I've asked this question before on PPD and the general response I got was either "attractive" or "all kinds of men". When I first understood this, the idea that feminist women would not prefer feminist men who adhere to the same beliefs angered me. I have come to a vague acceptance of it as it is essentially the final criticism of feminism that I still hold. It seems that an ideology that does not actually alter the behavior of it's members in a significant way may be undeserving of close attention. I have no doubt that a female reading feminist text will be empowered to pursue a professional career or seek to legislate government that will give her more autonomy. However as far as sexual behavior this same female is free to date any attractive or competent male, even if this male's behavior or beliefs do not correspond with her own self-respect. I think Red Pill is a reaction to a contemporary female's complete freedom to choose whoever she wants, regardless of her partners beliefs conflicting with her values, which means that us males must contort ourselves into an model of masculinity that is broader than the contexts of our niche professions, industries or social groups. Those affected by RP such as myself recognize feminist sexual ideology as merely an non-invasive augmentation over female sexual preferences, choosing to focus all prescriptions of physical regulation primarily on male sexual behavior. In sort, I believe feminists, growing dissatisfied with progressive males such as myself in their niche communities, simple gaze beyond these feminist males at whichever non-feminist males now excite them