TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Women to earn more than men by 2024

ILU2

June 22, 2015
16 upvotes
/r/PurplePillDebate

Discuss

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/7842041/Women-professionals-to-earn-more-than-men-by-2024.html

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Women to earn more than men by 2024
Author

ILU2

Upvotes 16
Comments 59
Date June 22, 2015 6:09 PM UTC
(11 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/PurplePillDebate
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/3aqia4/women_to_earn_more_than_men_by_2024/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/PurplePillDebate/women-to-earn-more-than-men-by-2024.281492
https://theredarchive.com/post/281492
Top posts by ILU2

"If You Believe These 3 Lies About Sex, You'll Struggle To Find Love." An unexpected article that makes me want to hope that redpill attitudes are becoming more mainstream

23 upvotes
February 15, 2016
/r/RedPillWomen

CMV: Someone who has regular contact with good, loving, normal women could not believe the dehumanizing things that red pill does about women.

19 upvotes
May 2, 2015
/r/PurplePillDebate

Heated Exchange between Red Pill mod and angry users. Every contrary view gets gilded... How far is resentment present in TRP?

13 upvotes
July 25, 2014
/r/PurplePillDebate

Interesting article "Why do we victim-blame?"

12 upvotes
March 23, 2015
/r/PurplePillDebate

RPers who don't like "sluts"... how many partners have you had?

10 upvotes
September 7, 2014
/r/PurplePillDebate

Red Pills, what is your most guilty admission of your behavior, thoughts or preferences in your relationships?

8 upvotes
December 1, 2014
/r/PurplePillDebate

To what extent are redpill endorsed users allowed to disagree with the redpill?

8 upvotes
July 6, 2015
/r/PurplePillDebate

How do you guys deal with the "anti-PUA" defence shittests?

7 upvotes
July 7, 2015
/r/askTRP

Comments

[–]Sacred_Moose_Knuckle 47 points47 points47 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

That's awesome! That means that men-only scholarships, affirmative action for men and all those other awesome things that come to "marginalized" groups should be on their way anytime, right guys?

Guys?!?!

[–]alexdelargeorange19 points20 points21 points 11 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

I suspect that things like alimony will suddenly start being thrown out or at least looked at somewhat objectively when women are more commonly on the receiving end of it.

[–]Sacred_Moose_Knuckle 9 points9 points9 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I think you're right on that, but we've got a looooong way to go there.

[–]wombatinaburrowfeminist marsupial-1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Alimony is awarded how often now?

[–]Sacred_Moose_Knuckle 0 points0 points0 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

So because it's not awarded in every case, that makes it ok? Do you feel the same way about rape? I mean, that's fairly rare, too.

That hamster logic, tho.

[–]wombatinaburrowfeminist marsupial-2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

I wouldn't call one in four women and one in six men rare.

Alimony isn't done in my country. What's the rate in yours?

[–]Sacred_Moose_Knuckle 5 points5 points5 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Those are bullshit statistics, and you should peddle them elsewhere.

[–]wombatinaburrowfeminist marsupial0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Lol. Why are you so invested in pretending men don't get raped?

[–]itgscv1Leaning MGTOW0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The hell are you talking about? 1 in 4 has been debunked for years and only someone stuck in an echo chamber or willfully ignorant still pushes it. The study it came from is blatantly biased and dishonest.

Where anywhere do they say men don't get raped?

[–]wombatinaburrowfeminist marsupial0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

1/4 and 1/6 has never been debunked. http://www.unwomen.org/en/what-we-do/ending-violence-against-women/facts-and-figures. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/09/130914-rape-asia-pacific-un-men-violence-women/

[–]Sacred_Moose_Knuckle 1 points1 points1 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Go troll someone else.

[–]wombatinaburrowfeminist marsupial-1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Why do you think that I am trolling?

[–]wazzup987Blue pill, you can beat me black & blue for it later[🍰] -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Give the mrm about decade

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

That is not a complete sentence, nor does it make sense.

"give the mrm about decade?"

wtf.

[–]APlaceInsideMyHeadRed Pill Man4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Give the men's rights movement about a decade

[–]TheGreasyPoleObjectively Pro-moderate filth0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I thought he was just mumbling. Thanks !

[–]topredhatSo Red14 points15 points16 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

There going to be so many single ladys.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

All the single ladies.

All the single ladies.

[–]ManRAh5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

US government statistics show...

Anyone actually have the stats the article is based on?

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The same government that takes statistics like 77% or 1 in 5 at face value.

[–]max_peenorCertified TRP Shitlord1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's from the same vault of made up horseshit that drives the statists.

[–]runswithelves4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So... where are the actual stats?

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points18 points 11 years ago (34 children) | Copy Link

Women already get more than men, via the married men that earn more sharing their wages with the women that earn less + all other state promoted male to female transfers.

[–]fiat_lux_Red Pillar14 points15 points16 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Right. The demographic of men that earn more than women tend to be older (i.e. from an era where more men worked). Given that they are older, more experienced, and more senior, it makes sense that that demographic would earn more than their female counterparts.

The 20s and even early 30s demographic have already begun earning less than their female counterparts. This has already been the case. No need to wait till 2024.

[–]LiaKathryn2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (32 children) | Copy Link

This article is about female professionals right? Not women soaking up financial returns from men.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (31 children) | Copy Link

Right.

I'm saying even with the wage gap as it is, women get more money than men.

[–]LiaKathryn0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (30 children) | Copy Link

Sure. But what you're talking about is the exact opposite of professional women being high earners, right? I wasn't sure how your comment related to the article. Or what your point was. Would you prefer women attain financial stability through the support of men? Or through prosperous careers of their own? And just cause it's the internet and tone gets lost I want to clarify there's no sarcasm or snark in my comments. Just genuinely curious.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (29 children) | Copy Link

My comment was pointing out that women have more of societies money anyway.

Regardless of what the on paper wage gap looks like.

[–]fiat_lux_Red Pillar3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago* (28 children) | Copy Link

The on paper wage gap is already favourable to women. Younger demographic.

/u/LiaKathryn is right. Your point about transfers, while notable, is the result of Men being the breadwinners.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (27 children) | Copy Link

Your point about transfers, while notable, is the result of Men being the breadwinners.

Not all of it.

Single men are transferring resources to single women, via the state.

[–]LiaKathryn2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (26 children) | Copy Link

Well... Women account for 47% of the US workforce. So it's pretty evenly split as far as supporting the unemployed single people of either gender.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link

Single mothers, numerous special programs for women (vawa alone is 1.25billion a year), women's extra health care costs.

A finish (I think) study found that men put more into the system than they took out and the reverse is true for women.

[–]LiaKathryn4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

Of COURSE, womens healthcare costs more. We bear children and actually GOTO the doctor when we're sick. Men avoid the doctor until they have a massive three vessle MI. I say that with only a marginal grain of salt. I just get this mixed message from the RP. "Fuckin career bitches, stay home and watch the kids and keep house." "fucking lazy bitches trying to leech of their husbands and take all their assets." If you don't want women to be successful and career/money oriented on par with men then what's the safety net for women who's husbands cheat, leave, die... If they don't have a career? Which is it. You want a world of dependent women? It's going to cost you financially. You want all women to have careers and be able to support themselves? Then be prepared for lower birthrates, kids in daycare raised by strangers, latchkey without a nuturing motherly presence 24/7.

[–]wazzup987Blue pill, you can beat me black & blue for it later[🍰] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

(vawa alone is 1.25billion a year)

so 9$ per woman per year

[–]LiaKathryn3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

And fun fact! Unemployed men spend more of their time on leisure activity while unemployed women spend it on caretaking and housework.

[–]TheGreasyPoleObjectively Pro-moderate filth0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Awesome !

I gues that helps make up for the fact that hardly any chicks will touch an unemployed 30 year old with a bargepole. Whislt all the unemployed 30 year old chicks can still get laid as easily as before, and get LTR's very nearly as easily as before.

I'm glad to see we get some extra X-Box time out of the deal.

[–]DaThrowaway808<('.'<) (>'.')>8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Maddy Dychtwald, a Californian demographer, attributed the trend – affecting professions such as lawyers and doctors - to a combination of employers being more amenable towards women staff, declining birth rates

It saddens me that this occurs.

and the US recession's comparatively light impact on female workers.

Men expendable for quotas? Sounds about right.

When I found out my fiancé made more than me I was overjoyed. I welcome the ability to abuse the fact that her job is more protected than mine based upon her gender.

[–]ILU250 shades of purple[S] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If you're marrying a woman, i think that's fiancée

[–]Xemnas814 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Guys you're blind to what's going to happen or just pretending to ignore it. Due to hypergamy even more women are only going to settle for the top 20%. If you're not stinking rich then obviously she's going to look for a reasonably well-to-do hot young stud instead. Basically if you're not aesthetic throughout your 20s to early 50s or using dollar bills as toilet paper you're gonna be fucked by 2030 for most of your adult life. You have been warned.

[–]IramadanceRed Pill Man8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Of course. I remember reading a study that said that higher earning women STILL look for higher earning men. It's not like money changes their strategy.

[–][deleted] 2 points2 points2 points 11 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Women already make way more than men if you judge it on money as equated to work done.

The amount of women I've seen earn the same wages as me for doing FAR less work, never having to do the hard jobs, getting the easier shifts, etc, is beyond belief.

[–]cvcv19912 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

That's great! more hotties in their 20's willing to sleep with my ugly post wall self for a couple of gifts.

[–]byebyebluepill 7 points7 points7 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

a glass of nice scotch = a kiss

take me out to family style restaurant = 2nd base!

if you pay the corkage I'll sleep with you!

but if you want that cunnilingus i need a $50 steak.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Brb making a Kickstarter.

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

You don't need gifts for that if you're in reasonably good shape.

[–]cvcv19913 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I'm talking about ridiculously good looking men, they're not that easy.

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Actually they are that easy to have sex with, just not to get ltrs with

[–]cvcv19910 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

NO, they're not, they can get sex from pretty women, why would they have sex with an ugly old woman for free?

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Cuz its still sex, and its free. Men love variety.

[–]throwinoutex-Red Pill, now Purple Man[🍰] -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Because the pretty woman may make them jump through hoops they are just tired of jumping through. The ugly woman is more likely to give up the pussy easier and with less effort, with fewer strings attached. The easier road has the appeal of being easier.

[–]ILU250 shades of purple[S] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't know. I know at least one :)

I bring him to the gym time to time as an extra measure.

[–]drok007Not white enough to be blue pill4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is how I feel about women earning more than men. Particularly the last one.

[–]YOU_ARE_A_TOY0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm interested in seeing how different groups deal with the information. I'm a bit skeptical of this particular article but if the sources prove to be accurate, honestly I think it will be a good reality check for everyone.

[–]RRBeachFG20 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

For some reason I read this as eat more than men...

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I predict there arising a community parallel to TRP that deals with the sexual frustration of women.

[–]strongalfalfa|||1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm really happy to see this. Finally proof of real progress for women.

[–]TheGreasyPoleObjectively Pro-moderate filth1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So, when are you going to stop fighting for higher wages for women then ? Now we've reached parity (including non-monetary benefits and govt. transfers) are you girls going to start saying "It's not equal any more. Give the guys pay raises and leave the girls alone ?"

Because you feminists tell us you are all for equality. So where is the commitment to equality ? Surely that means when women go past equal you guys start agitating to "reign in the girls" or "give the guys an extra boost" just as you do when the boots on the other foot ? Right ?

Will you Fuck.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Women are better behaved. They make more compliant office slaves for our betters.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter