~ archived since 2018 ~

The difference a single chromosome makes

January 28, 2023
32 upvotes
post image

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill content, including various subreddits and blogs. This post has been archived from the subreddit /r/AllPillDebate.

/r/AllPillDebate archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

Post Information
Red Pill terms in post
Comments

[–]warramite 11 points12 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Women have much higher standards for looks

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Women are nature's eugenicists.

[–]Constant_Ad6906 22 points23 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

The blackpill is undefeated.

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Bangmade -2 points-1 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Umm it kinda is

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

If you have two x chromosomes your biological value is inherent. If you have a Y you have to work for it because you are not born with it. It is what it is.

[–]Wide-Illustrator2906 6 points7 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

In my opinion he's objectively better looking than her

[–]ScrimmyBingusTwo[S] 4 points5 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

That's what I like about this experiment: It doesn't use an extremely ugly guy to prove a point. Instead, it uses a decent-looking guy with typical Mediterranean features but because he's not in the Top 5% of men, he gets zero matches.

[–]blebbyroo 2 points3 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

He’s not attractive Jin this photo

Old requires you to market yourself as desirable. If you can’t take photos that do that then you won’t get matches

[–][deleted]  (8 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]blebbyroo 1 point2 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Ok if you don’t want to take a part or online dating you don’t need to. If you do want to, stop being mad that it does require you to present yourself as a good option especially when there are so many more men than women using online dating.

[–]upalse1 points [recovered] (6 children) | Copy Link

Yep. You need marketing only to sell something people don't want in the first place. It's the desperation which makes it hilarious.

Please give me 8 selfie profile pics anytime. At least those are honest about one being self-absorbed.

[–]blebbyroo 0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

Oh sure only undesirable things are advertised. Lol your delusional if you believe that. Everything is advertised and marketed

[–]upalse1 points [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link

Consoom brain. Point me at an ad actually offering a good deal. I suppose you're mistaking advertising for visibility. Visibility is important so that people who want to find you can actually find you. It carries far lower signaling cost for everyone involved than advertising though.

[–]blebbyroo 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Every item that has visibility uses some form of marketing. Humans are visual creatures, we like things that look good. We like our products to look good, we shop and make decisions everyday based on marketing and branding. If you think you are above that then great you can enjoy being mad and single that no one wants to enquire about your poorly listed and displayed “goods” and you can keep being bitter on reddit.

Everyone gives men advice that if they aren’t doing well on online dating the first thing you need to do is take better pictures and redo your profile. If you don’t want to take the advice that’s fine, but don’t act all bitter that no one is swiping on you when there are literally 100’s of guys behind you who are putting effort into their profiles and photos.

[–]upalse1 points [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

It's why most people don't really use OLD, and prefer social media DM sliding - it's far more functional for branding/visibility, instead aggressively marketing snake oil down the throat of people who don't necessarily have a shopping addiction.

the first thing you need to do is take better pictures and redo your profile

If you have a hard time selling healing crystals and essential oils, is it because you spend too little on adsense, or is it because you're peddling bullshit nobody is interested in to begin with?

[–]orbstnedifnocdesab 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

bro only girls can get away with 1 single photo of a mugshot

[–]ScrimmyBingusTwo[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Unless your name is Jeremy Meeks......

[–]KayRay1994 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

damn almost as if guys either blind swipe and/or have very low standards on apps (and that’s not even getting into how the algo works/the gender split on the app)

[–]qaadeleted 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

There is a signifigant differnce but it does not actually matter that much do you search as woman/man but rather do you seek likes from women or men.

Like most guys can swap the search to guys and see their matches get flooded with men. Comes down to how the female selectiveness come into play from the start more often and the majority of dating app users being men.

[–]EviessVeralan -1 points0 points  (43 children) | Copy Link

The difference a 80/20 percent male/female ratio makes.

[–]caption291 2 points3 points  (41 children) | Copy Link

And why is there such a skewed gender ratio?

[–]EviessVeralan 3 points4 points  (39 children) | Copy Link

Because women dont like casual sex as much as men do and we typically find boyfriends in person.

[–]ScrimmyBingusTwo[S] 0 points1 point  (16 children) | Copy Link

“We don’t have to use dating apps because we get so much attention IRL” really isn’t the silver bullet against the blackpill that you think it is.

[–]EviessVeralan 1 point2 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

Considering the majority of these women arent all dating and marrying 6 foot 6 figures 6 inches Chads it kinda does.

[–]ScrimmyBingusTwo[S] -1 points0 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

Most younger women (18-30) would rather stay single than settle for a guy who isn't Chad

[–]EviessVeralan 0 points1 point  (9 children) | Copy Link

There are no stats that back up this claim.

[–]ScrimmyBingusTwo[S] -1 points0 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Just mention the topic of dating on r/TwoXChromosomes and they'll say the same thing: They'd rather be single than compromise on their standards for physical attractiveness

[–]Green-Quantity1032 1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Their standards is the guy being taller than them and looks like he takes care of himself, that's not chad.. It's an average non-loser guy.

If you mean for casual sex then yeah standards are high, but for dating/marriage? I've seen below-average guys with very cute girls

[–]_SaltUponWounds_ 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

the guy being taller

Which means being over 6'.

looks like he takes care of himself

An ugly man will never look like he takes care of himself, and an attractive man will never need to.

Also, what they claim their standards are doesn't actually matter. I know the thought that people would lie on the Internet is outrageous, but sometimes it does happen.

[–]EviessVeralan 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

TwoXChromosomes isnt representative of all women. We have decades of marriage stats that disprove the idea that women only go to top 1% of all guys.

[–]ScrimmyBingusTwo[S] -1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

You mean before the invention of dating apps and before feminism gained mainstream traction?

[–]_SaltUponWounds_ -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Try going outside.

[–]no_bling_just_dingself-aware MSTOW / janitor -1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

so... dating apps only work for people who don't need them. got it.

[–]EviessVeralan 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Yeah. Thats what happens in a low supply high demand dating app.

[–]no_bling_just_dingself-aware MSTOW / janitor 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

i think a lot of serious people dont even consider them at all

[–]noonereadsthisstuff -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes it is.

Why would a girl who just needs to go to a bar to be hit on by men need dating apps?

[–][deleted]  (21 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]EviessVeralan 0 points1 point  (20 children) | Copy Link

The study you cited separated meeting in person into multiple categories but left online as one. If you add all the in person categories, 60 percent of couples still meet in person.

https://www.statista.com/chart/20822/way-of-meeting-partner-heterosexual-us-couples/

[–]jumbolarge21 points [recovered] (19 children) | Copy Link

A decade ago it was probably 10%. The point is there’s been a rapid shift away from dating people you met in person. This has coincided with a massive increase in male sexlessness, suicide, and drug overdose. These issues will only get worse

[–]EviessVeralan 1 point2 points  (18 children) | Copy Link

The stats on most dating apps have shown that the vast majority of users are men. With the exception of gay men, this should be something they should look at and decide on a more fruitful strategy to find a partner.

It's ultimately your fault if you join a platform that's 70 to 80 percent male and dont find a female partner when there are better strategies to finding someone.

[–]jumbolarge21 points [recovered] (13 children) | Copy Link

more fruitful strategy

I’m a prematurely balding man with treatment resistant depression and no friends. There’s no “better strategy” for me

[–]EviessVeralan 2 points3 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

Almost any strategy would be better then competing on tinder with rich 6 foot plus guys for the attention of the handful of women who are on the app.

[–]jumbolarge21 points [recovered] (11 children) | Copy Link

rich 6 foot plus guys

I’m over 6 foot and I make around 250k a year. Neither have helped me at all, I’m simply not attractive enough and unable to socialize enough. I know guys who are shorter and make 1/10th of what I make and date all the time simply because they’re just better looking.

[–]no_bling_just_dingself-aware MSTOW / janitor 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

better strategies

tbh it is kinda hard when nearly every woman i had this conversation with was unable to come up with a clear, applicable and straightforward explanation of what such a strategy in a specific place and time looks like without contradicting themselves between the capital letter at the start and the period at the end of a sentence.

i get the importance of a social circle, been applying that myself for some time. even then - the next problem: 2 single guys for every 1 single woman. most of the women that i see just about anywhere anytime are already taken versus a minority of the guys.

[–]EviessVeralan 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

tbh it is kinda hard when nearly every woman i had this conversation with was unable to come up with a clear, applicable and straightforward explanation of what such a strategy in a specific place and time looks like without contradicting themselves between the capital letter at the start and the period at the end of a sentence.

No one male or female can make a fool proof guide to love. All I can really tell anyone is that if youre not a top 1% guy going on an app thats 80% male wont help you. Most guys are better off trying to meet someone in person.

[–]no_bling_just_dingself-aware MSTOW / janitor 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

i agree i dont think its something a guide can be written for

[–]inkvell343 -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Lmao why the FUCK are you playin right now? Lmao you actually think if tinder was a balanced ratio 50/50, that all the men would be able to get a girl or something lol. No you gaslighting ho. It wouldn't. 😂

All that would happen is that it would be an even MORE brutal blackpill where the bottom 80% of that 50% male ratio population will get to see as the entire 50% female ratio still ends up going after the top 20% of men (chads). How does it make any sense to you that an app that is pretty much centered around pictures (AKA showing how a person looks) will somehow be "fairer" to the male population if the gender ratios are balanced. Women control sex, and who they give it to (chads). Women are not going to automatically gain a sense of altruism for unattractive men and want to fuck them, just because they find out that there is an equal amount of men and women in a dating market. 😂😂😂 you are a literal dumbass, like I said before.

[–]noonereadsthisstuff 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

The women I know who don't use tinder see it as hook up app and they're not looking for hook ups.

Most of the girls I know who do use tinder don't have a choice because they're the girls guys don't want.

[–]BitsAndBobs304 -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Nah

[–]noonereadsthisstuff -4 points-3 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

The difference is that men make up the vast majority of tinder users and have much lower standards for casual hook ups

[–]Green-Quantity1032 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

lol you being downvoted tells me everything I need to know about this sub

[–]noonereadsthisstuff 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

People really don't like being told that they are the problem and not everyone else.

[–]Green-Quantity1032 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That's the thing, I don't know, or at least don't hang with people like that in real life.

It took me like 30 years to understand some people really expect the world to change because of their (godly?) preferences, it's mind-boggling

[–]RedditAdrninsArePedo 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Females are very lucky that men are not like them

[–]Spirited-Track4414PinkPill 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol idk why this is so funny to me

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2023. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter