Based on my understanding, Aspies are not good at picking up on how others are feeling/thinking (which is why they can be taken advantage of by others, since they can't sense whether someone is using them or actually cares, or they simply alienate people because of their disconnectedness). Narcissists/Antisocials don't care about others (which is why they find hurting others easy). Narcissists, unlike Antisocials, do care about what people think/feel about them because they crave external validation but they don't actually care about anyone in and of themselves (any thought/feeling they have unrelated to them), other people exist merely as potential narcissistic supply. If they can't provide that, they are worthless and degradable (sluts, blue pillers, etc.).

So, the question is, is red pill tailored, frequented, more by Aspies (people with a history of poor relationships because they can't relate/connect to others) and Antisocials/Narcissists (people with a history of poor relationships because they don't care about others)? Can you care about the feelings of others as much as you care about your own AND have high functioning emotional/relational intelligence and find value in red pill? Does any red piller that fits that description want to speak to that, want to talk about how much or little they relate to the average red piller, what exact value they find in red pill?

If RP is simply about not being a slave to the feelings/wants/needs of others, I have no issue with it, seems entirely sensible to not be the slave to someone else's feelings/needs and/or to not value your own at all.

But it seems to be more aspie/sociopathic/aynrandian, about putting your feelings/wants/needs above everyone else, disregarding (and often making fun of, ridiculing, devaluing) the feelings/wants/needs of others whether intentionally (in the case of narcissists and antisocials) or more unintentionally (in the case of aspies). In the red pill world women exist to validate the fragile red pill male ego, you can see that in many red pill posts (she appreciates how powerful i am, how i take what i want, etc., the self worship, megalomania is striking and celebrated if you look at the red pill preoccupation with dark triad traits).

If I am mistaken, can a redpiller post ONE SINGLE highly upvoted/commented red pill article that talks about the importance of being aware of the feelings/wants/needs of others (i.e. empathy) and balancing them with your own, versus only caring about, focusing on, being aware of what you want/feel/need (which is how aspies, sociopaths/antisocials operate)?

There is an obsession in red pill with power and hierarchy which is antisocial/narcissistic and doesn't reflect historical trends of modernity where power is more distributed, democracy more common in more functional societies (which speaks to the red pill obsession with 'tradition', and explains why return of the kings is the name of a popular red pill site). Again it seems you can't be red pill if you don't relate, aspire to be more primitively self centered, aspire to have relationship(s) with inherently replaceable vagina(s) whose purpose in life is to adore you and whose personality/identity does not matter otherwise.

So, I think people who have a problem with red pill are people who have a problem with toxic personalities (narcissists, antisocials, aspies). I don't think there is much room for sane debate with red pillers as they are all so messed up, deluded in their assorted personality dysfunctions. The narcissists exist to be validated so they will never admit they are wrong even when they are wrong. The antisocials don't care if they are wrong (because they don't value validation). An aspies are just not capable of processing the viewpoints of others.

It would seem the predominant personality on red pill is likely narcissists because antisocials and aspies don't seek the social camaraderie that narcissists value, crave (that's what motivates red pillers to post their look-how-awesome-my-red-pill-life posts are, they need group validation and that's what the red pill society offers them).

I think aspies are the token victim mens demographic that red pill types use to explain how unfair the world is to men as aspies do tend to be poorly treated in society (and most aspies are men). Antisocials are admired for not caring about what others think which most red pill types, being sociopaths, do but wish they didn't to some degree. So red pill types are mostly Narcissists who wish they were more Antisocial and fear being a vulnerable Aspie. But ultimately these are people who can't or refuse to see the perspective of others and desire complete external validation of their perspective/views (hence the red pill preference for one-sided/one-way relationships which entirely gratifies their narcissistic egos, see the brad pit rule post for an example http://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/2jyjc4/when_asking_a_girl_out_use_the_brad_pitt_rule/) so you can't get through to them, real debate with a real red piller is impossible. If you don't entirely validate their fragile egos, you have no value to them other than as something to degrade/devalue.

If you don't agree, please spell out what you think the average personality profile of a red piller is? Explain how/why you think they do value the feelings/needs/wants of others (i.e. are not aspie, antisocial, narcissistic) and show me popular red pill posts which reflect that?