TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Justice for Men and Boys
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Mensactivism
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

Mandatory DNA Testing | Men's Rights

maxlvb

January 11, 2022
96 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://mensrights.com/mandatory-dna-testing/
Archived from /r/MensRights

r/MensRights is a community advocating for the social and legal equality of men and boys since 2008.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/MensRights archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Mandatory DNA Testing | Men's Rights
Author

maxlvb

Upvotes 96
Comments 153
Date January 11, 2022 11:42 PM UTC
(4 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/s1r8n6/mandatory_dna_testing_mens_rights/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/mandatory-dna-testing-mens-rights.1095784
https://theredarchive.com/post/1095784
Top posts by maxlvb

Another small win for men in New Zealand.

1221 upvotes
April 18, 2021
/r/MensRights

Feminists judging all men. A dialogue.

556 upvotes
January 17, 2022
/r/MensRights

Why it’s not ok to say ‘Kill All Men’ — The Centre for Male Psychology

364 upvotes
January 3, 2022
/r/MensRights

Manspreading. An appropriate response...

340 upvotes
January 17, 2022
/r/MensRights

Almost 1 in 10 moms isn't sure who fathered their baby

335 upvotes
January 1, 2022
/r/MensRights

Believe all women.

271 upvotes
July 1, 2022
/r/MensRights

Another dialog with a feminist...

186 upvotes
May 8, 2022
/r/AntiFeminists

Biased sexist court system in New Zealand.

147 upvotes
July 25, 2021
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]maxlvb[S] 53 points54 points55 points 4 years ago (24 children) | Copy Link

Paternity fraud occurs when a woman bears a child but misrepresents to a man who the father actually is.

In every case of paternity fraud, she tells one man he is the dad when he’s not.

Usually what that means is she doesn’t tell the true father that he is the actual father. So what that means is in every case of paternity fraud there are two men being defrauded.


Feminists feel the same way about forced parenthood responsibilities as they feel about forced genital mutilation. As long as it's not happening to women, they don't care.

[+]EnvironmentalWar4627 -38 points-37 points-36 points 4 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link

Feminists feel the same way about forced parenthood responsibilities as they feel about forced genital mutilation. As long as it's not happening to women, they don't care.

Feminists are against circumcision. Have you never asked a feminist?

Proof

[–]maxlvb[S] 37 points38 points39 points 4 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

Really? You'll need to do a lot more than provide a link to a Reddit feminist sub that BTW bans people simply because we read and post in this sub...

Most feminists dont offer any support to stop male circumcision, not because it's wrong, but because MRA's are against it...

I.E MRAs and their allies are anti-circumcision zealots who operate as extremists within the intactivist movement. This branch’s online “educational efforts” and protests are defined by the vicious harassment of health-care providers and mothers.

https://everydayfeminism.com/2016/05/mens-rights-circumcision/


Feminism:Equality, when convenient.

[+]EnvironmentalWar4627 -16 points-15 points-14 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

There is nothing in that article supportive of the practice of circumcision. Why did you post it?

[–]LettuceBeGrateful 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

No, just some extreme tone policing.

Sexism is never a good look for a human rights campaign.

Weird how she can conclude that it's a human rights issue while writing that whole screed about the "myth" of misandry. Just another feminist article that's more interested in cherry-picking the other team's assholes to make mountains out of molehills, and resorting to academic navel-gazing invalidation instead of just admitting that the genital mutilation situation is horribly skewed against men in the West.

[–]bulletkiller06 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Dude, he litterary gave you a link full of feminist and their direct opinions, and you gave him an article by a single feminist who you think "had a tone about her"

[–]LettuceBeGrateful 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

He gave a link full of random redditors. Who cares? Feminist policy has pushed for needlessly gendered GM laws, and feminist groups seem to either ignore or minimize MGM.

Also, I didn't give him any article, I was responding to his reaction to an article. What are you talking about?

[–]Frosty-Gate-8094 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2007/mar/29/health.topstories3

That's the official policy of UN women..

If there has been a change in last 15 years, please update me..

[–]EnvironmentalWar4627 -4 points-3 points-2 points 4 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

That article says it should be offered to adult males. I have no problem with that. Do you?

[–]Frosty-Gate-8094 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

https://news.un.org/en/story/2011/12/397192-un-launches-plan-accelerate-male-circumcision-aids-prevention-africa

Recent modelling commissioned by PEPFAR and UNAIDS found that reaching 80 per cent coverage of adult VMMC in the 14 priority countries would entail performing about 20 million circumcisions on men aged between 15 and 49 by 2015.

15 year boy counts as minor to me... UN is engaging in circumcision of minor boys.. Without their consent.

More evidence...

https://home.crin.org/latest/the-african-resistance-to-mass-circumcision-campaign#:~:text=Then%20suddenly%20we%20heard%20over,uncircumcised%20communities%20across%20the%20continent.

12 year old boy.

https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/africans-speak-out-against-the-mass-circumcision-campaign-300370353.html

They are even using misleading campaign tools...
A consent obtain by misappropriation of facts is not a valid consent.. Even if its done in adults..

[–]EnvironmentalWar4627 -4 points-3 points-2 points 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

And to be clear, feminism is a shadow organization that controls the UN right? Every time the UN feeds a starving child, that's feminism right?

[–]EmirikolWoker 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

How about you address the point rather than lie, misrepresent, and gaslight?

[–]EnvironmentalWar4627 -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

No, we agree. Feminism doesn't advocate regarding circumcision. Just like mens rights doesn't advocate against female genital mutilation. I don't see a problem with either.

[–]EmirikolWoker 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Of course. Nothing feminist about the UN whatsoever. Nope. Nothing to see here.

[–]Huge-Program-2683 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Feminist troll. Fuck off you cunt.

[–]maxlvb[S] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

FYI: (just to follow your need to create strawmen and whataboutisms)

She also challenges some common misconceptions around FGC, such as the belief that it is forced on women by men. In fact, elderly women often do the most to perpetuate the custom. I thought African girls were held down and butchered against their will, but some of them voluntarily and joyfully partake in the ritual. I thought communities would surely abandon the practice once they learned of its negative health consequences. And yet, in Shell-Duncan’s experience, most people who practice FGC recognize its costs—they just think the benefits outweigh them.

https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/04/female-genital-mutilation-cutting-anthropologist/389640/


Men need feminism like bicycles need fish.

[–]Frosty-Gate-8094 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

May be...I get that feeling when UN promotes for gender-neutral words...

They have a feminist branch too called UN women.

And they lobbied for banning genital mutilation in 2000s (but ironically only female GM).. I I wonder why?🤔

To be fair, UN women is a better authority on feminism than some random commentors on ask feminists..

[–]Greg_W_Allan 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How about you don't put words in other folks mouths.

[–]EmirikolWoker 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

The user never said feminists are pro circumcision, only that they only care when it happens to women. Linking to feminist campaigns against MGM that have the same traction and effort as the feminist campaigns against FGM might have been a better route to take to argue against that.

That said, you seem really keen to protect a hate ideology from criticism.

[–]EnvironmentalWar4627 -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

So you feel feminism is obligated to campaign against male and female genital mutilation or they are a hate ideology?

Do you feel mens rights activists are obligated to campaign for prostate and breast cancer or they are a hate group?

Do mens rights activists need to protest against female homelessness or else they are a hate group?

Obviously not. The lengths people go to just to be offended is crazy

[–]EmirikolWoker 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

So you feel feminism is obligated to campaign against male and female genital mutilation or they are a hate ideology?

My, the deftness with which you slew that strawman! Bravo, hero!

No. Feminism is a hate ideology because The foundational principles of all flavours of feminism (class warfare between men and women with men winning, shorthanded as "Patriarchy") are inherrently anti-male when you examine what needs to be true for it to accurately describe reality. The indifference to MGM activism is quite peripheral to it being hateful.

And you still try to protect them from criticism.

How often do you have to have your habit of misrepresenting, lying, and gaslighting pointed out before you work out that maybe you're doing something wrong?

[–]Understanding_Bot -5 points-4 points-3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I know what you're sayin. I know what you mean. I feel you EnvironmentalWar4627. You do you <3

[–]Jakeybaby125 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Bad bot

[–]Greg_W_Allan 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Have you never asked a feminist?

I have. Frequently. The typical response is to try to change the subject.

In my country...

Feminist prime minister Julia Gillard gave money the the African circumcision project. Senator Kate Ellis also gave over $600,000 to the promotion of male infant circumcision in South East Asia.

Of course those feminists aren't Scottish.

[–]bulletkiller06 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

From what I read (and I read pretty far) about 3/4ths of feminist on there were against mgm, the major variation being that some felt it was less damaging than fgm even if they felt it should be treated the same, some were the exact opposite feeling it was directly on par with fgm. As opposed to being for mgm the remaining 1/4 felt that:

I really don't think there is much benefit in expanding the definition of feminism to be so broad that it no longer pertains directly to fighting for the rights of women.

However, note that some of the feminist that felt mgm on par with fgm were offten of the belief that mgm was a feminist fight that they were fighting (or were supposed to be).

[+][deleted] 4 years ago (62 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]ChaosOpen 29 points30 points31 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

That would make it harder to women for women to collect easy child support, don't you have any humanity? Just imagine a world where women are no longer able to buy Gucci bags? Such a terrible fate... *sheds tear* /s

[–]Bowlnk 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You need to present it differently. DNA testing to rule out: Heretical deseases Accidental baby swapping Or worst of all kinship. so baby A and B don't grow up not knowing they're half siblings.

If you present it in the mens intrest you scare everyone away.

Present it as being in the child besr intrest you can sneak some benifits

[–]NotCis_TM 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Why would any women oppose this?

Some may consider it a government overreach.

[+]velvetalocasia -13 points-12 points-11 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Everybody with more than 2 brain cells should consider this a Gouvernement overreach!

[–]BaddyRio 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The government can literally take your child away from you if they deem you an unfit parent, but paternity testing is government overreach now??

[–]velvetalocasia -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

When are children taken from their parents dude? When?

[+]velvetalocasia -17 points-16 points-15 points 4 years ago (53 children) | Copy Link

You do understand that a paternity test and a test for genetic mutations are very different?

[–]maxlvb[S] 16 points17 points18 points 4 years ago (48 children) | Copy Link

You do know it's real easy to run both tests on the same sample...


Feminism:Equality, when convenient.

[–]velvetalocasia -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago (47 children) | Copy Link

Technically you could but that’s actually not how genetic diagnostics works…..to make sense of genetic data regarding mutations/disease you need extensive medical data from the parents/family. It’s not that easy plus does everyone really want to know everything. This is not a one fits all.

And are you really all fine with the Gouvernement having all your kids genetic data? What will that mean for all kinds of implications? For health insurance? For life insurance? For social security?

That seems horrible naive.

[–]NAWALT_VADER 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

but that’s actually not how genetic diagnostics works…..to make sense of genetic data regarding mutations/disease you need extensive medical data from the parents/family.

This point you are making is in support of the need to ensure that biological parentage is determined. It is just as important that maternal parentage is accurately determined as that of paternal parentage. It isn't a matter just for the potential parents, but for the children as well. Everyone should know biological truth, whether as a child or a parent.

[–]velvetalocasia -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It might be for a tiny percentage when you already displayed a specific disease and don’t see how it would be necessary for the brought population.

[–]maxlvb[S] 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (43 children) | Copy Link

Technically you could but that’s actually not how genetic diagnostics works….

Because you say so? "That which is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence".

And are you really all fine with the Gouvernement having all your kids genetic data? What will that mean for all kinds of implications? For health insurance? For life insurance? For social security?

Why dont you ask all the kids whose mothers lied about who their children's fathers are...

IOW you're just defending the indefensible, as feminist do all the time.


Feminism:Equality, when convenient.

[–]velvetalocasia -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (42 children) | Copy Link

Not because I say so but because I had genetic screening done and know what data/medical history I had to provide so that the genetic researcher was able to make sense out of it…..and that was with specific questioning. In other words they knew what they where looking for.

So you are fine with you or your kid paying much more for health insurance or life insurance because there was found a genetic defect, that might never even play out?

What all of you guys constantly ignore is that there are laws in place for paternity testing…..you can have it done, nobody stops you.

[–]maxlvb[S] 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Not because I say so but because I had genetic screening done and know what data/medical history I had to provide so that the genetic researcher was able to make sense out of it…..and that was with specific questioning. In other words they knew what they where looking for.

So you're saying ancestral DNA testing companies are how real DNA testing is done? Really??? 🤣🤣🤣

Here's a thing for you to mull over. The rest of the world has medical and public health systems that aren't anything like USA's For Profit health services.

What all of you guys constantly ignore is that there are laws in place for paternity testing…..you can have it done, nobody stops you.

We dont all live in the good ol USA.

France does. It's illegal to get a paternity test in France.


Feminism:Equality, when convenient.

[–]velvetalocasia 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

No I say the exact opposite, dna testing companies are shit and genetic testing for disease is much more complicated and needs real researchers and doctors to make sense. I personally think this companies shouldn’t give out any health related testing.

I‘m not American, I‘m German and I can tell you from experience that genetic health testing can break your bones regarding all kinds of insurance, life insurance/occur disability/health (if it’s private). To make that mandatory for all people is insane and that doesn’t even touch on things like do you really want to know every disease you might eventually carry?

It’s illegal to go to family court and file for a paternity test in France? How do they determine who is the father when they have more than one candidate?

[–]maxlvb[S] 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

To make that mandatory for all people is insane and that doesn’t even touch on things like do you really want to know every disease you might eventually carry?

DNA paternity tests dont test for genetic defects or diseases. It's only to determine who the biological father is. Why are you trying to make it out to be something that it isn't?

It’s illegal to go to family court and file for a paternity test in France? How do they determine who is the father when they have more than one candidate?

https://avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/france-upholds-the-ban-on-paternity-tests/


Men need feminism like bicycles need fish.

[–]velvetalocasia 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I didn’t mesh paternity testing and dna screening together, the initial comment in this thread did. I just pointed out that they are different.

Your linked article clearly says that it is legal to petition to family court for a paternity test in France and that about 1500 are granted every year.

Can you try not to contradict yourself?

[–]maxlvb1 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Your linked article clearly says that it is legal to petition to family court for a paternity test in France and that about 1500 are granted every year.

FYI:

In theory, paternity tests are still legal, but only under a court order, with the explicit consent of the mother and under a strict supervision by the State. Annually, the French courts issue roughly 1500 orders for paternity tests. 1500 – that’s it! And the number is going down as the courts become more and more reluctant to issue such orders.


*Feminism:Equality, when convenient.

[–]velvetalocasia1 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

So what you said earlier is a lie, you admit.

Why does that not shock me?

[–]maxlvb1 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Unfortunately, although your comment was indeed clear, simple, and straightforward, there is some difficulty in justifiably assigning to it the fourth of the epithets you applied to the statement, inasmuch as the precise correlation between the information you communicated and the facts, insofar as they can be determined and demonstrated, is such as to cause epistemological problems of sufficient magnitude as to lay upon the logical and semantic resources of the English language a heavier burden than they can reasonably be expected to bear.


Feminism:Equality, when convenient.

[–]NAWALT_VADER 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago* (34 children) | Copy Link

What all of you guys constantly ignore is that there are laws in place for paternity testing….

What all of us are saying is that there need to be laws in place for paternity testing. They are not yet mandatory. Just because they don't yet exist as mandatory doesn't mean such laws shouldn't exist. This is the fight.

Paternity testing is currently done as a personal cost. I looked into it because I found my wife was dallying. Initially, ten years ago, the cost for paternity testing was about $2500 per child. That was unreasonable for most people. Today, the cost is down to about $250 per child. I recommend all men test their children. The cost is reasonable now. There is no reason not to verify truth.

[–]velvetalocasia -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (33 children) | Copy Link

You have laws for it! Every man can have his kids tested………

[–]Dark-Hatter 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link

Not exactly accurate. Some places require the consent of the mother before you can do a paternity test. And to be fair, it’s just weird how women push back against it. It’s like they have something to hide. I told my mom that I’m getting paternity tests done on all my kids the moment they’re born and she lost it. Talking about how it’s an insult to the woman and such. In my opinion, the mere fact that my partner has no problems with a test automatically makes me trust them more. But the opposite just makes them more suspicious.

[–]velvetalocasia -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link

You need consent, so what? I have yet to come across any place where the mother is actually able to stop a test. And it’s true, you are accusing your significant other of cheating…..that’s just the truth🤷🏻‍♀️.

[–]Dark-Hatter5 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Oh you can do the test but it’s rendered invalid in legal setting. And most courts will not grant one easily. As for accusing my partner of cheating, I could say the same about snooping through my phone, accosting me about my whereabouts or even asking penetrative questions about every single woman in my life. But I don’t mind unless you’re acting crazy. Why? Because my partner’s feelings are valid. They’re not in my head to know the facts of the situation so they have a right to ask questions and I have to assuage their fears if those questions are reasonable. Same goes a paternity test. As long you know you have nothing to hide, providing me with the confirmation I’m looking for is highly appreciated

[–]velvetalocasia2 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

You know of any case, when a court actually did not allow a test ever?

There we have it…..the feelings of the accuser are valid…..and so are the feelings of the accused, what ever they may be.

[–]Dark-Hatter5 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Everyone’s feelings are valid but in situations like this, there must be compromises to reach an amiable conclusion. That’s a relationship in a nutshell: Compromises.

[–]velvetalocasia3 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I never said anything different….

[–]Dark-Hatter1 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

https://m.timesofindia.com/india/no-dna-test-if-there-is-no-proof-of-adultery-supreme-court/amp_articleshow/85021297.cms

[–]velvetalocasia3 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

„The bench, however, suggested that the parties to go for a divorce settlement instead of raising the issue of adultery and DNA test again in a lower court.“

So they did not prevent the test forever, they just said that the filing must be right…..

[–]Dark-Hatter6 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

The court, after hearing both sides, quashed the order for the DNA test and said, “In the absence of primary evidence by the respondent in the case of adultery, the conduct of a DNA test which is the secondary evidence ought not have been passed. We set aside the order”.

They literally overturned the order. Did you miss that?

[–]velvetalocasia2 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Because it was not filled correctly…..they said there must be raised the question about adultery first.

[–]Dark-Hatter6 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Either way, my point still stands that the courts can and do stand in the way of getting legally admissible paternity tests. It’s even more rampant in contesting child support cases where, as you so said, a man can get a paternity test, submit it in court, it gets thrown out and the judge will refuse to grant a court ordered one. Mandatory or at least, highly recommended or encouraged paternity tests that are admissible legally can really help in helping men’s reproductive rights. Sometimes, a man can have a child with a woman and can prove paternity but since she wants “a stable life” with the other man, the first guy doesn’t have any rights to see his kid. And that’s okay??

[–]velvetalocasia2 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

You highly confuse a lot of things here….if you file for what ever with the court, you need to do that correctly. All kinds of things have statuses of limitation, that’s not exclusive to child support cases….I believe that’s the through out of court thing you mean? Visitation is a whole other thing…..

[–]Dark-Hatter3 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

It’s not been done correctly, fine. Give them the chance to do it right; that’s asking for a court ordered one but they get refused. The point I’m making is the one thing me can use as protection is often blocked. If you keep saying do it right but don’t even give me the chance then what’s the point??

[–]velvetalocasia2 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I don’t know, maybe start out in the legally right way? Sorry to tell you but there are not second chances for everything.

[–]Dark-Hatter3 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Wow!! Just wow!! Yeah, this is hopeless.

[–]velvetalocasia2 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Is this the only legality you know, where there are no second chances? I doubt it.

[–]Dark-Hatter3 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

You don’t get it. This particular legality has no stipulation saying you don’t get a second chance. It’s up to the judge’s discretion which, in family courts, are fucking messed up. In family courts, women get second, third chances and more. But you sit there and say get it right the first time. You obviously can’t cross the empathy gap so there’s no point to this back and forth.

[–]velvetalocasia1 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

What are you trying to say? That statues of limitation only apply to one gender? That rules about what has to be filed in which way only apply to one gender?

[–]Dark-Hatter2 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

You do know statutes of limitations don’t apply in divorce and custody cases, right?? Whether you case succeeds is highly dependent on how much slack the judge is willing to cut you. And as a guy, that’s not a lot.

[–]velvetalocasia1 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Your specific example about contesting paternity is very much a case of statutes of limitations to my knowledge. It can’t be contested after a certain time…..what would you call that if not statue of limitations? Do I have the word wrong?

[–]Dark-Hatter3 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

That even makes your argument even worse because most statutes of limitations concerning paternity average from the time of birth to when the child turns eighteen. Some even go as far as twenty-three. Most paternity cases happen during infancy to early teen years but still get thrown out. So what’s your point again??

[–]velvetalocasia2 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Do they? To my knowledge it’s usually between 3 and 5 years from birth. It’s 5 where I live. Where is it 18 or even 23years?

[–]Dark-Hatter2 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

https://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/state-statute-of-limitations-to-establish-paternity.html

[–]NAWALT_VADER 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

There is a cost for men, both societal and financial, to have their kids tested to verify they are their own biological children. Women have no such obstacles in their path to verify that their children are their own biological children. It is mandated by law that the provisions be in place to ensure women leave hospitals with only their own biological children.

There needs to be provisions mandated by law to ensure that men know that the children attributed to them are their own biological children before leaving the hospital. Just like is done for women. Equality.

[–]velvetalocasia 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

And regarding that…..you want to tell me that hospitals do genetic testing on all babies so they give every child to the right mother?

[–]NAWALT_VADER3 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I want to tell you that all hospitals make great effort to ensure that all babies are given to the right mothers. This is due to lawsuits that happened when mothers were given the wrong babies and sued the hospitals. When mothers were made to raise babies that are not their own biological children, it was seen as criminal. I want it to also be seen as criminal when a man is unwittingly raising a child that is not his own biological child.

[–]velvetalocasia-1 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

And why do hospitals have this responsibility? You are ditching the point!

[–]velvetalocasia -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

It’s not at all what you like to present it as……the hospital has to ensure that a woman leaves the hospital with the child she birthed because if she doesn’t, then the hospital switched the kid. The hospital has a responsibility here because they are the ones „handling“ the children. It’s fundamentally different regarding the father…..the hospital has no hand in if the father is actually the biological father. That is the difference.

[–]NAWALT_VADER5 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

No. It is exactly as I present it.

Why do you think it is important if the hospital switched the kid? What the fuck difference does it make if the woman leaves the hospital with her own child or some random switched child? Should a woman be upset that the child she is raising is not her own child if the hospital gives her a random baby instead of her own biological child? Should the mother in this case be able to have any complaint, raising a child she thought was hers when in fact it wasn't?

Should we just say "Well, she has a legal right to test it if she wants to."?

Does it matter if you raise your own child or some random child you are told is your child but in fact is not?

Are you allowed to be upset if the hospital gives you a random baby instead of the baby you are biologically related to?

This is the dilemma all potential or supposed fathers face.

[–]velvetalocasia1 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

You ignore the point…….the hospital did something wrong if they switched a child and gives the wrong kid to a mother. The hospital didn’t neglect any responsibility if they don’t test for the right father because they had nothing to do with who the father is. It’s not like the hospital impregnated the mother.

The responsibility of the hospital does not at all relate to someone being upset but to the hospitals tasks and if they fulfill them correctly.

[–]NAWALT_VADER5 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

No, the hospital has a responsibility to ensure the baby born in their facility leaves their facility with the biological parents.

This is generally easy to prove for the mother without genetic testing, simply due to monitoring the baby from the moment of birth through various means, such as bands on wrists.

For fathers, of course, determination is different. For fathers, it can only be accurately determined by a DNA test. That doesn't at all reduce the imperative of it.

It is still just as important.

[–]velvetalocasia1 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

You want to make the hospital responsible for something they have no hand in at all…..that’s the problem.

Let’s say we toss all law and sanity out the window and do this testing…..the presumed father is not the father and now the hospital has to find the actual father? What if they can’t? Do they have to keep the baby? How long?

[–]NAWALT_VADER1 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

You want to make the hospital responsible for something they have no hand in at all.

They have had a hand in it, as they are the place of birth, and therefore they have a responsibility to ensure the baby goes to the proper biological parent. It is not acceptable to give a random baby to a mother. There are rules in place to ensure the mother gets her proper baby. I suggest the same should be done for fathers.

If they give the wrong baby to a mother, and the mother takes that baby home and begins to raise that baby as if it were her own, then later finds out the baby isn't the biological child of the mother, the mother can sue the hospital. It is considered negligent on the part of the hospitals if they allow a baby to go home with the wrong biological parent, if that parent in question is the mother. I have already posted links to news reports of such lawsuits elsewhere in this thread. It has happened often enough that laws have been put in place and new procedures are followed in hospitals specifically to address this problem, but for mothers only. I suggest the same should be done for fathers.

For equality, the same consideration and care should be taken for fathers. For exactly the same reasons as the mothers cited, in that it is traumatizing to find out that the child you have been raising that you thought was yours was in fact not. If hospitals have this responsibility to mothers, as it has already been proven they legally do, then I feel they should also have this same responsibility to fathers. Parental verification needs to be done at the hospital where the baby is born, because that is where it can be done, and it needs to be done for not just mothers but fathers too.

[–]Toss2211 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ahhh. Go watch Gataca made in 1997. A view on exactly how that turns out.

[–]Amausniper 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Zzz stop trolling arguing without hearing other.'s argument is worthless and you are losing time to everyone

[+][deleted] 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Amausniper 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ikr 💀

[–]velvetalocasia -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah I know you don’t like to here someone with a different opinion. If you think this is wasting time maybe just scroll on?

[–]NAWALT_VADER 34 points35 points36 points 4 years ago (34 children) | Copy Link

To me, this is one of the biggest issues for Men's Rights. Mandatory DNA testing for all newborns should begin immediately. There is no reason to deny this, other than to cover up for infidelity. Rules are already in place, and have been for decades, to ensure that the biological child leaves the hospital with the biological mother. The same needs to be done for biological fathers. No man should ever be named the father unless DNA results prove it.

In the past, women have successfully sued hospitals when a mix-up happened and they accidentally brought home a baby that was not their own biological child. It is considered traumatic when a mother unknowingly is raising a child that she thought was hers but in fact was not.

Fathers deserve the same considerations. It is just as damaging to men. Perhaps men need to start suing hospitals until this change is made.

[–]hehimCA 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes and a lawmaker in Jamaica proposed it.

[–]velvetalocasia -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (32 children) | Copy Link

For what would the man sue a hospital in this case?

[–]NAWALT_VADER 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (30 children) | Copy Link

Exactly the same thing that a woman would sue a hospital for in such a case. Emotional trauma would be the easiest to prove, I would expect. There is precedence when women are affected. Some similar cases:

https://fox59.com/news/national-world/california-women-carry-birth-wrong-babies-due-to-fertility-clinic-mix-up/

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-58474478

https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/local/daily/may99/baby25.htm

https://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/la-couple-sue-reproductive-health-center-over-wrong-baby/2752927/

Those above are recent cases. Many many more cases can be researched for anyone who feels this isn't a problem. Google it.

If it is not ok for women to unknowingly raise a random child that is not their own biological child, then it follows that it is also not ok for a man to unknowingly raise a random child that is not their own biological child. Same shit. Otherwise, why don't they just hand out random babies to any person who claims to be a parent at hospitals?

[–]velvetalocasia -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago (29 children) | Copy Link

But the hospital did not do anything wrong in regarding to men.

If a fertility clinic implants the wrong embryo, the did not work properly.

If the hospital mixes up babies, they did not work properly.

What dis the hospital do wrong, if the man is not the father?

[–]NAWALT_VADER 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (28 children) | Copy Link

The hospital verifies that the baby is with the biological mother. The hospital does wrong by not also verifying the biological father.

[–]velvetalocasia -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (24 children) | Copy Link

Who says that that’s the responsibility of the hospital regarding the father?

[–]imgurRefugee85 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link

It is if the hospital assists in the processing of the birth certificate with a fraudulent Father's name on it.

[–]velvetalocasia 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link

So I don’t know how that works where ever you are but don’t the parents/mother fill the birth certificate in the US? Where I am the hospital has nothing to do with that at all.

[–]imgurRefugee85 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link

Some States the hospital assists in filling them out and sends them to the government, some States the hospital processes them, and some States the hospital has nothing to do with it. Michigan for example the mother can put any man's name even if she's never had sex with him. The hospital sends it to the government verifying it as a legal document. Now this man who has never had any sexual relationship with this woman must pay child support or massive legal fees fighting it. Yes I do know a woman personally that did just this to one of her "friends" because he had a better job than her boyfriend. The hospital filled the paperwork on her behalf. The one nurse even encouraged her to put down a good man's name as the father. Why shouldn't they be somewhat responsible?

[–]velvetalocasia -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link

Because they don’t determine what information is put down….they only record it.

[–]imgurRefugee851 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Wow. I had a feeling you had no concept of accountability. Thanks for proving that. Now I'm done with you, just like all your exes.

[–]velvetalocasia1 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

So your are telling me, that the hospital has power over who they have to record as father? They can say this guy….not that guy?

[–]imgurRefugee851 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

In some States yes.

[–]velvetalocasia1 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

How? Under what circumstances?

[–]imgurRefugee851 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/misc/hb_birth.pdf

Look at hospital responsibilities. If they are responsible for the data on the birth certificate they should be held accountable for the data. After you've read what you're willing to read. Please feel free to get back to me about the parts you're having difficulty.

[–]velvetalocasia1 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Page 5 Informant

[–]imgurRefugee851 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Did you notice the word "preferably"? That means an institutional preference to one gender, AKA discrimination. I also couldn't help but notice you ignored the responsibilities section. Again proving you have an aversion to that type of thing. Do you really think it's acceptable for a person to be forced to care for a child that's not theirs?

[–]velvetalocasia1 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I do not ignore anything but it’s made clear under Informant, that that person is responsible for the content of the information and certifies that by signing. As I said the hospital only records it (if at all).

Of course it’s preferably the mother, who else would it be?

[–]imgurRefugee851 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

It takes two to make a baby. Why is one given preference over the other? Why do you believe the hospital shouldn't be held accountable for accurate record keeping? Why do you think it's the hospitals responsibility to protect the mother? Shouldn't it be the mother's responsibility to ensure she's leaving with her child? Do you think the privilege of knowing you're raising your own child should only be determined by how you where born? If the institutional system openly discriminated against black women and forced them to raise someone else's child, would you be saying the same thing?

[–]velvetalocasia1 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Yep it takes two to make a baby but the mother birthed the child so she is arguably the person „closest“ to the child at birth, if you will.

The hospital can only be held responsible for things they actually have responsibility for.

Handling babies and giving them back to the right mother is a hospital task and their responsibility.

But they did not impregnate the mother, they weren’t present when she was impregnated……they have no hand in who impregnated a woman. So no that can’t be their responsibility.

[–]imgurRefugee851 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

The hospital can only be held responsible for things they actually have responsibility for.

Like filling out paperwork?

Why do you not want hospitals to verify their paperwork?

Do you support inaccurate record keeping when it comes to medical history?

Do you think people don't deserve to know about half of their medical history?

[–]velvetalocasia1 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

As you so graciously linked the hospital is responsible to DO the recording not for the CONTENT of the recording….I can not make it any easier for you.

[–]imgurRefugee851 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Why are you dodging my questions?

[–]velvetalocasia1 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

You confuse several things…..I just try to stay on the one topic as I‘m sure you do this purposely.

[–]imgurRefugee851 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Just answer this one question then.

Why do you think mothers are allowed to falsify fifty percent of their child's medical history?

[–]velvetalocasia1 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Thats a very different question and according to your own link, they are not allowed to do that….. page 5 Informant.

[–]imgurRefugee851 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

It's not a different question. Why are you avoiding answering it?

[–]velvetalocasia1 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I avoid nothing….to your link women are not allowed to do that and I never said they where. So why should I reason for an argument I never made?

[–]imgurRefugee851 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

You can't even answer a point blank question.

Why do you think mothers with the support of institutional hospitals, should be allowed to deprive children of fifty percent of their own medical history?

[–]velvetalocasia1 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

AGAIN, I NEVER SAID THAT MOTHERS WHERE ALLOWED TO DO THAT! What don’t you understand about that? That was never even the point of the discussion between you and me. So why do you try to put words in my mouth?

[–]Werwet10 -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The two are not the same thing. The hospital needn't care about the morality of the couples. It only needs to bother about the delivery of the child and to ensure the child delivered by the woman is given to her and not misplaced by the hospital.

However, the argument of emotional issues arising out of misplacement used in the legal argument can be used for men's rights.

[–]RevolutionaryCash645 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I get it .... You are saying that hospitals should make it a standard to do this procedure. Like a checkup. Like birth certificate, regular baby checkup just standardize the parternity test too right? And too be honest that's not a hard thing to implement and not even morally wrong. If hospitals would do that, this would also save couples from the argument of doing the paternity tests.

[–]Werwet10 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah! The real answer is a cultural solution...but nobody wants to reflect on themselves so much. We can't run away from responsibility by coming up with different solutions for our shortcomings forever.

So...as of now...this is the current solution...and yes, we can have the hospitals implement it as a routine procedure to ensure the baby is correctly matched to their respective parents which acts as a check of infidelity as well.

[–]RevolutionaryCash645 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

😂 haha true why would the man sue hospital if he isn't biological father ....

[–]63daddy 14 points15 points16 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

One had to wonder why anyone, in this case feminists would be so opposed to accurate facts. Obviously, they don’t want defrauded men to know the facts.

[–]SereneGoldfish 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well, in an ideal world, everyone would be happy to have the paternity test done. It would help identify any mix up at hospital, for a start

[–]iAntiMage 15 points16 points17 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Paternity fraud is legal is almost every country as getting a official DNA test is very tough and courts may not take home test result as official.

[–]Valeriopocoserio 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

As far as I know only in US and France (where it's illegal to have dna test in loco)

Fun fact french men to have a dna test have to ask and send samples outside of France. Mostly in Spain and Italy to have such tests

[–]iAntiMage 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

The main problem is no discussion on the topic by mainstream media ever. No debate. France is basically telling that being cuck is ok.

[–]Valeriopocoserio 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

that's the law! Just yesterday on Europe sub they posted that over 60% of the children in France aren't their father bio sons :D

[–]Valeriopocoserio 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_paternity_testing

https://www.irishtimes.com/news/french-men-s-insecurity-over-paternity-of-offspring-creating-a-society-of-doubt-1.773569

[–]iAntiMage 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

60% is really unbelievable... and sad too

[–]Algiz56 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Mandatory fidelity would be better. And sluts should be called sluts if cheated in marriage.

[–]SereneGoldfish -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Do you think both married parties should be fitted with trackers after the marriage vows? To help mandatory fidelity. Or chastity belts that can only be unlocked by a fingerprint scanner of the spouse?

[–]Algiz56 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Nope, I think society should just stop degrading into oblivion.

[–]SereneGoldfish 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

An excellent idea

[+]SereneGoldfish -13 points-12 points-11 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I think this is an excellent idea. Many fathers have been denied knowing their kids. I suspect there's a few cases where one should tread lightly, though. For example, the biological father is an abuser the mother is trying to protect the child from in the future. This is going to be rare though. Hopefully

[–]beachKilla 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It’s not rare when it’s the default of most custody battles now days. Throw shit at the wall and see what sticks, there’s no repercussions to perjury in custody cases so it’s a free for all

[–]SereneGoldfish 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

See, I do agree. I do think paternity tests should be a common thing and not just as a result of a court order or something. If someone is raped, the paternity test proves it was the rapist does that then mean the rapist has to pay child support. Is it enforced? Do they get visiting paternity rights when they're out of prison?

[–]w1YY 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Maybe the woman shouldn't cheat with an abuser.

[–]SereneGoldfish 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sometimes you don't get abused - male or female - until you're some way along in the relationship. And not necessarily cheating with

[–]poobobo -4 points-3 points-2 points 4 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

No. No no no. This is the worst fucking idea. This amounts to a human rights issue. I'm at awe how many people are ok with this because it's pandering to their fears.

[–]maxlvb[S] 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

A human rights issue for who? Dont you think knowing you're the father of your child is a human rights issue? Dont you think knowing who your father is, is a human rights issue?

Or are you trying to claim that women lying about who your child's father is, is somehow a human rights issue???


Feminism:Equality, when convenient.

[–]poobobo -4 points-3 points-2 points 4 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

No. What I'm trying to claim is the government has no right to a sample of my DNA without my consent. That is equivalent to an illegal search and seizure.

[–]throwaway67575753 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

The government has no right to make men pay for children that aren't theirs but they still do. You can kick rocks.

[–]poobobo 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

The government has no right to my bodily autonomy

[–]throwaway67575753 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

The government has no right to my money and time when its not my responsibility. Again, You can kick rocks.

[–]poobobo 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Your a fool. Youre so blinded by rage and fear that you don't realize what you are saying.

[–]throwaway67575753 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

You're an idiot who maintains a stance that's outdated at best because regardless of what you want the government most likely could have access to your DNA even without your consent. The fact that you are so against something that benefits everyone on a bodily autonomy stance shows how paranoid and foolish you are. Are you scared the government is going to make clones now? Also, I'm not blinded by rage and fear, you need to stop projecting.

[–]poobobo 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You must be working up quite the away with all these mental gymnastics.

[–]throwaway67575753 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You must own the gold medal in it.

[–]poobobo1 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Your a moron

[–]maxlvb[S] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

So you're saying that it's against peoples (fathers and children) human rights to find out if they're related because you seem to think the 'government' is forcing them to take DNA tests to find out exactly that... 🤣🤣🤣


You have become the very thing you are trying to fight against

[–]poobobo 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

No you are putting words in my mouth. What I'm saying is it is against people's rights to have their DNA records forcefully obtained. Man, woman, child or otherwise. I understand where you are coming from however you are throwing the baby out with the bath water with this solution. If you think governments and law enforce agencies will only use these records for paternity issues you are either dumb or willfully ignorant.

There are less intrusive solutions that doesn't give up your bodily autonomy to the government. Such as you can request a DNA test before being documented as the child's father.

Any society that would give up liberty for a little security will deserve neither

[–]maxlvb[S] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

There are less intrusive solutions that doesn't give up your bodily autonomy to the government. Such as you can request a DNA test before being documented as the child's father.

So tell me why ANYONE should have to request their human rights?

IMHO You're obviously so blinded by your 'anti government' paranoia that you're happy to deny peoples human rights because of it.


When you can figure out why a pizza is round, is put in a square box, and is cut into triangles, only then will you will be able to figure out women...

[–]poobobo 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You are so blinded by your anti women paranoia that you are happy to deny people's human rights.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter