TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

"Will misconduct scandals make men wary of women at work?" Why yes, AP. I think that's the idea.

WarOfNoise

December 11, 2017
144 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://apnews.com/d2f8656d20fc4dfda89831fa77f6dd84
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title "Will misconduct scandals make men wary of women at work?" Why yes, AP. I think that's the idea.
Author

WarOfNoise

Upvotes 144
Comments 49
Date December 11, 2017 8:19 PM UTC
(8 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/7j4ya7/will_misconduct_scandals_make_men_wary_of_women/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/will-misconduct-scandals-make-men-wary-of-women-at.909531
https://theredarchive.com/post/909531
Top posts by WarOfNoise

Pamela Anderson wants to advocate for men who are falsely accused of rape

2928 upvotes
October 19, 2018
/r/MensRights

as per that peice of trash on Twitter calling Jordan Peterson "a weak man".... here are the replies

2465 upvotes
October 24, 2019
/r/MensRights

France's actress Catherine Deneuve and 99 other French women denounce the #Metoo campaign for 'puritanism' and saying it is fueled by a "hatred of men"

2417 upvotes
January 10, 2018
/r/MensRights

men have body issues too

2394 upvotes
November 27, 2019
/r/MensRights

"Agony of being 50/50 mother" response article

2272 upvotes
September 29, 2018
/r/MensRights

Hopefully just a glitch - all 1,500+ reviews on "The Red Pill" documentary by Cassie Jaye are all gone on Amazon

1741 upvotes
May 25, 2018
/r/MensRights

Teen Girl Sent Teen Boy 5 Inappropriate Pictures. He Faced Lifetime Registry as a 'Violent Sex Offender' or 350 Years in Jail.

1144 upvotes
February 16, 2020
/r/MensRights

I advise we do NOT report r/femaledatingstrategy to the Reddit admins. Let it run, and watch.

372 upvotes
October 28, 2019
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]BlockNotDo 32 points33 points34 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I really wish we had context in these situations.

I have done and said things with female work colleagues that they were 100% on board with and were fully participating. Sometimes they were jokes; other times they were legitimate flirting. In the moment, no one in their right mind would have called any of it sexual harassment or sexual assault.

But if one of those women decides 20 years from now that they want to tell their #MeToo story, they could certainly make those stories sound pretty bad. And I couldn't denying them without lying. My only truthful defense would be "yeah, that happened, but in context, everyone was on board". But that is going to get an eyeroll and skepticism from a whole bunch of women who wouldn't understand that other women could willingly participate in sexual workplace jokes.

[–][deleted] 24 points25 points26 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Absolutely. I've had at least a half dozen women that I've flirted with, mutually, in my various work situations, mostly in my youth. All of them were 100% consensual and generally a lot of fun, but some of those women were stepping out on boyfriends they were bored of, doing it less because they liked me and more because they liked the attention, etc. At any point, those could be retroactively 'reimagined' to turn me into a so-called predator.

With that kind of possibility, where there's no such thing as the benefit of the doubt, no ability to defend yourself from the court of public opinion, and real job loss at the end, the only real solution is to back away.

Women may not like the colder world they are building, but that's exactly what they are building, and make no mistake about it. If there's no difference between innocent flirtation and 'sexual misconduct' because it can be retconned to either one, who is going to risk it?

Only the dumb ones.

[–]WarOfNoise[S] 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

and the ones who do would probably dare not admit it for fear of backlash from their peers

[–]EricAllonde 21 points22 points23 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Ana Quincoces, a Miami-based attorney and entrepreneur who owns her own food line, says her business and its success involves working mostly with men, and sales and other activities are often concluded over lunch or drinks. Those opportunities, she says, are dwindling, because many of the men she knows through her business “are terrified.”

The sad thing is that, while it's professional-victim feminists driving the witch hitch, the consequences of it harm non-feminist women too.

Like this entrepreneur: she's the sort of women that feminists hate, because she's clearly not a victim, she's going out and making things happen for herself rather than sitting at home and blaming men. If you asked her about the gender pay gap she'd probably laugh in your face, and rightly so. But now the professional victims aka modern feminists are pulling her down with them.

W. Brad Johnson, a co-author of a book encouraging male mentors for women, says limiting contact sends a troubling message. “If I were unwilling to have an individual conversation with you because of your gender, I’m communicating ‘you’re unreliable; you’re a risk,’” says Johnson, a U.S. Naval Academy psychology professor.

I don't think that's quite right: a female employee can be a risk without being obviously unreliable.

Jessica Proud, a communications professional and Republican political consultant in New York City, said it would be wrong if this national “day of reckoning” over sexual misconduct resulted in some men deciding not to hire, mentor or work with women. She recalled a campaign she worked on where she was told she couldn’t travel with the candidate because of how it might look.

Another woman who's almost certainly not a feminist victim, but now may pay a price personally because of what feminists have done. Sad.

[–]Mens-Advocate 14 points15 points16 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

it would be wrong if this national “day of reckoning” over sexual misconduct resulted in some men deciding not to hire, mentor or work with women.

So, victimising innocent men is wrong because it eventually hurts women? Here we have the extreme and extremely repulsive gynocentrism of the female of the species, yet even MRAs will fear to say so.

[–]EricAllonde 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

So, victimising innocent men is wrong because it eventually hurts women?

She's speaking up out of concern for her own career and opportunities. Her comment is born out of self interest; sure that's not as noble as looking at the rights and wrongs of the situation more broadly, but it's also far from the worst crime. Everyone acts from self interest at least some of the time.

[–]Mens-Advocate 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Since the beginning of time, men have created rules and laws (marriage, alimony, breach of promise, etc) to ensure the welfare of women. It would be nice were more women than just Straughan, Fiamengo, and Sommers to care about the welfare of men.

You proved my point - even MRAs make excuses for women's obvious gynocentrism.

[–]Mild111 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I don't think he was making excuses for gynocentrism, I think he was pointing out the difference between gynocentrism for "the cause of all womynkind" and gynocentrism as a self-serving platform for the individual.

Usually the former is just the political cover for the latter....but this woman doesn't hide it.

Where I differ from his opinion, is he believes the self-serving nature of such actions is noble because of her irrational fear of facing career consequences.

[–]Mens-Advocate 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't think he was making excuses for gynocentrism, I think he was pointing out the difference between gynocentrism for "the cause of all womynkind" and

But what if they're one and the same? After all, "the personal is political".

Either way, my objection still stands; the unfortunate reality is that the majority of womankind seems entirely gynocentric and entirely indifferent (or even hostile) to justice for men. And it matters not one whit whether their motivation is personal or political. It does matter that even MRAs manage to always find excuses for female gynocentrism.

[–]WarOfNoise[S] 11 points12 points13 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

good analysis. and i will reluctantly admit that I believe the more women this ends up harming, the better. men ultimately cannot change feminism, but women can. and the more women there are against this crazy shit, the higher the likelihood it will change.

[–]harbo 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The sad thing is that, while it's professional-victim feminists driving the witch hitch, the consequences of it harm non-feminist women too.

Why is this sad? If they want to escape these issues, they need to choose the other side. As it is, they're having their cake and eating it.

[–]McFeely_Smackup 20 points21 points22 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I haven't talked to a female coworker since 2001.

I mean, yeah...I've talked to them, but just not about anything even close to not work related.

After seeing two guys lose their jobs over some really petty bullshit, I realized that interacting with women in the workplace in anything other than "strictly professional" manner was basically like playing with a cobra. Eventually, and probably without warning, it's going to bite you...and if it never does, that was the cobras decision, not yours.

As a result, i don't go to lunch with female coworkers...I don't talk about the weekend plans, TV shows, nothing at all. If it's not directly work related, I excuse myself from the conversation.

Last year I worked with a woman who was a really cool chick. Great at her job, everyone liked her, she was into comics and video games...but she had a real temper problem and would frequently have meltdowns at work. One day her boss (whose office was next to mine, so I could hear every word) brought her into his office and said "you need to calm down, you cant be yelling at people like this" and she told him, and I quote "Fuck you, I quit!" and stormed out, slamming his office door.

I found out later that she hadn't even left the parking lot before realizing she'd just rage quit her job for no reason, and called HR sobbing, claiming she "just couldn't take the harassment any more".

So yet again, I find an HR "investigation" going on around me...everyone being interviewed about their interactions with this woman, her harassment complaint, etc. When it was my turn, I said 'I've never spoken with her about anything not work related" and it was honestly true.

All it did we reinforce that I'd made the right decision, and that it was not going to change. And that was before shit got way, WAY worse in the last year.

Right or wrong, this current climate of weaponized victimhood is going to make things far worse for women than it is for men. How many women are going to get passed over for jobs because it's just not worth the risk/hassle?

[–]monkeyboy247 11 points12 points13 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Weaponized Victimhood"...brilliant. I'm be using this.

[–]fengpi 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

When it was my turn, I said 'I've never spoken with her about anything not work related" and it was honestly true.

That's what I do, as a rule.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

'I've never spoken with her about anything not work related'

And that my friend is, in itself, harrasment.

Harrasment is whatever she says it is - you have zero control.

Well over a decade ago... at another employer (please don't council me to go to HR or some crap..) I had a couple of female coworkers that I would work very closely with. 12 hour shifts, we worked nights, mostly alone in the building.

The one I was buds with, the other scared me. The one I was buds with I had tremendous respect for. She was as good at - or better - at the job then me. The other one just made me nervous. She was a complaint to HR waiting to happen.

Whenever I tell this story, what I am about to tell you, whoever I am telling it to - they stop me and call bullshit on it. I don't know how to say to you, 'this is the truth, I am not lying, I wouldn't lie about something more then 10 years old and at another employer' any better then to just say that. It is the truth.

I made an effort to make eye contact with both of them when I talked to them. A concious effort. I figured, eye contact was respectful AND it would keep the one I didn't trust from accusing me of checking her out.

aaaahhhhh to be young and niave.

Anyways, I am 6 foot. These girls where both the short side of 5 foot something.

Luckily they didn't gripe to HR. They griped to a close friend. He came to me, 'Hey you gotta stop staring at there breasts.'.

~shrug~

I guess all I can do is refuse to look at them when I talk to them. Seriously, back me into a corner why don't you.

(I think the one I don't trust chatted up the other one...)

[–]Fortspucking 17 points18 points19 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It's not a backlash. It's a sensible response. Calling it a backlash just adds to the misandry.

[–]WarOfNoise[S] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

good point

[–]Tedesche 38 points39 points40 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I certainly hope it does. There needs to be a backlash over this. Only then will women disavow these feminist fear-mongering campaigns and start shouting down the hysterics when they start screeching.

[–]Mens-Advocate 29 points30 points31 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The greater danger is that it gives any woman with a grudge complete control over who become our political, corporate, and media leaders.

[–]ThePigmanAgain 10 points11 points12 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Which is precisely why the standard is "listen and believe," rather than "take seriously but ask for evidence." That way, any of the powerful men can be taken down, guilty or not, and they all know it.

[–]AyyyGreens 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Why do you think Gilibrand is leading this fight among the Dems?

[–]monkeyboy247 14 points15 points16 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

So, despite all the ridicule hurled his way, VP Mike Pence was right all along?

[–]orphancrippla 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Mike "No Poon In the Same Room" Pence seems to have been right here.

[–]WarOfNoise[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

in what regard?

[–]ThePigmanAgain 31 points32 points33 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Can't comment, busy firing all my female employees.

[–]McFeely_Smackup 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Shouldn't you be tweeting Mr President?

[–]ThePigmanAgain 10 points11 points12 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Why would i be tweeting Mr President?

[–]secondclassguy 11 points12 points13 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

If you think women get pissed at what you say to them now, just wait how pissed they are when you say nothing to them

[–]Jammersault 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

At a place I used to work at it was about 60 blokes and zero women until they employed the first and only woman in the place. She was difficult to start with and made everyone feel uncomfortable. One of my mates approached the management about the concerns he had about working with her and particularly in isolated circumstances with no one else around. They acknowledged his concerns and told him to just ignore her. A while later my mate gets called into a meeting because she had told the management that he was intimidating her. Both my mate and this woman were in the room with the management and HR, and they told my mate of the accusations. My mate being miffed, told them he found it hard to believe since he didn't even talk to her. The woman then said that it was the 'ignoring' that was intimidating. No shit !!! Literally a no win situation for my mate. Neither of us work there anymore but needless to say, she was the first woman in the joint and the progressive HR bullshit took over from that point on. It went from a good place to work to a place where everyone was walking on egg shells.

[–]secondclassguy 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

There's many examples of this, like when the women's movement first started. If you held a door open for a woman it was seen as sexist, if you didn't it was also seen as wrong. All this is leading to nowhere good

[–]Jammersault 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Yeah it's common. Not all women are difficult or dangerous or toxic or troublesome and no one is saying that all women are. But the truth is that it only takes one! It only takes one pain in the arse high maintenance entitled female to ruin everything for everyone, including all the decent, reasonable women in the vicinity. If anyone points this out, the feminists call you misogynist, if anyone points out that men are 'avoiding' or feel as though they need to tread carefully around women the feminists say that's proof that men 'feel threatened' by 'powerful' women, if someone points out that women are having trouble finding 'eligibly' suitable men to have families with the feminists say that men are like man babies that won't 'man up' and fulfill their biological responsibility.......it's endless. It's virtually all centralised around the lowest common denominator, that is if woman is unhappy, she's justified. It's behind the no win situations that men are finding themselves in more and more and are trying to avoid.

[–]secondclassguy 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

well said, women have freed themselves from any and all roles, yet they still retain for themselves the old roles if it suits them. In order for them to have it all like that men must be trapped forever in their roles for women who still want support, or fall back on it when needed. I have to say men often do this to themselves, and some will mock those men who try to buck this trap we are all in. Men need to give themselves the right to be full human beings, whether women like it or not. Only then can men and women be truly intimate the way nature intended

[–]Jammersault 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Totally agree. Much of the man shaming comes from other men that have been brainwashed to believe that masculinity is inherently bad. I see young blokes walking around with their heads down and their shoulders slumped, hating on themselves and less than proud of their manliness and it's often these kind of men that lecture to other men about how to be better at being acceptable to women. It's totally arse about psychology, but these are the white knight kind of men that can be dangerous because they are easily manipulated by women. The irony eh.

[–][deleted] 17 points18 points19 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

There was a woman in my office. We were both grad students, and i was sports coordinator for my department, meaning i paid for campus sports teams and made sure everyone who joined paid me back.

Anyway, I'm trying to be firm on deadlines because i always get burned when i trust people to pay me later. She messages over facebook pleading to save her a spot on the soccer team and that she will pay me garunteed. I figure, I have proof she said she owed me, i see her around the building day to day, why not.

She doesn't come to a single game but keeps promising she will. I'm beginning to feel I'm gonna get burned for the money. On the day of the last game, I encourage her to come out "because it will be really fun" like i had other weeks. Never did i ever say "hey! You owe me money!". I figured being nice and using warm lanhuage about how fun the soccer league is (despite her knowing wuite well she begged me to keep her on the team and promised payment on facebook).

Later on, maybe i was going to message her again, i notice she had unfriended me. I get it. I've been burned. I send an email to the three people who burned me saying there's nothing i can do to get paid back, but it would be nice if they held true to their word. I'm out $60 this semester, but i blame myself for trusting people to be decent and leave it at that. She's obviously a bit fucked in the head so I'm not gonna cause an office drama over beer money because I'm honestly worried how she might spin it. So i let it go.

I avoided making eye contact with her in halls and lunchrooms. Just pretend she doesn't exist and it works oit alright. A few days before I'm leaving because i defended my thesis, we pass each other in a secluded stairway and it's awkward. I call her when we're back in the main building atrium and say something along the lines of "It's ok. It's just money. You don't have to avoid me. It's cool".

I expected an apology because the tone of our voices is that of two people hashing out a previous disagreement in a forgiving way.... Then i listen to what she has to say and it throws me off big time. Basically she starts making up a narritive about how i was pressuring her to do something she didn't want and was a bully and her lab partners were there as wittness and all think I'm a jerk"..... She was expecting an apology from me. I'm not great at social conflict, so the best i could do was go numn in the fsce and nod and pretend i was listening to her in an understanding way. I figured there was no way to argue to Crazy, so just walk away and avoid her because my worst suspicions of her being capable of accusing me of workplace harrassment are true. So i continue to ignore her for the rest of my time there. $20 was not worth dealing with her crazy.

Fastforward 6 months. I'm back visiting my buddies in town. My friend tells me a story of how this same girl gets some staff member fired by going to campus police and reporting some sort of harrassment against him. I felt like i dodged one giant torpedo. I was weeks away from leaving after successfully wrapping up my Master's. Thank god i had the self control and wisdom to know not to pick a fight with someone even though i was in the right.

Nowadays i just straight up don't trust people to take advatage if they can. My mindset has helped me avoid future issues with people since then. There are really unethical people out there thst are not above lying to make monetary or career gains off of you. You just always have to be on gaurd... But unfortunately i have noticed that it is often women who try to use their gender to their advantage when conning you.

It's very unfortunate because i now have very little trust for women but do not want to feel that way because it is very pessimistic and i would like to believe i can trust people, including women, and not have to worry about how they might try to take advantage of me. At the same time, always being on gaurd has helped protect me against would-be predators, so I'm conflicted....

It was only this year that a woman tried to blackmail me by threatening a FRA. Luckily, i caught her on recording explaining her threat like some sort of batman villain, so I'm somewhat safe. Cops said i did the right thing handling her, but also gave the realistic advice of letting it go because "99% her threats are empty". Apparently trying to blackmail someone with am FRA and having evidence against you proving it isn't enough to get you in trouble with the law. The officer who advised me to let it go probably empathised but wanted to convince me to choose the most realistic option to stay out of trouble, which was "do nothing and hope she doesn't follow through with the FRA".

[–]WolfeBane84 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Only thing that comes up when I search FRA is Federal Railroad Administration.

She threatened you with a train?

[–]adamdavid85 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

False rape accusation maybe?

[–]WolfeBane84 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ahh, that's probably it.

[–]WarOfNoise[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

i didn't know what that meant either but I kind of hope she threatened him with a train.

that'd be pretty awesome tbh.

[–]-manatease 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You could try to reach out to the guy who got fired and share your stories. It could give him ammunition in a claim against the organisation.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's crazy, especially the last part...

Stay strong man.

[–]WarOfNoise[S] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"It's very unfortunate because i now have very little trust for women but do not want to feel that way because it is very pessimistic and i would like to believe i can trust people, including women, and not have to worry about how they might try to take advantage of me. At the same time, always being on gaurd has helped protect me against would-be predators, so I'm conflicted...."

i totally understand, and I think a growing number of men feel the same way. it's scary to me.

[–]Atheist101 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

The only safe and legal contact between men and women is going to be online or dating apps.

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points13 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I fear this won't be safe for men as well.

[–]WarOfNoise[S] 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

the "sexual consent form" from That 80's Show is looking more realistic each passing day

[–]uardum 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The only question is whether it'll fly in court.

[–]orphancrippla 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

When women can and do rescind consent without informing the man and rescind consent retroactively, I dont see how it could.

[–]uardum 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The way they rescind consent is by lying and claiming they never gave it in the first place. One might hope that a signed consent form would refute such a claim (but she could always claim she signed out of fear).

[–]soEezee 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So I was driving home from work the other day and was getting kinda bored so decided to flip out the 'ol nokia. I then notice a Tesla model S merge in front of me, it's not a legal requirement to have insurance and of course, I don't. Faced with the possibility of writing off a car worth more than my car and house combined, hands immediately went to 10-2, distance between us increased to several seconds and moved out of the lane first opportunity.

I don't want to feel that way by being around women but following r/news, here and watching afternoon tv I've pretty much convinced myself that mgtow is the only option that doesn't involve an unacceptably high risk to my economic and emotional wellbeing.

[–]boringcarpets 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes. Everyone in my line of work knows that a stag ship is the best ship, and if having women in your team doesn't cause even a little bit of concern then you haven't been paying attention

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter