the times when there are no good relationship prospects for them. When there is one in their lives, then promiscuous women can be loyal. Men thinking that promiscuous women will always want to be promiscuous is male solipsism because promiscuity is built into men's DNA.

And yeah, women often branch swing, but even non-slutty women might do this. I don't think that it's correlated with sluttiness.

i_have_a_semicolon · 2020-10-17T16:51:50+00:00

0ne0s1x · 2020-10-18T04:07:03+00:00

I think there may be some truth to this, but it’s just as true for men

DangZagnut · 2020-10-17T16:59:17+00:00

So what? That’s something limp wristed men want because of mommy issues.

Get over mommy issues and stop trying to insert other women into mommy mode.

Sex is fun. Stop ruining sex and fu. with pseudo-religious or mommy abandonment issues.

2020-10-17T17:14:39+00:00

Nope that is not a fact but an opinion. Being able to have casual sex or decide to have a long term relationship is completely up to the individual.

You can go and have a serious relationship and then when it ends just have a wild bit of pleasure seeking and be perfectly fine or just enjoy casual s3x while you are looking for the one.

If a person can build a good friendship then I'm sure they can build a good relationship with someone in the future.

sinfulthep · 2020-10-17T17:04:58+00:00

Nah.

I've always been very slutty when single, but very monogamous in relationships. It's really not that difficult.

withrowsprings · 2020-10-17T17:44:45+00:00

Monogamous relationships are actually ruining all the casual sex opportunities.

Marriage ruined women so far. Not anymore.

medlabunicorn · 2020-10-17T21:52:31+00:00

This confuses correlation with causation. People who bond easily and firmly aren’t going out having lots of casual sex with many different people, they’re either with their ‘one’ or they’re crying because they’re not with their one.

People who don’t bond easily like sex for the physical aspect alone.

This goes for both sexes. High-n men should marry high-n women and have open marriages, and low-n men and women should marry each other.

PickUpScientist · 2020-10-17T22:52:39+00:00

that isn't how drug addiction works luckily. after a year or so your brain will have recovered (or at least its ability to enjoy simple things).

thelajestic · 2020-10-17T16:55:04+00:00

😅 aw you just keep believing that.

AutoModerator · 2020-10-17T16:46:01+00:00

PURGE WEEK Auto-mod comment. Attention!

IT'S PUUUUUUURGE WEEEEEEEEEK

Booyah.

Once a year there are no rules.

(Well, there are still reddit wide rules. No Breaking THEM or the admins will fuck us up.)

Otherwise go nuts.

For a limited time THERE ARE NO RULES HERE

Explanation of Purge Week

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

John_Oakman · 2020-10-17T17:09:56+00:00

And stagnate wages ruined males because now they can't afford to pay for their a single mother's retirement fund, properly compensate her for raising her children, and pay for the cost of raising her children.

SaBahRub · 2020-10-17T17:49:39+00:00

You got it backwards

Grand_Duty · 2020-10-17T18:21:40+00:00

The highest five-year divorce rates of all are associated with marrying in the 2000s and having ten or more premarital sex partners: 33 percent.

.

2000s: Results are hazard ratios indicating increased odds of divorce compared to reference category of 0 partners (total abstinence before marriage).

0: --
1: 2.54
2: 4.05
3: 3.5
4-5: 3.18
6-9: 3.22
10+: 4.25

From <https://ifstudies.org/blog/counterintuitive-trends-in-the-link-between-premarital-sex-and- marital-stability>

X

<30% of marriages stable for women with 5+ non-marital sexual partners
Women were defined as having a stable marriage if they were currently married and had been in that same marriage for at least five years. Women who had more non-marital sex partners were less likely to have stable marriages.

Rector, R. E., Johnson, K. A., Noyes, L. R., & Martin, S. (2003). The harmful effects of early sexual activity and multiple sexual partners among women: A book of charts. Washington: The Heritage Foundation.

X

One twin study looking at a number of scaled sociosexual behaviors found a similar heritability for number of sexual partners in male and female twins (Bailey et al., 2000); another study showed divorce to be approximately 50% heritable among women (Jockin et al., 1996).

Genetic influences on female infidelity and number of sexual partners in humans: a linkage and association study of the role of the vasopressin receptor gene (AVPR1A). Lynn F. Cherkas, Elizabeth C. Oelsner, Y. T. Mak, Anna Valdes, Tim D. Spector Twin Res. 2004 Dec; 7(6): 649–658. doi: 10.1375/1369052042663922 From https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/15607016/citedby/?tool=pubmed

X

premarital relationships with other men are associated with a substantial increase in the likelihood of divorce.

.

an intimate premarital relationship with someone other than one’s marital partner may indicate increased risk to subsequent marital disruption. Multiple premarital sexual partners may indicate less commitment to the idea of a permanent relationship with one individual. Multiple sexual partners may also weaken the marital bond by heightening awareness of alternatives to one’s marital partner as sources of sexual intimacy and fulfillment. Similar to the case for premarital sex, multiple coresidential unions prior to marriage may indicate a range of personal attitudes and beliefs that might undermine the stability of unions

.

However, either premarital cohabitation or sex that occurs with someone other than one’s spouse is expected to be related to an increased risk of marital dissolution. These individuals are either selected on characteristics that increase the risk of divorce or their experiences with disrupted unions lead to destabilizing influences on marriage.

.

The effects for premarital sex in Model 2 indicate that it is only women whose first sex was with someone other than her husband who experience an increased risk of marital disruption (114%). The results in Model 3, which includes the effects of both premarital cohabitation and premarital sex (compared with women who did not cohabit before marriage and did not engage in premarital sex), show that the risk of marital dissolution is higher when the woman cohabited twice (by about 28%) and when her first sex was with someone other than her husband (by about 109%). Combining premarital cohabitation and premarital sex in the same model reduces the effect of having cohabited solely with one’s husband to nonsignificance. This pattern results because women who cohabited with their husband only are more likely than women who did not cohabit before marriage to have had first sex with someone other than their husband (73% vs. 41%; data not shown). That is, for these women, it is not the fact that they cohabited before marriage that is important for marital dissolution; it is the fact that they had at least one other sexually intimate relationship prior to marrying.

.

having at least one other intimate relationship prior to marriage is linked to an increased risk of divorce (from 53% to 166%). There is a substantially higher risk of marital dissolution if the woman both had sex with another man and cohabited with him (166% vs. 53%– 119% for other patterns of premarital relationships involving someone other than one’s husband, a difference that is statistically significant). That is, there is an interaction between having multiple premarital sexual partners and cohabiting multiple times.

.

women who have more than one intimate premarital relationship who have an elevated risk of marital disruption. This effect is strongest for women who have multiple premarital coresidental unions

.

women with more than one intimate relationship prior to marriage have an elevated risk of marital disruption.

Teachman, J. (2003). Premarital Sex, Premarital Cohabitation, and the Risk of Subsequent Marital Dissolution among Women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(2), 444-455. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3600089 From https://www.jstor.org/stable/3600089?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Past behavior is the best indicator for future behavior. We know it. They know it. They know we know it. Nevertheless they are trying to shame people for pointing out red flags.

Title	Casual sex ruins women's ability to have serious monogamous relationships
Author	PickleLine
Upvotes	14
Comments	44
Date	October 17, 2020 4:46 PM UTC (5 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/PurplePillDebate
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/jcyjef/casual_sex_ruins_womens_ability_to_have_serious/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/PurplePillDebate/casual-sex-ruins-womens-ability-to-have-serious.319311 https://theredarchive.com/post/319311

Comments