TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Male politicians receive more online abuse than female politicians.

iainmf

September 9, 2018
1566 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://imgur.com/17NVUrN
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Male politicians receive more online abuse than female politicians.
Author

iainmf

Upvotes 1566
Comments 102
Date September 9, 2018 5:38 AM UTC
(7 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/9easak/male_politicians_receive_more_online_abuse_than/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/male-politicians-receive-more-online-abuse-than.1185235
https://theredarchive.com/post/1185235
Top posts by iainmf

Men...Stop apologising for taking up space and standing up for your human rights.

2425 upvotes
July 19, 2021
/r/MensRights

A report from Australia shows about 30% of people think “Men and boys are increasingly excluded from measures to improve gender equality”

2019 upvotes
March 3, 2021
/r/MensRights

Boys are more likely to be undernourished than girls: A systematic review and meta-analysis of sex differences in undernutrition

1809 upvotes
September 22, 2020
/r/MensRights

This feminist thinks masculinity is about violence and oppression of women.

1594 upvotes
April 25, 2022
/r/MensRights

My list of studies showing we care more about women than men.

1143 upvotes
May 9, 2021
/r/MensRights

UN Women - As well as the health battle, the social impact of the #coronavirus is significant and it is women who are being disproportionately affected.

794 upvotes
March 16, 2020
/r/MensRights

Paper explains that men's shorter life-expectancy is not important in health equity.

572 upvotes
June 9, 2023
/r/MensRights

Survey finds most students disagree with woke views but are reluctant to admit it. — The Centre for Male Psychology

572 upvotes
August 15, 2025
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]TheMythof_Feminism 207 points208 points209 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Pretty sure , at least since about 2002 (end of internet 1.0 era ish?) it has been consistently demonstrated that men receive significantly higher levels of "abuse" than women.

Not just politicians, just men across the board.... if I recall, it isn't even close. I don't know if the most recent numbers show this, but I vaguely recall since at least 2002 and up to 2013 this has been the case.

[–]Blutarg 14 points15 points16 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"If anything, the study says, men tend to get more online abuse than women"

https://reason.com/archives/2017/07/18/men-as-likely-to-be-harassed-online-as-w

[–]pig666eon 19 points20 points21 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I wonder what the demographic is of the people complaining also that could shine some light into things

[–]BrenzoG11 points 7 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

I remember a study back in the day that showed the majority of abuse women received online came from other women. No idea for men though.

[–]FlagrantWrongsDotCom 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

All I know is I was at a conference where a main agenda item was a bill to stop "online violence" against women which basically criminalized matters of free speech or was entirely redundant to current legislation. The language that I saw lended itself to make it a tool to persecute people and completely ignoring all the abuse that men get as though that didnt even exist. It ignored basic facts like its already a federal offense to make a death threat to somebody online. The language was also extremely vague/subject to interpretation which obviously in matters of writing can vary so significantly there can be thousands of universities/schools covering the varieties of interpretations of a single text. Its an absolutely terribly terrifying piece of legislation.

​

When I spoke to a few self branded feminists who were there including one that appeared to be potentially obviously willing to do more extreme things they eventually did pretty much concede that this wasnt just/didnt make sense; however, they significantly discounted/dismissed any difficulties men suffered and still wanted the legislation just to have something/"support the cause."

​

Regardless that piece of legislation needs to never make it to law. I rarely have that type of response to stuff but it is literally that bad with such obvious potential for abuse/injustice/to cause terror. People need to be a lot better about monitoring pending legislation at state/federal/etc levels for high potential for abuse/redundant stuff and mobilizing response to things that dont make any sense. People shouldnt be abused online or anywhere however this is a lot harder to solve problem than just passing a piece of legislation and almost anytime people make legislation against freedom of speech etc it gets abused/warped sometimes even back upon the creators quite quickly. Political ebbs and flows of trends and power etc.

​

People making actual threats online generically probably need to be followed up on more in line with the SOP (we have had several school shootings etc despite blatant death threats being made openly, etc). This is already illegal. Its an enforcement issue rather than a legislative issue in that context because theres an abundance of tools to deal with that to prevent harm.

[–]torontoLDtutor 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Now we need a study of who's likeliest and least likely to complain about receiving online abuse (regardless of any differences in the frequency of the abuse). And a study about biases in how people respond to hearing such complaints (i.e., are they likelier to react to a complaint by a woman).

[–]Akesgeroth 85 points86 points87 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

I was gonna say that Trump, Obama and Bush would skew the numbers, but it seems to be a UK only study.

[–]Republikofmancunia 39 points40 points41 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

And the interesting thing about the UK is the ones that receive the most abuse are 2 female (R Theresa and Diane Abbott) and 1 male (Jezza). So if anything it's skewed toward them from the top three anyway.

[–]chelyabinsk-40 19 points20 points21 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

the ones that receive the most abuse are 2 female (R Theresa and Diane Abbott) and 1 male (Jezza)

Not true, if you look at the study (p.4). In 2017, the top three absolute recipients were Jeremy Corbyn, Theresa May, and Boris Johnson. Furthermore, if you look at the top proportionate recipients of abuse, Conservative male MPs like Boris Johnson, Michael Gove and Jeremy Hunt all receive more abuse proportionately than does Abbott.

[–]NecroHexr 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This raises the question. Is there a correlation between prominence and abuse received, and is the data skewed because the male politicians are more aired and/or more aggressive?

This study seems very difficult to prove.

[–]GordionKnot 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Is there a correlation between prominence and abuse received

I don't see how there couldn't be, honestly.

[–]FatFingerHelperBot 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It seems that your comment contains 1 or more links that are hard to tap for mobile users. I will extend those so they're easier for our sausage fingers to click!

Here is link number 1 - Previous text "p.4"


Please PM /u/eganwall with issues or feedback! | Delete

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think it's an interesting study. It definitely surprised me. There is a confounding variable though: the data is gathered via Twitter.

[–]iainmf[S] 36 points37 points38 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Online Abuse of UK MPs in 2015 and 2017: Perpetrators, Targets, and Topics

[–]TheImpossible1 59 points60 points61 points 7 years ago (26 children) | Copy Link

I'd be interested in seeing by gender of abuser.

Remember the guy that said the upskirting law needed to be debated?

The female supremacists stalked him and vandalized his house.

[–]vhisic 9 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

that would be the most interesting data i think.

[–]Lethn 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (24 children) | Copy Link

I know I sound like an absolute lunatic saying this but I would find it absolutely hilarious if these people targeted me. They always pick targets that can't fight back or won't, can you imagine what's going to happen if they pick a fight with somebody who points their weaponised autism at them?

In fact, I've been looking at researching wireless security cameras as part of an effort to prepare myself in case they do try anything, I remember that whole upskirting law thing, they barely seem to be talking about that now and yes, this is what's interesting, they really do keep the demographics of these abusers hidden, probably because it would mess with their narrative worse than showing who is actually abused more.

[–]TheImpossible1 12 points13 points14 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

I'd love to fight back against feminism. If I didn't have so many family issues that would end up in their shitty tabloids, I'd create an anti feminist political party.

The upskirting law got rebranded and now covers all "misogynist acts". This was conveniently discussed in private on the day where May dropped the Russia story.

I got banned from worldnews for pointing out the convenience of these events being perfectly matched.

I'm not saying she made it up, I'm saying she sat on that info until something really needed to be buried.

Edit : remember that BBC piece on kids getting depression? They never released gender data. They always omit it when it gets too close to proving the first thing that proves the evil of feminism.

The radical feminists didn't disappear. They changed tactics.

[–]Lethn 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Sounds completely plausible to me, politicians are extremely sneaky like that and I'm not surprised you got banned from WorldNews I think I got banned from there too lol, people just don't want to hear it.

[–]TheImpossible1 12 points13 points14 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

It's my 9th subreddit ban, they stopped affecting me after about 5.

I kind of realized a lot of moderators here are hell bent on keeping feminism's secrets hidden.

There's also some weird social engineering going on.

The moderators of the ever unbiased (/s) r/againsthatesubreddits are shared with the cuckold sub (NSFW seriously) r/hotwives

The more you look into who runs this place, the weirder it is.

r/braincels has a feminist mod for fuck sake.

[–]nybo 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

Wow T_D was rigth they'te cucks. Btw Why does hotwives have 2k subscribers and 4 posts? 2/3 of which are shitposts.

[–]TheImpossible1 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The best insults always have a hint of truth.

[–]TheImpossible1 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm guessing they scrubbed it when T_D made the connection.

[–]SabkaSathSabkaVikas 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A batalion of 2K alternativ accounts led by the same person, whose wife happens to like getting massaged by strangers while hubby watching.

[–]Blutarg -2 points-1 points0 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

weaponised autism

Give me a break. There's no connection between stalking people and autism. That's ridiculous. Let's leave childish slurs out of this.

[–]Lucius_Martius 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I completely agree. It always makes me cringe when people use "autism" as a derogatory term for this kind of behavior.

If anything, autism makes people less likely to behave like that because they can't handle social confrontation well and tend to avoid it, concentrating on things and facts rather than on people.

A much more fitting label would be the cluster-B range of personality disorders, which are in a way effectively the opposite of autism.

[+][deleted] -7 points-6 points-5 points 7 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

Wait so are you mad about not being able to look up women's skirts or is this a hypothetical? Because you sound like you are mad about that.

[–]Lethn 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

Maybe if you didn't bother looking at the actual laws feminists introduce that's what you'd think. My favourite thing to bring up is an analogy of "Are you against kicking puppies and toddlers?" they write the names of these laws in such a way as to make anybody who wants to debate them or argue against them as some kind of monster who hates women. When you actually look at the detail of the law, you'll find that they've put so much unrelated bullshit in there or made it completely unfair towards the accused to the point that no reasonable person could support it which is why they go to lengths to make sure that things are as vague as possible unless you go digging.

http://archive.is/aDl43

Generally you'd be right, you wouldn't normally be against an upskirt law would you? But here again is why I say this is so sneaky.

In the most serious cases, those convicted of secretly photographing underneath someone’s clothing without their consent in England and Wales will be placed on the sex offender register.

What they've done here is gone to complete extremes and actually want people put on the sex offender register for taking an upskirt photograph. Any reasonable person could see this is ridiculous, the sex offender register. They are placing people who act like douchebags and take upskirt photographs of women without their permission in the same category as peadophiles and rapists.

So because I actually researched the topic and took five seconds to understand it, apparently that's what I sound like and that's what morons will spam all over the internet if I try to argue this point.

This is nothing new by the way, Phillip Davies got treatment when he talked about I think it was an honour killings bill or something. He was the only MP to vote against it and was decried as a misogynist etc. as per usual and do you want to know the reason why he was against it? The bill wasn't gender neutral, the bill specifically only criminalised honour killings and and that sort of violence towards women. This was a tacit admission by feminists that they did not give a fuck about male victims of this sort of violence.

http://archive.is/QkUNF

With regards to the sex offenders' registry there's also the issue of false accusations, now that people will know about men being able to get on their just through an accusation about an upskirt photograph how do we not know that there will be women out there who will abuse this in order to ruin the lives of innocent men without genuine due process?

The language that these people use is very clever and everything is crafted to make you think that anybody who disagrees with them are terrible people who can be safely ignored and they have been successful at it for a number of years.

[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points-1 points 7 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

So you are for upskirt photos not being a sexual offense?

[–]Lethn 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

No

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 7 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

So then what is your problem with that specific law?

[–]Lethn 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

I just wrote a very detailed explanation and you blatantly ignored it.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

But you just said you are for them being a sexual offense. In the worst cases where someone is a blatant vouriest and is taking sexual photos of people without their permission do you not agree that maybe they should be placed on a registry if they are that pervasive.

The law clearly specified gradations in punishment based on the severity of the crime. What if they were exclusively pictures up the skirts of little girls? Is that not a valid enough reason to maybe deem their actions predatory?

Your only argument was that you don't think they should be placed on a registry. Then you went on a red-herring tangent about something totally unrelated, which yes, I did ignore, because it was pointless to the argument.

[–]Lethn 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

It's this thing called detail and context which is something you blatantly don't care about and no it wasn't pointless it explained exactly why I have the views that I do. You're obviously not here to argue with me from an honest perspective and just want to try and stick me with a label because I dared to argue for due process.

In the worst cases where someone is a blatant vouriest and is taking sexual photos of people without their permission do you not agree that maybe they should be placed on a registry if they are that pervasive.

You're talking about the worse examples, feminists are talking about one accusation where some guy takes a upskirt photograph of a woman, you're applying a standard to this law which doesn't exist in order to try and have a go at me.

[–][deleted] 7 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Memey-McMemeFace 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

He mentioned it on the comments.

[–]Blutarg 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Good point.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1804.01498.pdf

[–]DRUNKEN_ELVIS 18 points19 points20 points 7 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

Alrighty then, time to get the quota system in place and insult more female politicians.

[–]iainmf[S] 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Isn't that illegal already?

[–]DRUNKEN_ELVIS 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What telling politicians how pathetic they are?

No thats called honesty.

They fucking need to be told more often and held to account. This is Australian politics 2018 afterall for me.

[–]linkthebowmaster 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

To play devils advocate, there are far more male politicians than female ones and male politicians typically receive more spotlight time anyway

[–]Ak3rno 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yeah I didn’t see anything about what kind of abuse either. Was it rape/murder threats or being told they were dumb?

[–]linkthebowmaster 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree, I feel like this is less of an equality issue and more of just the facts of the business

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Does this correlate with the amount of females in these parties?

[–]Khachaturianoff 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nobody with a functioning brain should be surprised about this.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I love how the DUP are such a small party, yet get a disproportionate amount of the abuse. I'm not condoning abusive language, but the DUP are such assholes.

[–]Lethn 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

It will be because they're quite traditionalist from what I've gathered on issues like abortion so naturally that's going to piss off feminists of which there are a disproportionate number active in politics within the UK. There aren't necessarily a lot of them overall but they sure know how to mobilise into mobs and they're rich and white so they've got plenty of time on their hands.

[–]HeroBobGamer 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Not just feminists who think the DUP are a bunch of wankers. It's anyone who cares about other people, even a little bit.

[–]Lethn 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Yeah but ordinary people even if they really hated the DUP don't go around genuinely harassing politicians, that's my point.

[–]HeroBobGamer -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Eh, it's kinda justified with the DUP.

[–]Lethn 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No it isn't.

[–]Littleknight 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

But women feel more abused so if anything they're the real victims here.

[–]watermelonicecream 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It’s clearly because they deserve it. /s

[–]ExTurk 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's not surprising that conservatives get a lot of hate. It always seems like from the US at least that the left gets a shit ton more hate though. The conservatives definitely deserve it much more considering

[–]Lupinfujiko 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Also note, it's mostly conservatives who took the abuse.

[–]eyeisbloke 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

This series looks at why more people don't know this... https://youtu.be/ZGBWBMcM-oM

[–]iainmf[S] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Already subscribed.

Good videos but I find it hard to follow the thinking sometimes because the videos are quite long. I think I need things spelled out more clearly.

[–]eyeisbloke 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thanks and yes fair point - the next series will hopefully be snappier :-)

[–]Sonic-Oj -3 points-2 points-1 points 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

How about sexual abuse?

[–]genkernels 9 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This is pretty silly. The reason why verbal abuse of sexual nature is directed towards women is because that is supposed to be a more serious form of verbal abuse...for women only. Giving a guy an unspecific, not-credible threat to rape him is mostly going to make you feel, and look in the eyes of your peers, like you're gay and detract from the hate you intend to communicate.

It's like saying /r/MGTOW have it worse on the internet than women because they get more severe hate based on accusations of impotence and failure. No, it is just the button the haters try to push.

[–]sneakpeekbot 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Here's a sneak peek of /r/MGTOW using the top posts of the year!

#1: Upvote if you think Alimony should be illegal
#2: "Unrealistic depictions of women in videogames", user was suspended from twitter for this | 302 comments
#3: "You'll never find a girl like me!" | 106 comments


I'm a bot, beep boop | Downvote to remove | Contact me | Info | Opt-out

[–]Mode1961 22 points23 points24 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Why did you want to focus on that.

This has always been my problem with both online abuse and offline abuse that somehow sexual abuse is "WORSE" than physical or mental abuse.

[–]iainmf[S] 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This study did not look into that IIRC

[–]tjohn9999 18 points19 points20 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Even though I don't like to make these assumptions , this would most likely be the area where women do have it harder, at least from my anecdotial evidence of comments and other such things.

[–]Sonic-Oj 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree

[–]FlagrantWrongsDotCom 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well the other day I watched a girl make a pretty obscene gesture to give a blowjob to a motorcyclist. He wasnt interested. She offered again in the same way. He declined. They both moved on. This was in front of a ton of people. I dont really think theres necessarily an issue there. Just decline and move on. Be adults. Different people are different. If people dont after being declined, and assuming the other person doesnt send mixed signals/etc in any other way, then thats a possible issue. Women can and often do the same stuff men are archetyped as doing. People are to some extent practically trying to make legislation open for abuse that criminalizes hitting on people/trying to date if you arent already reading their mind perfectly and every possible state they might be in at some point in the future when they try to rewrite history because your eyes glanced over some other girl when you turned your head. I mean christ anybody even watch music videos, talk to actual women or anything anymore? People need to stop giving tools to bad actors, grow up and use the laws that are in place to deal with bad actors/consider what else can be done to reduce these situations generically. Theres an increasingly large % of people that practically dont feel safe dating anymore just from fear of false accusations etc without even considering all the other anxieties etc that many typically have with dating. Dont ruin love in attempts to deal with most commonly nuisance/awkward situations and make people criminals for social awkwardness/miscommunications/genuine malicious actors abusing law which are things that have potentially already happened for regardless of gender.

[–]PM_ME_UR_PC_SPECS 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

interesting.

Now, the question next needed to be asked is:

Do male politicians receive more abuse because of their gender than female politicians?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

How would you determine "because of their gender" ?

[–]PM_ME_UR_PC_SPECS 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly.

[–]_Mellex_ -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Men in general get the majority of online abuse. The bulk of men are the majority of a lot of bad, terrible, annoying things. This shouldn't be surprising to anyone anymore.

[–]VerumFalsum -4 points-3 points-2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This is probably way off due to the male to female percentage in government. Unless this is updated for that or if it’s actually balanced in that country.

[–]HeroBobGamer 11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's based on the percentage of comments that are abusive, so the total number doesn't matter so much.

[–]NinjaEmboar4 -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Dead🅱️ss thought the “grey bars” said “gay bars”

[–]vhisic -5 points-4 points-3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Wouldn't it be perfectly safe to assume this was the fact with how much men outnumber women generally in politics?

If anything all this shows is how much abuse of politicians in general has risen for everyone except males in the Labour party.

[–]Memey-McMemeFace 9 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This isn't the number of hate texts, but the percentage of replies that are hate. So any disparity between the number of politicians is irrelevant.

[–]TGordzzz -3 points-2 points-1 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Might also have to do with the fact that there are more men in politics than women. A lot of angry mid-western men in this sub, very sad.

[–]Lethn 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Why is it that men having an opinion and self-respect bothers you so much?

[+]TGordzzz -7 points-6 points-5 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I’m a man, but I think it’s sad to be so misogynistic that you have to resort to complain about male politicians being abused.

[–]Lethn 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Genuine question, do you ever look back and read your posts? Because you've made yourself look like a real scumbag for writing that.

[–]TGordzzz -5 points-4 points-3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Genuine question, but can you blow a jackhammer? :-)

[–]RezaWasTaken -5 points-4 points-3 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Makes sense seen as there are many more males in this field. At least that goes for Australia, seems likely in most places though

[–]Memey-McMemeFace 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I replied to this earlier, I'm just gonna copy paste:

This isn't the number of hate texts, but the percentage of replies that are hate. So any disparity between the number of politicians is irrelevant.

[–]RezaWasTaken 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

okaaaay jeez sorry...

[+]KayceeHoughton -13 points-12 points-11 points 7 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

What a bunch of bullshit! Woman are 10x more abused.

[–]Avbhb 10 points11 points12 points 7 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

I would like to read your source that backs up your claim.

[–]KayceeHoughton -3 points-2 points-1 points 7 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Do I need a source?

[–]Wsing1974 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

No, we're all going to believe your feelings.

[–]KayceeHoughton -3 points-2 points-1 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Its not my feelings, its facts hun x

[–]Wsing1974 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Source please, sweetheart.

[–]Avbhb 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think we fell into the trap of feeding the troll.

[–]KayceeHoughton -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Don't patronize me.

[–]Wsing1974 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Don't tell me what to do. I'm not your husband.

[–]KayceeHoughton 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I can tell you to do what ever the hell i want! Im a strong and independent woman thank you very much!!

[–]Avbhb 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

If you are going to make a claim that people are going to believe. Yes you do.

[–]KayceeHoughton -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Well its obvious so I don't need proof, duh.

[–]Avbhb 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Ahh. I see. Enjoy your redditing.

[–]KayceeHoughton 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

:)

[–]Mode1961 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Hmm, Last time I checked it was 11.234x more abused, At least it is dropping, that is good to see.

[–]KayceeHoughton 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Don't you dare correct me you sexist pig!

[–]Barthaneous -3 points-2 points-1 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Pretty sure there are a lot more men than women in politics. So that would make sense

[+]ExiledSenpai -6 points-5 points-4 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

No source in infographic; downvoted.

[–]Avbhb 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There is a link under the image to the source.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter