Women come here to get advice.
For the majority of women looking for advice on FDS reddit, they’ve evidently never heard of these strategies before. They’ve come out of toxic and emotionally abusive relationships. Yet their content is clearly being read by moderators and their profile is being labelled “pick me probation”.
I feel like it’s a form of victim blaming, and an attempt to hierarchise a women’s support network. That is not solidarity at all, and it’s shocking to think that one or possibly moderators in a sub like this actually think that way after reading about horrific emotional abuse people have been through.
Having had a failed relationship does not make you a pick me - if you’re moderating on a female dating STRATEGY subreddit you should understand there is more nuance than that.
That’s all I have to say
[+]ino_y1 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
Personally I've only flaired Pickme for comments quite clearly displaying pride at catering to men, or encouraging others to forgive, excuse, and accept bs. If someone's made it clear they've read none of the sidebar, the rules, ideology and recommended reading, and ask a silly question regarding the best way to continue their pickme dance.
I'm the biggest pickme of all, and I need to knock that shit off too.
I'm well aware it's complex-ptsd, codependence and fawning. And cultural, societal, media and patriarchal messages. And many rounds of abusive boyfriends. I've never flaired pickme for abuse.
I changed the flair to "New" and left a message for the other mods.
I believe the changes in flair are due to noticeable contributions of solid content, not judgements of a commenter's value.
[–]CSQUITO 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CoolMelonadeRuthless Strategist[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]extraacct1234Ruthless Strategist 4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]CoolMelonadeRuthless Strategist 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CSQUITO -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]CoolMelonadeRuthless Strategist[M] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]carobonaraFDS Apprentice 17 points18 points19 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]CoolMelonadeRuthless Strategist 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CuriousCatNYC777Ruthless Strategist 3 points4 points5 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]CSQUITO 4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]CuriousCatNYC777Ruthless Strategist 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ms_TillyRuthless Strategist 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]CSQUITO 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]extraacct1234Ruthless Strategist 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CSQUITO 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]carobonaraFDS Apprentice 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]womanofthenorth 8 points9 points10 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]extraacct1234Ruthless Strategist 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CSQUITO -3 points-2 points-1 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]womanofthenorth 7 points8 points9 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]CSQUITO 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]womanofthenorth 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CSQUITO -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MuttonDressedAsGooseFDS Disciple 17 points18 points19 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]extraacct1234Ruthless Strategist 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CSQUITO 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CuriousCatNYC777Ruthless Strategist 10 points11 points12 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]bluewarri0rFDS Newbie 8 points9 points10 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]CSQUITO 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CuriousPerformanceFDS Newbie 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]soxychamp1 points [recovered] (6 children) | Copy Link
Amen OP! I absolutely hate how there’s this completely unnecessary hierarchy of high value-low value women in this sub. And these self proclaimed “high value” FDS women like to assert their superiority over these other women, and hence are more suitable for “high value men.” Barf.
(Never mind the classism and other types of isms and prejudice involved in judging a somebody as “low value”..)
They don’t realize this actually is throwing these other women under the bus, and undermines women as a group.
Call yourself queens, but do queens really have to put down other women for any reason?
I haven’t seen this situation in other women-empowering subs like pinkpill or gender critical. Only here. And it’s eerily reminiscent of RPW who like to posture themselves as better than non RPW or feminists.
[+]GCchick1 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
I'm new here so I didn't see this yet but doesn't it sound exactly like incelly redpilly shit?
[–]extraacct1234Ruthless Strategist -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CSQUITO 2 points3 points4 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[+]soxychamp1 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
I’m Christian so I understood value as something innate, as in God values everybody equally and highly.
Also works in secular terms: even the most wretched of a human being also has the same value, dignity and rights as any other.
Something really weird about thinking you are better and can look down and make fun of other women, just because you are on FDS
[–]CSQUITO 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]GCchick 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]a-net_FDS Disciple -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]CSQUITO -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AutoModerator[M] -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]plutunic -1 points0 points1 point (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]CSQUITO 3 points4 points5 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]plutunic 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link