Feminist posts how-to guide on taking down Facebook pages with false reports

EvilPundit · 2014-08-12T22:37:48+00:00

An insight into the tactics used by feminists to silence online dissent.

Here's a screenshot in case the page disappears.

TheChymera · 2014-08-13T00:08:24+00:00

I'd say we better report them to facebook. I'm wondering whether FB will take the time to review this, but the page is evidence of a group effort to censor facebook. Maybe they care?

SirSkeptic · 2014-08-13T03:36:14+00:00

My mother had a little booklet in the 70's like this. It was about how to argue with your husband.

I only saw it for a moment before she ripped it out of my hands and I've never seen it again.

It had things like "Wait until he's very tired or doing something urgent" and "how to Maintain your Rage"

It seems the feminist mindset regarding fair play and honesty remains unchanged.

tallwheel · 2014-08-13T01:48:37+00:00

How-two guide on how to silence legitimate speech you don't agree with.

AryaBarzan · 2014-08-13T06:53:33+00:00

Man, as if the whole "pro-censorship feminist" wasn't enough of a stereotype, she wrote this little gem on her sidebar:

I weigh 94 kg / 207 lb and I am a 178 cm / 5.10 ft in height. "Experts" say that I am "overweight". They can go fuck themselves, with the implication that I should weigh any less than I do. What I am is fat and it is precisely what I am suppose to be.

Oh man. It's literally laughable how much of a straw-feminist this individual is.

Mitschu · 2014-08-13T01:02:21+00:00

I take it this is because they just can’t be arsed with sifting through and entire page and they don’t have our keen eye for fakery and misogyny. They will simply not bother to take such a report seriously.

Firstly, I really wish people would check what they post before posting. Through and entire page? Really? Errors like that typically occur during what I call the "inspiration" stage, when you're pounding out words back to back with no breaks in the rhythm for such minuscule things as using the wrong word. But... people who take their own writing seriously (you know, like people who publish online blogs) should also have a "proof" stage after that, where they spend several minutes reading and rereading to make sure that mistakes have been remedied and the internal structure remains consistent.

It's the difference between an ex of mine, who'd write chapters upon chapters of High Fantasy when she felt creative, but refused to do proofing because she deemed it the reader's responsibility to figure out what she meant... and pretty much any successful author, ever.

Metaphorically, it's the creative equivalent of the difference between wanting to have money, and being willing to work a job. So as far as pet peeves go, yeah, easily spotted mistakes like that get translated in my brain as "I want to write this because I know I'm awesome and deserve instant gratification and automatic respect, but I can't be bothered to actually do any of the work required to make it awesome, gratifying, or worthy of respect."

Yet sadly, that peeve wasn't why I came here to comment on this.

Rereading that, and then reading:

Sometimes new accounts get reported as fake faster than anything. In which case Facebook will demand a phonenumber and you don’t want to give them that under any circumtances, especially with their new sieve of a privacy policy about to go into effect.

(Incidentally, circumtances? Damn it...) Which is it? Is Facebook lazy and unwilling to put in any effort to verify things which get reported to them and lack the required skills to do their own jobs, or are they strict arbiters of their own rules who are steadfastly capable of cracking down on suspected violations "faster than anything?"

That is what I came to comment on, the inherent doublethink and victimhood narrative required to become an extremist like this. Either you have to accept that Facebook's staff are simultaneously inept and competent, or you have to accept that Facebook has a secret policy of cracking down on everything feminist while graciously allowing everything anti-feminist to stand uncontested, while in the same stroke catering to feminist demands on how their website should be run.

Either Facebook is run by literal oxymorons, or there's a conspiracy against feminists lurking in the underbelly of the platform that has given them practically every concession they've asked for in making Facebook "safer" for feminists to use.

... but really, the more important issue here to me... at least learn how to use text editing software (several these days are free and come with spell checks, grammar checks, malapropism checks, etc.) if you can't be bothered to do your own proofing before publishing. -_-

da1inchpunch · 2014-08-13T04:17:15+00:00

Now we know how to effectively shut down any feminist or anti male FB page we want. Thanks, feminist at sea.

a0i · 2014-08-13T04:09:55+00:00

The spirit of the BlockBot is alive and well. Thanks, adding this to my collection of Feminazi links, alongside Witchwind, RadfemHub, and "Remembering Aileen Wournos".

LeeryLucifer · 2014-08-13T08:16:52+00:00

This is why I haaaate feminism. And they wonder why people thnk feminists are fucking crazy?

Even though this fat cunt don't like penis in vagina sex, billions of other women do. If they didn't, there would be no children, or at least faaaar fewer.

nc863id · 2014-08-13T03:33:13+00:00

1.) It's a cliché, not a buzzword. 2.) It's exactly what you advocated doing.

SporkTornado · 2014-08-13T00:04:20+00:00

Well now that we know their tactics for censoring the opposition. I think it's about time to give these radfems a taste of their own medicine.

Title	Feminist posts how-to guide on taking down Facebook pages with false reports
Author	EvilPundit
Upvotes	175
Comments	54
Date	August 12, 2014 10:30 PM UTC (11 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/mensrights/comments/2ddob3/feminist-posts-how-to-guide-on-taking-down-/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/feminist-posts-how-to-guide-on-taking-down.1620073 https://theredarchive.com/post/1620073

Comments