TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/seduction
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

      • Artful Prudence
      • A Voice for Men
      • Alpha Game
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Good Looking Loser
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • In Mala Fide
      • KillToParty
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Married Man Sex Life
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Power Moves
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • The Spearhead
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

District attorney requests woman who had sex with a minor be punished the same as a man would: “We felt strongly that the defendant shouldn’t be treated any differently just because she is female, and would only accept a felony plea”

FSOexpo

August 25, 2021
6388 upvotes
/r/PussyPassDenied
https://leoaffairs.com/district-attorney-requests-woman-who-had-sex-with-a-minor-be-punished-the-same-as-a-man-would/
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title District attorney requests woman who had sex with a minor be punished the same as a man would: “We felt strongly that the defendant shouldn’t be treated any differently just because she is female, and would only accept a felony plea”
Author

FSOexpo

Upvotes 6388
Comments 233
Date August 25, 2021 2:15 AM UTC
(4 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/PussyPassDenied
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/pussypassdenied/comments/pb1umf/district_attorney_requests_woman_who_had_sex_with/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/PussyPassDenied/district-attorney-requests-woman-who-had-sex-with.1064870
https://theredarchive.com/post/1064870
Top posts by FSOexpo

Ashley Thomas, who was found guilty of aggravated child neglect, facilitation of sexual exploitation of a minor, sexual exploitation of a minor, criminal responsibility for rape of a child and continual sexual abuse was sentenced to 40 years in prison.

7240 upvotes
August 15, 2020
/r/PussyPassDenied

Felicia Mulkey, 33, pleaded guilty to one count of Continuous Sexual Abuse of a Child, one count of Super Aggravated Sexual Assault of a Child, and two counts of Possession of Child Pornography, and received two life sentences with no chance of parole.

3568 upvotes
December 13, 2019
/r/PussyPassDenied

woman, 37, was charged with 17 counts of criminal sexual conduct with a minor second degree and 202 counts of disseminating harmful material to a minor.

3465 upvotes
June 9, 2021
/r/PussyPassDenied

Woman was sentenced twice: 25 years, then 35 years for: rape, sexual exploitation of children and possessing child pornography. Prosecutor: “We didn’t think the federal sentence was enough…She needed to be held accountable for the rape of her child".

3087 upvotes
September 25, 2021
/r/PussyPassDenied

Woman who was previously fired as a correctional officer for “unprofessional conduct and inappropriate relations” with a juvenile offender was found guilty of "Continuous sexual abuse of a child", and was sentenced to 25 years in prison without parole. The victim was an 11 year old boy.

3025 upvotes
November 9, 2021
/r/PussyPassDenied

Former elementary school teacher, 42, who was found guilty on two counts of child molesting and one count of inappropriate communication with a minor, received a 47-year sentence for molesting a 10 year old boy.

2721 upvotes
January 6, 2022
/r/PussyPassDenied

Former female teacher who groomed and sexually exploited a student and then blamed it on the victim was sentenced to 19 years in federal prison. Female victim: "You are a manipulator and a predator...I always thought predators were scary men. I never would have thought it would be my own teacher"

2502 upvotes
March 13, 2023
/r/PussyPassDenied

Australia: Former teacher was ordered to pay almost $1.5 million in damages to an ex-student after a court found she sexually abused the vulnerable boy and lied about it for decades. [historical abuse, lawsuit]

2310 upvotes
September 18, 2021
/r/PussyPassDenied

Comments

[–]DLVVLD 1064 points1065 points1066 points 4 years ago (47 children) | Copy Link

And that’s the equality that’s needed

[–]stephen2awesome 142 points143 points144 points 4 years ago (36 children) | Copy Link

Equality will feel like oppression

[–]DLVVLD 75 points76 points77 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yes, yes it will

[–]I_actually_prefer_ 17 points18 points19 points 4 years ago (33 children) | Copy Link

What they don’t realize is that the “patriarchy“ prtects and coddles women. True equality would look incredibly bleak for women

[–]Rosee-lil-feet-2 points 4 years ago [recovered] (32 children) | Copy Link

It amazes me how little you think of women . Do you think the patriarch is protecting us right now? There is no equality because we are not equal and never will be

[–]Think_Temperature_39 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (28 children) | Copy Link

I know .....and it sucks how superior you are..and still want more

[–][deleted] 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Mythandros 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You like to generalize and stereotype people, don't you?

I totally expect a feminist to be a garbage person and you are proving me right.

