Premises: - the man I'm referring to is redpilled. - he thinks all women are basically equivalent. - he doesn't have nor wants a family. - there are way less attractive men than women (most women are attractive to men, most men are unattractive to women).

We all know the formula : female age = male age /2 +7

It's a shorthand to say that from 14yo onwards women age twice as fast as men.

Basically, women age faster than men on the dating market.

So at any given year, a man has in his best self interest to leave his current girlfriend, because the older he gets the younger relative to himself he can afford to date.

For example: if at 30 he dates a 22yo, at 30+5=35 he can date a 24yo while his gf is 22+5=27.

So given that:

  • a man is attractive enough to be on the dating market (so the market is in his favor)
  • his finances stayed the same (because they determine an offset on how younger or older he can date)

then he should leave his girlfriend as often as possible.

So dear women, don't complain if your man slacks during a relationship : you wouldn't deserve him otherwise.

TL;DR: Since women are a depreciating asset, a redpilled man always finds himself in one of these three scenarios: - he is unattractive (out of the market) - his attractiveness decreases - his rational choice is to change partner as often as possible.

PS: smart men are redpilled, bluepilled men are boring.