Good morning kiddies! I'm sleepy today and as I might have warned you that brings out my inner sadist. I'm taking this sub a step further than it's used to because you're all in a semi-PC circle jerk, prepare your jimmies cos they're about to get rustled.

Recently CisWhiteMaelstrom made a post mocking faux-purples who could "accept that women are basically children and sociopathic whores" but still adopt a blue pill comfort-based sexual strategy. Originally last night I had natural revulsion to such a strong statement, even with schlurpin' the purple as you can see, assuming you're not colour blind. In the light of day I can see some merits to what he said.

A disclaimer: Women are capable of empathy. They are, after all, mothers, and the maternal instinct thrives in their contribution to society. But if you notice, these contributions are the patronising transaction of a benevolent matriarch to the needy child. Doctor to patient. Teacher to student. Enlightened activist to a needy uneducated and plugged-in population. Always fundamentally in a maternal, nurturing yet subtly condescending role. Feminists thrive off this, FWIW. Inb4 projection

See on: maternal/erotic spectrum

I love my mom. I love my sister. Nanny and Grandma light up my life. I've had great heaps of support from doctors, terhapists, tutors, and even a student mentor. Mommies are great guys-except to that beta puss of a Daddy hehe So let's give a big round of applause to all the good moms of the world. clapclapclapyoufuckers

Where women are not as capable of empathy, and I would say have evolved to lack sympathy too, is in the struggles of being a disposable adult male. 2 good reasons for this:

i) women and men are fundamentally different, although we share the same consciousness as human entities, our life experience under the current system will have radical variations, one might even call these gendurr rollz

ii) women have adapted to have high standards for fitness markers for men (hence shit tests etc.) Don't want to pass on inferior genes to Baby do we? This extends to behavioural traits; a man who cannot fulfil his role as protector/provider will starve or die in the wild. Perish. As will she, probably, considering she's smaller and generally weaker and shit. What kind of retarded fucking investment is that, putting you and your baby's life, not to mention ye olde vajajay in future carrion? Ew

More on this here

http://no-maam.blogspot.co.uk/2006/01/very-few-women-are-capable-of.html

What men don't "get" is that we (men) are a "business" to women. The attention women can get from men is their survival tactic. It does not mesh with the male survival drive, which is "go get" or "go create." Sadly, we men have a hard time understanding that women rarely have the same desires as we do.

Women are designed by nature to look "yummy" to us so that we will give of ourselves to women. This is nature. It is not nature for it to occur the other way around. It works the same way as with women and children. Children will rarely care for the mother the way that the mother will care for the child. Children are not designed to empathize with mothers in the same way that mothers are designed to empathize with their children.

Women will never "care" about men in the same way that men "care" about the wellbeing of women. It has always been women who have walked out on men more than the other way around... it has always been women that have been more opposed to adultery laws than men... the 10% of children are the result of cuckolding is supposedly a fairly consistent stat over time/history/populations.

We are designed like this by nature, and men who are sitting around and waiting for women to smarten up and show men the proper amount of empathy/sympathy are being no more intelligent than a mother sitting down and crossing her arms until her children show a reciprocal amount of empathy for her... both will be sitting there for a looooong time.

Men are the naturally disposable sex in homo sapiens, without the egg and a female carrier body we are doomed, whereas all we need from guys really is a sperm bank and one Chad to rule all Chads. Under such a system men are the default protector/providers to women, as women are in turn to children. So there ya go, why it is foolish to complain about the Feminine Imperative and why feminism, the 'patriarchy' has such a large following.

Let's look at this in practice:

http://www.girlschase.com/content/12-traits-all-boring-unsexy-nice-guys-have-common

Let's just look at points 1-5 to save time, the rest is basically about pick-up Game and the alpha/beta thing which if you don't get by now and still consider yourself a respectable participant on this sub well please flush yourself down the toilet thanks.

'nice guys suck because'

  1. They wait: AKA women have a damn hard time empathising with guys with social anxiety/approach anxiety and whatnot, you want her man the fuck up and approach. Meanwhile they complain when they have to do it back, because FI don't'cha know

  2. 'Want Points for Being Nice': AKA Men are dancing monkeys to the female psyche, always having to prove their value to society. They say that "niceness is a baseline for civil interaction" but it's actually not. Women can get away with bitchy behaviour without judgment, it's practically encouraged under the 3rd wave. So it seems 'being nice/kind' is the basis for men to have any SMV, the O SMV baseline. What comes after is mostly LMS, social proof, social skills/Game, mastery of Frame etc.

  3. Get upset when the World Doesn't Play Fair: An excellent point, returning to the fact that women do not want to invest in men with low fitness markers, a victim mentality would denote high probability of this (inb4 I'm beta go fuck yourself you're demonstrating my point entirely) AKA women have adapted to struggle to empathise with men who struggle to take on the masculine protector/provider role-because said men would be weeded out of the gene pool in due time, back in the day (sigh)

  4. Believe in Justice, karma or Just Desserts: AKA subscribe to the Just World Fallacy. Do read this one, great RP truth in a nutshell about the chaotic psuedo-nihilistic nature of reality, shit happens, not everyone gets a happy ending yadda yadda. The left always seeks an oppressor.

Relating to the above but more nuanced, a man who honestly expects life to be just is not a man who will accept that attraction is amoral, he is probably the kind who will…end up questioning women's sexual strategy and attitude towards betas and omegas perhaps? Considering the moral implications of her game? Ooh does this sound familiar bloopers? Because it should. You're looking at the reason women hate artificial alphas: they had to adapt to the idea that attraction is amoral, hypergamy, she is not your shoulder to cry on etc. and with that comes a sort of dark awakening where women are bound to be caught out as to some extent predatory. The bitter musings of the 2nd phase would inevitably be captured, whether expressed outwardly on PUA subreddits, an underground philosophy hub we like to call the Manosphere, or kept inside his own mind. Girls don't like this, it gives men too much power and puts them in a bad light, at least until he concludes that one cannot morally judge an amoral strategy. Guys, maintain frame: don't talk about Redpill IRL.

Moving on.

  1. Consume a LOT of media: AKA blue pilled through Nice Guy romcoms. Relates again to the above, since it was these movies and other idealistic pieces of crap which gave Gen X and some of the Millennials the erroneous notion that women love unconditionally hahaha

Just a little look at this list can show you this crucial point: It is not only against a woman's nature to even sympathise with an adult male, who in nature is supposed to hunt, gather, lead, provide and sexually advance; it is a plain bad idea for herself and her baby to do so. Too blue bloopers and omegas can be written off with a quick cost/benefit analysis, a process you need about 30 seconds on Tinder to see happening in practice.

Now you're going to say NAWALT now, aren't you? "Oh but this one time my ex boyfriend's goldfish died and he got teary about it so I gave him a hug" Yeah and I bet that was a dead bedrooms scenario that night wasn't it, so shut it. Even if not of course there are outliers, this is why we have the Cry for grief rule within 'She is not your shoulder to cry on'.

But guys, ask yourself: is it better to assume that your SO cares a lot about you, like genuinely cares and loves you for who you are-only to be slapped in the face when the realities of the game, of conditional love and attraction hit you like a ton of pianos hurtling onto your blue-balls? Or is it better to prepare yourself in advance for the inevitable fallout? And which, honestly which basic rule on that Stone of Life in your head (your value system for those who aren't savvy) is going to get you laid more, have her respect you more? A mentality where it is safe to break frame and show weakness, neediness, seek attention or pity? Or one where there are no excuses, no fucks given for you and thus no excuses but to boost your SMV and strive for self mastery?

Conclusion: Even though we all know there are outliers to every bell curve, every graph, and every spectrum, the trend proves the validity of the hypothesis. Not all women are sociopaths, but the benefits of assuming as much to your SMV, Frame and Game will considerably outweigh the risks of assuming that all women will be unconditionally tolerant of you opening up to them. Treat all guns as loaded, and ye shall reap the rewards.

When all of you unplugging can understand this core principle, then debate here will become less necessary, since you'll understand that the RPWs understand the nature of the game and accept that their apathy to you is a natural, indeed healthy shit test, while the BPs will spend their time primarily defending themselves and appearing to give more of a shit to your actual life hardship than you actually do.

Inb4 why am I bitching here, well because on the Internet nobody gives a fuck, IRL my frame is so hard I spent my entire university life hiding my instability, because like hell a low SMV campus feminist is going to empathise with neurosis let alone the mid to top SMV women that comprise the bulk of college girls, nomsaiyan?

Shots fired

edit: oh look we already have our first WK making a false conflation. Newsflash bro, awareness of women's sexual/social strategy and m/f dynamics =/= 'be an abusive asshole'/'go be sociopathic back to her'.