so im the same guy that made the post last week (or 2 weeks ago, i dont remember) saying "if most guys just looked maxxed or took better care of themselves, they'd be attractive to a decent set of women" and i still stick by that post because i know most of you guys arent even ugly but keep comparing yourself to the most handsome men instead of comparing the men with wives or girlfriends but then keep saying "those women arent happy cause they're not with chad". ive read some of the comments and they did have some points but i still no doubt believe if they just lookmaxxed and put themselvs out there, they get ATLEAST SOMEONE to find them attractive.

but i have another CMV

Just Because You Find Someone Objectively Attractive, Doesnt Mean You Find Them Sexually Attractive.

i used the same example on my other post saying a guy like Henry Cavill is attractive but there are women that dont find him that attractive, despite him being OBJECTIVELY ATTRACTIVE.

Guys like Justin Beiber and Keanu Reeves (John Wick) are examples of objectively attractive guys but that doesnt mean 90% of the female population wants to fuck them.

you can look at some girl and be like "she's beautiful or nice to look at but she isnt MY TYPE of beautiful" . maybe you'd fuck her if she gave you the chance but its a good chance you'd wouldnt sweat it since she's really not you type anyway.

Look at girls like Megan Fox or Emma Watson, i dont care what you say, these girls are objectively attractive (i heard megan got surgery tho but still attractive) and they're nice to look at from eye point of view but that doesnt mean guys are just going to start throwing wedding rings are them (unless he's really thirsty).

Even guys have they're type on the women they want.

Same With Girls.

guys like idris elba or david beckham or bradley cooper are objectively attractive but doesnt mean every women finds them attractive. Even girls have they're type.

and you might say "okay but its still a chance that the guy that she's after is attractive" ok? And? maybe he's attractive to HER but if we were to see him, he'd be no more than a 6/10. but to her he'd be a 8/10 even tho he's not OBJECTIVELY ATTRACTIVE.

the only 2 most desireable physical traits most men need are height and low body weight. once you pass those both, everything else is subjective.

and i know once the guys hear height, they go insane. LIKE I SAID BEFORE IN MY OTHER POST, JUST BECAUSE YOUR SHORT, DOESNT MEAN EVERY WOMEN IS GOING TO FIND YOU UNATTRACTIVE. THEY'RE ARE MARRIED SHORT GUYS ON PLANET EARTH AND THERE ARE SOME WOMEN THAT FIND GUYS AROUND THEIR HEIGHT OR 1 INCH TALLER ATTRACTIVE, NOT EVERY CHICK WANTS A 6FT CHAD (i used capitals not because im yelling but to clearly state my point)

Face wise, as long as you dont have any facial feature that REALLY stand out, like a really big nose (even some girls find guys with big noses attractive), super big eyes or a non-exsistent chin (and im not talking about a round chin or oval chin cause you still have a chin, just not strong). or any facial deformaties like down syndrome, missing eye, missing ear, or anything extreme, its a chance that there was a girl in some point in you life that found you sexually attractive. unless your fat, then thats on you.

im not good at tl:dr but ill risk it.

TL:DR : just because you find someone objectively attractive, dosent mean you find them your type of attractive or maybe even want to fuck them. mayebe they just better to look from a far.

Also, if seen any mispells, please forgive, im 100% english, i to fast sometimes and forget to edit small words.