TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

University of Kansas maintains women's-only lunchroom for Muslims - The College Fix

Myfeelzarespecial

January 20, 2017
136 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://www.thecollegefix.com/post/30801/
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title University of Kansas maintains women's-only lunchroom for Muslims - The College Fix
Author

Myfeelzarespecial

Upvotes 136
Comments 45
Date January 20, 2017 4:58 PM UTC
(9 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/5p519p/university_of_kansas_maintains_womensonly/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/university-of-kansas-maintains-womens-only.933670
https://theredarchive.com/post/933670
Top posts by Myfeelzarespecial

Youngstown woman sentenced to probation for killing boyfriend

392 upvotes
December 9, 2016
/r/MensRights

Woman pleads guilty, but law says only men can be guilty of rape

248 upvotes
September 6, 2016
/r/MensRights

Danish doctors come out against circumcision

97 upvotes
December 5, 2016
/r/MensRights

Woman at center of Emmett Till case tells author she fabricated testimony | US news

89 upvotes
January 29, 2017
/r/MensRights

Nurse faked DNA test to trap man

80 upvotes
September 12, 2016
/r/MensRights

Lena Dunham is saying sorry to Odell Beckham Jr. after facing criticism for reverse-sexist, racist comments

61 upvotes
September 5, 2016
/r/MensRights

Indiana Mom Accused of Injecting Feces into Son’s IV During Cancer Treatments

57 upvotes
November 29, 2016
/r/MensRights

Twittergate: More 'massive child porn rings' emerge on following shock discovery

54 upvotes
November 22, 2016
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]Tmomp 49 points50 points51 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Harvard closes male only clubs.

University of Kansas opens women only lunchrooms.

Higher education to men: "Fuck you!"

[–]jb_trp 16 points17 points18 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Well, they do have to cater to their biggest customers, right? /s

There are 1.5x as many women in college in the US than men...

Don't forget... These women are "opressed," need "safe spaces," and you white male shitlords better check your damn privileges! /s

[–]ThePedanticCynic 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Wait, 1.5x? Where did you get that stat? Last i checked it was roughly 55% women.

[–]chocoboat 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Last I checked it was 58/42 which is 38% more women than men.

[–]nybo 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

58/42 is 38% more, but 60/40 is 50% more. Kind of amazing how steep (0.5+x)/(0.5-x) functions are.

[–]McFeely_Smackup 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Quit your mansplaining shitlord!

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

exactly!

[–][deleted] 24 points25 points26 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

The room, open on weekdays from noon to 1 p.m. in the public university’s Office of Multicultural Affairs, is open to all female students — but in particular it allows female Muslim students to eat in a segregated, private area.

[–]Joelfor3 25 points26 points27 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Nothing says progress in America like actually using the word segregated in articles and not having a problem with it

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Personally, I don't like the trend of making words taboo because of context and history. We can separate segregation from the history of racial segregation and still use it as a word in conversation. And even words that have no other merit, like nigger... it's not like I want to run around calling people nigger but I think grown adults saying "the n word" in conversation like we're trying to avoid saying swear words in front of the kids is really odd behavior.

[–]Joelfor3 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's fair I just find it sad that a word that otherwise should have evaporated from the lexicon of this country is now being used it such a way.

It's not so much about banning words or them being taboo it's just disheartening and regressive to see it being used again in media

[–]TeaspoonOfSuperAids 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I have no problem with females getting segregated spaces, so long as men also get to have them. I will continue to oppose women only spaces until men get theirs, then I will drop that opposition.

It is also true that male only segregated spaces have certain benefits to men. It's a pity people react with knee jerks to anything Muslims do because some of their male and female policies have merit. They don't force men and women to share the same spaces.

[–]Ibster 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They don't force men and women to share the same spaces.

No, they forbid them from sharing the same spaces.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

sounds like they want to segregate the sexes. i all for this but they need provide for themselves.

[–]McFeely_Smackup 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I assume they have a similar room for males, specifically hasidic Jews who are prohibited from eating with women whom they are not married to?

I've could also argue the the university is participating in and enabling the oppression of these women by a patriarchal religion.

[–]Aarondhp24 13 points14 points15 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

I wish men had a group like the FSM church that always challenged these sexist practices with a fair and balanced counterpoint.

It should be a default solution: if women get a private space, men should also get an equally equipped and accessible private space.

[–]OnTheSlope 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This will never happen, women are too threatened by men having exclusive spaces

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

They definitely should if they ask for it, with no uproar or fanfare or backlash. But it's unreasonable to say that for every x group getting a private space, their counterpart group should automatically get the same. There might be no need. Like if people with asthma wanted a space to talk about their issues, we wouldn't automatically need a space for non-asthmatics to talk about their issues. It should be driven by need and open to everyone.

[–]Aarondhp24 11 points12 points13 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

When it comes to matters of gender, it is never unacceptable. A great example would be campuses where mens rights activists are shouted down from seeing speakers. Have a male only safe space where they can discuss mens issues without interruption.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Definitely. Gender issues affect both men and women and there needs to be space to focus exclusively on men's issues. Didn't mean to imply that men were as unaffected as non-asthmatics in my dumb analogy, just that we shouldn't base it on "well they have a space so we should too" but rather focus on the need that drives the desire for a separate space. Because realistically, Muslim men don't have a need for a private lunch space because they don't have headscarves.

[–]bigbronze 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm just showerthinking here, but do you think that if you could add enough tags to a group, you could grant them those special privileges. Like Muslim women vs. low class single parent men. Like if you could justify that the group of men you are trying to help is truly in a bad place, it would be hard to complain against because it would then the opposition would look like heartless beings not caring about a underprivileged minority.

[–]Aarondhp24 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hard to say. The impetus of the group mentioned in this post was for women in general, but seemed to cater to a minority as a secondary purpose.

I don't know if it would help, but I know affirmative actions is a thing, so maybe.

[–]AppaBearSoup 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"I identify as a woman" while walking in topless to protest modesty standards for women.

[–]v573v 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The university of kansas is public and if you are American you should demand that it be unfunded.

They are forcing non-muslims to follow a muslim belief - it is now a religous school and should not be funded with public money.

[–]andejoh 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

“I think it’s creating an environment of inclusivity and acceptance."

Unless of course you're male then it creates a community of exclusion.

[–]samsc2 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well that's a clearly defined violation of Title IX

Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 is a federal law that states: "No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance."

I just wish I went there because i'd just walk right on in and if someone tried to yell at me i'd just ask them if they are assuming my gender. The worst thing that could happen is they kick me out and then I'd just get to sue them for discrimination.

[–]unbelievablepeople 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That is a terrible, one-sided article that doesn't even explore the possibility that anyone on campus might object to that.

I'm sure there are people at the University of Kansas who object based on the principles of separating church and state: A public university should not be making special accommodations for one religious group.

And I'm sure there are people who object based on the principles of equality between the sexes: Men and women should have equal access to equal facilities, not special access only for one sex.

For a news outlet to write such an article and not even explore those objections is outrageous.

[+][deleted] -9 points-8 points-7 points 9 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

I don't think this a problem for men's rights. Any group that has a need for a private/closed space should be able to have it. Is the implicit issue that if a group of male Muslim students wanted a segregated space it would be seen as an issue?

[–]user_none 16 points17 points18 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

You're right, it's not a problem for men's rights. It's a problem for ALL rights.

If it was a woman's rape survivor group that wanted to meet in private, go for it. This is for a lunch room, and is being promoted by a state entity for the purposes of something that's based in religion.

Separation of church and state.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I don't see a problem with state entities providing space for religious things as long as they're theoretically providing space for any religion that wants it. At my university there were all kinds of religious groups that used campus space for their meetings. Separation of church and state is a phrase that's too widely applied. As long as nobody is forcing me to participate what does it matter.

[–]user_none 14 points15 points16 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Here's my problem with the state being involved. Fund it on your own dime.

Note: not you, specifically; in general.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I see your point. If it were a concert hall that the university was renting out to groups for a fee, but giving to this group for free, I'd be upset. But it seems like it's just a room in the multicultural center and there's no money being lost. I don't know, I just don't think it's a big deal. But I get the issue is not that this is happening, but that it might be an issue if men asked for the same.

[–]mikesteane 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

But it seems like it's just a room in the multicultural center and there's no money being lost.

Economics, not your major, eh?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I can't roll back my eyes far enough to react appropriately to this. Sure, there's some sort of cost to the continued use of the multicultural center and to all the resources a university provides and I'm sure we could find a way to put a price tag on 1 hour of using that room and find out how much of it is paid from tuition or grants or whatever funding they use for the multicultural center, and label that as money being lost. Do I get a gold star now? This is so insignificant. It's one room for one hour a day.

[–]droden 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

can you have a mens only set of hours?

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

So you're saying I'm right - the only issue with this is that there would be outrage if Muslim men wanted to have a segregated time/space only for them? I'm of the opinion that they should be able to. I'm trying to understand if y'all agree with me, or if you think the idea of men's or women's only spaces is entirely wrong?

[–]droden 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

no the issue is that women are given women only time but if men (regardless of why - club or religion or whatever) wanted the same OMG SEXISM.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

That's what I'm saying.

[–]droden 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

should does not imply can. that's what I am saying.

[–]Aarondhp24 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes that is the issue. If men asked for the space it would largely be rejected.

[–]jb_trp 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

It all feeds into the BS narrative of the "oppression" of these "marginalized" groups and the vilification of the "privileged" males.

If women need safe spaces where men aren't present, it implies that men are dangerous to have around and thus are problematic. Sure, a lot of it is under the guise that Muslim women will have a designated place to remove their hijab and eat, but the article repeatedly talks about "safe spaces" and how it's a "safe space" for other women too.

I wonder how these same progressives regressives feel about the no-go zones in France and Germany, where there is such a high concentration of Muslim men that women (even non-muslim women!) can't enter into certain shops and restaurants?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If women need safe spaces where men aren't present, it implies that men are dangerous to have around and thus are problematic.

The problem is that "safe space" is just a catchy term that needs to be understood in context. It's not really about safety or danger but about creating exclusive spaces where we can narrow our focus and follow a certain set of rules. Pretty much every subreddit is some kind of safe space. But the implications of "safe" have led to this distorted narrative you talk about where victimhood is encouraged. But I wish there was a way to separate that BS narrative from what seems to be a perfectly reasonable situation of a university providing a room for hijab-wearing women to eat in comfort.

[–]TeaspoonOfSuperAids -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

no-go zones in France and Germany,

These are a Breitbart myth. Sorry.

[–]jb_trp 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There are videos of them, not made by Breitbart.

[–]TeaspoonOfSuperAids 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You are correct on the surface of it. However since men's segregated spaces are opposed we must oppose female segregated spaces. When they allow men's only lunch rooms then I won't oppose women's only lunch rooms. Until then this is indeed a problem for men's rights.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter