Men having a significant problem, women most affected.

Maldevinine · 2021-11-07T20:01:33+00:00

I want to pull out a specific comment here

But when men are in undersupply, the dating culture becomes less monogamous — men are more likely to treat women as sex objects and treat relationships as disposable.

I've actually read the research he was referring to here, and that was not the result. It was comparing the dating behaviour of a particular American Indian tribe between their rural/remote villages and their diaspora in the larger town. The rural areas were more male, the towns more female.

In the rural areas, men engaged in "mate guarding behaviour", i.e. they did things to make sure their partner wasn't having sex with anybody else. In the towns, men stopped with the mate guarding behaviour (they had no need to keep a women when women where in high supply) but women did not increase their mate guarding behaviour, i.e. women made no attempt to keep their men. And I think that's what is happening here. Women are facing a seller's market and complaining about it rather than adjusting their behaviour to the new environment.

There's another thing that I found very hypocritical in the article, and that's in the same quote.

treat women as sex objects

Where the rest of the article makes a point that these men are bad because they're disappointing in bed. Which is treating them as sex objects.

But I will give it some credit for the comment at the end suggesting that women approach men more.

ripyourlungsdave · 2021-11-07T22:56:49+00:00

“Men are going to college at frighteningly decreasing rates, here’s how this affects your vagina.”

neversince2001 · 2021-11-07T21:15:51+00:00

“Less men are attending further education due to gender bias*

DailyMail: “How can we frame this into a problem for women?” Media is dying.

Skirt_Douglas · 2021-11-07T22:05:38+00:00

Relationship therapist Charisse Cooke told FEMAIL: 'Golden Penis Syndrome speaks of the delusional belief that you are unusually and uniquely gifted as a man, sexually or otherwise, and are above established norms of good manners, respect and dating etiquette.

It can result in overly-grandiose behaviour and self-reverence and an inflated sense of power over the opposite sex. Women can be baffled by these men, but intrigued and lured in due to the man's self-belief and seeming promise.

AHAHAHAHA. “It can result result in men becoming over-confident assholes, which baffles women but draws them in because… you know… They’re kind of into that sort of thing.”

The title of this article might as well be “Can somebody get PUAs on the line? I need them to teach me how to neg.”

Party_Solid_2207 · 2021-11-08T07:47:54+00:00

I would like to see the story of how women sometimes behave in the military. Platinum vagina syndrome.

We used to have a weekly party night on our base and every once in a while women from the outside were there and the usual girls were not happy about it at all.

BloomingBrains · 2021-11-08T04:43:09+00:00

It's incredibly frustrating to watch people go through insane mental gymnastics like this. They ran 90% of the race but then just faceplant on the last lap.

'But if I were a heterosexual woman who was looking to get married, I would be wary of guys who have remained never-married into their late thirties and 40s.

The reason those guys never married was because most women blew them off when they were younger. Now those entitled women are sick of dating fuckbois and expect these jilted men to suddenly volunteer for marriage even though they were discarded like trash before. And when they understandably don't jump up to volunteer, they're labelled as "undateable" yet again as a way for the those lonely women to save face. But remember, men are always in the wrong and women are always innocent victims, so we have to twist the facts beyond all recognition to save face. What a joke.

I am glad they are acknowledging the harm of dating fuckbois, and I agree this "golden penis syndrome" exists, but they got the cause completely wrong. It's not that there is actually a lack of suitable partners. Its that many women going to college (or in the general population, for that matter) still expect to practice hypergamy and date men that are more successful. In other words, those women are artificially restricting their own dating pool. Now that people are finally noticing the consequences of that, they're attempting to reason through it in some bizarre way that doesn't acknowledge the obvious conclusion: if more women simply lowered their standards to a level that was more in line with egalitarianism, they would find plenty of men to date who don't have over-inflated egos.

'One of the solutions to the college gender gap that I write about in MAKE YOUR MOVE is encouraging women to be assertive and to make the first move with the men of their choice. Fact is, men like women who like them.

While I like this idea for many reasons, unless we also have a serious societal discussion about standards, I doubt this will do much but make it even easier for the fuckbois and inflate their egos even more.

