TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Justice for Men and Boys
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Mensactivism
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

Feminist Philosophy Class Was 'Indoctrination,' Says Columbia Student

JohnKimble111

February 8, 2018
238 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://pjmedia.com/trending/feminist-philosophy-class-indoctrination-says-columbia-student/
Archived from /r/MensRights

r/MensRights is a community advocating for the social and legal equality of men and boys since 2008.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/MensRights archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Feminist Philosophy Class Was 'Indoctrination,' Says Columbia Student
Author

JohnKimble111

Upvotes 238
Comments 62
Date February 8, 2018 5:16 AM UTC
(8 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/7w2kb1/feminist_philosophy_class_was_indoctrination_says/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/feminist-philosophy-class-was-indoctrination-says.906341
https://theredarchive.com/post/906341
Red Pill terms in post
feminist
Top posts by JohnKimble111

Women Should Have to Register for the Draft, Congressional Commission Says

6700 upvotes
March 25, 2020
/r/PussyPassDenied

BBC admits its viral “women write better code” story was fake news

6298 upvotes
December 28, 2016
/r/MensRights

Gender pay gap in modelling sees men paid 75% less than women

6153 upvotes
February 8, 2018
/r/MensRights

Toxic Masculinity

5904 upvotes
March 10, 2018
/r/MensRights

After feminist cry sexism over BBC pay, official review uncovers more underpaid men than women

5789 upvotes
January 31, 2018
/r/MensRights

Controlling girlfriend, 22, who starved and stabbed her partner, banned him from her bed and took over his Facebook account is jailed for more than seven years

3826 upvotes
April 16, 2018
/r/PussyPassDenied

'If you tell anyone I've cheated, I'll ruin you': Cambridge don is cleared after his PhD student fiancee accused him of assault 'to get back at him' for calling off their wedding after she had affair in Galapagos Islands

3770 upvotes
September 16, 2017
/r/MensRights

Amber Heard loses bid to get $50 million defamation suit by her ex Johnny Depp thrown out

3737 upvotes
March 28, 2020
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]TheToadShroom 81 points82 points83 points 8 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Not only did his professor fail to explore alternative views, but Hughes said his professor also ridiculed students who held dissenting viewpoints and suggested that they were evil, citing an in-class debate the professor facilitated on whether biological sex differences exist.

Same thing happened with me. Took a general feminist class, and challenged the idea that women historically held no "control". I brought a number of passages from Darwin's Descent of Man, as well as some ancient religious/philosophic texts, in a attempt to paint a different picture of women as a "gatekeeper for evolution" - and hence in control of human development itself.

Literally I was cursed at by some female students, sneered at - but they never actually even tried to refute any of my claims.

It's horrible in those classes. It's not indoctrination - it's strait up brainwashing.

[–]Electroverted 13 points14 points15 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

One of the absolute dark sides of the Obama administration was the environment they created in colleges. I look forward to admins putting a stop to this soon.

[+]RayOfSunshine243 -13 points-12 points-11 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

r/iamverysmart

[+]DoubleWatson -35 points-34 points-33 points 8 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

-Takes class specifically about women's issues

-comes to class talking about things that are not women's issues

-people get mad about your being off topic.

-"ha, got em." you think to yourself.

Sort of like if you took a class on decarte and decided to bring in your copy of Hume and ramble on about how decarte was wrong about everything. Yeah, sure, mabye, but that's not the point.

[–]S3xb3ard 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That’s exactly the point. How much learning goes on in an echo chamber? If one is to learn about Descartes, one must also learn about weaknesses/criticisms of his ideas, as well as counter arguments. It is very concerning that schools promote doctrine over discourse.

[–]RonTomJohnson 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The issue is that no alternative view points are being presented. They ONLY try to explain differences between men and women one way, social construction. Which, is demonstrably wrong.

[–]TheToadShroom 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Are you searching for truth, or only trying to know the opinions of others? One is philosophy, the other is sophism.

[–]Mikeavelli 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I took a gender studies class in college quite a few years ago (around 2010?), and didn't have nearly this bad of an experience. A lot of that has to do with the way the class was structured and run, which was much different than what the original article, or TheToadShroom is describing.

Class was divided into three sections: primarily male issues, primarily female issues, and primarily trans / intersex issues. Group discussion was actual discussion. The professor had a very clear position she was advocating for, but didn't ridicule students for opposing that position. The only wrong thing to say was the use of slurs or abusive language in class. Actual abusive language, not the crazy overbroad definition you sometimes see redditors going on about.

Those are the topics a survey of feminist philosophy should cover, and that's the way a feminist professor should cover them. A professor that ridicules students for presenting opposing viewpoints, or allows their students to curse at each other instead of backing their viewpoints up with sound arguments isn't running an effective classroom.

[–]Flavius_Stilicho476 49 points50 points51 points 8 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

I dropped my feminist theory class and transferred to a new "interdisciplinary studies" course after I was ridiculed for questioning the notion that all skyscrapers are phallic symbols of the patriarchy and that to further "gender equity" new buildings should be built in the shapes of bowls underground. I was literally laughed at when I tried to mention the costs of building an equivalent capacity underground structure and related engineering problems--apparently concepts like "efficiency" "profit" "objective scientific facts" are all part of the patriarchy.

I said--we are in a liberal arts institution of higher learning and you want me to accept that the scientific method and quest for objective truth---which is emblazoned in the masonry above the library---don't exist and are all part of the patriarchy?

I was told: Yes.

I responded: I am out....Enjoy your cult religion

I was then brought up on disciplinary charges which I fought for the rest of the semester and were dropped. At least some faculty saw the irony in prosecuting someone for "failing to adhere to and respect university values" when I was championing the motto on the school library.

[–]Chip_Clydesdale 22 points23 points24 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

How can this be a university class?

[–]F33N1X 15 points16 points17 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

virtue signaling is a powerful drug

[–]Electroverted 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The Dear Colleague letter had a greater impact on colleges than you might think.

[–]dukunt 15 points16 points17 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

So building a tower is phallic but building a subertain concave building isn't yonic? Feminists should build their underground lairs. They might be kinda cool. (i had to look up what the opposite of phallic was)

[–]HotDealsInTexas 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

but building a subertain concave building isn't yonic?

No, being Yonic is almost certainly the entire reason that professor called for building the things, and probably the only thought she put into whether they were a good idea.

[–]FastFourierTerraform 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I've seen a few buildings like that and theyre pretty cool

[–]TheToadShroom 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

the notion that all skyscrapers are phallic symbols of the patriarchy

The irony is that this is a Freudian notion - whom most feminists have rejected on grounds of the whole "penis envy" thing.

If they bothered to actually read about architectural history, you learn that most building designs in history typically had some kind of Utilitarian function first, then symbolic elements were dripped in when that original function was no longer needed.

[–]The__Tren__Train 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

BURN THE WITCH!!!

[–]Flavius_Stilicho476 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Pretty much it.

Offering rational criticism of feminist doctrine now = "hate speech" and "failing to adhere to university values."

[–]Vandechoz 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I was literally laughed at when I tried to mention the costs of building an equivalent capacity underground structure and related engineering problems

Can you imagine? It would be so handy to have a subterranean culture, avoiding pesky things like weather.

[–]v574v 43 points44 points45 points 8 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

If it's not open to criticism it's not philosophy or a theory - it's a sacrosanct doctrine demanding a leap of faith - also called religion.

Even 2+2=4 is open to criticism.

[+]Flavius_Stilicho476 -15 points-14 points-13 points 8 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Ah--so global warming then

[–]v574v 15 points16 points17 points 8 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

With regards to politicians - yes.

The scientists themselves work in probabilities - it's highly probable that human behaviour has a negative impact on climate change and from my observation they are quick to not blame every little weather phenomenon on climate change even with the media's leading questions.

[+]Flavius_Stilicho476 -8 points-7 points-6 points 8 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Well, from, a layman's perspective the problem seems to be the repeated stories of raw temp data manipulation, historical temperature data "adjustment" and inability of hockey stick theory to explain the warming "pause."

But mention any of this and you are deemed am anti-science heretic. I question the above as a matter of intellectual honesty and because I believe the research thus far has been politically motivated--not because I like big corporations or am in favor of pollution. Anytime that politics intersects with science, science suffers.

[–]BloodFartTheQueefer 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

That's because as a layperson "manipulation" sounds like a bad thing. All data is manipulated. Taking into account multiple factors is "manipulation".

What "warming pause"?

You probably heard about climate as proof of lying by scientists, using quote-mines like "trick" as evidence of fraud. Do you have other evidence of "manipulation"?

[–]BloodFartTheQueefer 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I meant "heard about climategate". Somehow that was eaten and on mobile so can't edit

[–]Lax-Bro 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I am not sure what hockey stick theory is, there has not been a warming pause either. If there was one it would be due to our massive oceans absorbing the heat which increases ocean acidity which also has its associated problems.

[–]RonTomJohnson 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

That's because you only look at sources that you already agree with. The hockey stick thing has been tossed do it as rubbish for years now. You wouldn't know that, because the only media that you will so much as look at, already hold the view you do. I mean, you could just look at Wikipedia. Which, is generally where a person would start, and then check the references being used. So, it's clear you haven't actually done any real research on this, and only look at biased sources. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hockey_stick_controversy

[–]Flavius_Stilicho476 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

ahh....only sources that agree with you are not "biased" and any criticism on methodology must ipso facto be from a "biased" source

[–]RonTomJohnson 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No, the sources that are peer reviewed are the ones that are going to have far less bias than say, a fox News opinion piece.

Show me the source you have if you think it's some bombshell the scientific community doesn't already know, and has addressed a decade ago. I'll wait...

[+]livinwise1 points 8 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

Political atmosphere? These views are held by governments (who don't really like to get more in debt) and scientists that cross political boundaries in almost every country. It being a political debate is completely subjective to your experience living in America.

[–]chadwickofwv -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

governments (who don't really like to get more in debt)

Who are you trying to convince? This statement is demonstrably false. All you have to do is watch a single budget debate in Congress.

[–]livinwise0 points 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

They don't actively aspire to have debt.

[–]Kyle_Fischer 20 points21 points22 points 8 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

It would be awesome if someone took a feminist driven agenda class and recorded each and every class. Then, they could put it on Youtube in it's entirety, so everyone could hear it. Of course, there could be a guide with time hacks for the important stuff along with transcripts. It would be a huge endeavor that would require a lot of time, but it would be nice to hear how men are discriminated against for voicing a view different than that of the professor and/or students.

It's one thing to read a transcript or a description of the event. You can't really hear the nastiness in the tone of the written word and a description is through the lens of the narrator. It's another thing to hear a recording and make the conclusions yourself.

[–]awksomepenguin 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago* (7 children) | Copy Link

This would definitely be a worthy endeavor, but there are a lot of logistical issues with it. Chiefly, you typically may have to obtain permission from the professor in order the record lectures. Further, you'd need permission to post them online. There are legal issues like copyright infringement at play here.

And if you tell the professor that you want to record their lectures and post them online, they will no doubt ask you why. If you're honest about wanting to expose the class as brainwashing, they will say no and probably bring you up on disciplinary charges. If you lie, and say you just want to share what you're learning with the world, you could probably be brought up on fraud charges when the truth comes out.

[+]livinwise1 points 8 years ago* [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

Couldn't you just post them on a anonymous account to YouTube and Vimeo using a coffeehouse wifi and a new account? if they did indeed blowup and go viral people will mirror the videos and repost them at which point you delete the account

[–]livinwise3 points 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

4chan would probably love this conversation

[–]chadwickofwv 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Claim a disability. They can't deny you.

[–]adamdavid85 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

You only have to disclose that you’re recording in some jurisdictions. All of Canada, for example, requires only one party consent.

[–]Kyle_Fischer 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

No, what awksomepenguin is saying is that broadcasting them would be a copyright infringement. That is a REALLY good point that I did not consider. Certainly, a prof has a copyright on slides. But, do they have a copyright on your questions and their answers to your questions? What about just doing an audio recording? And broadcasting it after you have graduated?

[–]PleaseDontNukeUs 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

As a current university student (in the UK): the general situation is that the university itself owns the copyright in the teaching materials, not the particular lecturer/prof, and they do go after people who leak these outside (if they're not Creative Commons or similar) because apart from the actual degree certificate, that's often the only actual unique aspect of their university course.

However /u/livinwise is basically correct when he suggests that you'll get away with it if you just upload from a coffee shop etc. Sharing lecture recordings from inside the university network is probably a bit stupid, but outside of that it's not like they can send the NSA after you or anything.

[–]awksomepenguin 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's just something I thought of because I think I remember hearing something about it when I was doing my undergrad or as I'm working on my master's. I can't say for sure what the situation actually is, and it may even depend on the university and its policies.

[–]BBQ_ur_booty 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I had a similar experience in a class titled "gender and society". The only perspective ever given credence was the feminist perspective. Although it isn't all bad because it was the most efficient route for me to altogether reject feminism.

[–]BloodFartTheQueefer 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Like reading the bible

[–]lostapwbm 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I can give you feminist philosophy in five minutes.

  1. Women and Men are two separate and distinct classes.

  2. Women, as a class, are oppressed.

  3. Men, as a class, are oppressors.

  4. Men oppress Women through a system of invisible and near total control over all aspects of civilization known as 'The Patriarchy.'

  5. Because Men have implemented a system of total control (The Patriarchy) Women can, and should, implement their own system of total control, known as Feminism.

[–]The-beat-man 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

if you are still attending these indoctrination camps you are part of the problem your fees are paying the salaries of these people. stop attending them go to other alternatives like vocational skills training. when less students attend they will get less revenues to fund these indoctrination session

[–]Electroverted 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Some colleges are making diversity classes a requirement, so there's that.

[–]stickstickley87 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

I plan on sending my daughter to college online to avoid the brainwashing. That is if she’s not interested in taking up a vocation, which I plan to expose her to.

[–]salbris 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Imho, you shouldn't deprive your daughter of the college experience becuase she might take a feminist class.

[–]stickstickley87 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

The college experience where you bury yourself in debt, get indoctrinated by degenerate leftist ideology, lose out on potential income and delay your career all for a piece of paper?

[–]salbris 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Does that change significantly with online classes?

[–]DesignerTackle 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

i've seen nothing but learning in my college. no politics at all

[–]PleaseDontNukeUs 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Same. I do maths and computer science at a good UK university, no bullshit at all on the course, would recommend.

[–]BloodFartTheQueefer 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I've spent many years at universities now and because I stick solely to physical science and computer science, I don't see much nonsense. That is unless I open my eyes to read boards and pamphlets and emails. Then it's frightening

[–]Grubnar 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Duh!

[–]gdengine -4 points-3 points-2 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Not only did his professor fail to explore alternative views, but Hughes said his professor also ridiculed students who held dissenting viewpoints and suggested that they were evil, citing an in-class debate the professor facilitated on whether biological sex differences exist.

At the same time, insisting that a feminist class explore alternative views is sort of along the same lines as expecting a biology class to explore "alternative creation views". If I show up to a physics class and insist on forcing the professor into a debate on whether or not the universe we all live in is a simulation or not, I am likely to be ignored. Personally, I took a philosophy/stats course once where the professor brought up one of those ghost hunters shows as an example of how one can mislead an audience...and some girl in the class wanted to go on and on about how much merit there was and how "legit" the science on the TV show was...he was having none of it, and I suspect that somewhere that girl wrote some blog post about closed minded philosophy professors. Point being, ideas are open to criticism, but there is a time and most importantly, place for them. We have one side of this story, and frankly, we know that a lot of feminists and anti-feminists have a sort of hyperbolic nature to them.

[–]AlmostNotSure 10 points11 points12 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Yea well you can't expect to go into a rigorous science class and expect them to abandon logic and entertain highly improbable truths.

We should, however, be able to go into a feminist class and expect them to utilize logic and entertain possible truths. That is where your analogy breaks down.

[–]DoubleWatson -3 points-2 points-1 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It doesn't though. It's sort of like taking a Descartes seminar and being angry that Hume's empericism isn't being given enough air time.

That's not really what we signed up for, is it?

[–]AlmostNotSure 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hah. Good try. But no. This class is still a philosophy course. And just like any philosophy course, even though the subject matter of an individual course may be narrowed to study the work of a specific philosopher, such as Thomas Nagel, it's imperative, for learning and full comprehension of the material, to "then spend much of the class exposing any weaknesses that Nagel’s argument might have.”

This is even the case for history-of-philosophy courses. Students learn the prominent arguments made throughout history about a topic, but discuss them and write about them themselves as well.

So Feminism, which is about equality, is necessarily concerned with discovering truth and accuracy. Even with regard to learning the history of Feminist thought it is imperative that room be made in the course for analysis. Anything less is literally indoctrination.

It's not like taking a geography course - where you just absorb information. Even history courses are no longer like that; they almost all involve analysis and discussion of implications of sources etc.

Thus even a feminist class - especially a feminist philosophy class - is about assessing reality.

In ALL of the social science courses it is imperative that “We don’t hold anyone’s views as sacred, or even special. We debate with one another"

Otherwise you end up with indoctrination and you teach people the “people-who-disagree-with-me-are-evil” mindset rather than to think for themselves.

Feminism should be especially concerned with making sure that women students, who are presumably the predominant attendants in a feminist philosophy course, are actually learning to think. Otherwise what was the point of the struggle and sacrifice for all the suffragists and feminists of the past - you know, the ones who actually fought? If you want to throw all that hard work away and churn out unthinking, dull, and brainless female graduates then you are not a feminist and you certainly don't deserve to call yourself one.

The feminists fought for women to be heard. You betcha they'd uphold the importance of the willingness to hearing viewpoints from people who disagree.

[–]Electroverted 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The scientific community challenges itself all the time. That's why the primary sciences shake their heads at the conformity and indoctrination attempts of modern social sciences.

[–]DoubleWatson -5 points-4 points-3 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

This was not my experience. I took a feminist class and found it to be rather enlightening and mind opening.

We can work together on all of our issues.

[–]nforne 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Would you describe yourself as a feminist by any chance?

[–]DoubleWatson 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes I would. You can do both.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter