TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Female Uber drivers allowed to reject male passengers

rbrockway

May 14, 2022
534 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10803855/Female-Uber-drivers-allowed-reject-male-passengers.html
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Female Uber drivers allowed to reject male passengers
Author

rbrockway

Upvotes 534
Comments 124
Date May 14, 2022 2:09 AM UTC
(4 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/up75s1/female_uber_drivers_allowed_to_reject_male/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/female-uber-drivers-allowed-to-reject-male.1114307
https://theredarchive.com/post/1114307
Top posts by rbrockway

Unprovoked 'one punch' attacks are now subject to harsh penalties in Australia unless the perpetrator is a woman in which case she gets off with a small fine as usual.

3441 upvotes
February 3, 2019
/r/MensRights

Women treat each other worse at work then men treat women or women treat men.

3035 upvotes
February 24, 2018
/r/MensRights

Woman burned 13-year-old boy's genitals with hot tongs for refusing sex

2919 upvotes
November 29, 2018
/r/MensRights

Woman committing sexual assault at “Women’s March” identified and arrested

2765 upvotes
February 4, 2019
/r/MensRights

Boys left to fail at school because attempts to help them earn wrath of feminists, says ex-Ucas chief

2614 upvotes
January 28, 2019
/r/MensRights

School proposes punishing boys by taking away part of their recess on International Women's Day

2488 upvotes
May 17, 2019
/r/MensRights

United Nations research finally admits that 94% of children held in bondage around the world are boys.

2424 upvotes
November 23, 2019
/r/MensRights

Women-only STEM college programs under attack for male discrimination

2130 upvotes
August 22, 2019
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]Frank_Bianco 142 points143 points144 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Good. My money can support a brother.

[–]mindset_grindset 47 points48 points49 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

this is the right answer

as long as they're not paying them a single consolation cent to skip guys, I'm fine with them cutting their own non hourly, ride based pay. as far as I'm concerned it's sexist tax bc the whole point of the app is that crimes won't happen if everybody that gets in your car has their name, address and social security code attached to the app for the police if they try anything stupid. what kind of thief or rapist would try something when they know the cops would be waiting for them at their house when they finished their crime ?

cabs that take complete strangers via cash are way more dangerous for the driver and they often do get mugged or held at gunpoint in dangerous cities.

still if it was taxi cab women who are getting paid by the hour to turn down men ? I'd boycott the shit out of that and want to sue for discrimination

the obvious solution tho is just for the company to pay to install the same security barricade as taxis have so smaller weaker women who absolutely are at risk of rape or harm if the guy is drunk enough or crazy enough can feel safe.

[–]Scrubadubdub82305 points 4 years ago [recovered] (16 children) | Copy Link

I used to drive Lyft. Had multiple women harass me. The double standard is absurd.

[–]Alarming_Draw 25 points26 points27 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Basically, its now LEGAL to discriminate against men unfairly-while even UPSETTING a woman is a crime.

As is staring...

Black is white and white is black. Up is down. Left is Right. Women good, men bad.

[–][deleted] 46 points47 points48 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Bitches. Brutal shame on them.

[–]Armyvet1984 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I was harassed as well. 2 women tried flirting with me and one saw my wedding ring. I only said hello when they entered the car and when I drove them I told the one in the back to stop touching me. I reported them to Uber and I’m sure nothing happened to those women. They tipped me by leaving 60 dollars on the front seat. But still I’m a man and should be respected like how I respect everyone.

[–]rainbow_bro_bot 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I bet it was mainly drunks?

Alcohol has a lot to answer for when it comes to harassment and bad behaviour in general.

[+]TangledGoatsucker -61 points-60 points-59 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

But they can't overpower you with sheer brute force.

[–]dishwatersupper 30 points31 points32 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

/s? Just in case you were being serious (which I'm guessing you weren't) if anyone were to come up with that argument, you try defending yourself whilst strapped in and being attacked from behind whilst behind the wheel of a moving car....

[–]bigdtbone 27 points28 points29 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Also if you managed to defend yourself and the attacker got even slightly injured you would be roasted based on that same f-Ing sentiment.

“yOu KnEw ShE cOuLdNt HuRt YoU cAuSe You ArE a BiG mAn!”

[+]BlastToCum -27 points-26 points-25 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

what did you do that you were harassed?

[–]shamblam117 15 points16 points17 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Is this satire?

[+]BlastToCum -13 points-12 points-11 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

lol all the downvotes, my question still stands, here's some context: ive not driven for work so i'm genuinely curious about how being harassed by women in a car looks while you're doing your job, do they small talk you and become evil ?

i worked in customer service on the phone, and usually managed to de-escalate verbally abusive women, but 1 in 200 were wild af and they said hurtful things xd

but same goes men, a lotta dudes talked shit to me too, anyway, I know it's different in a car and you are more in person, so how does it happen, if someone could fill me in here I would appreciate it

[–][deleted] 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[+]BlastToCum -6 points-5 points-4 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

okay, wrong subreddit for me

[–]yUnG_wiTe[🍰] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Homie the steroids are fucking with the cognitive processing that's supposed to be going on up there

[–]phuk-nugget 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There’s quite of few videos of women cancelling the ride when they arrive at their location. It’s sick.

[–]HelloImGargle 194 points195 points196 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

And they'll use this to prove the pay gap too.

[–]Grammar-Notsee_ 85 points86 points87 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

*In ten years time:

"Research over the last ten years have showed that women have made on average 50% less money than men whilst working for Uber."

[–]dishwatersupper 16 points17 points18 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Oh man..... It's true..... They'll have to start charging women twice the price for an Uber ride to make up for the niche specialist service they are using.

[–]bigdtbone 34 points35 points36 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

No, they’ll just “subsidize” female drivers with a “fee” paid on male-driver trips. Which definitely wouldn’t also affect tipping in any way at all. 🙄

[–]dishwatersupper 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

😩

[–]dishwatersupper 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Protection Tax...

[–]allmyghtt 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Aww damn I thought I thought of My point first

[–]-Merasmus- 135 points136 points137 points 4 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Shouldn't a Uber driver be able to reject any passenger? After all you should be able to trust whoevet is in the backseat of your car when going a hundred miles an hour

[–]PQKN051502 165 points166 points167 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

According to Uber, it's okay for female drivers to reject a male passenger. But it is NOT okay for male drivers to reject a female passenger. That's why people are upset. It's double standard.

[–]Ahielia 76 points77 points78 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Yup. If anyone could reject a passenger of their choosing, it'd be fine. When it only goes one way, that's discrimination.

[–]PQKN051502 45 points46 points47 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Yes. Instead of allowing all their drivers to reject anyone as they want, they give special treatment to a certain gender and make things complicated.

I don't know who come up with that crazy idea. I won't ever book Uber again.

[–]WhoDatFreshBoi 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It just makes it easier for us bis and gays.

[–]There-is-No-Beyond 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Stop talking sense!

[–]TheSoviet_Onion 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Companies and entrepreneurs are usually not allowed to refuse customers based on discriminatory traits in western countries

[–]Alternative_Summer 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I think you meant tens of miles an hour, sir.

[–]-Merasmus- 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I stand by what i said

[–]CaptainPrestedge 150 points151 points152 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

The fact men cannot turn down women is absolutely ridiculous. Women pose a threat to men in the way of sexual assault claims and men should have the option to refuse women based on this. Intoxicated women are a severe risk to men and it should be addressed! This is sexist and wrong!

[–][deleted] 4 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]CaptainPrestedge 15 points16 points17 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Without hesitation install one for sure!

[–]DochevD 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Where are you going without one UBER drivers?

[–]imsotired777 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They can reject anyone regardless of sex.

[–]bilgediver 40 points41 points42 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

how dare they assume gender.

[–]IronJohnMRA 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yep. They opened a can of worms.

[–]BeepBeepYeah7789 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yup, whenever you demand something, that "something" will come back and bite you.

[–]weirdornxtlvl 18 points19 points20 points 4 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Look at it the way you want, this is nothing but discrimination. Men are more likely to be victims of violent crimes, men are 80% more likey to be victims of homicide, even rape figures are almost 50/50 for young men. Anyone who uses the "safety" card for women is nothing but a sexist scumbag who has no regard to men's life and wellbeing.

[–]imsotired777 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Who is raping the men and assaulting them. Men are the ones predominantly doing this to each other. Why are you blaming a man assaulting other men on women.

[–]SchalaZeal01 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Who is raping the men

Mostly women.

[–]imsotired777 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Nah dude.

[–]SchalaZeal01 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, NISVS agrees with me.

[–]weirdornxtlvl 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

If you care about safety and if you care about victims, then why not allow male drivers reject male passengers? Since probably they get assaulted more? Also, why do you think those perpetrators are only men? And what them being men or women has to do with anything when our goal is protect all people? Unless you go the white supremacist route, who says black people commit more crime so it's a race issue, which is racist. What you are doing here is the exact same thing, but it is sexist. A perpetrator being a man has nothing to do with sex, it is a criminal issue not a man's issue. So, if it's really about safety and not special treatment, then the steps you take to protect women, you should take double to protect men. But, that's not what we see here.

[–]imsotired777 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

First of all I said ‘predominantly’, if you don’t know what that means look it up. Secondly drivers can cancel on anyone for whatever reason. I really don’t understand this made up outrage.

Let’s go with facts here. Most crimes especially those of a sexual nature are committed by men. In fact men commit more crimes than women in general.

You brought race into this. I as a woman would feel safer encountering a women at night than a man. Regardless of the woman’s race.

[–]SchalaZeal01 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Most crimes especially those of a sexual nature are committed by men.

The reported crimes and prosecuted crimes you mean. Not the crimes that happen. 99% of female rapists never get suspected, even less reported or prosecuted. Their victim often not even thinking its possible to be raped by a woman. Even as a child.

[–]weirdornxtlvl 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

"Lets' go with the facts" you don't care about the facts, you care about generalizing because you have a narrative and prejudice. It is a fact black people commit more crime, a racist person would say it's the mere reason they are black. A not racist person would say maybe if you look at social, economic, systematic reasons we would see that being black is not a factor. Maybe growing up poor makes you more susceptible to crime? just maybe? A racist or a sexist person like yourself don't care about the underlying "facts" because they love to generalize and be judgmental. Being a man is not a factor in the exact same way, if you consider social, economic, cultural, ideological factors you would find just being a man is not a factor. If you consider the number of criminals to the male population in any given country really, you would get 0,001% or so. I'm a man, I've done nothing bad in my life, but to you (a sexist person) me being a man means I'm bad. You have been indoctrinated to hate me and have prejudice against me.

[–]imsotired777 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

In America they do, considering their history I don’t blame them. Most pedophiles are white is that racist? I mean it wasn’t a black man who locked his daughter in a basement for 20 years producing multiple kids. If we are gonna fling sh*t let’s do it. Are you really arguing that men do not commit more crimes than women? Pick a country, any country and I’ll guarantee that they have more male prisoners than female ones. Being a man doesn’t make you a criminal but it also doesn’t make me comfortable around you in a space I can’t escape from.

[–]weirdornxtlvl 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Doesn't seem like you have a grasp on how damaging generalizing is. Taking the actions of the few and attributing them to the rest. The rest, who are the vast majority, have to live through stigma even though they have done nothing bad. The millions of people who suffer from this, racism, sexism, xenophobia, religion phobia all generate from this way of thinking. You confirming that yourself is all there is to it.

[–]heeroena 36 points37 points38 points 4 years ago (25 children) | Copy Link

That won't last when they make less money because of that

[–][deleted] 20 points21 points22 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

They'll just blame it on something else

[–]heeroena 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I am sure they will that's why you just ignore it

[–][deleted] 18 points19 points20 points 4 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link

So? They will just demand they get paid the same overall.

If you think I am joking... https://www.theguardian.com/business/2021/mar/26/court-rules-against-asda-in-workers-equal-pay-case

And people wonder why the price of things is going up...

[–]Saurons-agent 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

'Hey were not on the same wage that's not fair.' 'You are doing different jobs why should the pay be equal' why not just work in the warehouse...

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

why not just work in the warehouse...

They want to eat the cake but also keep the cake.

[–]Saurons-agent 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Whilst devaluing my cake and increasing the cost of a cake purchase lol

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well they want 2 cakes. 1 to eat. 1 to keep for later and a court ruling that somebody else pays for it.

But yes :)

[–]HenryCGk 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That was the damming testimony, that Asda paid "the rate for the job being done",

As best I can make out, (from para 23 of the supreme court judgment) allowing that:

would not promote the purpose of the legislation which was aimed at eliminating discriminatory differences between terms and conditions of employment.

And

Parliament could not have intended the claimant to have to show “an undefined substratum of similarity” between the terms of employment of the claimant and the comparator

So substratum can't mean any thing other than "any". So you jobs don't have to be the same or at all alike.

In pars 13 and 12 the Judges show this comes form the Equality Act 2010 Section 65(1) by see in the word "or" and then "(c) of equal value to B's work." and reading that the Employment Tribunal is to decided the value of work.

For any EU readers see DIRECTIVE 2006/54/EC section (4) to find the words "or work of equal value": in your chosen language, and applying to your state in some way.

[+]heeroena -12 points-11 points-10 points 4 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

that's not comparable.

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points18 points 4 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

Yeah it is... when you consider the men work in the warehouse the women do not. But women want equal pay for less dangerous work eg forklifts are running around the warehouse not the shop floor.

[+]matrixislife -9 points-8 points-7 points 4 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Redo the contracts so that you rotate through both distribution and in the shop, and make the pay in the distribution piece work so you get paid by work completed. Absolutely fair, but see who complains about it.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Thats exactly what the court just overrulled.

The actual solution here is creative accounting but it requries seperating the companies into a consumer facing and a distibution side. Kinda like how a McDonalds/KFC/etc.. franchise works.

That way you have all the wareouses workers in one and all the non warehouse workers in another and the selection critera between companies no longer can be applied as "equal"

Probably have to do that as well because... well the warehouse workers have all quit / gone for the shop floor jobs because it easier and less dangers. Don't need special health and safty / fork lift / HGV driving license and stuff like that as well....

Oh. you know the UK has an HGV (Lorry driver) driver shortage? Can't imagine why nobody want the job? lol

[+]matrixislife -7 points-6 points-5 points 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

The lorry driver shortage relates to Brexit, with a lot of the previous lorry drivers being from the continent deciding it's time to go home given the uncertain future over here.
Add to that the covid issues reducing working hours, and [again] Brexit making transporting goods overseas difficult [see the M25 lorry park] and you have a shitstorm no one really wants to be bothered with.
I've not heard actual working conditions come up as a significant problem.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Ok.. .So basically your clueless on the issue and completly missed the point. The COURT just overruled the situation.

Say for example. You get £15 an hour for both jobs. One you sit at a till, Talk to people and swipe items past a bar code reader. The other you have to haul good on and off pallelts and your messured by X tons per hour. When you go home you back and legs hurt.

Which one do you chose?

Realize nobody want to be a truck drive in the UK because the hours suck, the pay sucks, the conditions suck compared to the alternatives. The whole reason it was fill by people from the eastern block was because their option sucked even more.

| from the continent deciding it's time to go home given the uncertain future over here.

This is incorrect. What the goverment did is actually said. Your free to come. Your free to go. But what your not free to do is come and go at your will. This removed all of these people from the country because the workers used to come over for 3 months of the year. Then go back to their familes. When you also realize that 3 months UK minimum wage is the same as the country of origin for many of these people was the same as a years minimum wage. eg Poland, Lithuania minimum wage is 600/EUR a month. vs UK's 1700 EUR (after currency converstion).

This also has other strange effects like people would come over shack up 15 people in a 3 bedroom house of men who just worked literally 24/7. Then took the money and left again without paying ANY UK taxes because they were not in the country long enough.

Anyway.. This isn't really about brexit. Only the fact that avilability of a surplus of cheap labour drove the pay that UK truck drivers to absolutle minimum wage and kept it there. So.. nobody wants to do it because it doesn't pay enough.

| I've not heard actual working conditions come up as a significant problem.

Its the compensation is now being treated equal for tougher conditions is the problem. So the working conditions are worse compared to the alternative for the same pay is the problem.

eg Your basically stating... This is "not happening" https://www.thegrocer.co.uk/asda/asda-strike-looms-as-warehouse-staff-reject-pay-offer/664748.article

Go get a fucking clue......

[+]matrixislife -8 points-7 points-6 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Think you have a literacy problem there. [deleted] this conversation isn't worth the effort to type it all out.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Yup. So you basically have "nothing" to come back with except excuses because... you don't actually have a fucking clue whats actually going on in the world.

[–]heeroena -5 points-4 points-3 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Not the same. Uber you get paid by the number of customers not hours worked

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Ok... This is why there is a COURT ruling for that as well.......

https://www.fleetnews.co.uk/news/fleet-industry-news/2021/03/17/uber-drivers-to-receive-minimum-wage-pension-and-holiday-pay#:~:text=Uber%20has%20confirmed%20it%20will,'%20rather%20than%20self%2Demployed.

Realize that poeple are setting themselves up that they cannot be fired from a job and don't actually have to do half the job either but demand the same pay.

2nd person in 5 minutes.. I have told to "Go get a fucking clue"

[–]heeroena -5 points-4 points-3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

still not the same. they are talking about minimum wage which the guys who don't discriminate will get as well in addition to not discriminating on customers which means they will have more customers and therefore earn more.

In addition if uber is going to do that and they start losing revenue because of it, then they will have to restructure and change their rules or go bankrupt. Everything these sick feminists want will have consequences. The issue is how long till we get to a point where we (men) start saying enough is enough and stop covering for them.

Dial the autism down guy

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

still not the same. they are talking about minimum wage which the guys who don't discriminate

Right... I think you need to understand there is multiple variable here. You have people at one side forcing themselves to be paid minimum wage. At the other side you have them being able to reject 50% of the job but also continue to get the same minimum wage.

| In addition if uber is going to do that and they start losing revenue because of it, then they will have to restructure and change their rules or go bankrupt

They are trying to play by the rules. The COURTS... keep overriding their decisions and rail roading them down these paths. Thats actually the problem here is that in about 10-20 years time. It won't be possible to run a private company because of the rules that are required to follow and they will all go bankrupt.

[–]IceCorrect 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I've read some article about Uber pay gap and of course even when women work same hours, they didn't work in most demanding hours, so instead of driving they just sitting in car for free

[–]allmyghtt 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Next article: Female uber drivers paid half as much as male uber drivers..... how did this happen!!!!!

Lmao

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If you're a man, neither work nor pay for gynocentric companies like Uber. Easy as.

[–]Neppy_sama 20 points21 points22 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

During night time,if I get a woman as Uber I would politely decline. And wait for another cab even if it takes 30 minutes.

[–]fatguyonsteroids 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Why?

[–]ZachJung 14 points15 points16 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The gist behind this is to protect the so called "unequal" gender. While I advocate that women should always be allowed to feel safe no matter what, Australia's perpetuating of the stereotype that men=harasser and women=victim is horridly harmful for equality. I would advocate for a law that such drivers (regardless of gender) should have the right to refuse a passenger (regardless of gender) that causes them to feel unsafe. We live in a world with so many different genders and intersections and people are capable of being creepy and harassing regardless of their physical traits. Australia and the rest of the world need to wake tf up. Progressive my ass smh.

[–]ChaoticThing05 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This!!

[–]springy 20 points21 points22 points 4 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Just claim to be "gender fluid" and as soon as you find out the driver is a woman you can magically "identify as a woman". Nobody would dare challenge your identity, and refuse the ride, in these woke times.

[–]rainbow_bro_bot 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes.

I wonder how this would work in terms of transpeople.

[–]ChadWolf98 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Its bad and its sexism but ironically if she is a type of woman who would "cancel" you because you are a dude you are also safer not to ride with her (and not grt false meetooed)

[–]Ash_C 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No, We will reject female drivers first 🗿

[–]gnarlin 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Why not just make it a policy to allow all drivers regardless of their gender be allowed to reject passengers they feel uncomfortable with allowing into their vehicle?

[–]Drougen 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If women are scared of being Uber drivers, they shouldn't be Uber drivers. 🤷

[–]Youre-In-Trouble 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Can't say I've ever seen a female Uber driver.

[–]Saurons-agent 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So guys getting harassed by drunks is fine and doesn't intrude on their personal space? Dumb framing of issues that both genders suffer from.

[–]Ok-Sort-6294 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Soon we'll be accused once more of a pay gap that they themselves caused, at least the money will go to our bros.

[–]throwaway202108213 points 4 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

Uber is breaking refusal of service laws in Australia with this discriminatory policy and lawsuits can be brought against them.

https://business.gov.au/people/customers/refuse-service#:~:text=According%20to%20the%20Australian%20Human,gender%20identity%20and%20intersex%20status

Uber cannot refuse service to people due to race, sexual orientation, disability, AND sexual identity. Allowing female drivers to refuse male drivers on basis of biological sex constitutes discrimination and violation of this law.

#uberhatesmen

[–]rbrockway[S] 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Companies in Australia can seek waivers. They are routinely granted in cases where the discrimination is against men.

[–]BrokeMacMountain 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This just reinforces the toxic feminist message that

ALL women are victims, and ALL men are abuses.

It is a fundamentally wrong idiology, lacking in principle.

We should campaign for equal rights and take Uber to task puclicly.

[–]rbrockway[S] 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I object to the double standard. Allow all drivers to discriminate on the basis of gender and I won't complain.

I have recently learnt that Uber Australia allows a person to cancel a request for transport within 5 minutes without penalty. This might be sufficient for a man to learn the gender of the driver and cancel if it's a woman.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Honestly the nature of taxi type transportation services sort of raises different questions when it comes to unfair discrimination based on crude heuristics. The driver has personal safety issues and the pickups and dropoffs are like 20x/day sometimes. This is quite different than something like filling out a job, rental or loan application where personal safety isnt much an issue, the long term consequences are far greater and there is every opportunity to investigate in to each person to be fair rather than simply going off statistics correlating with outward features.

[–]rbrockway[S] 23 points24 points25 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Honestly the nature of taxi type transportation services sort of raises different questions when it comes to unfair discrimination based on crude heuristics.

Discriminating on the basis of crude heuristics is at the very heart of identity politics.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yeah. It reminds me a bit about the cabbies in NYC who dont pick up young black men for fear of being robbed. People always scared of me cuz Im a big guy. Like uh oh here's a big guy I dont know him whats he gonna do kinda thing. I drove for those companies before years ago. What surprised me the most was how fast the girls just get in the car cuz I was always used to women being afraid of me. It was weird.

[–]OldEgalitarianMRA 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In the 1970's taxi drivers in NYC would avoid entire neighborhoods that contained people of color. It was considered the height of racism and this is the height of sexism.

It should be illegal. Discrimination based on sex should be illegal.

[–]rainbow_bro_bot 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Aus men should in that case make a point of boycotting female drivers. When they call for an Uber request a male driver. Give the women less jobs.

[–]rudebwoyyyyyyy 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

and why cant men do the same again?

[–]PikAchUTKE 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wait till the law suit happens when they object to a male passenger with a service animal.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This article is a fat, tailed lie.

Female uber drivers are not discriminated. And according to some comments here some of them have been even oppressors against male drivers because they have harassed them.

How can nobody cares if male drivers are bullied but the moment a female driver complains, such privileges and rules are brought on a silver plate and are punishing to half of the world for fuck sake?

When men using ubers start preferring male drivers and male drivers start getting higher wages, those women will have no reason to whine about being preferred less and being paid less, because they are the only responsible for that.

[–]IceCorrect 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

And only men can be rejected, why don't they just go further and allow driver to ban race, but this will be allowed if the race was white

[–]1337NinjaBear 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

good point

[–]anonymousaspossable 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Its their car. Drivers should be allowed to refuse service to anyone.

[–]AzLibDem 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Agreed, but male drivers are not allowed to refuse women, so this is a discriminatory practice.

[–]Blablabblue -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This makes sense. Women are fearful of men in general, and lets be honest. No one would want two dudes in the backseat, smelling like piss, alcohol and weed at the same time, telling you to drive to a shady street. I'm pretty sure no one would reject an average old man, cheerful and composed.

[–]ainokissa -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Completely understandable and reasonable. It’s also their own car, they can choose who they wish to give a ride for or not.

[–]rbrockway[S] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Then why can't male Uber drivers refuse women? The article makes it clear this was specifically rejected.

[–]ainokissa 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I think they should be able to.

[–]rbrockway[S] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree. Uber doesn't unfortunately. I have recently learnt though that Uber Australia allows a person to cancel a request for transport within 5 minutes without penalty. This might be sufficient to learn the gender of the driver and cancel if it's a woman.

[–][deleted] 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Chinny_YT 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

????????????????????

[+]kingribeye -7 points-6 points-5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Female Uber drivers

This is includes transwomen.

[–]ThirdCrew 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't use Uber but are riders able to decline drivers without penalty?

[–]hawksdiesel 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And vice versa too right?!

[–]BTS_on_a_bicycle 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Good for us. Y’all want a woman driver? Thanks Uber!

[–]IronJohnMRA 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh. Uber just opened itself up to a lawsuit. Some people learn the hard way.

[–]Mysterious-Example85 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Why any group choose to reject another

[–]pappo4ever 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This will only affect women. People will only accept male drivers.

This is basic reasoning, do the people that makes those decisions think at all?

[–]blinman94 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Public transport segregation happened before...

[–]Macaroniandcheesez 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The difference is that Uber is not a public transport service. It is a private company that sells a service. Now wether it is discriminatory or not is another subject than Uber being public transport.

[–]vcs002 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

so i guess that now the male ubers can reject female passengers, right?

[–]ExpressMess1280 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Tbh I don’t understand it either, I mean everyone should be able to reject people on Uber if they feel unsafe. I don’t understand people who don’t agree with this

[–]rbrockway[S] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's a fundamental inequality built in to our system. Women can do this but men can't. This pattern is now repeated all over our society.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter