I made a comment recently about some science regarding mating behaviors and someone said it was a red pill comment. However, I find that I typically disagree strongly with RP proponents so i was surprised that someone saw my comment as RP.

After this I went looking for a clear definition of RP and I haven't been able to find one. Most of them are vary vague, and say something along the lines of "RP is understanding the world as it is", or "RP is about the biological differences between men and women's mating strategies", etc. They rarely if ever make it clear what they think the science says, or what conclusions should be drawn from it.

Even the Wiki for this sub defines it in vague terms:

"RP is a praxeology (a way of understanding actions in the world) that deals with Sexual Strategy. ... this framework is in disagreement with the general understanding of society in these matters (hence, taking the red pill).
A core belief is that male and female nature in regards to sexuality differs substantially by sex, but that within each sex there is much broad commonality of behaviours and instincts.
RP tends to believe core behaviours and instincts are innate (often genetic) in each sex but these core instincts and behaviours are moderated by cultural circumstances."

I've spent years studying the science of evolution, mating, etc and what I've learned often goes against what I hear RP proponents say, so I'm curious, what are some concrete things that RP asserts about male and female mating strategies, and what conclusions does RP draw from there?