TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/seduction
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

      • Artful Prudence
      • A Voice for Men
      • Alpha Game
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Good Looking Loser
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • In Mala Fide
      • KillToParty
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Married Man Sex Life
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Power Moves
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • The Spearhead
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Posting here even though it's probably not a good fit. This is the kind of misandry male victims have to put up with...

Lenzar86

February 4, 2023
456 upvotes
/r/PussyPassDenied

​

Getting a large amount of downvotes from the dickheads on that community. My now ex-wife literally forced me to give her a second child.

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Posting here even though it's probably not a good fit. This is the kind of misandry male victims have to put up with...
Author

Lenzar86

Upvotes 456
Comments 90
Date February 4, 2023 10:30 AM UTC
(3 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/PussyPassDenied
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/pussypassdenied/comments/10tda4w/posting_here_even_though_its_probably_not_a_good/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/PussyPassDenied/posting-here-even-though-its-probably-not-a-good.1150947
https://theredarchive.com/post/1150947
Red Pill terms in post
misandry

Comments

[–]rdrunner_74 301 points302 points303 points 3 years ago (46 children) | Copy Link

I can answer that question: No

Reason: UK law states that you need a dick to rape. (Otherwise it is "sexual assault" - which carries the same penalty - thats why you will never see an article from a UK outlet stating "She raped him" - it cant happen in the UK)

[–]Pherrot[🍰] 149 points150 points151 points 3 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Wow fuck this.

[–][deleted] 57 points58 points59 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Only men can rape, sweatie. 💅 /s

In all seriousness, agreed. It's a fucking sexist double standard.

[–]ZekalMacabre 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Sweatie? I think you mean "sweetie".

[–]Verain_ 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

woooosh

[–]ZekalMacabre -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

For you, yes.

[–]Verain_ 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

explain

[–]ZekalMacabre -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

See?

Woooooosh.

[–]ThrowAWAY6UJ 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol I know you’re getting downvoted, but this was a good comeback

[–]the-REAL-sherpa 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Here’s a towel for you to dry off, Sweatie. 💧

[–]CoolGuySauron 61 points62 points63 points 3 years ago (33 children) | Copy Link

Brasil: it's only domestic violence of the victim is female.

[+]Dull-Effort -60 points-59 points-58 points 3 years ago (32 children) | Copy Link

Objectively untrue. Both women and men can be victims, criminally speaking (as in, there is a law regarding domestic violence that treats both men and women as victims) of domestic violence. To be fair, however, there is a specific article/law/whatever regarding exclusively women (as victims, the criminal can be both women and men) in this kind of situation and the penalty for it is higher than the ‘normal’ domestic violence crime that also has men as victims, which is another matter entirely.

I’d argue it fair enough for the law to be like that honestly.

[–]synth_mania 36 points37 points38 points 3 years ago (27 children) | Copy Link

Nah that's fucked. Violence is violence

[+]Dull-Effort -35 points-34 points-33 points 3 years ago (26 children) | Copy Link

Well, the fact that violence is violence is protected by law, seeing what I just said. Domestic violence to women, specifically, gives a higher penalty.

It’s a question, I believe, with a lot more nuance than you’re giving it, considering the historical and social trend of violence against women in Brazil. And if you do consider all that, I think it fair for domestic violence against women to have a higher penalty. It’s an entirely different situation.

[–]synth_mania 15 points16 points17 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Then just raise the penalty for violence in relationships in general. There is absolutely no reason that violence against one gender should be considered less devastating than the other. Tell a male victim of abuse that "no, this is a completely different situation"

[+]Dull-Effort -9 points-8 points-7 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It is a different situation, though. And it’s not to discredit male victims and the abuse they’ve suffered, which is a serious matter on its own. I think you misunderstood my opinions regarding this as I do think male victims are not regarded properly here. I just believe the right way to approach it is different.

To keep it clear, I’m speaking about Brazil, my native country. So, while not exclusive to, my reasoning is thought of in the context of my country.

You have to understand that violence against women was/is something nearly intrisic to my country’s culture and, before the impacts by law changes that included specific mechanisms to protect women, it was something quite common and normalized.

These specific mechanisms were created to solve a huge problem ingrained into an entire country’s culture, which domestic violence against women is and, to be quite frank, domestic violence against man isn’t (as it hasn’t at any point in Brazil’s history been normalized or ingrained into its culture). So, a change of law was necessary to ‘solve’ (and it worked wonderfully in changing the culture and reducing the amount of cases) the problem of violence against women, whereas doing the same for men, i.e making the penalty equal, just wouldn’t accomplish anything at this point, except for fulfilling pointless gender equality agendas.

With men, society struggles to recognize violence against men as violence and abuse, which is a problem, but increasing the penalty wouldn’t solve it.

[–]DKlurifax 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I had a friend whose brother was beaten to within an inch of his life by his wife.

Fuck you.

[–]Dull-Effort 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You seem to misunderstand my point entirely. I don’t have anything to do with that.

Fuck you too :)

[–]peasngravy85 10 points11 points12 points 3 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link

Why's it an entirely different situation, out of interest? Being abused at home by your partner is awful, no matter who is on the receiving end

[–]Dull-Effort 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I’ve answered someone above and it’d be a decent explanation of my perspective on it being different, but, to keep it simple, violence against women was and is normalized and ingrained in Brazil’s culture, and much larger-scale than violence against men, thus a more extreme method was needed to combat it. Changing the law to increase the penalty of violence against men wouldn’t help with the problem at all.

That is, of course, not to banalize abused men’s suffering. It was never my intention to do that, and I’m an advocate for many changes in the way society regards violence against men. I just think that, objectively speaking, both problems stem from different sources and need to be treated and solved in different ways.

[–]peasngravy85 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I appreciate your answer, and I understand your argument. You’re clearly not just throwing stuff around and your answer is well thought out, so thanks for taking the time.

Maybe it’s impossible for me to understand it fully from your point of view, not having lived in that particular society.

Easy for me to just sit here and say “nope, nonsense!” without appreciating any nuance.

[–]Dull-Effort 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ay, thanks for being so polite and understanding with your answer. I appreciate that fr.

Regarding whatchu said, that’s fair lmao. Have a nice day :)

[–]Euroranger 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

Maybe all you need to do is identify as a woman...

[–]Butt__Munching 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

lol

[–]Dull-Effort -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Wow lmao. Transphobia sure is a nice way of adding to the discussion.

[–]Euroranger 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Nah. GFY.

[–]Dull-Effort -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Sure lmao. You woke up today angry at the world or smth huh?

[+]hicctl -7 points-6 points-5 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

seriouisly ? People try to discuss a serioius subject and all you have is a transphobic joke ?

[–]trevorb2003 7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I don’t think it’s a transphobic; more so just showing how stupid the law is.

“Your sentence is 5 years”

Your honor the defendant identifies as Female

“YOUR SENTENCE IS LIFE”

[–]hicctl -3 points-2 points-1 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

sorry but "you can just identify as a women and get beter tr5eatment" is a right wing dog whistle for trans people are not real and just want advantes by claiming to be women, so i can´t find anything funny about this, even if he did not mean it that way

[–]Euroranger 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Seriously. I was physically abused in my first marriage so I think I've earned the right to ignore some sanctimonious twat rolling up to try and gatekeep the topic through some bullshit shaming put down.

Go piss up someone's leg who cares about your feelings...cause that ain't me.

[–]Butt__Munching 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

go cry

[–]One_Kaleidoscope_271 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The specific law "Maria da Penha" is targeted to women, was created for that and judges and advocates will explicitely say this and you admitted, why the roundabout?

[–]Dull-Effort -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It is. Doesn’t mean that the law doesn’t protect men who suffer domestic violence. In fact, domestic violence against men is a crime. Whether the penalty being higher for violence against women is justified is another matter which I’ve already expressed my opinion on.

It’s not being roundabout, it’s correcting the information that other dude said.

[–]One_Kaleidoscope_271 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The specific law is directed to women. Wether its necessary or not, it's the judiciary sister explicitely saying that women lives are more important.

[–]throwaway_XXXX2 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

but muh womyns

[–]TheVambo 44 points45 points46 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The maximum sentence for rape is life, whereas the maximum sentence for sexual assault is 10 years.

​

There is, in fact, a specific offence of ‘sexual assault by penetration’, which can be committed by both men and women. That offence also carries a life sentence, but it is separate and distinct to the offence of rape.

[–]sydney2620 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What if she used her penis? These days women can have penises so I suppose it is possible for a woman to rape a man with her penis under the English definition

[–]Artorias606 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, but the thing is, that sex between married people simply never classified as rape, that's why it was "allowed". At least it was like that where I live.

[–]UltimateAnemone 41 points42 points43 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Show horn must be when you get your dick out in public.

[–]El-Lamberto 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Your lower horn

[–]LordGraygem 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Which is soon followed by some fellows in blue who show badge.

[–]sheriff_dwight 62 points63 points64 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Welcome to Reddit

[–]Lenzar86[S] 37 points38 points39 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

To be fair another, far less toxic sub (due to its content being rather non-mainstream I suspect) expressed a lot more sympathy over what happened to me.

[–]Christopherba 27 points28 points29 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You should man-splain to her that it’s “shoe-horn”

[–]jmills74 32 points33 points34 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Don’t accuse me of show-horning.

[–]onlyidiotsgoonreddit 26 points27 points28 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I'm currently working with a buddy whose wife has been funneling his paychecks into a dozen secret accounts for 20 years. No surprise, she wants a divorce. She hasn't worked her whole life, but she has a nice retirement planned with Sancho. Her lawyer wanted him to waive disclosures or assets.

He had no idea any of this had taken place, until I told him. I got him in touch with some lawyers who can recover some of these wages stolen from him. But he won't find even half of it.

Laws that limited the power of bankers over your family and your wages were good laws. Changing them empowered bankers and thieves, and contributed to the current high rates to divorce rape and fatherless children, and the crime that follows. Restore those laws.

[–]LurksWithGophers -2 points-1 points0 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Do you mean she's stealing from a joint account?

She would not be the one to set up his direct deposit with his employer.

[–]onlyidiotsgoonreddit 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In his case, his wife was able to fraudulently route his direct deposits into her separate account. She had formerly worked at the same company, and she had all his information, and that is why she was able to change his direct deposit to separate account. She used the same tactics to fraudulently pull money out of his 401k account. She registered as him on the company website and got access to it.

You might assume a diligent person would have noticed all this long ago. You'd be right. He was trusting, and when he asked about it, she became hostile, so he has tolerated it for many years, when he should have cracked down, sooner.

I've encouraged him to go to the police about it. He doesn't want to. But it was definitely against the law, for her to do that. He has a long process of legal discovery motions, to compel access to all this information, and recover as much as possible.

[–]Siganid 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It also needs to be pointed out that not being held responsible for debt is a massive privilege, not some kind of oppression.

A woman could abuse her husband by racking up debt, leave him with the debt and run off.

[–]One_Kaleidoscope_271 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There is a nice one.

Here in Brazil we have feminicide laws. The problem is that the law is applied to ANY domestic violence leading to murder or discrimination of the woman as a victim.

Funny enough 91,3% of men are victims of murder. 1350 victims of feminicide from 47503 of total murders.

I will take my time to compare the data and see how many men die in domestic settings

[–]ABlindCookie 12 points13 points14 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Technically, men were allowed to "rape" their wives, because the state believed the husband and wife are one in marriage, thus there was no such thing as martial rape.

However, the man was still charged with sexual assault, as it was illegal. Charges were in place, it just wasnt rape, nor was it legal.

[–]Atesz763 9 points10 points11 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Follow the hivemind or get exiled, that's how things go on reddit

[–]SeranasSweetrolls 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is so sad and disheartening. Just because the law says men can't be raped doesn't mean it's true. Woman can rape too. Both men and female rape victims can orgasm WHEN THEY DONT ACTUALLY WANT TO..

Its so wrong what's happening. I hope things start to change for the better soon

[–]DirectDog2717 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Females are seen as pure angels in WASP societies.

[–]slayerpjo 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Men can be raped in these situations of course but it's far far far less common than women

[–]badalki 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm sorry for what happened to you, but if you are looking for sympathy for what happened to you, then you need to choose which posts you want to bring it up on a little more carefully. you aren't going to find sympathy in a post where the topic is about all the ways women have been oppressed in the past.

wrong time, wrong place.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

As if you care. No surprise you post on r/twoxchromosomes . I was told I deserved it as a straight white man and then banned from there when I brought I was raped. That sub is toxic as hell. The cherry on top is that the user who said what was said to me still posts there. I wish they'd quarantine that sub along with those who defend them.

[–]kaosethema 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

you're right, it doesn't fit. not PPD

[–]Lenzar86[S] 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I don't know of a sub where it would fit without being treated as satire. :(

[–]Tredenix 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You could try r/everydaymisandry

[–]kaosethema 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

r/MensRights/  

r/antifeminists/

[–]Kelevracado42871 points 3 years ago* [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

I made a bad joke to a woman I thought was my friend and she slapped me in the face. I didn’t react and she immediately started calling me a pussy for not even “being a man” enough to hit her back. A few weeks later a local coke head everyone knows asked me “why did you make her slap you?”

Another time I put my hands near someone’s face at a bar a few months back (I was pointing, yes I shouldn’t have even done that) and she bit the fuck out of me in a bar. She got kicked out and I was told she be doing wild shit like that. A week or so later a “friend” of mine just peppered in commentary about the girl biting me and why I need to learn MY boundaries.

The person I was talking to at the time got so mad when I told them about it that I had to apologize for them getting upset that I got assaulted.

[–]kfmush 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You honestly sound weak to come here to complain about that. You live in the real world, dude. You don't need to impress shitty people. Don't let it get to you, fuck 'em and find people you like. So what a woman called you a pussy? Why do you feel you need to apologize about getting upset?

I don't know you but that last bit is a sign you may need some therapy. You might need to "toughen up," just not the way that girl who called you a pussy meant. You should work on stabilizing your emotions and owning your own mental state and not letting other people dictate how you feel about yourself.

[–]Kelevracado4287 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

r/pussypassdenied

[–]Outside_Gear_1132 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

What the heck is shoe horning???

[–]justl00kingthrowaway 13 points14 points15 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Shoe horn is a tool to put on dress shoes with out damaging the fit by forcing your foot into it or if your foot is a little to big to get in easily. The person is using the reference to basically saying that the other person forced their agenda into the conversation where it doesn't belong.

[–]Butt__Munching 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

when you fard and shid your pants

[–]Artixe -2 points-1 points0 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Forcing something where it doesn't belong. Like men's issues on a women's issues thread.

[–]looking_for_helpers 8 points9 points10 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Shoe horns help feet fit where they belong.

[–]Icefrisbee 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I would honestly agree with them if it wasn’t in the context of trying to make it seem like one was true and the other wasn’t. Don’t bring it up if it’s not unique to women, or at least say something about it being ridiculous that no one can/can’t do whatever.

I can say it’s unfair that their were literally zero laws protecting women in America in the 1500’s(because I don’t feel like actually researching shortly before I sleep), but there were no laws then for anybody and it paints a false narrative.

[–]ManWhoShootsSemen -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Bro some of you cunts in here are pure incel I swear. Makes me feel embarrassed to support male rights at times.

You have to acknowledge that women have had it fucking hard. It's disgusting that it was "legal" to rape your wife at one point in time.

Focus on the real issues, like women being entitled to 50% if your networth after divorce, or being favored for full time care of your children regardless.

[–]Mother-Key582 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Then how come men were forced to die in wars and do all the dirty hard work? Also, women have their own gyms, their own Day, their own MONTH, and society never holds them accountable for anything. So get a damn life.

[–]ManWhoShootsSemen 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's disgusting that it was "legal" to rape your wife at one point in time.

you ok with this then bro? fuckin incel

[+]Artixe -27 points-26 points-25 points 3 years ago* (13 children) | Copy Link

What misandry? You literally went "what about the guys" when they're talking about a female specific issue.

I don't appreciate it either when I voice men's concerns and someone makes it about women.

Grow a pair and maybe talk abt men's problems yourself, if you can only talk about it when people discuss women's issues you're not helping men. Like at all.

Edit: go talk about men's issues, start the conversation yourself and see how disruptive it is when people keep going on their whataboutisms. At least women talk about the problems they face, if you can only bring it up when they are talking you're a fucking tool. Y'all hoes mad.

[–]Airdropwatermelon 20 points21 points22 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

So when an issue comes up that you can also apply to other groups besides the one being focused on just stfu? Wow, you're a piece of shit.

[+]Artixe -21 points-20 points-19 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Oh shut the fuck up will you please. There's enough time to address men's issues but men rarely speak for themselves and a lot of people like OP only bring it up when a conversation is about female specific problems. People who interrupt your story to tell their experience because they relate to yours is equally disruptive.

[–]Tredenix 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You've mischaracterised the question. This isn't asking "wHaT aBoUt ThE gUyS" but rather "Is this a female-specific issue after all?"

[–]Red77777777 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

conversely, is it acceptable? is it not?
So I understand OP very well.

Women can easily break into discussions that were basically about men. And may they scream and screech about how women always get the worst because men are, by definition, bastards.

[–]Artixe -3 points-2 points-1 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Women can, but that's not what's happening here. You can't use a hypothetical to justify certain behavior that's stupid.

It actually happens to me quite a bit because of a female friend I have who interrupts a lot especially when I talk about my experience (as a man). you just kindly tell someone you're not done, and that their issues can be discussed at a later moment because you're talking about something else atm, it isn't that hard.

I hate the way discussions abt the gender differences go as much as the next guy and how relentless man-bashing is acceptable especially on the internet, but at least be above it; if anything set the example of how such discourse should be handled.

[–]Dull-Effort 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Honestly yeah, only right answer lmao.

[+]Optimal-Success-5253 -10 points-9 points-8 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

And then he came to cry on this sub like wtf dude youre wrong on that sub, youre wrong on this also get over it.

Although I get it, youve had a horrible experience with a terrible person. The downvoters dont know that so take it at face value, they sont want to hurt you they just disagree

[–]Artixe -5 points-4 points-3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This sub is full of self pitying idiots.

[–]Optimal-Success-5253 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Didnt seem that way until now, oh well if they want to circle jerk around woman bad then Im not stopping them anymore

[–]Paycheck2paycheque -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Y'all hoes mad.

Braindead

[–]Artixe 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Pussyboy

[–]Paycheck2paycheque -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yikes, even more braindead

[+]Optimal-Success-5253 -28 points-27 points-26 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Im all top-G andrew tate men are the best etc but why did you have to mix men into the argument? We either talk about how both sexes can be abused pr how there was literaly a law that said it was fine for men to rape their wives… is the law legit btw? Seems sus

[–]Friknob10100101110 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Certified reddit simps

[–]Embarrassed_Wall5306 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Smh

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter