Link: https://archive.is/2stoX

Edit Update: https://archive.is/Y8V8c

She claims she never said his name on any of the videos...interesting.

Did you say his name in any of the videos? Did you have any introduction or are you just awkwardly jumping into it? No, no firm name usage. I did have intros that used generic pet names - baby, sexy, and the like.

Her story sounds so sketchy and unbelievable. When she was asked why she closed the laptop like she was guilty her response was:

Why did you slam the laptop closed? My initial thought was "OH MY GOD I'LL RUIN THE SURPRISE." It was a gut reaction. It was stupid. I should have paused and reacted better.

Can you spot the cheating whore?

TL;DR: Man catches his naked girlfriend masturbating in front of a webcam. Walks out on her and refuses to answer her calls. Woman claims she was making videos for him.

From the post:

The woman is an attorney who will be going out of town for two weeks and claims she wanted to make videos for her bf to jerk off to.

I decided that I wanted to do something a little special for boyfriend (let's call him... uhm, Logan). While he's been in night class for the last few weeks I took to my laptop/phone and decided to make some sexy videos for him.

So this woman has been making videos for weeks without telling her bf. Isn't it common to just skype or send videos via phone to your SO? Also since she's an attorney, it seems kind of sketchy that she would make so many explicit videos.

I wanted to give him some extra spank bank material while I'm working, essentially incommunicado, for two weeks. I was working on video number five. Shower head fun. I was doing my thing at 5:45pm with plenty of time before Logan's lab let out at 8:30pm. I didn't hear the front door open but Logan sure heard me making noise. His lab had let out early. I left the bathroom door open to keep it from getting too steamy so he rounded the corner and saw me, naked in front of the webcam rocking the detachable shower head.

told him to let me explain it is no way as bad as it looks, I wasn't camming with anyone I was making videos for him. Logan shouted at me that it was the stupidest excuse he had ever heard.

When someone in the comments asks if she's said his name at all in the videos, her response is priceless:

Let this be a lesson to any other significant others out there that want to make surprise sexy videos for their lover, for the love of god say their name a few times to cover your ass JUST IN CASE.

Most of the comments seem to believe her except for one guy:

Because she's an attorney, and she makes a very clinical very outlined case, yet can't seem to actually apply her explanation to her real world scenario. Which means, him stumbling upon this post might be that real world scenario.

She apologizes for it's jumbled-ness, but when looking it over, it's the exact opposite. There's no panic, or fluster in this post. It's laid out point by point, by someone who knows how to prove and disprove guilt. And the reason is because this post is her way of disproving guilt. Re-read it everyone. It takes forever to get to the actual problem, and barely even asks for applicable advice. First, she sets the stage, she's a respectable lawyer, who's going out of town. Then she goes on and out about how she's innocent and a great girlfriend, and it all leads up to a crazy misunderstanding. She's PROVING to us why she's innocent, when really a normal person would say what went wrong, and say her SO doesn't believe her, and she needs help. There's this heavy weight added to this post where she's proving herself to us because that's what's most important to her. If the internet commenters believe her, maybe her bf will. It's all laid out like a criminal defense strategy. Establishes foundation of evidence, gain sympathy from peers, and then prove why these events are the actual ones.

Why is there such an onus on proving to us that's she's innocent? She's focusing more on the "AHA! See? It all fits together perfectly!" moment than her actual problem. Could she be innocent, and could this just be the innate lawyer in her doing what she's trained to do? Sure. It's definitely weird though.