TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

'Guilty until proven innocent': life after a false rape accusation A growing group of men and women are calling for changes in the law around sexual assault to protect those who are the victims of false accusations

TR6Cool

October 28, 2015
870 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking-man/11912748/Guilty-until-proven-innocent-life-after-a-false-rape-accusation.html
Archived from /r/MensRights

r/MensRights is a community advocating for the social and legal equality of men and boys since 2008.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/MensRights archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title 'Guilty until proven innocent': life after a false rape accusation A growing group of men and women are calling for changes in the law around sexual assault to protect those who are the victims of false accusations
Author

TR6Cool

Upvotes 870
Comments 79
Date October 28, 2015 1:32 PM UTC
(10 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3qk3vl/guilty_until_proven_innocent_life_after_a_false/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/guilty-until-proven-innocent-life-after-a-false.968445
https://theredarchive.com/post/968445
Red Pill terms in post
false rape accusation
Top posts by TR6Cool

Native American inmates in Alabama lose battle to wear their long hair due to 'security and hygiene reasons' but all female inmates across the USA are allowed long hair. Blatant gender discrimination.

3847 upvotes
August 7, 2015
/r/MensRights

Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.

3125 upvotes
October 5, 2015
/r/MensRights

Mother who beat her three-year-old son to death is living in a luxury jail cell with ensuite shower and her own KEY. Whilst men are locked in a cell for 23 hours a day.

2732 upvotes
December 19, 2015
/r/MensRights

'Kind, funny and bright' student, 17, hanged himself after being falsely accused of rape and finding it 'difficult to cope with the investigation'

2603 upvotes
October 1, 2015
/r/MensRights

The male Pill is coming - and it's going to change everything. New forms of male contraception are estimated to hit the market in two years and - unlike women's options - most won't contain hormones.

2221 upvotes
June 18, 2015
/r/MensRights

School sends 11-year-old boy home because of his long hair - which he's growing to raise money for cancer charity. 'It is gender discrimination and sexism. Girls can have short or long hair, why can't boys?

1926 upvotes
September 25, 2015
/r/MensRights

Justin Bieber's penis has held a mirror up to our alarming double standards on privacy. If this hadn't been Bieber, but a female celebrity, would the reaction have been the same?

1581 upvotes
October 10, 2015
/r/MensRights

Feminist outrage over new phone app which allows users to video their date agreeing to sex to protect them against rape claims

1500 upvotes
July 13, 2015
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]Jernlov 91 points92 points93 points 10 years ago (35 children) | Copy Link

Until men start suing proven false accusers instead of taking the "high road", things will never change.

If you wait for the criminal justice system to change, you might die first.

[–]kragshot 42 points43 points44 points 10 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

That is if they let you sue. In many cases, the courts of a given jurisdiction will refuse to allow the case on the docket.

After I pursued and obtained a declaration of innocence in my FRA case, I decided to go after the woman who falsely accused me. After three attempts to have my case heard, I was told off the books to "back off" or else "I would be found guilty of something." I was told in no uncertain terms that I "should just take my little victory and go away or else."

My case did more than expose an adulterer; I made a lot of people look very bad by thwarting their case against me.

The other "charm" of false accusations is that they make police departments and prosecutors look good. It puts out the message that they are "hard on crime." Rape is such a visceral criminal violation that it often will galvanize an entire community or larger. Look at how many "high-profile" rape cases we see in the media. When that happens, it places great pressure on the local law enforcement and justice departments to act and act quickly.

With the huge anti-rape lobby we have today, the pressure to succeed and find a suspect is greater for law enforcement and prosecutors than ever. They've got to find a culprit or else. So, more times than not; they are driven to "like somebody" for the rape and then hold on to that subject like a pit bull even if evidence to the contrary may become available. The only way that they will concede to contrary evidence is if a "more likely or suitable" subject is found.

Because at this point...it is not about justice. It is about appearances, presumptions, and re-appointments/re-elections.

[+]VoicelessFeather 10 years ago [recovered] (6 children) | Copy Link

Isn't there some action to be taken against a corrupt court? Or are you helpless to be "found guilty of something". I find that absurd.

[–]kragshot 14 points15 points16 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

You can find it anyway you want...I'm just telling you what happened.

A person pulled me aside and told me that if I persisted in trying to sue the woman who falsely accused me, then I would be most likely subjected further consequences. They told me that the best thing for me to do was to just let the whole thing go...accept my "declaration of innocence" and let that be enough.

I left my home after that happened, knowing that I would not ever get justice against the woman and system that wronged me. This has happened to more men than anyone would want to believe. Leaving home was the only way that I would be able to rebuild my life. I go home every once in a while to visit my family, but otherwise, I keep my head down and never stay more than a day.

[+]VoicelessFeather 10 years ago [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link

Wow, that sucks. I'm reasonably sure the court couldn't do anything at all to you, unless they completely ignored due process. If I was in that situation I would have done the same thing, so I shouldn't talk.

[–]kragshot 13 points14 points15 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The other reason I left home was to let the heat die down on my family...I wasn't the only one who was catching hell about the accusation. My family suffered nearly as much as I did and it cost them a pretty penny to help with the legal funding and paying for the therapy to keep me from falling into the abyss. (As it turns out, I actually have a "rich uncle" and he was able to help me out greatly. The only regret that I have now is that he offered to set me up out-country to start over. I didn't want to get that far away from my family back then...but I should have in retrospect.)

But there was a lot of social pressure on my family as well, especially because they continued to defend my and maintain my innocence. This especially included my sister who is a DV/rape survivor. It was very hard on her but she stuck by my side through the whole thing and didn't let her personal issues taint her love and belief in me...especially when her counselors were very vocal in their belief that no woman lies about rape.

When it was all said and done, my family stood by me and it cost them dearly. Leaving home was the only way I could give them a chance to resume their lives without worrying about me.

Now you know why I am so adamant about fighting this evil. Because it is evil...the kind that destroys souls and crushes families...the same way that an actual rape affects a rape victim and their family.

[+]VoicelessFeather 10 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

Absolutely, no protections for the falsely accused, not even being compensated for the legal fees, people not understanding the concept of "innocent until proven guilty", the idea that women never lie, are all evil. But on the bright side, your family sounds amazing.

[–]kragshot 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They are my soul. I could not have asked for a better group of people to share my life with. It it wasn't for them, I probably would have ended my days swinging from the neck somewhere dark and alone because of that evil.

Thanks for being sympathetic. Now go out there and help some other people.

[–]Glarks -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So do I.

We live in an absurd world. Your life will end before you get a fair chance in it. And then you will be forgotten. And that's all there is.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I was told off the books to "back off" or else "I would be found guilty

By who...why are you protecting these people?

[–]Rethgil 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Why are you trying to derail the main points? Why are you raising suspicions about an innocent man accused by crazed women?

[–]kragshot 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No...the person who told me this was a woman who worked for the county clerk's office. I am not naming names or locations because I do not want this to come back and begin haunting me or my family again...it has been more than 20 years. In addition, even if I named this person, they would deny everything.

I've told my story. Let the lesson of it be enough.

Please.

[–]intensely_human 27 points28 points29 points 10 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link

Ugh, the "high road". One of the worst lessons I learned as a kid was turning the other cheek. It was until I was in my twenties and hanging out with some MIT kids that one of them shared with me the game theory about tit-for-tat strategy.

Combined with a zen teacher who kept saying to me "dude when someone hits you hit them back", it was enough to finally change my mind. My relationships have improved, my career has improved, my emotional health has improved.

Accepting an attack without retaliating is a low, low road. A fight is better than abuse (abuse being a one-way fight) because fights tend to end and abuse tends to continue.

[–]chocoboat 10 points11 points12 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Taking the high road shouldn't mean sitting there and taking abuse and doing nothing about. It means "don't lower yourself to their level".... don't get violent, don't use lies to try to ruin their reputation, don't become as much of a scumbag as they are.

Handling it and solving the problem in a mature way (in this case, filing lawsuits) is the high road.

[–]intensely_human 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Taking the high road shouldn't mean sitting there and taking abuse and doing nothing about.

Unfortunately one of the powerful moral memes in our cultures is exactly this: "Don't stoop to their level" is often used to mean "don't admit this affected you; and don't do anything about it".

Many people are raised to believe that absorbing attack without response is best. I believed that for many, many years, and would have felt deeply offended if someone had told me that retaliating was better than just absorbing an attack.

I agree with you that the best response is to use proper channels. But I don't believe it's necessarily morally better, it's just better because it protects your own safety and doesn't expose you to more legal vulnerability. So basically, retaliate legally.

[+]scurvebeard 10 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

some MIT kids that one of them shared with me the game theory about tit-for-tat strategy.

I heard an episode of RadioLab about this. Some smart people ran a bunch of simulations and--as I recall--found that the best strategy for a slow but steady increase in peace was to retaliate on a 1:1 ratio... but to sometimes, randomly, forgive.

Here's the segment.

[–]intensely_human 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I've heard that segment actually. It was nice to hear this appear in pop culture.

Thank you for adding in the benefit of occasional, random, forgiveness. This tends to end "feuds", which are situations where you and someone else both think you're retaliating (and neither one thinks they did the initial attack), so your retaliation policy just tends to lead to endless conflict. Having random forgiveness cuts these chains of tit-for-tat short.

[–]mwobuddy 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

Zen Retaliate

Wut.

[–]intensely_human 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

What's the issue?

[–]heterosapian -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

Zen is a subset of Bhuddism. Bhudists believe in karma and anyone who believes in karma almost certainly doesn't advocate tit-for-tat. Look at Tibet's non-violent resistant to China.

[–]intensely_human 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

anyone who believes in karma almost certainly doesn't advocate tit-for-tat

I'd say anyone who believes in karma believes that tit-for-tat is built into the universe. However in my school we learned the non-wooey version of karma: choices you make have effects; the life you have is a result of your choices.

Basically he taught me that the shitty relations I had to other people was in part the karma of my choosing not to retaliate. As it turns out, he was right.

[–]heterosapian -2 points-1 points0 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

What it boils down to is that he thinks people who are taken advantage of have it coming to them because they're unwilling to retaliate... His advice may have been helpful to you personally and others unwilling to help themselves but it seems like the deeper idea, if taken to the extreme you're suggesting that every action should provoke a reaction, is fundamentally not Buddhist at all.

[–]intensely_human 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Every action does provoke a reaction. That is the law of karma. Nothing you do is in a vacuum. But that's just me playing word games.

The beauty of my teacher is that he didn't take it to the extreme. He sees no reason to worship this philosophy or that or attempt to get brownie points by toeing some intellectual line.

I don't think he ever once strayed into "had it coming to them" territory, in a moral sense. He often did say things like "that's what you're choosing", or "that's not her problem, it's yours", always bringing it back to choice, but he never once said anything like "you deserve that abuse because you didn't follow the zen rules right" or whatever.

[–]heterosapian -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Western media has very much idealized Buddhist pacifism. Still, I guess what I'm getting at is that the deeper idea doesn't exactly seem congruent with the beliefs I've come to understand from many Buddhists I've run across traveling through Thailand, Bhutan, China, etc. At the end of the day if that teaching gives you fulfillment and improves your life, I'm not going to judge - all the better to you.

[–]intensely_human 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I won't claim the teaching is part of buddhism. That's one of those caught-on-name-and-form things. But it is a good human teaching.

Perhaps for someone who already had the retaliation software trained into their brain, my teacher's message would be "stop retaliating and learn to forgive".

According to game theory, the optimal strategy is actually to retaliate if attacked, but in a random subset of those situations just let it go and do nothing.

[–]Adrelinen 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

That's a massive misinterpretation and oversimplification of Buddhism.

[+]aThoughtCrime 10 years ago* [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

It really isn't, though. Violence or other negative actions towards another person in retaliation for their own negative actions towards you just generates more negative karma and keeps the cycle going. Buddhists would instead advocate loving-kindness towards this person, since they are misguided. And they have already accumulated negative karma because of their actions, which is punishment in and of itself.

It goes without saying that actually practicing Buddhism outside of a monastery is incredibly difficult.

[–]dungone 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Regardless of the religion, if you listen to it's teachings and all you get out of it is, "Obey!" then you are certainly not one of it's leaders. All of the world's major religions come with loaded messages that tell you whatever it is you want to hear - or that someone else wants you to hear. And down to the last one, they all teach their lowest ranking members to sacrifice their own best interests for that of the religion and it's higher ranking members. I am sure that if you reflect on this for a little, you will find that this is true about Buddhism as well. Buddhist pacifism is nothing more than having some low-ranking members set themselves on fire (or whatever) to serve the political goals of their leaders. All with a very thinly veiled threat of "we've got the disposable manpower to kick this thing up a notch of you don't comply to our demands". It is just a different form of violence.

[–]Adrelinen 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhism_and_violence

There's a LOT of violent Buddhists, who's entire justification is that they are working for Karma. You're literally taking one type of Buddhism and pretending that that's ALL Buddhism.

Most Buddhists advocate for neutralisation as opposed to zero retaliation. They aren't infantile idiots who think everyone will just get along by being nice. Peace takes effort, and most Buddhists will put in that effort.

[–]heterosapian -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

It really goes without saying that speaking to any religion in a few sentences can't represent every possible interpretation.

[–]Adrelinen 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Yes, but they didn't just misrepresent some types of Buddhism, they basically misrepresented all but one small subsection of Buddhism

[–]heterosapian -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Do you think the majority of Buddhist practitioners would approve or disapprove of what he said?

[–]Adrelinen 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Rotten tomatoes much?

And realistically, they're going to disagree, because anyone who believes in Karma knows that it's not some moralistic justice system. It's literally just "Everything that occurs to you is a reaction to you", it does not mean "You Do Bad = Bad is Done to You"

The idea is that nothing is random, and that your success, failure happiness and sadness is controlled by you. Whether you need to toughen up or soften up, become nicer or meaner is all possible under Karma's teaching.

[–]mwobuddy -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Zen teaching retaliation. Not very zen at all.

[–]intensely_human 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So what is zen?

[–]Jernlov 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I honestly believe that once mass lawsuits against proven false accusers occur -- if this happens -- you will start to see more arrests for the same accusations. I really can't explain why I feel this way, but it somehow has to do with the the fact that there will be a growing perception that the police and courts are not doing their jobs and men have to take matters in their own hands.

[–]newharddrive 16 points17 points18 points 10 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

In many countries, it is against the law to publicly release the name of the accused, but OK after found guilty.

[–]evolutionof 8 points9 points10 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

in the US it seems to be against the law to release the names of police officers until proven guilty. Does that count?

[–]newharddrive 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No...

[–]BullsLawDan 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

in the US it seems to be against the law to release the names of police officers until proven guilty.

It's not. Not at all.

[–]BullsLawDan 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

That's a terrible idea. An open court system is a lynchpin of justice. Court proceedings need to be open and names need to be public record.

[–]StabbyPants -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

what happens when the accused gets some extra judicial justice? just think - you could accuse someone of something heinous, he goes to the hospital courtesy of a mob, and you get no consequences

[–]BullsLawDan 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Names are already public record. Do you have evidence that what you suggest is a widespread problem?

[–]StabbyPants 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

i'm suggesting that getting accused of rape can devastate you socially and economically, regardless of any court proceedings. further, you may run afoul of a crowd of do gooders looking to make an example

[–]BullsLawDan 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

i'm suggesting that getting accused of rape can devastate you socially and economically, regardless of any court proceedings.

I understand that. However, it's the lesser of two evils, since allowing a government to have secret courts is FAR worse.

The solution for your problem is to educate people about the court system and "innocent until proven guilty," not to remove the public from court. It's also to provide better access to justice in the form of attorneys and other services.

further, you may run afoul of a crowd of do gooders looking to make an example

Again, my position is already the way things are, and yet we do not have this problem on any kind of regular or even rare basis.

[–]ramot1 14 points15 points16 points 10 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

I watched an old Highway to Heaven episode, in which a high school girl accused a bus driver of touching her. Later she recants, saying she did it because she loved him.

I turned off the tv when I heard one of the angels say that the girl needed help. Maybe she did, but they took care of her before they helped the driver. i assume that after that, the angels helped the driver get his job and wife and kids back, but I don't know for sure.

[–]chocoboat 9 points10 points11 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I found the summary of that episode in no time (isn't Google great?)

The school bus driver's public reputation is ruined, he loses his job, and his wife starts to doubt his innocence. The truth comes out, the newspaper prints a retraction and his employer re-hires him, but the other parents won't let their children ride his bus because they still believe he's a pedophile.

Actually I just found the episode here and watched the end of it.

The school principal reacts to learning the truth by demanding that the false accuser's name is published as well, so people can know who was responsible for this mess. Unfortunately Michael Landon's character defends her, saying it's not her fault and nothing will be gained by publishing her name, and that all of the fault belongs with irresponsible reporters who published something before verifying it's true.

At least that stance favors withholding the accused's name from the media and demands that the media should never "listen and believe", but it's also taking the position that women aren't responsible for their actions. Not surprising for 1988 though, in fact it's relatively progressive.

[–]ramot1 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Unfortunately, because she is a minor, many publications would not publish her name, and it may, in fact, be illegal to do so.

'taking the position that women aren't responsible for their actions'

Yeah this is probably why there are still false accusations. If they were forced to take responsibility for their own actions, the world would be a safer place.

[–]BullsLawDan 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Unfortunately, because she is a minor, many publications would not publish her name, and it may, in fact, be illegal to do so.

It wouldn't be illegal to publish it in the United States.

[–]ramot1 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think the case was in the U.K. but your point is still valid!

[–]BigOldNerd 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Wait... This isn't heaven. muahahaha

[–]ramot1 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Just a nice long highway though.

[–]zulu127 16 points17 points18 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The survey at the end has 97% of people agreeing that the accused should be kept anonymous, so far.

[–]auronvi 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In today's media, that's an impossibility unless you make it financially nonviable for them to release the name of the accused. Huge fine so that no media outlet even thinks about risking it.

[–]Ransal 11 points12 points13 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

and what's sad about this is that hardcore feminists are actively fighting these people. Saying things like MRA are sexist and should not exist.

[–]Ovendice 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

And then the average female doesn't even care about men's rights at all and see men as subhuman. Do these females sound like Feminists?https://i.imgur.com/imyV6Ai.jpg

No, that's just your typical every day females who have been brainwashed with Feminism and it is now mainstream. In another 5 years, 'hardcore Feminists' will be just those women who murder men. Just cut the crap and wake up and realize women in the U.S. hate men or at the very least are completely indifferent and couldn't care less about what men have to deal with and are too busy actually believing women are 'oppressed' and whining they aren't treated like queens.

[–]Ransal 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's what I always have a problem with. I'm alright with them having their superiority complex, it doesn't harm much. But when they start abusing men then claiming the men they abuse are the violent attackers, I draw the line.

[–]Rafa4275 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Disgusting.

[–]DrDoSoLittle 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's funny how we've forgotten that anyone can be a victim.

[–]BullsLawDan 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Not releasing names of people accused and/or arrested is a terrible idea. We need an open, public, court system in order to assure justice.

The problem isn't the publicity of the name, it's the handling of it by everyone else.

[–]bretth104 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

What does that gain of everyone knows who the accused is? If proven guilty, that's fine. If innocent, how would it help either the accused or the alleged victim?

[–]BullsLawDan 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

What does that gain of everyone knows who the accused is?

A lot for the accused. It prevents the government from being able to secretly arrest someone and hold them without due process. It allows alibi witnesses, character witnesses, and other evidence to be found more easily. It reduces corruption by shining a light on the justice system in general.

As I said, an open court system is absolutely necessary for a free society.

[–]bretth104 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Good points, but you can also say "person x was arrested and accused of a crime. Where was person x at this time?" You don't need the public to know what the person is accused of as long as the accused knows what the charges are. The accused is welcome to share this information at their own discretion. Overall a public announcement of arrest does little to protect the accused and does much more harm to their reputation. This goes for any crime at all.

[–]BullsLawDan 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I disagree with your entire characterization of whether that benefits the accused, as a lawyer and adjunct professor of Constitutional Law, for the reasons I already explained. Fortunately, our Founding Fathers agreed with me, which is why we have the Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments, as well as the Habeas Corpus protections, in our Constitution. Your approach would require Constitutional Amendment.

But I respect your disagreement.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

any change in the law would require Parliament to accept that sexual allegations are more damaging to an individual than offences of murder of theft

This is complete and utter bullshit. Do people get routinely accused of murder and theft in the media before evidence such crimes were even committed is uncovered?

Imagine someone being accused of murder in the media without an alleged victim, no body, and no evidence of any other kind to support the allegations. It would be absurd.

[–]KaonPlus 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Apples and oranges.

Rape is, almost always, a crime whose prosecution is based off so-called "he said, she said" testimony. There might be witnesses for events before and after, but in a lot of the college situations that are making the news, it's anecdotal evidence.

Murder, more often than not, involves a dead body; a physical consequence of the crime. A person charged with murder, at least in the UK, will almost always be implicated in the events surrounding that dead body.

People don't routinely get accused of rape in the media; they get accused of rape, and the media reports on it. In the UK at least, newspapers know not to accuse anybody of a crime without an official accusation or they'll get sued to fuck.

[+]Ovendice -13 points-12 points-11 points 10 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

Show me the men in our society destroy women's lives with lies. There are none. What more proof do you need that women hate men? You say not all women make false accusations, but there are, count them, ZERO women protesting false accusations of rape. And I'm not going to risk my whole life having sex with some female just because she might not 'be like that.' YOU go ahead and do that, I CARE about my life.

[–]ABC_Florida 12 points13 points14 points 10 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

ZERO women protesting false accusations of rape

  • Lauren Southern

  • Karen Straughan

  • Wendy McElroy

[–]TR6Cool 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Many women including my wife and daughters want the the accused given anonymity. I actually think it would lead to more men being found guilty which is a good thing if they are guilty! At the moment I think some juries take the view that the man has been punished enough even if he is guilty and consequently do not convict him. In court all can see that the woman accuser is protected but the man is not which i think leads to some juries having sympathy with the accused.

[–]ABC_Florida 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

These feminists are ruining the society.

First the presumption of innocence is taken away. Then they will censor the internet because of their feelings.

They are so stupid to think that the same things won't happen to women in time.

[–]Ovendice -5 points-4 points-3 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Please. No one even knows who they are outside of MRAs. I'm talking about organizations and entire groups of women. But all we see from Feminists and women in general is Slut Walks- literally millions of women over the last 5 years screaming out on the streets that they want to dress like whores and be whores.

[–]TR6Cool 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I disagree in the UK I think the general public, men and women, want anonymity for the accused It is only some feminists that do not. Women have male relations as as well!

[–]Missing_Links -3 points-2 points-1 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Okay, buddy. Since you seem to be lost, r/theredpill is right over here.

[–]kragshot 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Don't downvote this guy for being afraid. You all don't know what he may have endured to get to this point.

His fears are real...rather than ridiculing him for his anxiety, we should just let him know that it is okay to be cautious but to not let fear dominate his life.

Dude...don't alienate all women because of the actions of some. It's okay to be wary...but don't box yourself totally out. Go talk to some MGTOWs about how they have adjusted to living without fear of women. If you choose to go full Galt, that's fine too...but be logical about it, rather than just responding to fear.

[–]Ovendice -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Not every time you drink and drive are you going to jail. But smart people don't do it. Why? Because the penalties and risk is far too high. And it is the same with dating women in the U.S. You're confusing character issues with legal issues.

Maybe not 'all' women are capable of making a false accusation of rape and violence, but 100% of all of the laws are the same throughout the country, some states simply more horrific than others. And women don't tell you up front they're going to make a false accusation, don't wear a sign saying they are. And how would you tell? Because they say so? LOL Because she has nice teeth, is pleasant at dinner parties, comes from a good family? Sorry to be the one to introduce you to the truth about women, but all of that is called the bait. ALL women are spiteful, petty. jealous, completely unaccountable and vindictive. The perfect storm of elements that lead to false accusations of rape and violence. Oh and btw, don't think false domestic violence accusations aren't as damaging. They keep you from getting good jobs, into nice neighborhoods and I know of a guy who got put away for 20 YEARS for domestic violence because it was his second violation and was even 10 years later! And he didn't even hurt the women really at all and it was a mutual fight, both of them hitting each other.

Until there is a radical change in the laws, dating and/or even being around women is out of the question. And women in the U.S. themselves? Well, with women, it's not even an issue of character and whether or not they are evil or spiteful, it's also a question as to whether or not they are completely INSANE and so incredibly stupid, it borders on pure psychosis. Just look at this: https://i.imgur.com/imyV6Ai.jpg

Look at how they discuss rape, as if they don't even understand what it even IS and actually believe that the laws are corrupt because the law defines rape as a violent sexual assault. And that it's perfectly reasonable to accuse a man of rape if he breaks up with you. These women may as well be from an ALIEN PLANET and that is most women in the U.S. today. I see messages like that all of the time! And every day for the last 20 years there's at least one false accusation of rape in the news- and those are just the more outrageous ones who just happened to get caught. Just try to imagine just how many men have gone to prison who were falsely accused.

You think you know some female and then suddenly one day something comes up like this and suddenly you realize she's psychotic and completely out of touch with reality. It's time for men to stop fooling themselves: IT'S OVER. ALL of it, marriage, dating, even working with women or having anything to do with them at ALL.

Don't point at ME and talk to me like I'm the one who's crazy, no, you know and I know and everyone knows it is WOMEN and the LAWS that are insane and evil. It has NOTHING to do with me.

The situation with women in the U.S. now is a pure living Hell on Earth and a nightmare. A life of drug addiction is nowhere as devastating as the horrors of what women can and will do to you and they have nothing else better to do, have GOD LIKE POWER over you and are 100% completely insane, emotionally unstable, petty, unaccountable, vindictive, jealous, confrontational and toxic.

[–]kragshot 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Listen son (and I'm 51, so I'm not being condescending...just a bit patriarchal). I've survived a false rape accusation. You don't have to sell me on how fucked up this can get.

Yes it's true; the current legal climate gives every woman the potential to leverage a lie to destroy a man's life. But what you are doing is allowing fear to drive your thinking rather than logic.

Again...if you are that fearful, then by all means; go full Galt and withdraw from society (no, I am being very serious...I am not mocking you). It would be the best thing to assure your peace of mind. Expatriate and head to one of the SE Asian or South American countries. I have a buddy who lives in the Philippines now because he thinks as you do. He's pretty happy now and I'm happy for him.

Otherwise, then you need to stay and fight to turn this around. And attacking women overall is not going to work. There are women who are our allies in this fight...they agree that this power that they have over us is not right.

The choice is yours.

[–]Ovendice 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I have a far better grip on the reality of the situation both socially and legally than you do and most men in the U.S. You're still living in the past. It's over and those days are not coming back in our lifetime. Women hate men and they are your No.1 enemy.

Forget ISIS, Muslims. The top terrorists in your life are American Women. They hate you, they want to throw you in jail, they want to steal everything you have, take your children, keep you from seeing them and hurt you and be as cruel as they possibly can and will laugh at you when you commit suicide. That was the goal!

Women have been taught to hate you by Feminism and are taught to hate men every single day, all day long in our schools and media. And taught to fuck you over and take everything from you and burn you to the ground using the very court system as the vehicle to do it! Because you are SCUM, a rapist and child molester and murderer and EVIL. That's what they are being taught over and over and over. Women HATE you. Wake the fuck up.

And just because a woman isn't outwardly and openly aggressively spewing hate for men doesn't mean JACK SHIT. You should thank those types for giving you a warning. THE most dangerous women are the ones who do the entire act to pull you in, like a black widow spider into her web. Until you wake up and realize all of this, you're walking under the hammer.

[–]kragshot 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Dude...you're going to have to go that way without me.

My family included a lot of women who stood against the tide of popular opinion and supported me. So...we are going to have to agree to disagree with the total disdain of women.

People make similar generalizations about my fellow African Americans. While I will not deny that there are some of us who are fucking up wholesale; that is an assessment based on human nature as there are people from all demographics who are just horrible human beings. But to brand an entire group in that manner is just completely irrational.

We are fighting the same fight at one level, but I am not going to damn all women for the perfidy of a few. That would make me no better than the rabid feminists who are ready to damn all men.

Go in peace, brother and may you find what you seek....

[–]Ovendice 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sigh Still not getting it. That's why there's winners and there's losers in life. No matter how much you explain what is going on, unfortunately there's the half that just doesn't get it. The laws women have on their side in this country are a loaded gun to your head with God like power over you. I'm not going to trust even my own mother to hold a gun to my head. The problem is not her, it's the loaded gun to my head. And until the laws change, every man in the U.S. is in extreme danger at any second in a minefield of legal horrors for whatever reason some psycho bitch decides they want to destroy your life. 'Not all women are like that.' That line isn't even applicable to the reality of your life as a man in the U.S. You don't know who they are and all women are insane and justify anything they do to themselves. And we now have TWO whole generations of women now trained to hate you and taught you are the enemy. It's over.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter