TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/seduction
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

      • Artful Prudence
      • A Voice for Men
      • Alpha Game
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Good Looking Loser
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • In Mala Fide
      • KillToParty
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Married Man Sex Life
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Power Moves
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • The Spearhead
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Woman stabbed man so hard between the eyes it reached his brain - sentenced to just three years in prison

JohnKimble111

September 29, 2021
1545 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://metro.co.uk/2021/07/25/woman-stabbed-man-so-hard-between-the-eyes-it-reached-his-brain-14986614/
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Woman stabbed man so hard between the eyes it reached his brain - sentenced to just three years in prison
Author

JohnKimble111

Upvotes 1545
Comments 147
Date September 29, 2021 11:45 PM UTC
(4 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/py7o0i/woman_stabbed_man_so_hard_between_the_eyes_it/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/woman-stabbed-man-so-hard-between-the-eyes-it.1073473
https://theredarchive.com/post/1073473
Top posts by JohnKimble111

Women Should Have to Register for the Draft, Congressional Commission Says

6700 upvotes
March 25, 2020
/r/PussyPassDenied

BBC admits its viral “women write better code” story was fake news

6298 upvotes
December 28, 2016
/r/MensRights

Gender pay gap in modelling sees men paid 75% less than women

6153 upvotes
February 8, 2018
/r/MensRights

Toxic Masculinity

5904 upvotes
March 10, 2018
/r/MensRights

After feminist cry sexism over BBC pay, official review uncovers more underpaid men than women

5789 upvotes
January 31, 2018
/r/MensRights

Controlling girlfriend, 22, who starved and stabbed her partner, banned him from her bed and took over his Facebook account is jailed for more than seven years

3826 upvotes
April 16, 2018
/r/PussyPassDenied

'If you tell anyone I've cheated, I'll ruin you': Cambridge don is cleared after his PhD student fiancee accused him of assault 'to get back at him' for calling off their wedding after she had affair in Galapagos Islands

3770 upvotes
September 16, 2017
/r/MensRights

Amber Heard loses bid to get $50 million defamation suit by her ex Johnny Depp thrown out

3737 upvotes
March 28, 2020
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]shaka_alpaca 216 points217 points218 points 4 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

3 years for attempted murder? Fuck that

[–]Deckardisdead 52 points53 points54 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Literally fuck that shit.

[–]Alistair_TheAlvarian 132 points133 points134 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Brain stabbing through the skull between the eyes with a giant ass knife.

That's some seriously attempted murder.

[–]goingoverthatplace 91 points92 points93 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

In UK there have been women who got less than 3 years for successfully killing children so 3 years is usually pretty harsh for a woman in the UK I'm surprised she even got 3 years.

The hypocritical misandrist baby killer sympathisers who write the law in this country are an unusual phenomenon that I suggest the public should review. After all, when did the UK public get given the right to vote against the misandrist baby killer sympathiser laws? I don't remember being asked in my lifetime. It seems to me it's something the government brought in without consulting the public. Perhaps it's time for a vote, like with Brexit. We could call it misandrexit? Should we keep laws in place that make excuses for women who crush children's skulls? What do you think UK public? Should we see how U we are on this law?

[–]Right_Pepe 18 points19 points20 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Do you still have the link for that? I want to comply as many of this bs and one day use all this info to slap my feminist friend.

[–]goingoverthatplace 16 points17 points18 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

UK - example of 2 cases with 3 years or less

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9826239/amp/Care-worker-mother-24-spared-jail-killing-newborn-crushing-skull.html

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-humber-24908037

Australia -

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8334923/amp/Infanticide-law-repealed-stop-mothers-kill-kids-avoiding-jail.html

The law is also active in Canada and elsewhere.

This law is becoming increasingly globalised, but when was the public in any country asked to vote on the matter? This is what happens when people watch too much TV and get too distracted, or watch too many headlines, (I'm not judging, I have myself been distracted and ignorant in the past) because the things that the misandrists don't want the public to discuss, don't generally go on the headlines. I know full well that if the masses attention turns to these laws that would be the misandrists worst nightmare. So tell as many people about it as you can. I would recommend telling more than just your feminist friend if possible, and if your feminist friend starts defending these laws and you remain friends with them, then in my opinion you are part of the problem. So take my advice or leave it.

[–]Right_Pepe 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thanks for the info.

I been doing my best to explain to my friends about why feminism is cancer but most of the time (espically more progressive leaning female friends) don't by it till I get the concrete evidence. Some still pull but it is a minority card for now but they least admit that it can become a mainstream problem.

I stay as friend with that feminist because 1. He was in a depression phase and I wanted to help him out. 2. He helped me out alot before and I still owed him a little. Eventhough he can be unresonable.

Still. Thanks with this I can convienced others, espicialy WK to reject feminism for the sake of society.

[–]FBI_NewWeegeeBoy1243 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah that'd be great to have in case my mother goes on another one of those rants where she claims she's being feminist but is actually just complaining.

[–]Broadside_Beers 14 points15 points16 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It would be really easy to convince the world that men are valuable in a practical sense.

You would just need everyone who wears a blue collar to work to take week off.

Fuck it, even 48 hours.

[–]MBV-09-C 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Had a pretty damn good reminder of that just recently. I live in an area where hurricane Ida hit directly and if it wasn't for those blue collar men, we wouldn't have power, water, or places to live anymore, just another week or so and my family will be practically back to life as usually, had those men not been around, it wouldn't have taken a month, these parishes would straight up just remain inhabitable.

[–]mattsyboo 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

6 months for actual rape, fuck that. Plus rapists can also serve in Supreme Court so

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No. Three years for pleading guilty to GBH with intent.

[–]63daddy 287 points288 points289 points 4 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link

  1. Judges told to be more lenient in female criminals.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1311004/Judges-ordered-mercy-women-criminals-deciding-sentences.html

  1. One of many examples of the P-pass in action. Society is gynocentric after all so this should come as no surprise.

  2. Second the point about this relating to why there are fewer women in prison. Women are less likely to be sent to prison for the same crime and on average receive shorter sentences when incarcerated. Consider a notable feminist who participated in the kidnapping rape and torturing to death of a man is now out giving motivational speeches to feminist groups. A man who did that would have been executed or in prison for life.

[–]sicr0 54 points55 points56 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Just for curiosity. Who is this woman you speak about in point 3?

[–]helicoprion08 49 points50 points51 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I think they are referring to Donna Hylton

[–]ayram3824 32 points33 points34 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

i just read about her after your comment…wtf…how is she out and an “activist”…what a fucked up workd

[–]Angryasfk 19 points20 points21 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She has the nerve to say she’s “innocent” too.

[–]helicoprion08 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah the world is kinda crazy

[–]63daddy 20 points21 points22 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, Donna Hylton.

[–]goingoverthatplace 38 points39 points40 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

As for that number 1 I'd just like to remind any member of British public who might read this, we didn't vote for the government to give that order, so what right should they have to give it? I'm not comfortable with misandrist baby killer sympathizers dictating the law in this country.

[–]Living-Reference5329 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The sally challen one gets me

[–]Remzi1993 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Sick, I'm telling you: This society is sick. I'm adamant that feminism is a sickness just like communism even when I'm a fairly social democrat.

[–]FBI_NewWeegeeBoy1243 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Yep. It's not as bad as it could be but it is definitley bad enough to make me very mad. On another note, did you know it is completely legal for Women to Rape Men in England?

[–]Broadside_Beers 16 points17 points18 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

And if that man that is raped is actually a child (ie, under age) he can then be sued for child support?

Yes, this has happened.

[–]kamikazihiphop 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Wow. Wtf is wrong with the world

[–]Broadside_Beers 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Feminism.

[–]FBI_NewWeegeeBoy1243 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Correct. I used to be a feminist but now that I see it's the Misandric Bloodbath it is I am definitley not anymore.

[–]Broadside_Beers 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I used to be a feminist too.

The dirty little secret that feminists don’t like to talk about is that a substantial number of anti-feminists, egalitarians, and MRA’s all used to be feminists.

[–]Abstract_Knight 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

On certain way i used to be feminist too, or at least i believed on feminism. I just grown up, lol.

[–]alrun 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So what is the maximum applicable sentence in the UK and how is it called?

[–]soupcan121 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I'm not trying to defend Donna Hylton but she was released after 26 years in prison. She was sentenced to 25 to life.

As far as the justice system is concerned she paid her debt to society and had the right to be released.

Now being promoted by the DNC is very fucked up but she did do her time.

[–]63daddy 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

She did her time, but out after 25 years for torturing someone to death is light for that crime.

The more telling issue however as you indicate is the DNC and feminists hiring her her to speak.

[–]soupcan121 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That is true. Admittedly I haven't looked in depth into it.

A quick Google says there were 7 people involved.

So fortunately it's not like she was the sole perpetrator. Still fucked up though.

[–]mattsyboo -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Rapists only get 6 months in prison, because they have “a bright future”. 70% of rape cases don’t result in a prosecution. So plz, shut u0 with this gynocentric bs.

