I've noticed something about women (in case you haven't)

Whenever I say that I want to be a stay-at-home dad who only works part-time when my future kids are not in school and full-time everywhere else, I always get 50 female snoos strawmanning that as "why do you want to never work?"

It finally dawned on me the other day that well, it's not a mistake. One woman among these hundreds of entitled witches just flat out said, "that will sound like you don't want to work at all to most women," and I'm guessing she was simply the only one upfront about it.

It's not impossible to find abortion debates on the internet where every comment by the pro-life person says "why do you support murder?" over and over again like a brick wall because it's *not* a mistake; it's just not a false equivalency to *them.*

So similarly, it's not a false equivalency to *women* to say "guy who takes a break to be a parent = man who does not want to work at all" because anything that is not the trad provider role for men is in fact less in the direction of offsetting ∞, because if you ask most women what a man can do to properly offset pregnancy and request being a stay-at-home dad or an equal relationship outside of that, it's "her pregnancy is worth ∞."

Because I was being naive and it was never 50 women misreading one comment, it's like 90% of women who will ALWAYS equate a work break with total unemployment, and it's not an error to them, because it's woman code for "fuck you pay me, fuck you pay me, fuck you pay me" and men's ability to translate this mess serves as it's own network of shit tests, like "if I had to explain it to you, I would already be gone"

This is why men talk about how women really do speak a different language, like the joke in The Venture Brothers that "we need to talk" is "universal chick code" for "we need to break up."

So, question for the red pill council of doom: How often do women not only "speak a different language," but how often are there actual autistic 1:1 "translations from womanese" like this that are possible? Aside from the fact that the Venture Brothers example is backed by non-fiction, the best example I can think of are Maddox's "lies girls have told me," where he similarly argues it can, in fact, be a 1:1 correspondence, and we aren't sure if that's an example from fiction or real life. I think you can not only go for a 1:1 meaning in 90% of cases, but also produce something similar to a dictionary for understanding womanese, with hundreds of entries. It very clearly goes beyond just basic "unspoken" things among men.