I don't know. Maybe that's actually the goal in the first place, and this whole thing is an insidious dogwhistle.

dr_pepper02 · 2021-11-07T19:38:50+00:00

The article says that men are becoming entitled and problematic to women because they are having a problem, not achieving higher levels of education.

TobiasWidower · 2021-11-08T12:00:53+00:00

My fuck, the mental gymnastics are top tier.

Fewer men in university/ university educated (to a 3:1 ratio at one school) and rather than the fact that a school is 75% one gender, they'd rather focus on treating those 25% men as sex objects. It honestly reads like some "nice guy" incel posts.

Hookup culture has long favored women as the overly desired sex, yet they don't like the table being reversed and not being treated like some goddess on a pedestal.

Glorifying one school where the men wake up on valentines day to make valentines cards and cook pancakes, while denigrating guys practicing clear communication and their right to choose a partner, not to be obligated to provide sex.

Seriously flip the genders and this all reads like a whiny incel complaining that "hoes ain't shit"

BeanieBreakdown · 2021-11-08T00:30:53+00:00

DailyMail is a tabloid rag full of bunk pseudo-science. They shouldn't be given any more credibility than The National Enquirer or The Sun. And they've become the news-source of choice for UK TERFS.

That tells you everything you need to know about their reader-base, which ensures you never have to take anything they publish seriously.

jpla86 · 2021-11-08T00:40:46+00:00

I guarantee you “golden vagina syndrome” is a hell of a lot more common among women than “golden penis syndrome.

And TIL that men also go to Sarah Lawrence College. I thought it was a top tier women’s only college.

RockmanXX · 2021-11-08T13:47:27+00:00

Here's how College Prowler described dating at Sarah Lawrence College, which has a 75:25 ratio — or 3 women for every 1 guy: 'The girls complain about loneliness

Well Too bad, Colleges aren't designed to act as a hub for you to hook up with the opposite Gender, you go there to STUDY. Secondly, there's absolutely NOTHING stopping these women from dating Men outside these colleges.

A freshman woman told me she had given up any hope of finding a boyfriend, explaining that straight Sarah Lawrence men have no interest in relationships.

CORRECTION, Straight Men do not have an interest in having a relationship with THIS particular Woman. What about the women those men are with? why not interview them? Hmm...

Femail

That made me chuckle lol are we sure this isn't the work of some undercover Troll?

Golden Cock Syndrome' or 'Golden Penis Syndrome' (I heard both) — was part of the campus vernacular

"Golden Uterus Syndrome" was coined by redpill groups to describe the "Protect the Women&Children" instinct of humanity. "Golden Penis Syndrome" is feminists appropriating redpill language. You can't consciously limit your dating pool to Top 10% of Men and then complain that Top 10% of men are picky, then don't chase the Top 10%!

But when men are in undersupply

Men are 50% of the human population, so how can there be an UnderSupply without wars? Oh, you mean the Top 10%? right...

I would be wary of guys who have remained never-married into their late thirties and 40s

So men with a history of failed marriages are better than men who don't? lol what? This guy is speaking the language of Gods.

OirishM · 2021-11-07T23:57:09+00:00

This is hilarious seeing as we've basically had Golden Vagina Syndrome across most of society historically.

Turnabout sucks, doesn't it? This article probably breaks some kind of record for how little self-awareness one can cram into a thousand words.

FearlessReaction5 · 2021-11-09T05:50:08+00:00

I hate how feminist rhetoric is always laced in psuedo-academic speak. "overly-grandiose behaviour", like they're trying to paint the bullshit archetype they made up as akin to schizophrenia or narcissism

LandscapeClear1630 · 2021-11-08T02:27:56+00:00

In the UK, 57 per cent of all higher education students are female. The proportion is higher in the US, where women account for 59.5 per cent of all college students.

Does 7 and 9.5% more, really make that much of a difference?

Title	Men having a significant problem, women most affected.
Author	epicnessBoi
Upvotes	129
Comments	41
Date	November 7, 2021 7:37 PM UTC (4 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/qow0l4/men_having_a_significant_problem_women_most/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/men-having-a-significant-problem-women-most.1085384 https://theredarchive.com/post/1085384

Comments