[–]dungeonmonkey69 63 points64 points65 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Close the sentencing gap

[–]sahinbey52 23 points24 points25 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Close the sentencing gap!

[–]SweetPotatoPie476 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

CLOSE THE SENTENCING GAP!!!!!

[–]deathsowhat 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Close the sentencing gap!

[–]Billsplacenta 173 points174 points175 points 4 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

Can’t wait to hear the feminist say: well what did he do to deserve this?

[–]TheClinicallyInsane 54 points55 points56 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes but quit joking around.

What was he wearing? He had it coming after all, you would've done the same

/s btw...I'm joking about how they will do the same to us that they try to claim we do to them, except they'll mean it wholeheartedly.

[–]xTheVyrusx 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They won’t even say that they’ll applaud the short sentence and be happy a man died they don’t care about any info.

[+]Sachiko01 -14 points-13 points-12 points 4 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

As a feminist, let me tell you, those people aren't feminists, they're sexists.

[–]Psycedilla 27 points28 points29 points 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Let me guess! Shes not a "real" feminist? Can someone link this person the Karen Straughan copy pasta? I dont have it.

[–]Jakeybaby125 19 points20 points21 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There you go

[+][deleted] 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Psycedilla 15 points16 points17 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

"i have no rebuttal so i gonna mock her name"

Wow, Just wow.

[+]Sachiko01 -13 points-12 points-11 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

My bad, don't have the time right now to read the full post and just wanted to make a funny comment

[–]Psycedilla 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

fair enough, maybe i was to harsh, just tired of the endless stream of "thats not real feminism". sorry mate.

[–]Broadside_Beers 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It’s okay. Whilst the “real feminists” are busy with University and casual jobs the “not real feminists” are busy changing laws, running university gender studies, changing social policies, and generally causing a measurable impact on the world through organisational activism such as through the UN and the NOW.

But I guess you’re too busy being a “real” feminist to call out all the feminists acting under your banner being actively sexist and destructive all over the world.

girlpower

[–]Ahielia 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It was a comment, at least.

[–]Reddit1984Censorship 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes they are wake up your movement has been corrupted for decades please stop supporting the movement that is hurting men so much.
If egalitarianism is what you want then please just call youself an egalitarian.

[–]reddut_gang 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

those two aren't mutually exclusive. In fact the venn diagram between those two is basically a circle.

[–]hardturkeycider 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Unfortunately, feminism is about as well defined these days as my midsection. Not well.

[–]rabel111 58 points59 points60 points 4 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

A few interesting observations about the event and the article.

Neither the police or the article identify this as domestic violence. A zero tolerance of DV, and the communities concern over the ongoing violence in relationships, should have been takenn nto account when sentencing. But instead this is identified a "knife crime". The unwillingness of the courts and the police to identify female perpetrtors of DV demonstrates the sexist bias if UK justice.

Stone was arrested at the scene and pleaded guilty to a charge of grievous bodily harm with intent, but not attempted murder. Stone followed her victim as he attempted to escape and stabbed him in the head with massive force. But the police and the court excused her vicious intent to kill her victim, assuming she didn't intend to kill, because of her sex.

[–]FBI_NewWeegeeBoy1243 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

I kinda skimmed thru that and only read the end but from the end, they're saying that She put the knife through his head so hard it reached his brain but didn't intend to kill him?

[–]scyth3s[🍰] 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Accidents happen

[–]FBI_NewWeegeeBoy1243 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Is that sarcasm or are you saying it's possible to accidentally put a knife through someone's skull?

[–]scyth3s[🍰] 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Sarcasm

[–]FBI_NewWeegeeBoy1243 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Cool Cool. But when your trying to be sarcastic I suggest putting /s at the end which lets people know your being sarcastic.

[–]rabel111 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yep. Given her female frame, shorter arms, less musculature, she must have put extraordinary force behind the attack.

[–]FBI_NewWeegeeBoy1243 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wow! I just can't even handle this bs.

[–]Ahielia 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Brother's ex in England tried to kill him by stabbing him in the back with a big kitchen knife. Only reason he survived was because he was wearing a leather jacket or something similar at the time so the knife didn't really penetrate fully.

She didn't serve any jail time,and got full custody of their 2 kids when they divorced, kept sabotaging and poisoning the childrens minds against him, the court told her repeatedly to cut her bullshit but they were in and out of courts for years until he finally gave up. She never got any punishment for denying him acves to the children even though it was supposed to be some 5050 split. By that point the children absolutely hated him because of what that cunt had lied about,and that they believed that he didn't want to see him. This was some 15 years ago now. He kept all the court documents and things related to this and legit mailed it to his eldest child when she turned 18, they have started to talk again because she saw how batshit insane her mother is, though its a lot to heal. It will take a long time.

If the police force and courts in that country were any more cucked, they'd be imprisoning the men the instant they're born and giving all their money and property to women.

[–]Bowztradamus 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Glad that story had a partially happy ending.

[–]BorgSimulation 170 points171 points172 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Not surprised that this was in the U.K. just tell a judge you were on your period and you can walk away from any crime. Except not paying your taxes.

[–]Insomniacbychoice90 72 points73 points74 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I hate that you're correct, but I have no faith in our "justice" system anymore and a lot of people think the same way.

[–]ContreversialViews22 26 points27 points28 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

legal system, justice died many years ago

[–]BorgSimulation 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If someone gets a fixed penalty notice (such as dropping litter) and they can pay it within 14 days that person will just end up with an empty pocket. If another person can’t pay it within that time they go to court and get a much higher fine along with a criminal record. That’s just one instance of a two tier justice system.

I know it’s not directly relevant to the topic, but anyone who thinks that we have a proportionate justice system is completely deluded.

[–]OblongConsistency 137 points138 points139 points 4 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

I remember the case of a woman in New Zealand who murdered her husband and she got 18 months home detention. Meanwhile, our government has just passed legislation that would imprison anyone who refuses to affirm someone's gender identity to 3 years in prison.

[–]WingsofSky 29 points30 points31 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think one woman got a day in jail for murdering her husband. Not sure if there was abuse going around in that or not.

[–]ipwr85 42 points43 points44 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Mary Winkler in Tennessee shot and killed her husband while he was asleep then claimed self-defense.She was convicted of manslaughter and served just two months in jail.

[–]helicoprion08 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Which country passed that?

[–]scyth3s[🍰] 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

No country passed that. There is a 100% chance he is severely over simplifying something.

[–]Traditional_Ad_139 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

While true, the circumstances don't help her at all. She got scammed, got in an argument over it and shot her husband. No violence from his side. After getting shot, he lived, she left after unplugging the phone while he bled out.

[–]scyth3s[🍰] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm saying no country passed the 3 years in prison for not affirming gender identity thing

[–]Abstract_Knight 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

lmao, suddenly the unique reliable justice system is having the population over the legal system. (this happens where i live and thanks to that its safer than the city.)

[–]Based_Hootless 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

New Zealand did that? Do you have a source?

[–]ManofGod1000 25 points26 points27 points 4 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

And yet, as Coach Greg Adams says, men are still willing to do a hope strategy when it comes to women and marriage. Or more to the point, it is between slim and none and slim just died.

[–]kamikazihiphop 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

lol facts

[–]40moreyears 26 points27 points28 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If I hear “systemic misogyny” or “women are oppressed” one more fucking time from these people who think women’s shit doesn’t stink I’ll flip.

[–]SpookeyClown 20 points21 points22 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I can't imagine being the guy's parents hearing that the woman who took their baby away from them will be out in a few years.

[–]Alistair_TheAlvarian 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I'm pretty sure the guy lived albeit with some extra drainage for his brain.

[–]kamikazihiphop 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yeah but it should be eye for an eye imo. The punishment should fit the crime...stab her with the same knife in the same spot. Maybe a shorter knife if you want to be safe but let her get a taste of what she's dishing out...usually that teaches them.

[–]Alistair_TheAlvarian 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sounds good on paper at a glance but impractical and ineffective. Prison removes these people from the population so it eliminates the problem temporarily. And rehabilitation in cases where it can work is the best option as it doesn't cost 250K a year for society. And of course there are some people who can't be rehabilitated and prison or more permanent removal are the only option.

As much as an eye for an eye would be, it wouldn't lead to the whole world being blind but it definitely would lead to a legal and logistical nightmare and rampant crime.

[–]Terror-Error 48 points49 points50 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And people wonder why so few women are in prison.

[–]Superb_Disaster_7676 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Gynocentrism in society doesn’t want any woman in prison, period. Regardless of their crime. There is always sympathy for female criminals, even those who committed terrible crimes. You’ll always see articles and celebrity campaigns for women in prison.

People always say there’s much more men in prisons like that means women are inherently good. But that’s because women don’t get sentenced to prison.

[–]BigGuy7999 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

wtf?

[–]Pencil-lamp 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Mr Burrows continued: ‘I am pleased to see this result from court and that she has been handed a lengthy prison term for her serious crime.”

Pathetic.

[–]kamikazihiphop 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Lengthy prison term? What a fucking joke!

[–]kamikazihiphop 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You know what's lengthy? Being blind in one eye for the rest of your life

[–]Broadside_Beers 20 points21 points22 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

UK court system are rookies! Isn’t it possible that the man head-butted the knife? Or walked into it like in this Australian case where they couldn’t rule out that the man walked himself onto the knife?!

https://www.portstephensexaminer.com.au/story/7273652/lily-ridgeway-found-not-guilty-of-murder-over-stabbing-death-of-jason-adams-at-raymond-terrace/?cs=762&fbclid=IwAR3Iu3AFsxL5DAZg6G1Ac6IPaPeY6a4dtQkbz1f9HzcjrtflftI3HYwZybU

[–]helicoprion08 19 points20 points21 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

That Australian court case is fucking disgraceful

[–]Broadside_Beers 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yep, I’m not excited about living in this country.

Notice that there isn’t a single mention of “domestic violence” in that article too.

[–]helicoprion08 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly

[–]dakotasundaybro 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

At this point if I was convicted of something and awaiting sentencing I would just transition.

[–]Right_Pepe 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ok. This one is ridiculous now. She get almost the same time as the girl that lure the autist kid to be killed by 2 other boy. So by that defination her crime is as "light" as that crime. Wtf!

[–]helicoprion08 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's really fucked that she was only brought up on charges of grievous bodily harm with intent because stabbing someone in the head definitely screams attempted murder to me

[–]masterdarthrevan 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Quote from Mr barrows " I am pleased to see the court result and that she has been handed a lengthy prison term" wtf this lost his eye, after she stabbed him in the head.

[–]kamikazihiphop 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm not even from the UK so this is surprising to me, justice is dead

[–]pfizerface 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No this can't be real. Judge needs to be sacked asap.

3 years for an eye? Hahaha... she could do an online degree and walk out as if nothing

[–]Status_Reporter1910 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

My father was thought that "Women are born nice & Men are born evil" by his mother. So naturally when my father starts his family, my sister never gotten any discipline for her wrong behaviour and my brothers and I always get punished for being "evil".

Because of this, my sister became the worst person I've ever seen and always caused problems to my family that made my father broke down in tears because he couldn't control her anymore.

Moral of the story here is, discipline bring joy to the family and it is sufficient to say the women who stabbed her boyfriend has zero discipline from her parents. Discipline your kids people, it will give you blessings in life

[–]__pebble____ 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The MINIMUM sentence for attempted murder is 10 years. If this isn't a prime example of women being favored in the justice system, I don't know what is.

[–]coloradocaniac 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Awful.

[+][deleted] 4 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]JohnKimble111[S] 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Less than half IIRC.

[–]jpsouzamatos 17 points18 points19 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

She (and the judge that gave her only 3 years) deserve death penalty.

[–]kamikazihiphop 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree.

[–]beurhero7 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Where's the equality

[–]Bowztradamus 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

The UK is a fucking joke. Imagine being lenient to attempted murder just because the perpetrator was born with a vagina..

[–]SAVAG3_B3AR 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Another example of how unbalanced the justice system truly is.

[–]StudentOfTheTruth0 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Let me propose a guessing game. State how long a sentence a man would have gotten if he had done this to a woman?

[–]Alarming_Draw 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yet feminists still play on the 'weak woman/strong man' defense whenever faced with consequences for physical violence

[–]Doctor-Nemo 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Justice" just keeps on failing everybody.

More people should know how many people were executed for the holocaust, the worst crime in human history.

It's 8. 8 people out of the millions who helped it happen.

Justice has never existed.

[–]Imperium_Britannia 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is typical murder! It deserves a life sentence! Screw this matriarchy!

[–]Oinkus42069 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How WONDERFUL

[–]CyrexPlex 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wow. Just....wow.

[–]yoman076 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Question, when it comes to law taking action on cases like these, is UK worse than USA?

[–]bfte2 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is like clockwork at this point.

[–]Winter-Telephone-960 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Seriously? You may as well put her away for life, she was obviously very close/trying to kill him. But its a girl so oh well

[–]Rockbottom503 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

3 years for gbh..... Which in reality means she'll probably serve less than 18 months........ For pursuing and stabbing someone walking away from you right between the eyes, in public?!? And the police think they have a decent result?!?!?

The CPS clearly needs a shake up - why attempted murder charges were not pursued is beyond me!

[–]Savinit 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

ThE FaIreR SeX

[–]Coucoupietre 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Many places they dont get any punishment. They say the man is beating them for years and the judge claims self defense and set the woman free.

[–]AdityaGutpa 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

OFCOURSE, HOW DARE YOU TRY TO IMPRISON AN INNOCENT GIRL

LOOK AT THIS EVIDENCE SHOWING WHY WE SHOULD CLOSE FEMALE PRISONS- https://thewire.in/rights/why-female-prisoners-should-be-treated-differently-from-men

[–]Abstract_Knight 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

wait is this a repost? just to be sure...

[+]God_Got_Speed -12 points-11 points-10 points 4 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

But okay just eh.... what if in this case the penalty was right 🤷‍♂️ like we don’t know the fuck she pulled the knife for. What if he did something first to provoke? Ofc stabbing someone in the face is not being the right or legal thing to do, for which she got punished. But why is THIS an example of gender injustice within the system? Like guys yes y’all are right things are wrong, but not every female centered case is wrong by definition. Saying such things would only water down the real arguments and examples, piling them up as “yet another complaint”.

Also the legal professional being happy with the sentence says it all. Like the law is set and made to treat most everyone equally. You can’t have all cases fluctuate in sentencing, so that one would be treated less equal than another. Apparently 3 years is what the law says, which has nothing to do with modern gender inequalities. As for the professional who studied for this shit being happy with it.

Sure the law itself isn’t bulletproof but is pretty much based on the most just and moral considerations. Also it takes a lot of time to change it, since a single adjustment needs a lot of research and approval from different parties before it can be approved. Only, again, to make it as fair as possible.

On a side note I beg to question the effectiveness of prisons in general. Like we really want every person who just fucks up once to rot in prison? Like sure a knife to the face is a big fuck up. But what are we trying to achieve with prison penalties anyways? Like do we want to rehabilitate our prisoners, or just punish them? Because for either both of these the efficacy of prison sentencing is widely doubted.

Just punishing this one woman to fit all the punishments men have received throughout time ain’t gonna change shit imo

[–]Reddit1984Censorship 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

If a man would have stabbed a woman into her brain he would not ever come out of jail or have any life left.

How is stabbing someone in the skull not worse than rape for example?
Do you think he is not going to be traumatized for the rest of his life for this and maybe some irreversible damage?
Only 3 years for being the superior gender that matters.

[–]BonelessHumann 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wait, he is fucking alive?

[–]God_Got_Speed -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Where is the evidence? And how would that individual case be identical to this one? Again we don’t know wtf happened other than “a row erupted”. How is this case compared to rape? Rape is an intentional act of violence for personal gain, again cause we don’t know anything about the specifics; this case could very well have been an act of self defense.

Again I don’t say there is no gender inequality. All I’m saying is; don’t waste time presenting every female centered case as an example of this inequality. All you’ll be doing that way is making yourself look not nuanced. Basically destroying your own path to equality, for people won’t be taking your good arguments serious. Because yes there are good arguments and there is gender inequality. Just not in this article perse.....

[–]Reddit1984Censorship 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

Get a grip not in a million years the sentence would be the same if the genders were reversed.
If it was self defence then she wouldnt have being sentenced.
It is compared to rape in the sense that is brutal violence that will traumatize him for life maybe irreversible damage brain damage.

[–]God_Got_Speed 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Okay you can just say that, but where is the evidence? Where are two identical cases where the only difference is the gender of victim and accusee with the sentence being wildly different? You cannot just say that without evidence, it makes you sound incredible.

Also sure both crimes may leave similar traumatizing and mental harm to the victim. Yet they are in no way the same. The justice system luckily also takes the intentions of the suspect into account, not just the consequences of their actions. Rape has a clear intent, harming someone else for personal gain. Crimes like these are far more nuanced than that. Many factors could have been at play, we don’t know anything about their relationship. We don’t know anything basically from this article other than some few limited facts. So maybe something more went on here than those few sentences depict in this one article. Maybe all of the more has been discussed in court were it should be and not in these reddit comments. And maybe the sentence was therefore righteous, as confirmed by a MALE legal official; namely Detective Constable Peter Burrows.

Also what is the point? Should women get higher sentences and then suddenly world peace is found? Think about what you want to achieve anyway. Because if it’s just punishing women harder only because men are too, it would be very petty of you. Don’t do unto others what has been done to you. It will solve nothing.

[–]Reddit1984Censorship 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I dont have evidence, do you have evidence of the same crime with the same sentence? No right of course we are talking with what we both personally know.
What ''gain'' are you talkign about, a nut? are you kidding me thats a mundane body function theres no ''gain'' in a rape, a gain would be stealing a large amount of money or getting a promotion or thing of those sorts not a nut thats irrelevant the rapist is a psycopath that is hurting another human being like stabbing is.
The gender of the prosecutor is completly irrelevant we are not 2 different alien species sharing this planet we are all human beings, people of a gender are not ''ants'' following the will of their ''gender hive'', a feminist piece of shit can be male obviusly why do you think the gender of the detective is relevant whatsover?
The point is EQUAL sentences. You are pitty of me for caring about men being sentence higher just because of their gender while being shoved down their thoarts that they are equal to women... and you are PITTY OF ME? jesus christ it blows my mind.
This triggers me a lot as it shows lol but of course i appreciate the discussion of course.

[–]God_Got_Speed 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

My evidence is that this article is limited with its information, therefore I say more might be at play than just her gender. You come with the preconception that all female cases are sentenced lower than those of male offenders. Which makes you biast and able to present even this article as evidence. Also if this were to be the case, wouldn’t that mean that there are no women with life sentences? Yet there are plenty. Which law is there that serves differently based gender? When sentencing someone many things are taken into account. Many personal things connected to the accused. Like how likely are they to commit another crime? How big of a threat do they appose to society? The level of their remorse etc. The answers on all these variables decide what the final sentencing will be. Non of these variables are biased to one gender or another. However sure the gender of the accusee may play a high roll in the answers of all these variables. That’s not to saw the law itself is sexist. It says more about criminal behavior amongst gender than anything. Not to say that the justice system isn’t imperfect, but it isn’t solely on the grounds of gender. Plenty of male offenders have received sentences which were way too low. As there are plenty women who have received one way too high. Also sexual gratification is very much a personal gain. It’s why you nut daily, it’s why we have sex. And unfortunately it’s why a psychopath rapes indeed. The point wasn’t the gain, it was the clear unjustifiable intent rape apposes. In contrast to any other case, which might have more nuanced intent. Basically rape is simply bad, stabbing a person is too but could have more “justifiable” reasonings. Comparing the two and saying they are both equal as crimes is simply nonsensical. The gender of the detective is very relevant. Why would he as a male agree to gender inequality within the system? Also aren’t most judges male in general? Now tell me, why would all these men who actually have the tools and abilities to make a fair justice system, why would all of them be in cahoots and sentence their own gender harsher? No I never said I pitied you for caring about men’s rights. I questioned what your main goal was into sentencing females equally higher. Doing that just because you believe men are treated harsher, thinking that the only right thing to do is sentencing females higher is very petty though. If you truly care about men’s rights, why not sentence men lower instead? Why not look at prison sentencing in general, non gender based? How will punishing punishment with more punishment solve anything whatsoever? Simply sentencing females higher because men receive high sentences, doesn’t make the system fairer for anyone.

[–]Reddit1984Censorship 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Lets try to keep it concise otherwise it gets to lenghty and hard to read and respond to.

I do strongly believe the stabbing someone in the skull is a far far more severe crime that should be punished far more than rape and the carnal pleasure is insignificatn and irrelevant to the sentence.

If the system is judging a male as more likely to comit crimes that is institutional sexism by definition wich is a non starter.

I dont want to accuse you of sexism but the sex of the people sentencing is irrelevant because otherwise you are implying that you can know the motives and how a person thinks and acts based on their gender wich is literally sexism (the most piece of shit man hating feminist can be male for example).

Yes my motivation comes from my belief that men are being sentenced longer for the same crimes across the board while current society is shoving down mens thoarts that we are equal to women therfore any show at all whatsoever of different treatment towards men is completly unacceptable while feminism is applying all sort of policies that benefit only females to the detriment of men under the guise of equality (example female quotas without merit)

The reason i dont want men sentenced lower is because i dont want people who stab other people in the skull with a knife walking freely on the streets i want those people of bith genders to be in jail for longer even.

" Simply sentencing females higher because men receive high sentences, doesn’t make the system fairer for anyone." With all due respect go in front of a mirror and tell that to yourself with a straight face.

[–]Coucoupietre 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Fuck off

[–]__pebble____ 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

At the very beginning of the article, it very clearly says that the victim was drinking at his flat, and she followed him with the knife and stabbed him when he walked outside. The attack was unprovoked and she is entirely to blame.

Also, the minimum sentence for attempted murder is 10 years. She got a slap on the wrist and her miniscule sentence is a massive injustice.

[–]God_Got_Speed -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

It also said they were drinking inside and a row erupted. Very few sentences for something which clearly initiated this entire attack. A vital moment it seems, yet so little words spent on it. This article doesn’t tell us shit.

Luckily tho there is an entire legal system created for centuries on the basis of equal and joust punishments. And there are people around who studied for years to make this shit work. Luckily they probably spent more hours than all of us reading this article on making this case result in the most fair outcome. So maybe in all those hours spent in that courtroom, all the evidence presented (which I can assure you would have been a lot more than this one shitty article presented) might just have led to the conclusion of it being something other than attempted murder. Therefore explaining the difference in sentencing. Combined with the fact that a MALE detective agreed with this sentence, maybe things were just right here.

Then again it is very petty to punish all women higher, only because men apparently have been treated such for years. Maybe spend your time better on thinking about how useful any prison sentence really is in general. So that all future people, both men and women, could get a chance at a fair system. And non of us would have to deal with outrageous sentencing in the future.

For the rest, leave the legal system to the professionals.

[–]__pebble____ 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

So many words, yet so little said. You didn’t refute my claim at all. And as far as I’m concerned, the attack was still entirely unprovoked. She stabbed him in the forehead. That is attempted murder.

When it comes to “leaving it to the professionals”, no, I won’t. The justice system is extremely flawed, very biased towards women, and needs reform.

[–]God_Got_Speed -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

My point was quite clear. You said 3 years is very low for attempted murder. I say, well maybe she wasn’t sentenced for attempted murder then. You really think the judge came in to court, sat down, saw a women before him and decided “well let’s give her a lower sentence for the same crime”? You really think not every individual case is treated with the most equal care, taking previous presidents into account? You really think sentences don’t have to follow any rules and could just be altered, based simply on gender of those involved?

The justice system needs reform? Well then stop waisting your time in here. Go grab a book, start a study, become a master in the field of law and justice. And change that bitch. Being an angry redditor presenting every female centered sentencing as evidence of how this system is flawed won’t do shit.

[–]__pebble____ 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

What is called when you try to murder someone, but fail?

Also, yes, I absolutely do believe a judge sat down and gave her below the minimum sentence because she was a woman, because things like that happen all the time

I find it pretty funny how you think to change something, you can’t talk about it, and you have to constantly be doing something. Talking about it is one of the most important steps to changing it, but seeing as you like to argue with logical fallacies, I don’t think you understand that.

[–]God_Got_Speed -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This whole argument is a logical fallacy. You are of the notion that women get below minimum sentencing and therefore you assume any and all cases, like this article, are evidence of that. Sure you can change something by talking about it. But being unnuanced and presenting even the shittiest article as evidence of your statement is a fallacy. One that makes you overlooked cause nobody cares about someone saying the same shit to every female sentence they see.

Then there is the article, it literally talks about sentences from 1979 to 1983. Which is like 40 years ago lol. How are sentences from back then compared to those nowadays? The article literally says women are treated harsher when their crime violates their sex role stereotypes. We could stop here as this won’t be relevant nowadays, since sex role stereotypes of both men and women wildly differ now as to those of the 1980s. If anything it shows the flaws of the system back then. Flaws which might still be at play today as the justice system isn’t flawless. However it’s flawed to both men and women, as your own article has proven.

So ordering to change this system, with your main demand being; giving female offenders higher sentences is counterproductive. As it would put another high importance to the gender of the accused, as it did in the 80s. Basically solving your problem with a new one. Better solution would be taking away the importance of gender of the accused overall.

Yet again the main point being that this one shitty article is in no way a valid piece of evidence, to your overall notion of females getting below minimum sentencing solely based on their gender.

[+][deleted] 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]DraganTehPro 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

But in any case, rapists are also let out of prison after just 6 months because they “have a bright future that would be ruined”.

And 99% of those are women.

[–]mattsyboo 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Lolol what u smokin? Heard of Brock Turner? Brett Kavanaugh? Heck men can threaten to rape women and then serve in Supreme Court. And 96% of rapists are all men.

[–]amillionstupidthings 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

are you delusional? cite yourself if you wanna make wildass claims like that. wtf? fuck feminism and mens rights for now, because acknowledging that rape is a horrible problem, especially for women, has nothing to do with either. its just true.

[–]amillionstupidthings 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

as a feminists lurker, lets not do that. Injustice is injustice. girl, stop.

[–]mattsyboo 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I know, but it’s hard to give a damn when most people here are raging misogynists pretending to be oppressed and shitting on women.

[–]amillionstupidthings 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

for real. i feel you. But you and ik this is just gonna solidify their irrational hate towards feminists. since we're in this together, might as well be the better people. (i mean, next to them , we already are lol) theyre extremely anti-feminist. thats all there is them. Sometimes they talk about real issues men face, and at that point, im all here for them. till then, fuck em.

[–]mattsyboo 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You’re right. I just have a predilection for running my mouth because I can handle hateful bigots who came back at me, but I am also tarnishing the reputation and image of feminism as a whole and other feminists who might be negatively perceived and impacted by my words.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter