The accuser first propositioned McGregor, sending him suggestive pictures over social media and volunteering to go to his hotel. Despite this, she claims she had no desire to sleep with him.

She left her boyfriend to go see McGregor as part of a multi-day bender, but lied to him about where she was.

CCTV showed her kissing and touching both McGregor and his friend — AFTER McGregor was alleged to have raped her. In fact, she stayed for hours partying and drinking after the alleged assault.

She alleged he put her in a choke hold and told her “now you know how I felt in the Octagon, where I tapped out three times” — Really?

A couple in the bedroom next door testified against her account of events, they never saw or heard any signs of assault. One of these people that testified this was HER OWN friend and work colleague!

One of those people testified that he slept with the woman. She denied this, but it was seemingly corroborated by CCTV footage showing her all over him AFTER the alleged assault. She also sued this man for sexual assault (despite claiming to have no recollection of meeting him), but he was found not guilty by the jury.

She claimed to have no memory of the events of the CCTV footage showing her all over the two men, but had a good memory of everything else.

She claimed to be out of it at the time of the assault, explaining her lapsed memory, but she was texting lengthy text messages of lies to her boyfriend at the time.

For some reason, her boyfriend recorded the conversation with her when she returned home. What does that suggest?

The case was thrown out as a criminal case by the Director of Public Prosecutions due to insufficient evidence — twice. This was a civil case where it does not need to be proved “beyond reasonable doubt”, but just found to be more likely than not. The jury was made up of 8 women and 4 men. And lastly, this is NOT a rape conviction, but an award for damages over an assault.