Let me clarify one important thing for you. People here don't hate WOMEN, we hate FEMINISTS and FEMINISM. Not all feminists are women and not all women are feminists.

You should remeber this.

[–]Mythandros[M] 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Don't worry boys, the FDS troll has been removed and banned and will not be spreading their lies, abuse and toxicity here anymore.

Talk about a no value human, holy shit.

[–][deleted] 4 years ago (24 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Think_Temperature_39 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link

MA'MM im happily married with 4 kids...YOU SEEM VERY HATEFUL AND PATHETIC YOURSELF ...MAYBE YOU SHOULD SEEK THERAPY

[–]JakeDC 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago* (17 children) | Copy Link

It is an FDS poster. Ignore it.

[–][deleted] 4 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Think_Temperature_39 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

Did someone hurt you? ..i'll bet you are just sad because being overweight,always single,no friends or prospect of ever having a person care about you and being mentally ill just makes you lash out at people...BUT IT WILL BE OKAY CRAZY PERSON

[–][deleted] 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Think_Temperature_39 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Who did it?.... Was it an uncle or dad.... Probs an old boyfriend huh

[–][deleted] 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]WorthlessDrugAbuser 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Shut up whore

[–]Mythandros 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The joke is that there is no such thing as patriarchy. It's made up jargon intent on vilifying all men.

[–]thefudmaster 127 points128 points129 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Only if the judge isn't a simp.

[–]Ayrab4Trump 77 points78 points79 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

She so ugly they should add extra time.

[–]Serenity--Now 125 points126 points127 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Her being unattractive is likely the reason for the aggressive prosecution. Every other week I see these hot women rapists get off with a slap on the wrist or at least only getting FRACTION of the time a man would get for the same offense.

But ugly women. They are fair game to throw the book at.

[–]NormStewart 46 points47 points48 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thats what i was thinking. The sexy teachers that do this usually dont get the out come thats deserved. I know its a bit different but if Casey Anthony wasnt so hot i think she’d be in prison.

[–]PurpleCrackerr 25 points26 points27 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

My first thought after reading the title. “Bitch must be ugly”.

[–]JohnDax 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

THIS!! this is not even gendered... pretty and attractive people overall get away with fucking murder... but God help you if you get caught doing anything while being ugly...

[–]InterPool_sbn 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

https://southpark.cc.com/video-clips/9lb529/south-park-nice

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

mogs me

[–]antifeminist3 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Using the argument of equality just a few years ago was non-existent. Maybe the MRA's have actually had an effect here.

[–]SkinnyPenisLand 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

More of this equality might see statistics even out a bit, too. I wonder how many rapes and murders are pled down by women - notice how it’s newsworthy that a District Attorney wants a felony plea for raping a child..

[–]CoxyNormus696969 766 points767 points768 points 4 years ago (99 children) | Copy Link

Raped not "had sex"

[–]Assassin1089 295 points296 points297 points 4 years ago (93 children) | Copy Link

The case of them saying "had sex" when it's a female and "raped" when it's a man kinda reminds me of when they call someone "mentally issued" if he kills someone, but if that same guy is Arabic, he's referred to as "Muslim terrorist"

[–]Restless_Fillmore 93 points94 points95 points 4 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

It doesn't meet the definition of "rape" in the California penal code. If the reporter had said "rape," rhe paper would be handing the defendant a fat check for defamation/libel.

See the statute.

But IANAL.

[–]bunnite 37 points38 points39 points 4 years ago* (8 children) | Copy Link

IANAL

But the statute linked defines sex with a minor as ‘unlawful sexual intercourse’.

The Merriam-Webster definition of rape is “unlawful sexual activity and usually sexual intercourse carried out forcibly or under threat of injury against a person's will or with a person who is beneath a certain age or incapable of valid consent because of mental illness, mental deficiency, intoxication, unconsciousness, or deception”

Since this case is within the common English definition of rape, I don’t think it meets the standard for libel. Also, I think you’d have to prove that stating “raped a child” was significantly more defamatory than writing “unlawful sexual relationship with child”.

A lawyer should probably fact check me though.

[–]Ayrab4Trump 18 points19 points20 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

“… deception.”

👀

Uh oh. That sounds quite subjective. I’m a little worried now.

[–]bunnite 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

In California I think the following conditions would describe ‘deceptive’ rape. It’s a bit hard to happen accidentally.

(B) Was not aware, knowing, perceiving, or cognizant that the act occurred.

(C) Was not aware, knowing, perceiving, or cognizant of the essential characteristics of the act due to the perpetrator’s fraud in fact.

(D) Was not aware, knowing, perceiving, or cognizant of the essential characteristics of the act due to the perpetrator’s fraudulent representation that the sexual penetration served a professional purpose when it served no professional purpose.

(5) Where a person submits under the belief that the person committing the act is someone known to the victim other than the accused, and this belief is induced by any artifice, pretense, or concealment practiced by the accused, with intent to induce the belief.

(7) Where the act is accomplished against the victim’s will by threatening to use the authority of a public official to incarcerate, arrest, or deport the victim or another, and the victim has a reasonable belief that the perpetrator is a public official. As used in this paragraph, “public official” means a person employed by a governmental agency who has the authority, as part of that position, to incarcerate, arrest, or deport another. The perpetrator does not actually have to be a public official.

[–]Ayrab4Trump 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

5) Where a person submits under the belief that the person committing the act is someone known to the victim other than the accused, and this belief is induced by any artifice, pretense, or concealment practiced by the accused, with intent to induce the belief.

“He’s not rich like I thought! Rape!!”

This is what I mean.

[–]JohnDax 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

makeup can be deceptive... just saying...

[–]musselshirt67 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Merriam Webster is great but it isn't the penal code

[–]VIIIMan 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Boy, you are not wrong about that. I've met some girls that celebrated Halloween year round.

[–]bunnite 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That’s not the point. My argument is that since this person committed a crime which would be commonly considered ‘rape’, it would not be libel to refer to the incident as a ‘rape’ in the context of a news article.

[–]EtherMan 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They’re not arguing it in court though so that doesn’t actually matter. In common speech you’re not bound by the legal definition of words. For defamation to apply in the US, you have to get around the first amendment and that protects any discussion like that and if the description of what you say is commonly understood as a thing that is true, then you’re protected by that truth is an ultimate defense.

HOWEVER, it MIGHT pass an anti SLAPP check in which case just fighting it is in itself costly. This is why papers will often avoid such labels exactly in situations like when it doesn’t match legal definitions as well as common speech definitions.

[–]Imagine357 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, she had unlawful sexual intercourse.

[–][deleted] 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Restless_Fillmore 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I didn't miss that. That isn't "rape"...that is what she was actually charged with.

[–]Crafty_Department_57 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Statutory rape is rape. They are not old enough to consent.

[–][deleted] 4 years ago* (49 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]mum_puncher 41 points42 points43 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Be careful saying allah Akbar, I’ve seen some people say that abit too loudly and it makes them explode.

[–]El_Maltos_Username 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Not a very good magic spell when that's the result.

[–]giustiziasicoddere 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

it is, in the grand scheme of things

[–]VIIIMan 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Well, you apparently get 72 virgins if you explode so it kinda makes up for it.

[–]creatureslim 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Or was it 72 Virginians?

https://youtu.be/9346wHJnswA

[–]Assassin1089 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (42 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, that wasn't what I meant tho

[–][deleted] 4 years ago* (38 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Assassin1089 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (25 children) | Copy Link

I get that if he kills for a religious reason he's a terrorist, I meant in a situation where he had different reasons and they link it to his creed

[–]delsignd 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

What if he kills for government reasons? Why is one acceptable and the other not?

[–]mum_puncher 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

One is sanctioned, the other is vigilantism. Durr

[–]delsignd -4 points-3 points-2 points 4 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

So killing is okay if the government says it is? Government is the arbiter of morality then?

[–]Assassin1089 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It isn't okay but It has a different word for it

[–]mum_puncher 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

That’s why people like you leave it to people like us

[–][deleted] 4 years ago* (8 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]DatMX5 -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Why are you so focused on Islam?

[–][deleted] 4 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]DatMX5 -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Dude you went from zero to,

If you shout alla akbar at any point during the killing you're probably a Muslim terrorist though

What line? That you're a fucking dumbass?

[–]Assassin1089 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Random topic that came up on my mind, also why not?

[+]DatMX5 -6 points-5 points-4 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

What exactly are you asking?

[+]Ahza17 -12 points-11 points-10 points 4 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

You know nothing of islam do you

[–][deleted] 4 years ago* (8 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]VIIIMan 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yeah, I don't see too many Christians these days blowing anything up or making YouTube videos of them cutting someone's head off with a dull pocket knife. I mean, if you shit-talk Christians, you might get a protest or a strongly worded letter. With the Muslims, you can expect to be on YouTube, getting your head chopped off or something as equally barbaric.

[+]Ahza17 -13 points-12 points-11 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

You realise. One of the major rules of islam is that you cant attack anyone unless they attack you first. Judging an entire religion over the actions of insane terrorists claiming to be from that religion is idiotic. I suggest you learn about islam Not from the extremists that claim to follow it

[–]Divine-Nemesis 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I used to be anti Islam till I turned off the television and actually met Muslims and had open conversations. The ones in the Middle East right now are extremist, the same way the Spanish Inquisition was with Christianity. Every religion has extremists that take it off to another level of wrong. Every Muslim I have encountered are some of the most humble and gracious people I have met. I stand by my Christian values and never once has a Muslim attacked me or even treated me differently. This is my personal experience from someone who just had hatred and anger towards Islam after 9/11 and ISIS to now respecting and appreciating it for the beauty of what it can be. Look deep enough in every religion and you will see atrocities done by man in the name of the religion.

[–]jacksuisse 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The problem with many muslims is that they feel like being attacked very easily.

[+]Artixe -8 points-7 points-6 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

just because a religion has these rules that doesn't mean the followers of that religion even respect those rules, if that were true, living in a major muslim neighborhood wouldn't be so fucking shit.

[–]Ahza17 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The muslim population of the world id 1.8billion. if even half of those were people taht you were describing there would be a LOT of chaos than there is currently. Like i said generalising the many over the actions of the few.

[+]Y_A_Gambino -13 points-12 points-11 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Kak stupid. Islam does not instruct people to kill others.

[–]giustiziasicoddere -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

you've gotta understand lefties, anon: they live and breath politics narratives

[–]MazerTag 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You're the only one laying down political narratives.

[–]giustiziasicoddere -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

the guy deleted the comment

[–]usernameinvalid9000 17 points18 points19 points 4 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

Yeah by definition terrorism needs a political or religious motive, when you're beheading someone and screaming Allah akbar that when it becomes terrorism and not just murder.

[+]Assassin1089 -14 points-13 points-12 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

True, I meant if he's Arabic and they link the murder with him being a Muslim even if his motives are far from that topic

[–]usernameinvalid9000 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'd like to see some examples.

[+]Onayepheton -8 points-7 points-6 points 4 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

No, it actually doesn't. All it needs to do is induce terror in a group of people. It's literally in the name.

[–]bunnite 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago* (11 children) | Copy Link

There is no single, universally accepted, definition of terrorism. Terrorism is defined in the Code of Federal Regulations as “the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives” (28 C.F.R. Section 0.85).

“the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.” -Oxford Dictionary

“the use of violent acts to frighten the people in an area as a way of trying to achieve a political goal” -Merriam-Webster

Terrorism is a crime committed to intimidate/coerce a group of people with the intent of furthering some agenda (political, social, religious, etc…)

[–]Onayepheton -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

The word terrorism predates the USA. lol

[–]bunnite 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago* (9 children) | Copy Link

Fine then.

Oxford defines terrorism as “the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.”

UK .gov defines terrorism as “Terrorism is the use or threat of action, both in and outside of the UK, designed to influence any international government organisation or to intimidate the public. It must also be for the purpose of advancing a political, religious, racial or ideological cause.”

[–]Onayepheton -5 points-4 points-3 points 4 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

You literally cherry picked one out of multiple. lol Also: I hope you are aware, that terrorism is not just a legal term.

[–]bunnite 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago* (7 children) | Copy Link

I literally included the two largest dictionaries and US.gov and UK.gov. Sorry I didn’t link every single definition and English speaking country in the world? Stfu.

Terrorism is a crime committed to further a political, religious, or other agenda. You’re just being a lazy idiot.

[–]Onayepheton -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Well the dictionary one didn't restrict it, did it?

[–]de_carole 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Wasnt it the other way around?

If muslim did it its clash of culture, cultural differences, or whatnot

But for others, domestic terrorism

[–]FlowSoSlow 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It's hilarious how you can tell what brand of news people consume by how they interpret these things.

[–]de_carole 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yep, Thats what extreme polarity do to your country

[–]miss_step 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Or “immigrant” if a Mexican moves to the states, but “ex-pat” if a Brit moves to Spain.

[–]thejynxed 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Well yes, because that has to do with perpective from point of origin. A Mexican calling another Mexican who moved to the States an ex-pat makes sense, someone from the US calling them anything but an immigrant does not.

[–]miss_step 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

? I think you missed my point. What I’m saying is that “immigrant” is tied up in negative connotations compared to “ex-pat.” Let me put it like this: an Iranian moves to the US. He’s called an immigrant. A German moves to the us, he’s called an ex pat.

[–]MazerTag 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No he's not. My German friend is called an immigrant all the time.

[–]SkinnyPenisLand 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It’s kind of the other way around; the guy at the Pulse nightclub was shouting Allah Akbar when gunning down a bunch of gay people, and everyone insists the motive is unknown..

Right…

[–]Reddit_Sux_Hardcore -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I would say "mental problems because he's religious".

[–]AlienZerg 17 points18 points19 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Could be the correct terminology law-wise.
In some places “rape” is defined as being penetrated, hence why “women can’t rape men” (except anally i suppose?) in those places.

[–]youknowjus 16 points17 points18 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I’ve never understood that because penetrate is a verb. I could penetrate with fingers just as much as a penis. So a woman can most certainly penetrate somebody

[–]AlienZerg 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I think that in those circumstances (for example anal penetration with finger or a dildo) it would be called rape (law-wise).

[–]M_Salvatar 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

In my homeland, you wouldn't reach the court. There's a very particular hate for pedophiles. People go berserk.

[–]Zonkysama 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In my homeland after aged 16 you can have sex with people of any age without getting in trouble. And vice versa.

Excludes are teachers/students and any kind of similar relationship.

In my company a 17 y old femal trainee started a relationship with an over 50 y old colleage and all the officials said to their parents was: "She wants it, so we can do nothing. She has the right to do so."

Lasted about 15 month. The talking stopped after around a month or so. Than it was just irritating.

[–]MadeInBeirut13 320 points321 points322 points 4 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

The fact that we have to “Request” for this to be a thing is already ridiculous

[–]lil6ost 24 points25 points26 points 4 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

chill, at least it happened. i get your sentiment but lets celebrate this one

[–]TheRedTomahawk 26 points27 points28 points 4 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Nah fuck that...not enought.

[+]lil6ost -26 points-25 points-24 points 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

you're acting the same as women.

[–]FourthBar_NorthStar 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

No, we’re just advocating for equality. And it’s not equal right now, so it’s not enough.

[–]lil6ost -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

i understand that. progress is gradual. this is a win.

dont act like an arrogant little bitch just because were not there yet.
men are patient, men dont budge. its gonna take time to convince people, you getting all emotional is exactly what we disavow about womens reactions.

stop. celebrate the wim. i agree its not enough. but it will happen.

[–]TheRedTomahawk 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Wut? do you even understand the concept of pussy passes?.The point of this sub is not to advocate for women being inferior..like U seem to think sexist clown...and that is why u got down voted into -17....the point is to call the social or sistematic advantages women have over men....as often they are wrong and isntitutionally enforced...I just want equal laws that don't get designed to benefit women over man...things like women "equal" quotas in traditionally men filled jobs disproportionally benefit women as there is a reason for those distributions....hardly being the "patriarchy",as much as rad fems would like it to be.

[–]lil6ost -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

yes, and change takes time. youre acting the same as an irrational woman yapping about how its not enough.

things take time. changing peoples minds will take time. dont adopt their same behaviors. youre being emotional, youre being blinded by your rage (which i also have) but i see the bigger picture.

the reason why equality has been so slow to achieve is because sadly optics matter. when men let their emotions get the best of them and you act out like this. this justifies womens arguments. this sets us back even more.

the media and "popular thought" already is biased against men. letting them get you emotional will only prove them right (even though theyre wrong)

as a man you should understand that. they will never play by the rules, they will find any and every flaw in a mans behavior and use that as a way to inalidate us.

dont give them any ammo is all im saying. i understand its not enough. but this is proof that public sentiment is changing. you cant be mad that theres no overnight change. be patient , stay strong.

be a man.

[–]TheRedTomahawk 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

....if u agree with the not enought statement...and call me out for saying fuck that...u are playing semantics...no one really cares if some guy disagrees with u vehimently.

[–]lil6ost -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

ok bro. ur too mad to see my point but ok.

[–]TheRedTomahawk 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nah. just disagree.

[–]saltypepper128 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Plea bargains are always a request to the judge to skip straight to the ruling. The judge always gets final say whether it's allowed or not but they usually do

[–]lostmylogininfo 222 points223 points224 points 4 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

Fuck man.... I saw a thumbnail with a pic of a girl in red. Clicked before I saw this was a sad post. That lady is a dog.

Before you down vote please remember if this kiddie diddler was a man and I called him ugly I would likely get updoots. She ugly AF.

[–]Reddit_Sux_Hardcore 40 points41 points42 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yup. If she was attractive she would not be treated like a man.

[–]lostmylogininfo 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There is a precedent. It needs to end.

[–]Assassin1089 22 points23 points24 points 4 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Indeed, for some reason all pedophiles caught are always ugly af

[–]SamwiseLordOfThePans 18 points19 points20 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

So the ones that aren't caught are hot as fuck. Got it

[–]NotTheBestMoment 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Less likely to tell if it’s a hot woman raping a 15 year old boy I imagine

[–]Assassin1089 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I meant all the pedophiles I saw are ugly bro, nothing else

[–]SamwiseLordOfThePans 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I know. I'm making a joke my guy

[–]Assassin1089 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

My bad then, never was good at understanding jokes

[–]ursrsly 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Whoosh... Oh wait... Shit. Me either

[–]lostmylogininfo 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I remember there was a string of good looking female pedos that essentially got off easy and then some fugly ones for not. Hopefully now they are all treated the same.

[–]okron1kPPD Poet Master 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There’s a subreddit for you. /r/UNBGBBIIVCHIDCTIICBG

[–]airfox3522 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Which is why the Cali DA is asking for felony conviction, instead of misdemeanor?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, i wouldn't touch her with yours.

[–]ONEJOHNSON 37 points38 points39 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Probably only was requested because she isnt good looking.

And was therefore missing the halo effect as a secondary line of privilege.

[–]devil_lettuce 77 points78 points79 points 4 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

If she was attractive she probably would have been given a break 💅

[–]Assassin1089 32 points33 points34 points 4 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Can't argue with that, that hoe looks like my grandpa's ass

[–]SamwiseLordOfThePans 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

How do you know what your grandfathers anus looks like.

[–]Assassin1089 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

That's a very great question, too great that I have to avoid it

[–]SamwiseLordOfThePans 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

No i want to know

[–]Assassin1089 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

He's older than to take care of himself or even walk by himself, at some point I had to clean him until I got the chance to put him somewhere

[–]kit_ease 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Questions don't end with periods.

[+]SamwiseLordOfThePans -8 points-7 points-6 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

This is reddit, i could care less about grammar

[–]kit_ease 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

*couldn't care less

[–]ursrsly 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How can you be so sure they couldn't care less. Maybe they could but choose not to.

[–]PROLAPSED_SUBWOOFER 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

💯 I guarantee you if she was attractive she’d get off easy or even get out of conviction altogether.

[–]TheSigilStone 38 points39 points40 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Justice being served 🙏

[–]ArthurHaroldKaneJnr 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Revenge justice is a dish best served cold.

[–]Shodandan 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Can anyone explain that article. It says the 30 year old had "unlawful sex with a minor more than three years younger than her "

Why is it written like that? A 26 year old is " more than three years younger than her".

I dont get it.

[–]Shiprat 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Likely its a condition in the law wherever this is saying that an age difference of three years is immediately a crime, whereas say if the age of consent is 16, a 16 and a 15 year old or a 17 and a 15 year old might still engage in consensual sex. Generally the laws for age of consent is to stop adults from having sex with young teenagers or kids, not to stop them exploring consensually with others of their own approximate age, which makes sense. Seeing as the accused is older and was abusing a minor it seems a bit redundant to mention that it was more than three years difference but I assume its intended to make clear the definition and reality of the crime and not leave anything up to speculation.

[–]rizlakingsize 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Poor research and proof reading. Wait a day or two and Google it - you'll get more info.

[–]ViciousKiwi_MoW 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Equality, finally

[–]ViberArmani 17 points18 points19 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"a woman who had sex with a minor"??

if genders reversed:

"a pedophile man who raped a young girl"

[–]Reddit_Sux_Hardcore 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She's only getting the fair treatment because she's fugly.

[–]supershqipa 15 points16 points17 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Ok ma'am. Please face the wall.

[–]Danthemannnnn2 -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Based

[–]supershqipa 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I keep seeing based. What exactly is that and why do people call me that all the time?

[–]Danthemannnnn2 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

A word used when you agree with something; or when you want to recognize someone for being themselves, i.e. courageous and unique or not caring what others think. Especially common in online political slang.

[–]supershqipa 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's crazy cause I'm about as middle of the road as possible. I don't think truthfully statements or right ideas should be politicized but whatever I guess.

[–]El_Maltos_Username -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Based and redpilled is the right's stunning and brave.

[–]airfox3522 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A California DA asking for this? Now that's a rarity.

[–]Kn1ght_4rt0r14s 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They wanted equality. I want equality. Let's have equality.

[–]CRYTEK_T-REX 25 points26 points27 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Bitch ugly

[–]CrackedOutSuperman 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's why she raped a.minor

[–]Rogueshoten 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

(Especially since she’s ugly)

[–]Significant_Help_167 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If only this would truly happen.

[–]henrysmyagent 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If a man "had sex" with a minor, would he only have to serve 4 days in prison and 2 years probation?

[–]MyFeetLookLikeHands 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nope

[–]sony_anumo 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You have violated the law and will be tried as an Adult.

"Oh thats fine"

As an Adult man

"Aaaah shiieet"

[–]wkrausmann 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

She pleaded ‘no contest’ and got two years probation and credit for time served…four days.

Prosecution wanted her to be punished the same way a man would…but didn’t get it.

There was no PPD in this case.

[–]Nylon_Riot 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I would say it is the same. Brock Turner only got 6 months for dumpster rape because it "might ruin his life".

Before you flame me, a predator is a predator, and anyone regardless of age, gender, whatever should be treated as one if they prey on minors.

Regardless, anyone who preyed on my kid, be it male or female, would be fitted with cement shoes and introduced to the Atlantic Ocean.

[–]N3wPlayerI 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

FINALFUCKINGLY! True justice!

[–]Avlock 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Why is that a "had sex" and not rape ?

[–]Restless_Fillmore 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Because it doesn't meet the California penal code for "rape" and the writer doesn't want to get sued for libel.

https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?lawCode=PEN&division=&title=9.&part=1.&chapter=1.&article=

IANAL.

[–]Bigbog54 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Finally a DA with balls, or a vagina, I don’t care, equality is equality

[–]Lurkay1[🍰] 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Or ovaries. Which would be the anatomical equivalent of balls.

[–]NextWayisBest 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wow quite the realization there. /S

[–]Memphisrexjr 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Equal right only when it benefits not punishes.

[–]lil6ost 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

lol if she were a little bit less busted would this have happened?

[–]SirBlankFace 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Make it a legal precedent.

[–]WinnieMandela 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Reword the title from “women who had sex with” to “women who raped boy”

Your giving her a pass

[–]mandathor 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

all of this black lives matter and feminism activism has ironically put a spotlight on how women are given much more lenient sentences than men. I guess you reap what you sow. no more special treatment

[–]rhubarb2896 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I hate that they always say the women "had sex" with a minor. No, she RAPED a minor, just because they were male, doesn't take away from the fact he was raped.

[–]SansyBoy14 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It’s kind of sad that an attorney has to even request this. You would think it would be common sense.

[–]NineFingeredZach 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So if you are ugly they charge you like a man and if your attractive you get the pussy pass?

[–]uCry_iLoL 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Women are always demanding equality — here you go.

[–]Spencer5520 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Equality!!!

[–]Luckys0474 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

So I read the article and it states the person was 3 years younger than the 30 year old woman. What am I missing?

[–]iamzurek 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

same...if she's 30 and banged a 3 years younger dude, that just means it's a 27 year old with poor taste, coz she an ugly ass

[–]Luckys0474 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Then they write about an 18 year old which is still not a minor.

[–]Dayv1d 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"But thats not how we had handled things 10 years ago AT ALL!"

[–]strifelord 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes that monster should get the same.

[–]01ARayOfSunlight 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The part of this that bothers me the most is "threatening to use force or violence".

Not only did she rape a child, she threatened to beat his ass. I hope they throw the book at her.

[–]CRTOONS 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Faith in humanity restored

[–]Interesting_Song2944 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes!! you get what you fucking deserve bitch.

[–]FlagrantBooch 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

We request that the law actually act like the law and not just a recommendation

Gee wiz spongebob you'd fucking hope so.

[–]OriginalProngles 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Poor kid, she’s not even attractive

[–]NDC03 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Hope he was on top... that looks heavy.

[–]OriginalProngles 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Her and her gunt

[–]StuJayBee 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Which is to admit that there is a pussy pass in the first place. Thanks judge!

[–]EymaWeeTodd 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Where is this DA? I want to spend the remainder of my natural life volunteering with their campaigns.

[–]cropguru357 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Two years on probation. You all know that’s not a denied pass.

[–]Gaiinahat 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not a PPD yet. Let us wait and see what the sentence is.

[–]djkoz78 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is what Ppassdenied is supposed to be. Lately a I see a lot of PPASSES on this subreddit without the denied part.

[–]Grasshopper42 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Woman can't "have sex" with a minor without it being rape.

[–]Trevixle 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I think 'raped' would be more suitable in place of 'had sex'.

[–]Trevixle 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

The downvoter does not agree? What if it was a man? Then you would've agreed, right?

[–]alexdiezg 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

IT

IS

SPELLED

RAPE

[–]Snoo36988 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It was RAPE. Not “had sex with.”

[–]ariesAquarius 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The disparity in sentencing among genders is 8x than among races. She likely still got a lower end of the spectrum cause of our sexist culture.

[–]PettyCrocker_ 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

GOOD

[–]TheRedTomahawk 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Request" Meaning it is not the standar....so they know the system is sexist..but rad fems still claiming they opressed cause they don't own 50 percent of ford 500 companys....

[–]Uptown_NOLA 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Whoa, she's 30? She looks 45.

[–]PitBullFan 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The WALL! She hit it.

[–]ReginaldJohnston 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I actually screamed when I saw the photo of the abuser.

Can't see the thumbnail obviously and when I clicked up the article, I literally jumped out of my seat.

Face like it's been smacked on a Papa John's stove and that's no lie.

[–]SheprdCommndr 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Is it only because she’s not hot?

[–]adeadfetus 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Only because she’s not attractive. If she was attractive she would be treated as a woman.

[–]WhizWit21 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It’s because she’s ugly lol

[–]stellarola 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not worth.

[–]drunkennudeles 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's a rough 30.

[–]avirusbroughtmehere 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Why would she ever be treated any differently? Woke nonsense or not. Sex with a minor is criminal no matter who? Am i missing something?

[–]Accomplished-You6197 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

E Q U A L I T Y

[–]_eXo 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wait.... She is 18? Initially I read the sentence as her age which didn't make sense. Man, she's some damaged goods

[–]esands1970 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Damn she ugly af. The boy she took advantage if mustve been desperate asf

[–]iRojasPlays 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She looks like a shitty version of Jimmy Neutron if he was a she.

[–]Throwaway194820924 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is rape, not sex.

[+]smimton -14 points-13 points-12 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

If she were a 10, would it still be the same?

[–]LDLSA 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

If she were a 10, would it still be the same?

Does it really matter though? It's an adult who had sex with a kid, why bother with hypotheticals in this situation?

[–]smimton 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

no it doesn't, my piont is - There have been attractive teachers, who have gotten a much, much lighter sentence.

Infact one recently got to keep her license.

[–]LDLSA 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's also partial blame on the judge/jury that had convicted those others, I can definitely see where you're coming from though

[–]dreevsa -5 points-4 points-3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The article basically has no details

[–]Luckys0474 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

From they article...3 years younger than a 30 year old...so 27?...18 year old...still not a minor.

[–]YMarkY2 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

You should re-read the article. That's not what it says at all.

It says, "unlawful sex with a minor more than three years younger than her"

[–]Luckys0474 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Verbatim. An Olivehurst woman pleaded no contest on Wednesday to one count of unlawful sex with a minor more than three years younger than her, according to Sutter County Assistant District Attorney Cameron King.

[–]YMarkY2 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

So a minor more than 3 years younger than her could be 17, or could be 5, who knows. But certainly not 27 like in your post above.

[–]Luckys0474 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Your math sucks. She’s 30.

[–]YMarkY2 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I'll try one more time because I'm a nice guy.

  • A 27 year old is NOT a minor so that fails the one part of the equation.
  • A 27 year old is also NOT more than 3 years younger than 30, so that fails the other part of the equation.
  • A 26 year old would fail the first part but pass the second part, but that means the equation as a whole still fails.

Hope that clears it up for you. If you want to have a battle of math problems with me, you should arm yourself better.

[–]Luckys0474 -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Are you telling me 30-3 doesn’t equal 27.

The article states she’s a 30 year old woman do the math.

[–]Luckys0474 -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If I'm wrong fine. The article is written/read as a 30 year old had sex with a person 3 years younger than her.

[–]jonbonesholmes 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's just a way of excluding the context of Romeo and Juliette laws from the conversation.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter