~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
[deleted]
[–]KingRemu 129 points130 points131 points 5 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link
Exactly. Only thing we can do is be the best version of ourselves and hope that they like that and stick around.
[–]anon3451 40 points41 points42 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yeah I've recently just had an epiphany that the absolute best way to live is improve yourself always every day and strive to be the best, max potential version of yourself and let results fall as the may instead of looking for happiness externally like getting a gf. Ironically when you do this your chance of getting girls goes up, but you must always remember to be your best self because thats all you can control, and if you get a result awesome but you dont stop
[–]chizhi1234 12 points13 points14 points 5 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link
Tbh I think that's fucked up, like there's always a chance that he/she will leave
[–]pistachio02 55 points56 points57 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This entire universe is going to leave lol
[–]McWhiters9511 41 points42 points43 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
everything is temporary. everything. so enjoy the present.
[–]chizhi1234 8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Can't do that as a uni student lol
fuck maths
[–]TheOffice_Account 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
calculus has entered the chat
[–]nineteennaughty3 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I wish more people understood this. It took me WAY too long to realize this and after I did, Life got so much better
[–]caveatemptor18 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yes. Eat, drink, be merry for tomorrow we ___?
[–]ImJustSo 16 points17 points18 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
It isn't fucked up, it's the best way to have a truly rewarding and healthy relationship. You must acknowledge that you are free to leave and the other person is free to leave at any point in your lives. Once that's accepted as a fact by both parties, then both parties can acknowledge that the other is there by choice and neither party will take the other for granted. There's nothing keeping that person from leaving except that you're worth being with and they are, too.
[–]python1937 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
What about loyalty tho?
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Only as long as what you offer is still wanted or rewarding.
[–]ImJustSo 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What about it?
[–]shindafuri 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
loyalty is valuable BECAUSE of the option to leave. if they can't leave then it isn't loyalty, because they have no choice.
[–][deleted] 5 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]ImJustSo 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You okay, bud?
[–]paddywacknack 11 points12 points13 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Or they die. Or enter a coma. Or any any other numerous things. Thats just life.
[–]Fxxlings_22 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It is, completely become strangers to the point where you forget you even saw each other naked.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
http://letmegooglethat.com/?q=Codependency+
[–]Dominus-Prime- -3 points-2 points-1 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
“Hope they like that”? Why is a King hoping a subject likes them?
[–]Geekedphilosophy 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Wrong...only thing you can do is be the best version of yourself and hope they do so themselves and give no fucks as to what others like or need in order to "stick around"...if they want to be around your energy great if not then move around and miss me with the bullshit!
[–]paddywacknack 33 points34 points35 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Very stoic.
[–]ConsiderationDue111 17 points18 points19 points 5 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
Nothing in life is certain, but death.
[–]Solitairee 12 points13 points14 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
and taxes
[–]ConsiderationDue111 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Not if you live off the land....
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link
Still have to pay taxes on the land you’re living on ...
[–]ConsiderationDue111 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Not if you don’t own the land.
[–]HumpiestGibbon 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Not if you’re a pan handler...
[–]ConsiderationDue111 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
REALLY????? You people just don’t get it.
[–]Fluid_Economics 8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
No more villages, no more families... just a giant swarm
[–]squeezycakes19 19 points20 points21 points 5 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link
but it's alright to want to belong to someone, and to want someone to want to belong to you
[–]Dominus-Prime- 8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
Sure you can want it but in reality it’s an illusion
[–]rawbface 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
This type of black and white cynicism cracks me up.
Life is what you make of it bro
[–]Dominus-Prime- 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
So it’s cynical to think human ownership (the other end of the rope to belonging to someone) is a bad thing?
Wait you probably didn’t mean it in such a literal way of physical belonging. Maybe you meant just belonging to someone with regard to your autonomy? Still too literal? Well that only leaves the romanticized idea of “belonging” to someone; and while fun and all isn’t objectively real. It’s a culturally manufactured poetic illusion.
Fact is, unless you’re a slave or a child under the age of 18 with parents, no human belongs to any human. I’m sorry but a woman will never belong to you barring some serious gaslighting.
Bro
[–]rawbface 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I think we're arguing past each other here. Maybe we're both closed minded, maybe we're both projecting, I dunno. But, I want to meet you halfway.
I interpreted /u/squeezycakes19 comment as "it's okay to want a monogamous relationship", which should go without saying, but not so much in this subreddit.
I subsequently interpreted your comment as "all romantic love is an illusion", which also gets repeated here from time to time. At some points in my life I would have believed it, too.
So call it a misunderstanding, but I mostly agree with what you're saying here.
unless you’re a slave or a child under the age of 18 with parents, no human belongs to any human
You're missing one more scenario where one human can belong to another - KINK!
[–]Dominus-Prime- 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yes, I was going to get into bdsm but that’s a huge topic on its own with deep psychological capacities.
I was going off what you said. There’s no way to interpret what you mean. Just say what you mean to say.
And I agree with the base sentiment that romantic love is an illusion that people choose to participate in thus making it seem real. But the fact is, that romance as we know it is a cultural fabrication. Go find a non-industrialized, non-media influenced tribal culture in Brazil. They will have no concept of romance. That’s because romance is not innate to human nature.
Various courting rituals have existed throughout time across the planet yes, but if you look at them they are more functional than anything. And this is not romance.
Or you could take the thought experiment and raise a child on an island completely cut off from culture. Only the necessities are taught to him/her. Then bring them to a western culture (mainly where romance exists bc that’s where Romanticism began). They will have no clue about romance. They will have to learn it just as you have. But in the case of westerners, humans are born into it so it’s more of a passive indoctrination. We literally can’t see past the rose colored glasses that are fused to our faces.
[–]Lord_Augastus 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Bro, you live and participate in consumer capitalist culture. You have no idea about who owns who and what freedoms you actually have. Thats the tangable world we live. In terms if phylosophical conundrums you may be expiriencing towards this idea of "beloning or ownership", is a byproduct of the reality you embody. Thus, sure you think nobody truly belongs to anyone. But try not paying your taxes, or loans, not work, and go down to the prison industrial complex and see how they are going with modern day slavery. Or worse yet, wall st and their conglomorates of corporate behemoths lobbying globally to keep inequality at all times high. 🤷🏼♀️
[–]Dominus-Prime- 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Nope. See those are choices. You can’t choose to own someone or belong to them except in some far out cases where deep psychological issues are present. It’s literally illegal.
As far as not paying this or that; my neighbor has taken her house off the grid as far as electricity goes.
My friend Sam isn’t owned by anyone. He built his own house in the woods and owes nothing to anyone.
Just a couple of examples.
I brought up literal belonging/ownership as that’s the words that were used. I can’t extrapolate what was meant. Only what was said.
Talking about loans, taxes and credit cards isnt ownership. That’s more “ownership”. Truth is, in those cases you signed a legally binding contract that doesn’t outline belonging/ownership, it outlines financial responsibility.
And even if you wanna go down the irrelevant rabbit hole you present as it relates to human belonging/ownership, it’s still wrong. Are you saying because your loan lender kinda sorta “owns” you (even though you agreed on the dotted line) that it justifies claiming ownership of another human?
Sorry but your argument while fun, holds no water. How about we get back to seduction of women and having fun on dates?
[–]Lord_Augastus 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I love how you start with a fallacy, then proceed to just justify it with anecdotal evidence. Basically, once again, its not a choice, people are born and live and are a party of large systems. Freedom from them is suoerficial at best, but nice try...
[–]Dominus-Prime- 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
It’s a fallacy to say it’s illegal to own another human? Which one? Law of excluded middle? Equivocation? Red herring?
I gave examples of those operating outside of “ownership”.
To your examples of loans and taxes these are not forced upon you. You can live outside of that if you truly wish to. You take out a loan you are agreeing to a responsibility to pay it back. That isn’t ownership or belonging. That’s a choice you made with consequences if you go against your legally binding agreement.
To the original point- a person can’t belong to another person in a relationship sense. It’s an illusion. To the wider point (to which I have no idea why you’re widening the scope so much unnecessarily) you are correct. There’s tons of ownership/belonging in a myriad of subtle and coarse ways. But to the kid that started me on this thread, it means nothing to his adopted sense of romantically belonging to someone
[–]Lord_Augastus 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
No, you gave examples of soft ownership. Like a predotory loan shark or something, you fail to realise the human condition. On a level we are all slaves to ourselfs, our ideations, needs and wants. To be truely free, is to understand where your oercieved freedoms end. No it isnt illigal to own a human, slavery still exists and percists in the world today, so does entire production for human consumotion relies on workers, animals and planet. You argue that one can not be free on basis of legality when its clear that legality is a concept that doesnt encompass everything. Then you argue on the basis of morality and philosophy with witmch i agree with you, but reality still comes down to us. Reality isnt what you think it is, its the substance that remains even when you stop believing in it. And that the harsh truth of power and kniwledge is that anyoje can fall into being owned....but just to add, legally parents are responcobile for everything a child does, like they own the responcibility for then, and their lives ubtill an aebutary age of 18... And you think thats now ownership?
[–]Dominus-Prime- 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I don’t disagree at all. But it’s a soft ownership that the kid was talking about.
As far as human ownership of course it’s all over the world. In the US where I’m at it’s currently illegal in the classical sense of the word of the civil war south. Of course legality doesn’t encompass all. That would be a dumb claim. The legal responses I gave were based on your examples of loans and taxes. And as far as children go the notions we currently have in the West about parental ownership of children, and about children as chattel, are traceable to Roman law and a lot of that still exists. It wasn’t until recent that children could have legal status separate from their parents.
I get all that you’re talking about. You got flex. But again all of this is unnecessarily going out into philosophical nar nar. I mean if you want to do that might as well go all out and serve up a big steaming plate of hard solipsism with a side of nihilism, eh? Or how about a play of light on the eyelash of Brahama. Eventually the concepts become less and less tangible for the common man and that’s all I care to help. I spent too many years dealing with philosophical, theological and moralistic concepts to really care much for them anymore.
It doesn’t help young guys who get in trouble by believing their girlfriend belongs to them just because they love each other or are in what they believe to be a committed relationship.
It’s been a pleasure but I’ve gotta move on. My girl is getting annoyed and really wants me to fuck her. So I’m going to respectfully bow out
[–]prettydirtyboy 25 points26 points27 points 5 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link
She not yours, it’s just your turn
[–]Dominus-Prime- 39 points40 points41 points 5 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
Wrong mindset. You’re not hers. It’s just her turn.
[–]prettydirtyboy 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Facts📠
[–]rad_dynamic 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Nah this puts you in a submissive frame.
You're the prize.
[–]Dominus-Prime- 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
You don’t get it. So you’re saying it’s not submissive to be her next?
Nah.
Read what I said again homie. Tonight is Becky’s turn at trying to win my attention. On Thursday is Lisa’s turn at trying to win my approval. On Saturday is Susan’s turn at trying to win more of my time.
If you’ve got more than one woman sweating you, you know what I’m talking about
[–]rad_dynamic -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Lol, I have more women than days in the month at my finger tips. And you just described what it's like to be the prize who should be fought over. You didn't describe what it's like to be a girls turn. To be a girls turn, she is basically using you for what she can get. Not a good mindset.
That saying "she's not yours but just your turn" came from guys who think they own a particular woman. It's much better to think as yourself as the prize.
You said previously “you’re the prize”
Here now you’re saying “what you’ve described is what it’s like to be the prize”
I didn’t describe what it’s like to be a girls turn because one, I’m not a girl and two, nobody asked me. But if I had to imagine it would be a mixture of excitement and disappointment.
“She’s not yours/just your turn” is a mindset of guys who put women in a seat of power. These hoes have no real power. Especially if you know how to take the power out of their pussy.
You said at the end there “it’s much better to think as yourself as the prize”.
Homie, you just said at the top of your reply that, that’s exactly what I described.
[–]rad_dynamic 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Yea I'm not reading that, fucking weirdo arguing on the internet
Lol. You just described 3/4 of the planet
You know who else uses passive aggression?
Women
[–]VellaPunk 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This comment just hurt me, but its true, and that's the sad part.
[–]stayingpositive7 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Love this comment...
[–]anon3451 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
He is not hers, it's just her turn for the top dudes lol
[–][deleted] 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]comfortfood4soul 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Tis better to have loved and lost than to have never loved at all
[–]Runningoutofideas_81 -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You know the guy who wrote that, wrote it for his male friend, right?
[–]rawbface 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I don't think marriage is crap, but I do think a lot of people screw it up for themselves. Seduction doesn't stop once you put a ring on it. When people say "marriage takes work", this is the type of work they mean.
You're not wrong though. Married or not, if you give up part of yourself for the sake of a romantic partner, you will lose everything. Be compassionate, be understanding, but don't stop being your best self.
[–][deleted] 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Lord_Augastus 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Just dont use this as justification for infidelity.
[–]VellaPunk 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
How are you so wise in the ways of life?
[–]fabsid 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
This is exactly being yourself means. Well explained mate.
[–]letsgetrandy 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link
This is precisely the reason why I hate when people use the word "taken".
"She's taken" -- as if someone has laid claim and now owns her. It doesn't work that way.
[–]twolanterns -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Well, that's more to signify that someone's not up for grabs. Even if you wouldn't call it "stealing", going out of your way to get with someone who's (seemingly happy) in a relationship is widely regarded as a shitty move.
Plus it goes against the idea of plenty of fish in the sea, that no one's special, and, yes, that no one belongs to anyone. She doesn't belong to her bf, no, but she doesn't belong to you either. Have some integrity, go somewhere else and wait that shit out. The world doesn't need more negativity.
[–]letsgetrandy 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Don't be a dick and downvote me. Especially if you're going to form an argument against things I never even said.
[–]twolanterns 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Lol I wasn’t the one who downvoted you, someone else thought your comment was off.
Want me to upvote to cheer you up?
[–]letsgetrandy 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Points don't matter. I just hate the passive-aggressive world that Reddit has become. I don't think people should downvote things that are fair to say.
If I wanted anything from you, rather than an upvote, I would prefer to receive the fucking courtesy of you responding to what I DID say in my comments, rather than arguing with things I never even said. Putting words into people's mouths is fucking rude.
Upvote= agree Downvote= disagree
[–]twolanterns 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Alrighty! Where to begin...
I don’t think I put words in your mouth; possibly I overdid the interpretation and use of - what I would consider - synonyms. One can only do so much with such few characters, yet I did feel I could read between the lines. Taken - stealen - up for grabs - they’re all similar enough to me, if that was the part you were pissed at. I did ramble for a bit in general terms but we’re all adults here, right? A reply to your comment isn’t always only a reply to you. I won’t take the rest of your words seriously because I don’t think anything that I wrote was rude. Possibly you could interpret it as somewhat condescending, but even that’s a stretch.
You, however, jumped to the conclusion that I downvoted you, which I didn’t. Then you completely went overboard with that tantrum, I don’t even know where you got those words from. Again, if we’re discussing rudeness, I don’t think I’m the aggressor. I can clearly see why the passive-aggressiveness doesn’t suit you - not because you don’t like that kind of negativity, but because it’s not aggressive enough.
I must say though, this was not what I expected but gosh if I’m not entertained.
[–]twolanterns 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
I guess I can see you being annoyed by that word only, not what it symbolizes. You could think the “ownership” part is the bad one, and given the history of women’s status in society and the age we live in that kind of sensitivity isn’t unheard of.
But I believe it still conveys an important message, in that you shouldn’t get involved - “she’s busy” might be better, I suppose.
[–]letsgetrandy 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
If we're all going to be white knights now, and stand up for feminism and women having agency, blah blah blah... can we just fucking begin by acknowledging that calling someone "taken" implies that they are property?
I guess I can see you being annoyed by that word only
Oh, you mean EXACTLY LIKE WHAT I FUCKING WROTE?
[–]twolanterns 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Holy fuck man, chill.
I now went out of my way to offer an alternative view, which happened to be the one you originally intended - I was even prepared to apologize even though I don’t think my first interpretation was ill-minded - and you’re still pissed?
I am clearly not the problem here. Making a small logical mistake -> waking the dragon of fury up? Yeah, reasonable. Good luck in life, you’ll clearly need it
[–]letsgetrandy 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I literally said exactly this:
I hate when people use the word "taken".
I said nothing about "going out of your way to get with someone who is in a relationship." I also said nothing about her belonging to me.
And you told me to "have some integrity -- go somewhere and wait that shit out". You put words I didn't say into my mouth and then scolded me to "have some integrity". It's called gaslighting, and you're damn right I get very angry when people do it. Gaslighting is a form of abuse.
And then you did it again with your passive-aggressive "good luck in life, you clearly need it" nonsense. Maybe if you hadn't been a disrespectful cunt in your original comment I wouldn't be angry. Have you considered even for a moment that you had agency in this exchange? No, of course not. You think you can put words into other people's mouths and that somehow they are the ones who are wrong when they get mad at you for doing it.
So to quote you.... Good luck in life, jack. You clearly are going to need it.
You/your in a reply to your comment doesn’t have to mean you personally. It didn’t in this case. I think that’s something you’re expected to grasp in what, middle school? So you took something that wasn’t meant to be personal personally.
I didn’t write anything disrespectful, you chose to interpret it as such. I’m not gaslighting, you’re sensitive. You can’t throw around big words like abuse and expect to be taken seriously. The problem with using a term like gaslighting is that everything I write can be discredited as such.
I also chose to make an interpretation and reasoned in general terms for the sake of rhetoric. That’s not a personal attack. I could apologize, but once again, I don’t think that’s the right thing to do since it wasn’t directed personally at you, but in general of the consequences in getting rid of a term like that.
What I’m getting at is that you escalated and you brought out the big guns. I wasn’t pissed, I made a minor logical error, not directed at you, and you made a storm out of it. I really can’t see a reason for why my comment justified those kinds of words. You could have let it slide, because a stranger’s error shouldn’t affect you, but you didn’t. That’s why you need that good luck.
Read everything again, maybe with rose-coloured glasses to get some love in the mix, try to see it from another point of view, like I did. And if you can’t, I’m afraid the only conclusion that can be drawn is that you get upset way too easily. I hope it only affects your semi-anonymous conversations online.
About the agency, yeah, I admitted responsibility three comments back, but I think it was completely countered a hundredfold by your escalation.
[–]SandtheB 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The only time I have ever seen someone selfishly pro-claim that they are "taken" was a former High School crush. That contacted me out of the blue, behind her boyfriend's back... apparently she was also "taken" with me.
[–]thesomnolentkoala 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Sad times
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Yea not anymore. Women and children used to be considered "property" to the man. It's only been recently in history that women have gotten rights, and even still there's a bunch of countries where women can't drive, vote, or go to school.
[–]twistedhippo -2 points-1 points0 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
But don’t your kids belong to you
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Your kids don’t even “belong to you” you gave birth to them (or planted a seed) and they are a part of you. It is your responsibility to teach them how to be self sufficient, independent, respectful, individuals. So be a good example!!!
[–]LLVLTrojax -3 points-2 points-1 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Wrong. If your girlfriend gives me look belongs to me.
Your wife belongs to me
I am Dom I am Pred
She is sub and she is Prey
And you are cuck. Get in Cage cuck.
All your base are belong to me
I know this, but still find it hard to swallow that pill when i get attached to someone...my mind always tries to make that person “mine”
[–]Runningoutofideas_81 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
“I like to keep in my mind that even after I have seduced, had sex, shared emotions with my partner, after all this action, that person is an individual and I don't own her.”
Yea, my problem is having her (them) wanting to own me.
[–]Icr711 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
“All you can do is letting go”. Indeed
[–]raquelmckay 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Exactly! I think people get too caught up in the, “we’d be so perfect together we’re meant for each other, they’re mine” mindset too much when they get attracted and it can become toxic and deteriorating for both parties in the wrong situation
[–]raquelmckay 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Exactly!! Staying grounded in realistic expectations and respect for the other person is so important
[–]allygator84 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Truth.
I’m struggling somewhat currently even though I know better. 😬
[–]Zero36 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Healthy mindset. I’d say you should think this way even after being with someone for +5 years
[–]immatonton 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
"She's not yours, it's just your turn."
[–]dayfan 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I regret every moment I am apart from my husband. Settle for nothing less than that and never will you be alone.
[–]DaJosuave 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yea, good reminder. If you make this clear early on to the other person I bet it would seduce them a bit.
[–]Jaja_Aureolin 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You are an imbecile . Argue if you want me to explain. This is clearly a gaslighting trap .Negativity disguised as positivity.
Are you one of those burning clutz angry turd feminazi's ???
Shame on you Mufasah !!!
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]KingRemu 129 points130 points131 points (21 children) | Copy Link
[–]anon3451 40 points41 points42 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]chizhi1234 12 points13 points14 points (16 children) | Copy Link
[–]pistachio02 55 points56 points57 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]McWhiters9511 41 points42 points43 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]chizhi1234 8 points9 points10 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]TheOffice_Account 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]nineteennaughty3 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]caveatemptor18 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ImJustSo 16 points17 points18 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]python1937 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ImJustSo 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]shindafuri 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ImJustSo 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]paddywacknack 11 points12 points13 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Fxxlings_22 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Dominus-Prime- -3 points-2 points-1 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Geekedphilosophy 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]paddywacknack 33 points34 points35 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ConsiderationDue111 17 points18 points19 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]Solitairee 12 points13 points14 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]ConsiderationDue111 5 points6 points7 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]ConsiderationDue111 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]HumpiestGibbon 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ConsiderationDue111 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Fluid_Economics 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]squeezycakes19 19 points20 points21 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[–]Dominus-Prime- 8 points9 points10 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]rawbface 2 points3 points4 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]Dominus-Prime- 5 points6 points7 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]rawbface 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Dominus-Prime- 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lord_Augastus 0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]Dominus-Prime- 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lord_Augastus 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Dominus-Prime- 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lord_Augastus 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Dominus-Prime- 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]prettydirtyboy 25 points26 points27 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[–]Dominus-Prime- 39 points40 points41 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]prettydirtyboy 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]rad_dynamic 0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]Dominus-Prime- 2 points3 points4 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]rad_dynamic -1 points0 points1 point (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Dominus-Prime- 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]rad_dynamic 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Dominus-Prime- 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]VellaPunk 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]stayingpositive7 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]anon3451 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]comfortfood4soul 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Runningoutofideas_81 -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]rawbface 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Lord_Augastus 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]VellaPunk 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]fabsid 4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]letsgetrandy 3 points4 points5 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[–]twolanterns -1 points0 points1 point (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]letsgetrandy 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]twolanterns 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]letsgetrandy 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]twolanterns 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]twolanterns 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]letsgetrandy 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]twolanterns 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]letsgetrandy 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]twolanterns 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SandtheB 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]thesomnolentkoala 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]twistedhippo -2 points-1 points0 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]LLVLTrojax -3 points-2 points-1 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Runningoutofideas_81 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Icr711 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]raquelmckay 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]raquelmckay 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]allygator84 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Zero36 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]immatonton 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]dayfan 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]DaJosuave 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Jaja_Aureolin 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link