TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Desperate feminists now attempting to gaslight men about sex robots, claiming that it will make men, not women, obsolete.

commiesbtf

January 5, 2018
167 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-01-04/maybe-sex-robots-will-make-men-not-women-obsolete
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Desperate feminists now attempting to gaslight men about sex robots, claiming that it will make men, not women, obsolete.
Author

commiesbtf

Upvotes 167
Comments 94
Date January 5, 2018 5:14 PM UTC
(8 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/7ocmfb/desperate_feminists_now_attempting_to_gaslight/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/desperate-feminists-now-attempting-to-gaslight-men.908306
https://theredarchive.com/post/908306
Red Pill terms in post
feministgaslighting

Comments

[–]pazz 56 points57 points58 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Didn't vibrators and invitro-fertilizing already make men obsolete? Sex robots are like 99% about replacing women. How can they argue the other side?

[–]Wisemanner 26 points27 points28 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"How can they argue the other side?"

Feminist logic:@'$%£"&*!

[–]the_unseen_one 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Well they still need men to pay taxes to the government so women can get a payday from the government, so not yet. They've made us obsolete for everything but our labor, and through that our resources. The funny thing is, they can't have this bot buy them stuff or divorce rape it, so where's the appeal for the ladies? She actually had to use her own money to obtain this android, rather than gain money from it. That's the antithesis of the current male-female relationship.

[–]988908098908090 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The funny thing is, they can't have this bot buy them stuff or divorce rape it, so where's the appeal for the ladies? She actually had to use her own money to obtain this android, rather than gain money from it. That's the antithesis of the current male-female relationship.

Not only that, but the "bot" won't ask them out, initiate, escalate, and take all the blame. With these "bots" women will be in control and responsible, and even the most ardent rosietheriviter feminists still want men to do all of that for them unless they feel like giving a blowjob in the girls bathroom on the sly (but not for hunny, that's for random guy she was aroused by and had to gargle the semen of).

[–]-redditardation- 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Seems like men are still in the running the same way women will still be in the running even after sex robot ownership is 'common place'.

It probably will be somewhat similar to vibrators and women. Most men will probably try one at some point, some will always have one around but most will manage just fine without one.

[–]KingRobotPrince 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They recognise a threat when they see one.

[–][deleted] 83 points84 points85 points 8 years ago* (55 children) | Copy Link

Would that be such a bad thing? In the #MeToo age, I feel like raising standards is quite reasonable. It’s called for, in fact. Make the men compete. It’s the dating equivalent of having free state colleges lower tuition rates everywhere.

We've already been doing that, and frankly we're burned out. Female expectations in a mate have already risen to unreasonable levels, which is only compounded by the fact that Feminism has done a tremendous job confusing women as to what they actually want.

So thanks, but no thanks. If the idea is to increase competition even further, I think what you'll find is more and more men opting out of the game ( note; this is already happening ).

[–]Demolition_Menz 43 points44 points45 points 8 years ago (52 children) | Copy Link

Make the men compete

Disgusting. Just fucking disgusting.

Imagine a man saying such a thing about women. He would be absolutely pilloried.

The kicker? As profoundly immoral as this bitch is, she may be expressing a biological instinct.

Female Mate Choice is Influenced by Male Sport Participation

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (31 children) | Copy Link

Disgusting. Just fucking disgusting.

I guess I'm neutral to this now; that's just mammalian nature. In most species, males compete for mating rights. It just is.

Mind you, I refuse to participate in that nonsense...but then I do have a child already, so I may be a bit of a hypocrite here.

[–]Demolition_Menz 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (27 children) | Copy Link

that's just mammalian nature.

True. It's still disgusting. Like when a Komodo Dragon gradually eats another animal while it's still alive. I remember a story about a wildlife photographer: he quit after watching a pack of hyenas gradually eat a baby elephant to death (sorry to ruin your day). The dogs started with the trunk. This is one of the images that trans-humanists use to justify the idea of eliminating predation in nature.

The world is truly awful. But wonderful. Hopefully we can improve it :)

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Same deal: I learned to accept the world as it is a long time ago, and save my energy for what I can change.

Changing human sexuality? Good luck, and unless you're willing to advocate that men begin pursuing traditionally unattractive women en mass, wanting to change this aspect is a bit hypocritical...although the feminists who've been crying about "fat is beautiful" might appreciate your efforts. :D

[–]Demolition_Menz 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Changing human sexuality? Good luck

Well that's a can of worms. Have you looked at bonobos? There is a funny quote by a zoologist that I'm going to butcher: chimps solve problems with violence, bonobos solve problems with sex.

And yeah, I'd be willing to have sex with a few fat chicks if it meant world peace ;)

Don't get me wrong, I'm not pretending that women will ever do the same, nor should they be expected to. When Maslow created his "hierarchy of needs", he mentioned that women seldom reach the top level: justice. That's something that has been removed from most books on psychology ;)

[–]Eryemil 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's easier to change biology than it is to change society---or at least it will be within my lifetime. All we have to do to completely take away women's social power over men is to discover a means to allow men the choice to become bisexual. At the moment women couldn't hope to compete with men in terms of sexual desire and common interests; the only thing that gives them so much power is that straight men have no other choice. The most beautiful thing about this is that I don't think this would work in reverse (making women bisexual, if they aren't already) because of women's evolutionary derived meta values i.e. hypergamy.

Even if only a minority decides to go through with it, it will leave heterosexual males with an elevated sexual market value by virtue of their relative scarcity. You'd have a society of hetero men with harems of women eager to please him (and probably making all the babies) and a bunch of bros hanging out with their buddies playing video games and sucking each other off.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's the other thing people are probably burned out on.

Disgusting. Just fucking disgusting.

True. It's still disgusting.

[–]Eryemil 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link

This is one of the images that trans-humanists use to justify the idea of eliminating predation in nature.

As a transhumanist, I'm giddy to see someone mention abolitionism in a r/MensRights thread of all places.

[–]Demolition_Menz 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link

lol!

I totally support your ideals, but come on, haven't you seen a single sci-fi horror film? Something will go wrong.

[–]Eryemil 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link

Oh, the chances of something going wrong are much, much higher than the chances of everything working out.

It's still the only viable path. As I was just telling someone else: 99.99% of all species that have exer existed are extinct. Without continuous technological advancement that's us. We're due to some kind of cataclysm; whether it be a GRB, meteor impact or supervolcano. Our only hope, and the only hope of the entire genetic legacy of our planet, is to spread out through the galaxy.

Without technology, we're certainly dead. With it, we have a small chance.

[–]Demolition_Menz 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link

In keeping with the theme of this sub, one theory is that females will simply not allow trans-humanism.

This idea seems completely absurd at first, but the Oxford anthropologist JD Unwin charted thousands of human cultures and he came to one conclusion: feminism = societal decline, rapidly. Then some "patriarchy" conquers the defunct society.

Don't blame me. I'm just quoting him. But it's sort of an interesting addition to the "humans will never evolve because they'll all be dead" theory.

At the end of the day, I think women will come through, and allow us to pursue real equality. Just kidding. We're all gonna DIE.

[–]Eryemil 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

Western society is not about to collapse any time soon. By the end of the century all social and biological factors affecting us now will be irrelevant---replaced by a while other set of issues.

I don't necessarily disagree that given enough time we'd be outcompeted (though technologically superior minorities have subjugated huge majorities throughout human history) but our technology is advancing too fast for any of that to matter.

[–]Demolition_Menz 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

There's also the possibility that the degraded working class -- and here I'm talking about poor white men in particular, since they are endlessly maligned -- will seize the means of production.

I don't consider that probable, but it's a real possibility.

As for endless technological advancement -- well that also requires...men. And if men decide to chill rather than advance, that's a real problem; Unwin noted that every single society that embraced feminism underwent a sharp decline in productivity.

I think the moronic assumption is that men will go on doing what they do. But when men have only a stick and no carrot, they may decide to impede your utopian dreams. They may even decide to overthrow the whole social order.

[–]6465565646564 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

I guess I'm neutral to this now; that's just mammalian nature. In most species, males compete for mating rights. It just is.

OK. So animals do that. HUMAN BEINGS didn't do that for thousands of years but you all think history was always like this, or was this with skyscrapers and computers but right before that it was orgy warlords...that seems to be the continuity you all view humanity through..

...because for MOST of human history we didn't allow human behavior to be animalistic. For MOST of human history we had a civil society with marriages. That's HOW we got here. Why is there is revisionist 1984-esque "it's always been that way, we have always been at war with eastasia?" Oh, that's right, because it's idiots on the internet.

This fatalistic "monkeys do it" is such bullshit defeatism and is THE EXACT OPPOSITE OF THE ATTITUDE THAT GOT US TO THE MOON.

Also, to the other dude...bonobo females eat the fingers and toes of low status bonobo males. That's what feminists do to you all and you take it and go "well, monkeys do it, can't be fixed."

--edit--in response to posters follow-up:

It's easy to forget how simple most of you are.

You should stop talking. You're too stupid to know how stupid you are, so you think you're clever.

Clever people don't blindly defend the status quo as impossible to break. That's what slaves and simpleton followers do.

Be more honest with yourself. You're not ingenuine or intelligent, you're simple and you lack the foresight to create. Be more honest with everyone, you're the patsy, you're the one we play. You're too stupid to understand changing states, so you throw up your hands and try to get others to do the same because unconsciously, you know you're wrong. That's why you talk about horoscopes. Because you know you're wrong and you need to deflect.

Don't you have burgers to flip while you talk about roleplaying?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hey, I'm Aries, what's my horoscope? I mean, you are obviously some kind of seer to be able pull all that out of what I said. Go on then.

Seriously dude, put down the crackpipe and go outside. I don't know where you incorporated engineering and science with human sexuality, but I'd say your rant is more illustrative of your own internal psyche than anything I said.

Would you like to know what you're actually saying?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wow, all that raw intelligence, and the 'reply' button is still beyond you.

We've got a regular beautiful mind up in here.

[–]BernieSandersgirl101 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

Amen! I’m a woman who dreams of well, asking somebody out! Be upfront and reap the awards!

[–]Demolition_Menz 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

I've seen you a few times on this sub and you're terrific :)

Men deserve the rights and privileges that women have. I don't even know why that's controversial -- actually, I do. Men are supposed to "protect" women not vice versa. But kick ass women like yourself understand that supporting men also means supporting women. And besides, supporting men and boys is a noble goal in and of itself.

[–]BernieSandersgirl101 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

Thank you so much! Even if supporting men wasn’t supporting women, it’s still what we should do! Everyone should be equal! As a leftie, that’s how I feel!

[–]Demolition_Menz 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

I'm also a leftist on a great many issues. It sucks that politics are so polarized. Like, I support the right of people to own guns, but I also support a social safety net. I think I'm like most people: we don't fit neatly into "left" and "right". Anyway, keep up the good work; I think women need to solve the gender war; men are sorta hamstrung.

[–]BernieSandersgirl101 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I’m leftist on everything except four things things! Guns, Israel (HUGE Israel supporter), Jonathan Pollard (I don’t get how liberals don’t support him! I mean, broken plea bargains, torture, and lots of unfairness), and Feminism!

[–]Zyklon_Bae 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

WYMYNZ invented the gender war! Feminism is not about equality; it's about special treatment of vagina owners, to the detriment of penis-holders.

[–]Demolition_Menz 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

The great secret is that both vagina holders and penis holders benefit from support of same. When women benefit men also benefit, and when men benefit women also benefit.

[–]Zyklon_Bae 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

When men benefit, women suddenly find them interesting.

[–]Demolition_Menz -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Well there's a saying that men try to achieve power to have sex, and women have sex in order to achieve power. This is true. But we could also embrace egalitarianism. That is after all how we lived for 99 percent of our history....

[–]Zyklon_Bae -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

You swoon for a guy that got pushed off-stage by two screeching college chicks..that is hilarious! https://i.ytimg.com/vi/mLji9PiBcGA/maxresdefault.jpg

THAT CUCK is who you think should be in charge of the world's strongest military? HEE-HAW!!

[–]BernieSandersgirl101 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

At least I'm not voting for a known liar.

[–]Demolition_Menz 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Bernie's fine. He's a politician, which means he's imperfect by definition. But from my vantage point he's better than the nutcase psychopaths Hillary and Trump.

[–]BernieSandersgirl101 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thanks. I always liked him.

[–]Zyklon_Bae -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

They ALL lie, honey. All politicians are psychopaths. Lib, conservative, in between...they are all power-mad robots. You DO know he and his wife are under FBI investigation, right? https://www.cbsnews.com/news/bernie-and-jane-sanders-under-fbi-investigation-for-bank-fraud-hire-lawyers/

[–]BernieSandersgirl101 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Kay! And are you from the Alt Right?!

[–]Zyklon_Bae -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That is a meaningless term that basically means 'not a crazy liberal', so...maybe.

[–]the_unseen_one 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well we're already competing. Even back before feminism we had to compete. Even in societies with arranged marriages, men are chosen based off of social standing and wealth to ensure the most profitable match. I don't think competition itself is disgusting, what I find disgusting is her being so self centered and unempathetic that she can't see that men already compete massively just for a slim chance. Or at least the majority do.

[–]the_unseen_one 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What's funny in a mind boggling way is that she seems under the delusion that men aren't so ready competing. That the barrier for four fifths of guys to get with women isn't so high as to not be worth the effort. You have to be: fitter, taller, more handsome, make more, have fancier stuff, funnier, smarter, more interesting, more available, and more masculine than the other 200+ dudes she's got hitting her up on social media and tinder. Our competition has reached fever pitch, while all she has to do is sit back and say no to the vast majority of suitors.

And that even if you get lucky and nab a good woman, you have no protections from her getting bored, going for other men, and taking everything you have for the privilege. Because when she has such an abundance of choice, you're never going to be able to remain the most appealing. Something different will always come along and make all that effort pointless no matter what you do, because the competition is endless. When even A list international celebrities can't keep a woman, what hope do normal guys have?

So yeah, if they want their androids then that's fine. If they want more competition to wear men out even more trying to keep up with ever rising standards, that's cool too. I'll opt out, make myself happy, take it easy, and take my near future gynoid when availablr. Shit isn't worth it anymore.

[–]KingRobotPrince 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The whole thing you've quoted is just gobbledygook.

In the meetoo age? I've never sexually harassed or assaulted a woman, what the fuck do I have to compete with in that regard?

There's no logic to it.

And dating is already completely free market and the women have the advantage up until 30+, not the men.

[–]Wisemanner 33 points34 points35 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Robots will not pay alimony and make up the sixty per cent more than they earn expenditure of women.

[–]Mr_MRAnarchist 29 points30 points31 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

So much projection here. It's scary how much this women doesn't even understand her own mind.

[–]putamanoutofaplane 13 points14 points15 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

What seems to be common to most Feminists is that they don't understand men and relationships but, in particular, they don't understand women.

[–]KingRobotPrince 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They don't understand anything. All they see us what they want, and they believe that if they campaign for it enough they can completely change biological and sociological functions.

The early success that feminism had with things that were actually sexist, has made them think that they can drive through and get complete equality of outcome regardless of inherent qualities or natural differences.

I honestly wouldn't be surprised if they wanted to administer hormones to make men less competitive and hardworking to try and address the "wage gap".

[–]the_unseen_one 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm seeing that a lot of feminist nuttery is projection as I learn more and more. But you're right, the lack of self awareness and introspection demonstrated here is truly impressive.

[–][deleted] 19 points20 points21 points 8 years ago* (12 children) | Copy Link

Crap article

Edit. Until the robots come with a wallet.....

[–]Fortspucking 13 points14 points15 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

And the ability to listen endlessly about how they need to change...

[–]KingRobotPrince 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Haha. Yeah. They'd be in the shop every weekend telling the tech guy that this and that needs work.

It would actually be quite a successful feature, if it allowed women to blame the robot for all their problems and it just said "you're totally right dear". Then every weekend "I got annoyed with him on Wednesday and I know it couldn't have been my fault so there must be something that needs tweeking. Adjust his agreeableness by 13%."

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I’m wondering if women will choose to employ their robot. Get it a construction job and send it out to work every morning. Checks arrive in the mail made out to her. They’d love it!

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

That level of robot is 30 years away.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

That’s not a long time.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'll be dead by then.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That sucks, 2050 sex robots are gonna be awesome!

[–]the_unseen_one 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

If we get androids that can make more money than they cost, we're going to see a massive upheaval in our economic, social, and political systems.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

We had them in the 80s. Look what happen to auto industry.

[–]the_unseen_one 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I meant in all facets of life. If you've got a humanoid robot that can cook, clean, and generally manage human things on its own, that's going to make virtually everything humans do aside from science and engineering obsolete. I work in a steel fabrication plant, and if you had these robots, they could use a grinder, weld, blowtorch, and operate a crane without issue. Plus no muss, no fuss if one of then gets maimed or destroyed since they're robots. It'd make factory line automation look minor in comparison. No service jobs, no desk work, no labor jobs, nothing but engineering and sciences left.

[–]KingRobotPrince 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Universal basic income and the dawning of Idiocracy.

[–]the_unseen_one 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

UBI will be a necessity despite the possible consequences. There won't be work to be had even if people are ready and willing.

[–]Lethn 14 points15 points16 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

It's trash talking guys, this is something I've noticed from articles like this, it's trash talking designed to wind men up. I guess you could call it their equivalent of 'trolling' but the problem is they actually believe the bullshit they're spewing.

We've seen what happens in reality when feminists try to enact out the lives they want, they are the most desperate and clingy women out there and these articles are just them trying to put down men in an effort to make it look like they're the ones in control.

This viewpoint of theirs couldn't be further from the truth, I think as more of their movement falls apart, expect much nastier articles to come out and more men bashing to increase. They're going to get pretty vicious especially as people leave their groups and they slowly start to realise that they're not going to get away with demonising men anymore and that all their greatest fears are a load of bullshit.

[–]putamanoutofaplane 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

The way metoo, heforshe, mansplaining etc spread overt the western world seems to indicate that feminism is gaining speed not slowing down.

[–]Lethn 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

No, this is them lashing out, I guarantee it, they're making a lot of noise but they're not getting a single thing accomplished. I mean, they're like that generally, but if you know what I mean they're not as able to target people as they were before.

[–]putamanoutofaplane 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

These "hashtags" have been discussed in the UN, dozens of parliaments, mainstream media, thousands of workplaces and so on. It's enormous, no other group, movement, ideology can boast that they could achieve the so much even if they put a lot more resources to it.

It's frightening.

[–]andejoh 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Did the UN do that because they're feminists or chivalrous though?

[–]KingRobotPrince 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The Japanese didn't start the kamazee missions until close to the end of the war.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Articles like these are horrendously sexist to men and yet if we take them seriously we're told to lighten up. But at the same time we're told we're supposed to punch any man in the face who makes a rape joke or we're one of the bad guys.

[–]Lethn 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Don't forget we have to punch anybody who they decide is a Nazi as well :P

[–]LateralThinker13 10 points11 points12 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, no. Robots can't generate an income for you ladies, and they don't give you the leadership that you crave.

[–]KingRobotPrince 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

"I want to be able to criticise everything you do and complain constantly, but I do also need you to lead my family in almost every way."

[–]LateralThinker13 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I do also need you to lead my family in almost every way.

They don't usually know this or admit it consciously, however. They can't. They're Strong, Independent Women, remember?

[–]boringcarpets 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It's funny you know, they "reduced" men to a phallic object and bought them in the millions and yet we aren't obsolete, someone creates sex robots and they're tugging their collars because they can't compete. As always feminists are projecting

[–]the_unseen_one 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The fact that most women can be replaced with a hunk of silicon whose sole purpose is to be fucked is pretty telling about how much the modern woman has to offer a man. Which explains the visceral terror you feel in anti sex doll and sex bot articles.

[–]sonofsuperman1983 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I want a sex robot. When I get the money I am getting myself a really good one like plug into the main kinda technology. I’ll save a fortune dates and I can save all my social skills to use on friends.

[–]lolnottelling 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I can appreciate that but I think there’ll always be a market for hookers. Sex bots will hopefully lower market rates.

[–]sonofsuperman1983 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sex robot will hopefully be a lot less risky with no meth mouth.

[–]rodvanmechelen 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Women already have sex robots. They're called vibrators. Are men obsolete, yet? Virtual slaves, maybe, but obsolete? Not!

[–]JestyerAverageJoe 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The idea of most women working all their lives to support a robot that stays at home and waits for them to want to have sex is hilarious. I'm perfectly fine with the man-hating women that believe a robot will provide the emotional and financial stability that most women want choosing to exclude themselves from the gene pool. Let Darwin do his work.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Wow, does she know what is happening in Japan? Its the guys who are withdrawing, not females. The guys are playing video games and hanging out, staying away from the gals.

[–]Arby01 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Truth is irrelevant. It's all in how you spin it.

[–]Elfere 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Tools are neither good or evil. Its all in how we use them.

[–]ScarpaDiem 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I would take a Westworld style sex robot over the struggle to find a not high maintenance girlfriend any day.

[–]andejoh 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I've seen something similar when someone created a men's only event in response to the women's only Wonder Woman screening with the exception of the guys did it the legal way. Some women complained and said I don't care let the guys have their own event. It being pretty obvious that the only reason they brought it up (and trashed it) was that they were upset that there was an event that excluded them (whether they wanted to go or not).

The main difference I see here is that there are no men who are afraid that they'll be replaced by robots. There are no men seeking to deny women their menbots. What's that saying about today's gender dynamic?

[–]-redditardation- 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sex robots will not make men obsolete. Seriously how many women do you know that just need a nut... that's right, barely any.

Women and men of course both want much more from a relationship than sex but on average men desire sex more than companionship and the other emotional benefits whereas for women this is inverse. Making a relationship robot is much harder than a sex robot.

I honestly think all this 'women will be obsolete because we have a glorified fleshlight' nonsense is also hysteria. Some men will choose to forgo relationships because of sex robots but the average man will still want a human companion. It really speaks to how little feminists think of women if they think the only thing keeping men in relationships with women is a slippery hole to stick your dick in. If any man insinuated such a thing about women the feminists would be outraged.

[–]lol_lauren 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

I think the whole concept that sex toys or robots are replacing either gender is wrong to at least some degree. While doing research for a college paper I found a that study that concluded that people who work to satisfy their partners rather than themselves when having sex are overall happier with their sex lives. Making sacrifices for your partner to make them feel good is what makes most people feel good. This self serving stuff may in fact be making all of you less satisfied.

I'm not sure if I can link the paper because it's accessed through my school's database. It's called "Applying theories if communal motivation to sexuality"

[–]Eryemil 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I think the whole concept that sex toys or robots are replacing either gender is wrong to at least some degree. While doing research for a college paper I found a that study that concluded that people who work to satisfy their partners rather than themselves when having sex are overall happier with their sex lives. Making sacrifices for your partner to make them feel good is what makes most people feel good. This self serving stuff may in fact be making all of you less satisfied.

What was the distribution of these results between men and women?

[–]lol_lauren 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It was similar for both genders surprisingly.

[–]Zyklon_Bae 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Honest, I just want one that's glad to see me when I get home, and rubs my feet and cooks dinner.

[–]gdank 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

We are all equally obsolete!

[–]KingRobotPrince 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Another unsubtle man-hater.

What if female robots become so realistic — and so adept at sex — that they render men incapable of engaging in real human relationships?

Actually, I think it’s the men who should be worried. It’s entirely possible that robots can outperform them.

Men with sex robots = men become incapable of having a relationship. Women with sex robots = robots become better than men.

Notice how in both gender's use of sex robots the man is rendered useless by the sex robot? No acknowledgement of men's right to choose. Pure sexist misandrist bile.

[–]Arby01 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's also interesting in that women often complain about 'objectification' but this writer's only concern or belief of the point of the relationship with a man is the man's 'performance'. Projection perhaps? I am slowly beginning to believe that the gender that does most of the 'objectification' is women.

[–]andejoh 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The thing that's more interesting is that I don't think the men will compete in that they won't try. They'd get a sexbot. If we had sexbots tomorrow and all women rejected all men the day after, all men would have sexbots the day after that. No guy would be crying in his beer over it. It's not like men have never had to deal with rejection before.

[–]Rethgil 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Just remind them how the upcoming artificial womb will make women surplus to society....

On that day feminism will die. Women will have no value in the workplace since they can't compete physically with men. Generally speaking of course. There'll be no reason for the marketplace to pander to them anymore. Especially when men can use sex robots themselves.

[–]Me_ADC_Me_SMASH 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I for one cant wait for a viable product to empty my balls without the added stress of having to manage another person

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter