TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

'There's no room for anything manly now': Feminist writer Camille Paglia speaks out AGAINST the loss of masculine virtues and its negative impact on society

[deleted]

December 30, 2013
191 upvotes
/r/TheRedPill
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title 'There's no room for anything manly now': Feminist writer Camille Paglia speaks out AGAINST the loss of masculine virtues and its negative impact on society
Author

[deleted]

Upvotes 191
Comments 86
Date December 30, 2013 2:14 PM UTC
(12 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/1u0jre/theres_no_room_for_anything_manly_now_feminist/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/theres-no-room-for-anything-manly-now-feminist.231894
https://theredarchive.com/post/231894
Red Pill terms in post
feministthe red pill

Comments

[–]randarrow 67 points68 points69 points 12 years ago (28 children) | Copy Link

'What you're seeing is how a civilization commits suicide’. Couldn't have said it better myself.

[–]vaker 11 points12 points13 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Some of us have been saying this exact thing for a decade+. Except we weren't 'feminist writers'. So pointing out reality got us all kinds of nasty labels from deluded liberals.

[–]ahostofeyelashes 8 points9 points10 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Camille Paglia has taken more shit and more nasty labels than almost any other serious modern public thinker I can call to mind. She brushes it off as the ideological whining it is, which is the only correct response.

[–]mheyk 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

imagine if a black person came out and said it

[–][deleted] 12 years ago (24 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]CptDefB 25 points26 points27 points 12 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

In the past, 1 income could support a family. A family in which the mother, the person with the closest bond possible, was actually able to raise her children. Values were taught and adhered to, communities were tighter as women bonded (thus bringing men in by familial associations) while raising their kids.

Now, 2 incomes can barely support a family. Both parents are out of the house mostly, and children are left to be raised by institutions or other women who don't make as much as the ones whose children they're raising for them. Values are taught by... well... the internet and media, really. As she's said, there are very few real world paragons of our best virtues... and ultimately, most people are unhappy (when they're not distracted by the things they consume).

It's seriously messed up, and no one takes the time to think about it. Feminism's circumstances were not unforeseen. I personally think they were deliberately planned. Consider this, if men in power thought oppressing women was so great, why would they put their enemy's propaganda all over the mainstream media of the time?

Consider the way our mainstream media works today.

It's not like it was "more honest" back then. The stock market crash of '29 is not unlike what happened in '08... and what happened then? MSM lied to everyone, got everyone to buy in, and... boom. Our civilization may be doing pretty good, but our people suffer for it akin to animals on a treadmill to slaughter. The tragedy is that humanity could be so much more... if we'd just take the yoke off our necks.

[–]vaker 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I personally think they were deliberately planned.

More likely embraced because it fit so well into the agenda. There are always crazy people pushing all kinds of crazy ideas. Some of it gets picked up and pushed by the propaganda machine.

[–]CptDefB 4 points5 points6 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You raise a very good point.

I could easily see a bunch of men going, "Wait... so now we get to tax EVERYONE? Yup, run it."

[–]mheyk 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I was raised by must see tv

[–]FREEPIG 54 points55 points56 points 12 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

She famously said "If civilization had been left in female hands we would still be living in grass huts." Her argument is that advancement into the unknown is an inherently masculine quality thus civilization will retard and regress when masculinity is not allowed to flourish among men.

Edit: CatchMyGeneticDrift's comment is valid and down-voting it will only bury the understanding that my reply articulates.

[–]captshady 10 points11 points12 points 12 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Fighting and protecting are inherently male attributes, ones in which we've evolved ourselves to do well (that, and run away really well). Men are constantly shamed into acting more feminine, while 2nd and 3rd world countries (some of which just might be interested in coming over here and starting some shit) don't apply 3rd wave feminism to men, and allow them to do what nature has intended them to do. Basically she's saying we've raised up a country full of pussies that can't fight anymore.

I find it valid, given the challenges presented by wild life management organizations, given the decrease in numbers of those who hunt.

[–]vaker 9 points10 points11 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The banksters prefer docile drones.

[–]Camo47 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Even our Army is becoming feminized. Our military had gained a lot of collective combat experience by being in two (albeit unpopular) wars. Actual combat vets are being pressured out of the military right now, due to the fact that we buck the new status quo of a "kinder, gentler Army". Women in combat MOS's? Stupid. I've heard fairy tales of women that can physically do what I can, but I've never seen one in real life. It's a decision that will cost lives, all in the name of "social equality".

[–]captshady 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So very true. The more women have participated in combat related MOS's, the more trouble has been brought to the men who actually do the fighting. Getting Captain's Mass/Article 15 or any other trouble, because some dainty female finds something you do as offensive? Fuck that. No victim, no crime.

[–][deleted] 12 years ago* (7 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]vaker 3 points4 points5 points 12 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

The red pill truth of economics. A ZeroHedge link should be on the sidebar :) Except it's not 'sexual strategy'.

[–]CptDefB 7 points8 points9 points 12 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

I'd be very interested in someone more educated in this stuff taking the time to provide citations for this argument.

We know it to be true, but until you can link things, people just go, "Pffft, well you can't prove that." and turn their brains off.

The banksters prefer docile drones.

Is exceptionally on point.

Who made life really hard for bankers back in the day? Men like Andrew Jackson, real fucking men. Men willing to make decisions that would have people try to kill them... poor JFK. :(

Unfortunately once you make that connection, people just go, "Pffft, conspiracy theorist." and similarly turn their brains off.

[–]vaker 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

There may be a 'red pill effect' going on regarding this topic as well. In other words people may need to start tuning out mainstream propaganda and start searching for the truth themselves. At that point they're ready, and you can point them to information.

I consider zerohedge a pretty good intro point. In conversations when it comes to investments I often mention it. Not pushing, just saying people should check it out because it has good info. It has a sexy name, people tend to get curious. If they are willing to be open minded they'll continue reading it and continue from there to other information and arguments.

It's interesting to watch as major 'conspiracy theories' from Libor manipulation to Snowden keep turning out to be true recently.

[–]CptDefB 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's interesting to watch as major 'conspiracy theories' from Libor manipulation to Snowden keep turning out to be true recently.

As a conspiracy theorist, I'm very happy to see it all play out. The next decade or two should hopefully see declassifications on some seriously incriminating shit within America's alphabet gangs. That said, the CIA has long been doing their best to slow this process.

Never really read ZH, but a quick skim says I'm going to like it a lot.

Thanks.

[–]Rhodos 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'd be very interested in someone more educated in this stuff taking the time to provide citations for this argument.

As I said above, we are a consumer driven economy with women controlling 70-80% of the spending. Women have the final say on where the family lives and how it lives. Man have the man cave, she has the house. Just follow the commercials on TV. Most are geared towards women, not men.

[–]Rhodos 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In my view, feminism in its current form is only a symptom of a much larger problem. Namely excess opulence and entitlement funded by loans that are backed by more loans. There really needs to be a thread tieing the current economic reality and the red pill together.

This is really profound, but the answer is quite simple: we have a consumer driven society in which women control 70-80% of the spending. Our current economy is molded on women's desires, not men's. As indirect proof, a buddy of mine just moved in with his gf. I asked him how the move went and he said: "Okay, but up to this point I didn't realize how much shit she has.". I followed up with more questions and he admitted they rented a space bigger than he wanted and "THEY" spent HIS money on furniture he didn't want (she's still in school making bupkis).

[–]rapreaper 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think you should read 'The Misandry Bubble' from the sidebar.

[–]Senior ContributorDemonspawn 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I have written so many long answers to this question that for now I'm going to write short one.

It's not feminism. It's equality. Equality is a disease. Men and women are not equal. What happens to a functional system when you treat non-equal parts as equal? What would happen to the metals market if we pretended lead could be turned into gold?

On top of that, seeking equality inverts natural law. In our attempts to "achieve equality" we punish what works and reward what fails. How long can we sustain that?

[–][deleted] 12 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Senior ContributorDemonspawn 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

And how do you share resources you didn't acquire? What happens when you make acquiring resources an "exploitative practice" that is looked down upon? evil wicked grin

But you're a thousand percent right. Men and women are not equal. They are complementary. They have role synergy.

It's really not that men nor women are more valuable than the other. They both have roles to play. Both roles are valuable. Society NEEDS both roles to be played in order to keep advancing. But we've freed women from their role (which is more supportive in nature) and we keep men tied to theirs (because without it it's obvious that society collapses). Well, as men continue to be exploited this way, more and more of them say "fuck this shit" and drop out. Women leaving their roles is just as destructive to society... it just happens slower.

But I want to touch on one thing directly:

not a "good" thing

There are no good things. There are no bad things. There are just tradeoffs. Sickle cell is a very good example: traded strong resistance to malaria (big risk mitigation) for a small risk of a condition that harms the host. Was a great trade in Africa, not so much in Europe and northern North America.

[–][deleted] 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]TRP VanguardArchwinger 58 points59 points60 points 12 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link

What struck me most about this article was when the woman outright says, "Masculinity is just becoming something that is imitated from the movies."

That's really the crux of it. Nobody's a man any more. Nobody just goes out, does their thing, and is a man by default. Instead, people have to stop and think, "Okay...so now what would a real man do in this situation?"

That's partly the reason why we have this whole world of PUA, seduction, Red Pill, and other bullshit out there. Because men don't know how to be men, so they learn how to imitate man-like behaviors to attract women. And women don't know that they actually like men, so they learn how to convince themselves otherwise while banging pretentious pricks.

[–]WoodyHarrlesonsAgent26 points 12 years ago [recovered] (13 children) | Copy Link

I know plenty of manly alphas. They are the working class of my rural Arkansas life.

Their masculinity is hampered by lack of intelligence (and cultural bias towards self improvement and fancy ppl)

A Man in Full is a rare thing.

[–]eremetic 3 points4 points5 points 12 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Could you expand on that? Especially the self improvement part.

[–]RockinRhombus 7 points8 points9 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Well if it's anything like the mexicans (like me) I hang around:

It's an aversion to working out/throwing some gel in your hair/dressing decently. Fuck, even having some hobbies. A lot of them, just work. Not much interesting outside of being a good provider (in women's eyes)

While they're behavior does attract a certain quantity of women, imagine how if they were to improve themselves ever so slightly, their numbers could improve greatly.

[–]jkonine 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I bet they live happy lives with lots of great sex. I'm sure that their fathers were the same way.

They don't want to change for a reason.

[–]Senior ContributorDemonspawn 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Reminds me of the businessman talking to a guy taking a siesta story....

[–]vaker 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

I wonder if we need some kind of organization that connects these groups. (working class rural men and self improving middle class males) Both groups would benefit from understanding the attitudes of the other. Something like boy scouts but for grown men.

[–]2johnnight 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Something like boy scouts but for grown men.

maybe a club, where men could fight...

[–]vaker 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

:)

That book/movie made a number of very valid points.

The best approximation to fight clubs are sports from pickup basketball games, through martial arts, to fishing. I may not be allowed to open a men only club. But who I invite to fish is nobody else's business.

The problem is that sports tend to bring men together from the same socioeconomic class resulting in a limited exchange of ideas.

[–]cherubym 3 points3 points3 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

  • The general public would mock us
  • Feminists would call us sexist
  • Open-minded liberals would try to shut us down
  • Conservatives would call us anti-family
  • The government would place us on the FBI watchlist

You're just deluding yourself at this point.

[–]vaker 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I realize that the reaction would be exactly as you describe. There are too many vested interests in the current clusterfuck, and among themselves they control the media, Wall Street, academia and the government. Yet it would be beneficial (for men and for society in general) if something like what I describe above existed.

[–]MightySurly 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I believe men's clubs were outlawed based on sexual discrimination in the 80s. There used to be men's clubs with a bar where men could go sip grog, smoke cigars, and talk to each other without fear. Women don't want men rallying together though, the consequences might not favor women after all!

Meanwhile it's completely legal to have a women's only gym.

[–]vaker 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

it's completely legal to have a women's only gym.

Is there a precedent establishing that? Or has nobody bothered to sue yet?

[–]Rhodos 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I know plenty of manly alphas. They are the working class of my rural Arkansas life.

I live in a big city and work in a white collar field (STEM). The vast majority of young men around me are bluer than Obama's hot chocolate-sipping onesie dude.

[–]2johnnight 20 points21 points22 points 12 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

How can sons of single mothers learn to be a man?

[–][deleted] 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]RockinRhombus 10 points11 points12 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In my own case, I learned from the men at work (construction). I was raised by my mother and two sisters a certain way, as my dad passed early on. ya'll know damned well which way they raised me. I'm pretty much learning/undoing all the damage and bullshit they fed me all these years.

[–]ahostofeyelashes 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

By single mothers acknowledging that male role models are very important for boys and taking action based on that, making sure her sons have good men involved in their lives.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Instead, people have to stop and think, "Okay...so now what would a real man do in this situation?"

Shit you're right, I have to stop and think about this... Wait

[–][deleted] 30 points31 points32 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It's nice to see a woman that understands gender roles.

[–]Lightfiend 10 points11 points12 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's nice to see a feminist* that understands gender roles.

[–]AnotherPint 17 points18 points19 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Paglia is smart and courageous. Anyone who's been excommunicated so hard by the mainstream feminist community can't be all bad.

[–]ArtilleryCamel 53 points54 points55 points 12 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

This woman isn't a feminist as we know them, she clearly believes in gender roles. Stick her somewhere in the middle east and she's a feminist, but not in the first world.

...many of today's young women fail to realize the role their sexuality plays in society and 'partying till you drop has gotten as harmless as a Rotary Club meeting'.

Dissident Feminist = Red Pill Women.

[–][deleted] 17 points18 points19 points 12 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Ammo for the view that RP and women's rights are not opposite.

[–]Endorsed Contributorgekkozorz 26 points27 points28 points 12 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Exactly. Quite the contrary - they're complimentary.

What women really want is an alpha. Someone with confidence, dominance, and authority. What they say they want is a feminized beta with his balls chopped off.

It's a shit test which BPers fail waaay too often, and it's the reason the SMP is as skewed as it is now.

[–]ArtilleryCamel 8 points9 points10 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Well, their lizard brain wants an alpha. If they say they want a beta, then they think that cerebrally. Everyone has to decide for themselves which brain is king, and a women enveloped by her emotions will rarely choose the latter.

[–]2johnnight 17 points18 points19 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

We know that they want both, depending on the day of the cycle.

ovulation = want alpha brute

post-ovulation = want beta daddy

menstruation = want to throw dishes

That's why you do not want a woman with the finger on the nuclear button. Because depending on the day of the month she is gonna nuke the world or surrender to Manly Putin.

[–]vaker 4 points5 points6 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That was really funny. Thanks for the laugh!

[–]strangestdude 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This woman isn't a feminist as we know them, she clearly believes in gender roles. Stick her somewhere in the middle east and she's a feminist, but not in the first world.

She's a 'darwinist' feminist.

[–]SSTUPNC 13 points14 points15 points 12 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Masculinity is thoroughly penalized in our society to succeed you must be overly feminine and accommodating.

It started with the slow transformation of the classroom.

"Formal learning" is sitting back passively and accepting domination (lecturing) without any real feedback or input. Of course girls and effeminate males are going to do better in that type of educational system than boys will.

If a young male wants to interact or do some kinesthetic learning he is drugged into effeminacy.

[–][deleted] 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]phelsumas 11 points12 points13 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In other words you have to be 'practiced in the art of deception,' another feminine trait.

[+]Future_Alpha -8 points-7 points-6 points 12 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

  • I think its a result of democracy. Too many 'rights' makes for pussies who can't stand up for themselves.

  • Introduce conscription for males 18+ for a MINIMUM of 2 years.

  • Introduce forced labour as penalty for crimes.

  • Introduce a nation wide death penalty for heinous crimes.

  • If a doctor wants to practice medicine make him pass a minimum physical exam (x amount of pushups, x amount of pullups, x lbs of bench press, x pounds of squats, x pounds of deadlift, etc) he needs to be below a certain BMI and Waist:hip ratio, plus be well versed in the science of medicine.

  • Re-Introduce coporal punishment at home and schools

  • Let boys fight after school without interference of the school/teachers.

  • Don't allow parents to interfere in school matters like telling the school that their child has "too much homework".

  • Don't waste 8 years in elementary school but progress along the education system used in the USSR and China for science and math so that things actually get done, not wasting 8-10 years of life on pointless shit.

  • By following the plan of the USSR/China education system, school can be cut down from 9:00 am-1:00 PM for grades 1 -5/6, instead of having kids waste all their time at school on homework, without having time for socializing, playing outside, etc during their childhood formative years (that's the way it was in the USSR -- the education system was designed to progress from simple to complex and give a solid foundation so that you didn't need to do much independent studying to learn something new hence they didn't have to cram and didn't have ridiculous amounts of homework).

  • Have university/schools re-introduce sports like boxing (my university removed a boxing club because it was 'dangerous').

  • Remove liberal arts programs and integrate them into a childs education from a young age. Have them read Aristotle, Plato, Adam Smith, Machiavelli, Dumas, Hemingway, London, etc from a young age instead of having them read random modern shit like To kill a mockingbird or lord of the flies or starwars (thats what I did in school).

  • Have expeditions in schools/university/college (not the gay ass field trips they have now), but have the kids learns how to pack a bag, give them boots and take them cross country skiing for a month as a class where each kid carries their own provisions, tents, etc and is responsible for certain chores and needs to break camp and help his classmates set up their tents. If kids whine, have them ridiculed by the teachers and classmates.

  • Remove so many gay laws that are simply stifiling.

  • Remove the ability to 'sue' randomly. Leave it for only life threatening emergencies, or for big businesses/academia.

  • Remove the need for insurance for EVERYTHING.

Feel free to add to this list.

[–]1PaulRivers10 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Trolly post is trolly.

[–]Future_Alpha -1 points0 points1 point 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nah. I speak my thoughts. If my list is implemented, red pill will go mainstream.

[–]xiko 8 points9 points10 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The entire article is here: http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303997604579240022857012920

[–]Spore2012 9 points10 points11 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Who builds bridges and skyscrapers again?

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points 12 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I think I've seen this same article for the third time in the past few days on this subreddit.

[–][deleted] 12 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]gg_s 8 points9 points10 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not the same article, but Camille Paglia's name had indeed run through this sub several times in the past few days.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm pretty sure there were two other articles that were the same. This article is not the same exact one but it has the same quotes from her. It's cool I guess since it is generating new discussions.

[–]ahostofeyelashes 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is your typical Daily Mail watering down of other, more in-depth articles. I'm not opposed to it because it gets it out there to people who would otherwise not see it but yes, this is mostly a rehash of the recently posted Time article. Which was itself, IIRC, only the intro to a longer speech she gave.

[–]Rhodos 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

repetitio est mater studiorum

[–]strangestdude 3 points4 points5 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Men are no longer willing to be voluntarily disposable as they once were (ie. not being so eager to join the military) = bad?

This lady is a gatekeeper.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Read her WSJ article a few days ago... good stuff. Refreshing to see a un-PC look at western civilization

Is anyone really surprised that sports, zombie movies, and stories of military heroism are increasingly popular in America? These are really the last bastions of male-empowerment (as some would derisively call 'gender roles') - some realistic, some fantasy - but all are increasingly popular as there are fewer avenues elsewhere for males to go

[–]Endorsed Contributor30303030303030 5 points6 points7 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

when we say the same thing it's misogyny

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I like the part where she says something along the lines of: "Who made Feminist X who says doesn't like me the Pope?"

[–]Nemester 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Whatever, let it burn.

[–]Captain_Self_Promotr 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm not sure why things are different now than in the past but one thing is more apparent - it's that masculine women are rewarded more than feminine women and there's very little incentive for men to be tough. Maybe it was always like that but I doubt it. Women are uglier now than they have ever been and men are more feminine than ever.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Original WSJ interview for those interested.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She's just realizing this now?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hey she sees the writing on the wall, I'm glad she's speaking up.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

solid article, and great opinion piece. Glad to see things like this out there.

[–]Dealbreaker-Jones 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well this is the future she chose.

[–]Terry_Bruce_Dick 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I hate to be the one to point this out... but this is the Daily Fail. This is pandering to the conservative purchasers of this tabloid, not TRP.

[–]dflooo 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I love that she can be a self-proclaimed feminist and liberal, yet she supports Phil Robertson's ability to express his personal beliefs and acknowledge a difference between males and females. Dare I say, best feminist I've ever heard of?

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It reads like an Onion article. "Lesbian feminist believes military experience in government is a requirement, differences in the sexes, and people have a right to verbally bash gays. Its like she actually thinks!"

I have no problem with gays at all, and I have no problem with people saying things I don't like or agree with. When you limit people in what they can say or think it does a disservice to everyone. How are we to know in advance if someone is an asshole or jerk if they are not allowed to inform us?

[–]Theophagist 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Some would call her a true feminist. Those who know what feminism really means know she's exactly the opposite.

[+]Glorious_Master -33 points-32 points-31 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

wtf is masculinity anyway? its just different expectations(sometimes contradictory) in different people, and some NOTs (a masculine man isn't overly sensitive to his looks being the most common 'NOT')

how about biological masculinity? now that is clearly defined. definitly has a role considering the increased need to be adaptable and be skilled at an monotasking skill in todays world, working in a demanding STEM related field.

and ofc the advantages of greater strength with none of the costs associated with maintaining said strength due to food abundance (a young 80kg guy with an engineering job he commutes to via public transport is burning like 3000 calories a day, vs about 1800 for a female in the same position food is cheap,time isn't)

[–]puaSenator 11 points12 points13 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

God damnit, you're drunk again. Nothing of what you said made any god damn sense.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter