http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/trump-rejects-categorically-false-charges-raping-teen-girl-article-1.2618137

Related link above

I’m not going to debate whether Hillary is better suited for POTUS than Trump is or vice versa, but how typical is this? Man runs against woman for POTUS and less than a year before the election the man is charged with rape, of a 13-year-old girl no less. What’s so insidious about the charge is that the supposed rape occurred 22 years ago, and what that says about the supposed victim, Katie Johnson. If she was truly raped a reasonable person should expect she’d have come forward within eight years – enough time for her to learn what rape is, figure out that she was a victim of one, and come forward – but she didn’t. If she wasn’t raped but was only interested in Trump’s money, which he estimates is 10 billion, a reasonable person should assume she’d have come forward within 20 years, disgusting and soulless as this would've been. But after 22 years? So close to the general election? Not even the naivest white night or blue pill shlubb could believe she is doing anything else but attempting to discredit Trump as a nominee. I wish I could say that in the process she’s putting her self-respect on the line to do so, but making false rape allegations seems to be a feminine rite of passage nowadays. I’ve met numerous women who’ve confessed to me that they’ve been raped, disingenuously and nervously, as if it was a sign of their attempting to demonstrate higher value, or of them trying to pass a strange shit test. I literally met a girl last year who told me – after the second time we met – that she was raped by her father, AND HAD THE CHILD, and I don’t live on some backwards farm.