TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Studies show that "in households where the husband earns more money, both spouses share in the financial decision making. But in marriages where the wife brings home a bigger paycheck, the woman is twice as likely as her husband to make all the financial decisions."

secaa23

April 3, 2015
970 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://www.businessinsider.com/breadwinning-women-control-family-money-2015-3
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Studies show that "in households where the husband earns more money, both spouses share in the financial decision making. But in marriages where the wife brings home a bigger paycheck, the woman is twice as likely as her husband to make all the financial decisions."
Author

secaa23

Upvotes 970
Comments 95
Date April 3, 2015 5:39 PM UTC
(11 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/31bya8/studies_show_that_in_households_where_the_husband/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/studies-show-that-in-households-where-the-husband.984112
https://theredarchive.com/post/984112
Top posts by secaa23

Male student now sues Columbia University over classmate who carried a mattress around campus and accused him of raping her

2331 upvotes
April 24, 2015
/r/MensRights

Whoopi Goldberg on woman's spitting and assault of Cleveland bus driver: "Women have this idea that you can hit and punch on a man .. and it's ok and he's not going to hit you back. Those days are gone".

1418 upvotes
October 15, 2012
/r/MensRights

Newly hired Boston University professor tweets “White masculinity isn’t a problem for America’s colleges, white masculinity is THE problem for America’s colleges.”

1343 upvotes
May 11, 2015
/r/MensRights

Feminists argue now that for transsexuals to pretend they’re women is insulting to real women - a genital form of "blackface"

456 upvotes
February 5, 2015
/r/MensRights

Feminists upset over statue of man and woman talking

235 upvotes
May 28, 2015
/r/MensRights

Forbes sacks columnist over piece saying "drunk" female students pose "gravest" threat to frats

137 upvotes
September 25, 2014
/r/MensRights

Woman who killed boyfriend changes story, claims battered woman’s defense.

130 upvotes
February 2, 2014
/r/MensRights

California woman faces torture charge after dousing her ex-husband with a pot of boiling water that burned over 60% of his body.

123 upvotes
November 30, 2011
/r/MensRights

Comments

[+][deleted] 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Stag29 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This isn't the case of gender inequality, this is a biased study. They found what they wanted to find. A true and unbiased study of this should have polled 1000 men too.

IMO if you are the household breadwinner naturally you'd have more interest in protecting your earnings, regardless of gender.

[–][deleted] 228 points229 points230 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Female Entitlement Syndrome.

His money is Her money. Her money is Her money.

[–]ofekme 55 points56 points57 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

the funny thing its a rule in islam lol

[–]Totsean 9 points10 points11 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's actually true. Doesn't mean it's applicable.

[–]YuriJackoffski 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

But I've been told the womenz are infinitely oppressed over there and the men live like kings!

[–]brokedown 125 points126 points127 points 11 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

You know, wording is a bitch. Those two conditions in that sentence are not mutually exclusive, and could apply to the same stats. It's describing two different aspects as if they're the same, but they're not.

Really, this whole article is bull.

In 2013, 40% of households with children under the age of 18 were headed by breadwinning women.

This doesn't mean couples. Single moms fit this description. But the inverse of a single dad is much more rare, for unnatural reasons. In 100% of single-mom households, the woman is the primary breadwinner.. And that just throws off any comparison you could make into absurdity.

That's four times higher than the number of breadwinning women who headed their households in 1960.

's/breadwinning women/single moms/' and that sounds pretty close.

Along with earning more, women are also taking control of their family's finances.

No statement was made to suggest that women are earning more.

women who earn more than their husbands are more likely to make the financial decisions for their household.

It's no surprise that the person with the bigger vested interest in finances would want to be the decision maker regarding those matters, is it?

But in marriages where the wife brings home a bigger paycheck, the woman is twice as likely as her husband to make all the financial decisions.

Basically repeating the last statement, but applying crafty wording to make it sound like it says something that it doesn't!

Following up with some bs informal survey of the author's facebook friends, you get some numbers that would seem to reinforce the statements above.. But in plain English, it's not the same discussion.

This is the kind of nonsense you expect when the listed sources are other articles by the same rag and some book you can buy on amazon.

[–]eletheros 13 points14 points15 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

It's no surprise that the person with the bigger vested interest in finances would want to be the decision maker regarding those matters, is it?

There is a direct comparison there that you're refusing to see, which takes quite an effort on your part, since it's all in the same paragraph

"in households where the husband earns more money, both spouses share in the financial decision making. But in marriages where the wife brings home a bigger paycheck, the woman is twice as likely as her husband to make all the financial decisions."

So yes, it is a surprise that the person with the bigger vested interest in finances are the decision maker because it only happens when women are the ones with that interest.

This has nothing to do with single parent households. This is a direct comparison of couples.

Torabi asked over 1,000 heterosexual women in committed relationships if they or their husband managed the household finances.

[+]brokedown -8 points-7 points-6 points 11 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

Nonsense. Torabi asked 1000 people, but that "confirmed" the data from an unspecified source, which no evidence was given to suggest that the data is actually comparable. You've chosen to accept the unwritten definition that the data performed in an actual study (which is unsourced unless you buy the new book, "When Women Earn More" from amazon!) is directly comparable to a casual survey that an author of the book did.

A little more than half of the participants make more than their husbands.

So you either accept that this survey doesn't represent the population, or this author just disproved the whole wage gap concept without bring in type of job or education levels or hours worked or any of the other reasons commonly mentioned to disprove the gender wage gap theory!

Furthermore, the statement:

But in marriages where the wife brings home a bigger paycheck, the woman is twice as likely as her husband to make all the financial decisions."

This is such a crazy thing for them to say. Just look at their chart, where the numbers clearly don't add up to women being twice as likely as men to be the sole decision maker on financial matters. Here, I did the 3rd grade math for you to make it easier to digest.

What you can glean from those figures (if you must glean anything from them) is that women avoid making decisions about investing or purchasing. In the other categories, it's pretty clear that the inverse of their statement is true. If you take the overly simplistic route and assign a point to each percentage for each category, then tally up the points for both situations, men lead by 95 points (511 vs 416).

Edit: fixed the chart URL and points totals

[–]eletheros 9 points10 points11 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Nonsense. Torabi asked 1000 people, but that "confirmed" the data from an unspecified source, which no evidence was given to suggest that the data is actually comparable

That's because it's an article about a book, not the book. The book has citations.

So you either accept that this survey doesn't represent the population, or this author just disproved the whole wage gap concept without bring in type of job or education levels or hours worked or any of the other reasons commonly mentioned to disprove the gender wage gap theory!

It did neither, since it was a study of married couples who both work.

This is such a crazy thing for them to say. Just look at their chart, where the numbers clearly don't add up to women being twice as likely as men to be the sole decision maker on financial matters. Here, I did the 3rd grade math for you[1] to make it easier to digest.

I was going to laugh at you, but you pulled your image so it's clear you admit your error and are sorry for being so silly.

[+]brokedown -6 points-5 points-4 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

  1. So all statistics in the article are unsourced, yet you choose to accept them.

  2. That doesn't really change anything. The gender wage gap isn't about single people.

  3. Look again, I had to make a quick edit. Laugh all you want if that's what you're into.

[–]eletheros 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So all statistics in the article are unsourced, yet you choose to accept them.

None of them are new insights. I don't ask for a citation when somebody claims gravity exists either. The book is a year old and draws data from studies and Pew polling from the last decade.

That doesn't really change anything. The gender wage gap isn't about single people

No, it's about all people, and you can't point at data about a sub category of people and call it a disproof.

Look again, I had to make a quick edit. Laugh all you want if that's what you're into.

That chart has nothing on the claim of making "all the financial decisions." The statement was not "in all separate financial categories", but rather "in couples where one makes all the financial decisions, women who earn more are twice as likely as her husband"

[–]Zosimasie 20 points21 points22 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

In 100% of single-mom households, the woman is the primary breadwinner.

Also not necessarily. The woman could be 100% financed by alimony and/or child support, and she would not be the primary bread winner, technically.

[–]brokedown 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Remember then we did that whole TARP thing, and the banks all posted a profit because of the taxpayer money they received? It doesn't matter how she got the money. If she earned it, stole it, won it in the lottery, found a discreet brown paper bag filled with unmarked, non-sequential bills in a park trashcan, it would still count as her income.

[–]kolakgnat 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A very good reminder to read things critically, thanks. I noticed that part about houses headed by bread winning women. 'Female headed households' is often almost a synonym for single-parent households.

[–]From_H_To_Uuo 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You are just applying the dark side of statistics. It can be used to prove anything.

[–]leftajar -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Thank you, for revealing this bullshit on behalf of logical thinkers everywhere.

Notice how all the sentences have VAGUE language:

are more likely to..

(how much more likely?)

share in the financial decision making

(well that's vague. My dog technically shares in the vacuuming when he scoops up a dropped morsel.)

The author conducted her own study, and found that it confirmed this trend.

I'm sure she found exactly what she was looking for.

[–]brokedown -3 points-2 points-1 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I spent 2 minutes fixing their chart as well.

When you look at the figures instead of their dialog, it tells a very different story.

edit: fixed the chart

[–]leftajar -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Awesome point. Even their chart confuses and obfuscates, with its fem-centric data structure.

The correct comparison, which you provided, reasserts that men are, in fact, more assertive than women on average -- a common-sense fact that Feminism would love to delete.

[+][deleted] 11 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Raidicus 7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

According to the Population Reference Bureau, the two biggest reasons for single-parent households are unwed parents and divorce. I personally doubt that "one night stands" are the problem. For unwed parents, the most likely situation is young couples making terrible decisions. The woman decides to keep the kid (likely despite the wishes of the man) and boom, we have another unwanted child in the world.

[–]brokedown 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Sure, those are all valid reasons, I was more referring to instances where there was a choice of which parent became a single parent, and that choice defaulted to the mother, for reasons not based on fact.

[–]riker89 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, that's true. I was merely pointing out that there are both natural and unnatural ways it can happen.

[–]shellibelli -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The other thing is correlation vs causation here. I'd bet the person who makes more money has a better head for numbers, but in more traditional style households the man does it anyways.

Personally I can't wait to get married because I can let my future husband make all the decisions so I can be lazy, even though I might have a job while he won't for a while and be supporting him.

... but I'm drunk right now so what do I know. I'm not sure I even have a point with this post, but thank God for autocorrect.

[–]uberpower 87 points88 points89 points 11 years ago* (34 children) | Copy Link

There was a brief period in our marriage when my wife earned more than me. Three months to be exact. I was initially very proud of her then . . . you should have seen the attitude that came with it: totally dismissive of everything I said, entirely stopped doing her half of the chores, never shared any of that money with me or for our bills . . . she lost that job quickly, lied about still having it, cried and begged and brought in her brother to argue on her behalf because I told her to move out when the lie was exposed.

Edit: To be clear, we're still together despite that dark period. She is a reformed person and mostly good wife and great mama, she gives me her earnings to manage our finances with, there was never any cheating or abuse on either of our parts . . . we're doing OK. People make mistakes, money gets to their head, and some things can be forgiven.

[–]flyingwolf 18 points19 points20 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

there was never any cheating or abuse on either of our parts

You mean of course besides the lying, stealing, and emotional abuse. Right.

[–]Raidicus 40 points41 points42 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

She sounds like a lovely woman.

[–]Sir_smokes_a_lot 26 points27 points28 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

She sounds like a bitch

[–]MorCowbell 16 points17 points18 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah op, I think you saw a taste of the beast inside your wife. Right now it's just chilling, festering until it awakens again.

[+]ocnenckek -11 points-10 points-9 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly. Caught the independent woman lib jew disease.

[–]Grubnar -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well ...

She is a reformed person and mostly good wife and great mama

... so yeah.

[–]wanked_in_space 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link

So you left her? You're not to clear on that.

[–]uberpower 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link

No I broke her in and now she's a good mom working at home on social media and giving me most of the earnings to manage our finances with. Not sure if it's the right move but she's a kickass mama who lets me manage all the money and raises good little children so . . . .

I gave her another chance and it worked out for us. She just had those bad three months where she was unacceptable. We never cheated on each other, we never abused each other, we know each other for very long (friends before marrying) . . . it is what it is. I'm not regretting it. There's a lot worse women out there.

[–]wanked_in_space 35 points36 points37 points 11 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

No I broke her in

That's a fucked up comment if I ever saw one.

Thanks for the update though, you left us hanging.

[–]salgat 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Eh I can understand what he means. She went nuts once she let the money get to her head, wouldn't change even after she lost her job, and he put her back in her place (being an equal member of the family). If a woman did this to a man who went nuts in the same way, I'd agree with her. What it came down to is, either she changed big time, or he was done with her, so it's safe to say she really was broke in.

[+]wanked_in_space -6 points-5 points-4 points 11 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

When they say they broke her in. That's what I have a problem with. Not the action, what they called it.

[–]salgat 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago* (8 children) | Copy Link

I'd say the same thing too if my spouse (male or female) went nuts on me and nearly ended the marriage. You can even say that about a kid that is out of control.

[–]wanked_in_space -4 points-3 points-2 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Using a word generally reserved for objects, like shoes, is kind of fucked up.

[–]GeneralDogsbody 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

I think he was using it differently to the way you've interpreted it.

Taming a wild horse is referred to as breaking it. You break a horse in to eliminate the wild behaviour and make it comfortable with and trust it's riders/handlers/new environment.

Seems appropriate.

[–]wanked_in_space 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

She's am animal now? Yeah, that's not fucked up. At all.

There's a battle for public opinion and you guys are defending stupid ass comments like this. Ridiculous.

[–]Grasshopper21 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Sounds legit to me.

[–]wanked_in_space -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Fortunately, you're the minority here. That's not what we're about.

[–]Grasshopper21 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Meh. It's a difference of opinion.

[–]wanked_in_space -3 points-2 points-1 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'd say it's a fundamental difference.

[–]Grasshopper21 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And you're wrong, but whatever

[–]WhatIfThatThingISaid -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's a common term. Ever heard of breaking bad?

[–]kolakgnat -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Agree

[–]jaheiner 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Just out of curiosity did you call her out on her behavior and ask her how she'd feel if when you're making more money that you behaved as she is?

[–][deleted] -5 points-4 points-3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No real point in that. She would just chalk it up to stress or some other convenient stand-in to make it nor her fault. If he persisted, she would end up insinuating it was his fault. Arguing logical points with females is a losing game, particularly if you're married to her and she knows that you have already given up every card you held when you slipped that ring on. Her emotions reign supreme until death or divorce-rape do you part.

[–]escobari 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

welcome to the real world

[–]kizzan 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I am glad you got out. Congratulations on being strong.

[–]FerretHydrocodone 9 points10 points11 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

He specifically said he didn't get out. He's still with her.

[–]kizzan 9 points10 points11 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

When I commented it didn't have the edit. I apologize for getting it wrong.

[–]Napkin_whore 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You coo meng

[–]Vance87 41 points42 points43 points 11 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link

In most TV shows I've seen, the woman even as a stay-at-home mom makes all the financial decisions, because the man is too stupid to balance a checkbook.

[–]Fang88 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

This whole balancing thing makes no sense. It's not like the bank is going to make a math mistake. That's all done by computers now.

Now of course you should check the amounts going into and out of the account to make sure no one is forging checks in your name, but they're not going to make an adding mistake.

[–]dionidium 15 points16 points17 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

The point is to track your outgoing checks. This was necessary when people wrote a lot of checks. It has nothing to do with fear of bank error.

[–]Fang88 7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The phrase "balancing" comes from the accounting idea where you literally add up all the numbers to make sure they agree with the banks adding. Nowadays, that's just silly. Verify the numbers are correct, but don't waste time punching them all into a calculator.

[–]marswithrings 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

/u/dionidium is right, this is primarily a holdover from when people wrote a lot of checks.

see when you write someone a check instead of just paying with a credit/debit card or with cash, they don't necessarily cash that check right away. so even if the bank's calculations are done by computer, the bank has no idea that you just wrote a check, nor does it know for how much. so your bank account won't reflect that until the check is cashed.

people without a lot of money to play with would want to keep track of how much money they had spent using checks because the bank systems would not reflect those amounts right away, and people sometimes need to know exactly how much money they have at their disposal

since checks have almost entirely died out and are mostly used either by people too stubborn to give them up or in rare situations where you're required to pay with one (in my experience usually first month's rent) this is no longer relevant.

but when it was, it didn't matter if the bank used computers and had accurate numbers. they weren't checking the math, they were tracking money that was essentially "spent", but hadn't shown up on their account yet

[–]trahloc 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That may be the accounting term but normal people use balancing as synonym for budgeting. You can argue your point all you want but you're wrong just like people who argue that "ain't" ain't a word.

[–]FangornForest 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

Can confirm. Am 26 y/o male and have never balanced a book in my life...

[+][deleted] 11 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]dionidium 9 points10 points11 points 11 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

People used to write a lot of checks; you'd need to keep track of outgoing payments so that you'd know how much cash was available.

Edit: also, before the Internet, you actually had to go to the bank to find out about your account. You tracked it yourself so that you always had all of your balance information available.

[–]KingMong -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

well im quite capable of managing my own money mentally,usually checking it weekly at the cash machine or online, suppose that might become more difficult if you aren't the only one spending it.

[–]PurpleAriadne 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes but in the days when it was mostly checks someone may have sat on the check and not deposited it....you have to make were there is still enough room in the account.

[–]trahloc 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is a legacy term from an era you probably didn't have any responsibilities if you existed at all. Today it's antiquated like the buggy whip, that doesn't mean that it isn't still of use to the older generations that haven't adjusted or those like myself inbetween who see balancing as striking a balance between our income and outgoing. Properly referred to as budgeting.

[–]Rafoie 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's from a day before mint existed. So you can know how much you have. I haven't touched a check book ever. I use my backs online system to see my account. It's an antiquated device.

[–]norsethunders 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

27 and have never done it myself, but I do have vague memories from when my parents dealt w/ checks. Two things to consider, it could take days/weeks for a check to get processed and you didn't have easy access to find out your bank balance/transaction history. So, every time you write a check you log the amount spend and deduct that from the running balance you're keeping. At the end of the month you'll get a statement from the bank with the current balance and a list of all the checks/amounts for that month. "Balancing the checkbook" is verifying that your data matches the bank's data. This is done primarily to keep YOUR records accurate (so you know how much money you have at a given time), not to catch errors from the bank!

Now that nearly everything is electronic, payments are processed rapidly, and online banking is a thing there really isn't a point in keeping a running balance yourself.

[–]baskandpurr[🍰] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The banks favourite way of taking money used to involve checks. Whenever the person you paid cashed the check, the bank would take money from your account. Then they keep it for a bit to get interest before passing it to the other person's bank. That bank could keep it for a bit and then eventually give it to the person you intend to pay.

The trick was that if your account didn't have enough money to pay for that check whenever it was cashed and your bank eventually decided to hand the money over, the bank could 'fine' you. What a great game! The banks makes up some unecessarily complicated rules for how they use your money and if you didn't stay within those rules exactly they take money off you. The bank didn't even have to tell you when the check got cashed.

To increase the chance of catching you off guard, the period of time changed if the person used the same bank as you. Also, if you had enough money to cover the check in a different account that wouldn't matter. The important thing was to take your money wether you could pay the check or not.

[–]ThisIsWhyIFold 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's more about managing your cash flow.

[–]uberpower 9 points10 points11 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I'm 41, have never balanced squat, and have an 800+ FICO score (that's an elite credit rating). Just pay your shit on time (autopay of full balance due is great) and earn more than you spend.

[–]KingMong 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

earn more than you spend.

why cant some people grasp this, even if you used a credit card, always pay it off straight away, that interest will kill you, if you don't have it don't spend it.

Dont take loans you dont need to(like brand new cars, save and buy 3-5 years old) and take a mortgage at like 75% of what they will give you

Always live slightly below what you can afford to, you will have less stress and more money to spend on luxuries.

[–]uberpower 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's the way. I get at least 2% cashback on all my credit cards, never pay interest or fees, always pay in full each month . . . sometimes the cashback is 5% - 10%. Can't beat free money. That's how savings accumulate for rainy days.

[–]Totsean 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wise words, honestly words to live by.

[+][deleted] 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]KingMong 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Those things don't happen constantly, and anyway that advice doesn't work for poor people, it's for average people that run themselves into debt for no reason.

[–]Lugonn 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well, no. The household finance has always been part of the women's sphere of influence. That's not because men are seen as dumb, but because men are needed to do the dangerous external jobs so society can thrive.

[–]HerbertRTarlekJr 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So when women make more, they are statistically more dictatorial than men?

[–]BarneyBent 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So, just looking at those stats, "financial decisions" seems pretty broadly defined.

When it comes to paying bills, 62% of women who earn more money pay bills compared to 43% who earn less money. But when deciding on purchases and investment (arguably far more important elements of financial decision-making) you have 26% to 19% and 44% to 27% respectively.

All this study seems to confirm is that the person who earns more money takes more responsibility for financial decisions than if they earned less money, and that in terms of deciding HOW money is spent, men still have more power even if they're not the primary breadwinner.

[–]aaronite 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not in my household. She makes more, but we decide together. I have absolutely no problem with this and i would be perfectly happy to work even less

[–]Cysioland 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

„What's yours, is mine. What's mine, ain't yours.”

[–]Doriphor 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Gotta fight the patriarchy and be a strong independent woman! /s

[–]bibeauty 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ok well I am a woman and do manage our finances. But the reason for that is my husband refusing to learn to pay bills. So I do it all so we don't tank what little credit we have. I make more than him but work less hours therefore I have time to manage it all too.

[–]Drunken_Pink_Rhino 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Honey, let's go to Disneyworld this Summer."

"God damn it, Sharon! I'm tired of you telling us how to spend our money!"

[–]DarkGamer 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Equality, ladies and gentlemen.

[–]mARINATEDpENIS 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If you are dumb enough to marry in 2015, then you deserve this.

[–]v8beetle 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I wonder if the author asked questions pertaining to financial abuse of the spouses who earned less than their partners. I'd be willing to wager they didn't. I'd also be willing to wager that there is a positive correlation on that front as well. If correct in my hypotheses, one could reasonably conclude that abuse is further disengendered and that neither sex is immune to such behaviors. But we couldn't possibly reveal that given that feminists have lied and obstructed the truth for decades to paint the narrative they want to project.

[–]Catabisis -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is one of many reasons why I do not date American women anymore. They are arrogant narcissists. Not to mention that they are bitchy competitive with other women. The last one sums up everything a man needs to know about our American women.

[–]Vagabondvaga -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

"Thats right honey. Youre in charge. you're the man of the house. Now I've bought $1000 worth of clothes online and $200 worth of cosmetics today. We've spent too much money this month so maybe we cant afford to buy your beer this week. Oh and honey, If you ever dare leave me you'll rarely get to see your kids again and I'll make sure that when you do that they hate you. Ok see when you get home from work! Love ya!"

The OP stats might be full of it of course.

[–]EricArthurBlair -4 points-3 points-2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

TIL: Men are suckers.

[–]konoplya -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

what /u/brokedown said below

[+]xRennyBx -21 points-20 points-19 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

My wife makes 4 times what I do. I make every financial decision. /thread :P

[–]Prof_Acorn 12 points13 points14 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

/thread

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistics

[–]kizzan 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/anecdotal

[+]jhorphear -8 points-7 points-6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Just don't the bitch in the relationship. Make the money.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter