Imagine that you are someone who wants to avoid being a parent at all cost. Would you rather:

A) be a woman who has to grow a child inside of you that you don't want for 9 months, and then at the conclusion of those 9 months (if you still don't want to be a parent) you can give that child up for adoption consequence-free and go on to live your life as you normally would have

B) be a man who doesn't want a child, and have a woman give birth to a child who she claims is yours, and now you are forced to pay for her decision for 18 years under threat of jail time if you don't pay into this extortion?

Honestly, I think that I would rather go through option A. 9 months of something that I didn't want using my body seems much more preferable to 18 years of financial extortion. At least with option A you can go on to live a normal life after those 9 months are over. Option B you are just a financial slave for a whole quarter of your life, and makes starting a family that you do want all but financially impossible. IMO, if you choose to rather go through option B you are kind of insane to me (or maybe you have an huge trust fund that 18+ years of child support doesn't impact your quality of life??).

Option A could be the current state of affairs for women in several republican states. Option B is the current state of affairs for men in all 50 states.

From a reproductive rights standpoint: I would rather be a woman in a republican state more than I would want to be a man in any state.