Evolutionary Psychology Research: Women's frequency and depth of orgasm is related to the man's family income, self-confidence, looks, sense of humor and the breadth of his shoulders.

pontifx · 2014-11-12T19:43:06+00:00

Sample size of 54. Only PIV sex. Interesting study but only weak corollaries can be eschewed from it's brittle wake.

Yes, a TRP dint makes this study believable off our market research, but the science is speculative at best.

Here's a possible, reasonable way to interpret this study:

College aged girls who fuck a lot know what they like and cum a lot to show it.

Don't get me wrong here, the things they select for make a ton of sense and it's pretty damn likely to apply unilaterally though granularly because of the desparity between their SMV peaks however there are some biased factors here:

People are recalling the events, so their measurement is suspect.
They are sampling whats considered attractive to colleged aged girls from a particular locale. The study isn't done worldwide.
They do not state the races of the girls studied and the desparity.
Wealth in their eyes. Wealth as a term is a glittering generality in this case, so we can infer it's what advertising tells them is "wealthy".

Knowing this, let's propose another possible conclusion:

If the selected factors they tout as great are true, the following were not very important:

Age
Race
Social Relations (in so much as social circle connectedness, if they see you as socially dominant that is the only factor)
Cost per lay
Penis Size
Sexual Technique

Additional measurements are also important if you like to quantify yourself:

The average amount of orgasms was 1.4. This means a spread of 1-2 orgasms is what you need to measure your true SMV in the eyes of your target. Less than that can be inferred with dissatisfaction and thus energy spent in the marketplace.
Social Dominance, Focus, and (roughly) Intent were higher than humor as attractiveness factors. Women might like to laugh, but they want a rock slightly more.

I think the raw actionable take-away is if your girl isn't cumming, you may be out of your frame. If she's cumming like crazy your current effort allocation is reasonable in other areas of the interaction.

Personally I have had different experiences than these. Given this study what female mate-preservation strategies can we infer are bullshit? What else did this study miss? I like sexual deviants personally and this wasn't selected for so it's tough for me to tell whether or not this is actually useful information.

sir_wankalot_here · 2014-11-12T16:24:25+00:00

What is the old joke ? Women are only interested in the bulge in a man's pants, the bulge in back of the pants that is :-) Maybe with credit cards and debit cards the joke is dated.

TDCRedPill · 2014-11-12T15:08:11+00:00

For more than just the abstract:

http://www.epjournal.net/wp-content/uploads/EP12958978.pdf

GayLubeOil · 2014-11-12T17:38:48+00:00

Shoulder Width is the easiest one to improve.

SIDE LATERALS- DOING THIS SHIT RIGHT- Rich Piana: http://youtu.be/-6rMAG2NVDE

etcomro · 2014-11-12T15:54:25+00:00

That's pretty fascinating. Family income, huh? I wonder how hard the women who marry into the Rothschild family get off.

anonlymouse · 2014-11-12T19:36:20+00:00

No influence on sexual technique then? Good to know what not to waste time on.

OakTr3E · 2014-11-12T20:20:21+00:00

Well its no surprise to me. And I am not even very experienced. But I have noticed that the more confident or attracted the person seem to be towards me. The easier it is to make her get there. There have been partners where you without any finesse just goes in and out and she goes crazy, cums and then you just continue pounding and she keeps on cumming until you wonder if she is going to pass out from exhaustion. Why? Because to her I was very attractive for various reasons. Then you have had partners where you give all you got and make a big effort to stimulate here and there (after great foreplay even). And she doesn't get nearly as excited. Why? Because my percieved SMV was lower, again, for various reasons.

That being said. I found this interesting:

Women who began having sexual intercourse at earlier ages had more sex partners, experienced more orgasms, and were more sexually satisfied with their partners

This is my experience with women too. Those who are more experienced seem to enjoy sex more easily. Too bad starting early and getting many sex partners also can ruin the womans happiness in post-wall LTR. Either a sexually satisfied slut or a happy low-partner-count woman who thinks she might be missing out on the CC adventure out there?

Can't have the cake and eat it :D

fasterpussycatdie · 2014-11-13T00:42:18+00:00

That explains why my wife cums like a banshee.

HatredsBlazingGun · 2014-11-13T02:15:04+00:00

I'm calling bullshit on that.

In my experiences it's everything to do with her state of arousal and how much my thing is making contact with her clit.

truchisoft · 2014-11-13T18:08:56+00:00

Why the hell did anyone upvote this? the first post by pontfix contains the minimun ammount of information we should require for anyone to post a link like this.

fatfaggotfuck69 · 2014-11-12T15:37:20+00:00

Makes me wonder how good those liberals actually are in bed. They think they are hot shit because they are "in tune with their sexuality" or whatever, but if they have a neckbeard and twiggy body even toys and lots of lube might not necessarily make up for their lack of prowess in other areas.

foldpak111 · 2014-11-12T17:40:14+00:00

In my experience, family income has nothing to do with it because who the fuck in the club goes up to a chick and says "my father makes 90k"

Wintamint · 2014-11-12T23:49:31+00:00

The true RP Response: "Who cares?"

Title	Evolutionary Psychology Research: Women's frequency and depth of orgasm is related to the man's family income, self-confidence, looks, sense of humor and the breadth of his shoulders.
Author	walkonthebeach
Upvotes	113
Comments	34
Date	November 12, 2014 2:46 PM UTC (11 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/2m2q8b/evolutionary_psychology_research_womens_frequency/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/evolutionary-psychology-research-womens-frequency.24754 https://theredarchive.com/post/24754

Comments