~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
AlphaWookie
[removed]
[–]murphtaf48 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
“She is an English professor; she has no background in feminism,” she told the Journal. “She has no background in political studies and she has no background in women and gender studies.”
I really liked that bit. It's as though the woman who's contesting the Men's Rights group believes that in order to criticize feminism, you must first be taught what the issues are... by a feminist.
I think that and the whole 'you're against feminism? You're a rape-apologist, a victim-blamer, a misogynist, and a masochist' are two big ways that feminists try to shut down arguments against them. It's sort of funny how a movement, that claims it's so essential to not only women but men too, has to spend so much time trying to shut anyone who disagrees with or challenges them out of the conversation. While also in the same breath claiming that they want equality and everyone should have the same chances and opportunities.
EDIT:
unsettling for its insistence that no matter what a woman does — no matter how careless and irresponsible — she is always innocent
Also, I'm glad that she said this because I personally think it's true not only of the 'Don't Be That Guy' campaign, but of feminism at its core and I don't see how this could in any way be empowering to women when all they're told is that they're victims, and nothing more.
[–]zyk0s30 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
That's because they believe feminism is a science, a complicated one at that, necessitating years of study. That's what happens when you allow identity politics to be treated as an academic discipline.
[–]demiurgency19 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Exactly right. We in the MRA community have to be aware that when we challenge feminists, we are not just calling into question someone's beloved (but fictitious) world-view. Often-times, we are calling into question the validity of a person's entire graduate education.
Thomas Sowell has great insight into the ways intellectuals can sometime see themselves as an ordained elite. I highly recommend it if you're not familiar with his work. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERj3QeGw9Ok
In the case of hard science, this is not so much of a problem. With my highschool chemistry education, I'm not going to argue with a chemistry PhD on the properties of a hydrogen isotope. He's got me beat there. PhD's in the social sciences want this very same veneration for themselves. After all, they worked just as hard to get their degree as the chemistry professor. The problem is, their speciality intersects with political opinion, opinions where no one's opinion is objectively better than another. (**Edit: clarification. An opinion might be practically better, but not objectively better).
If my 15 years of experience in software development could be entirely undermined by some guy just now figuring out how to use Microsoft Word, I might be pretty defensive too.
For clarity, here's the Futurama version:
Civil Defense Van: Calling all scientists! Calling all scientists! Be advised that there will be a worldwide conference on global warming in Kyoto, Japan.
Homeopathic Doctor: I have a degree in homeopathic medicine.
Civil Defense Van: You've got a degree in baloney!
[–]TracyMorganFreeman9 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
"Uh yes I have a PhD in Truthology from Christian Tech"
[–]greenlightideas21 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The "educate yourself" argument usually boils down to: "You can't tell me about God because you obviously don't have the same relationship I do with him." You'll never be "educated" enough, because if you were, you wouldn't be challenging her in the first place.
It's like when you argue with your parents; you'll never win per se, but if you can get them to say certain phrases you know they've lost.
[–]IrideTheDirt13 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Purely speculative, but in order to fire people up, and get them to rise up against their oppressors, they first need to be convinced they are, in fact, oppressed... This makes the culture of victims in feminism a requirement... Again, purely speculative.
[–]AnotherDAM8 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You forgot this gem:
Fiamengo has actively criticized the “Don’t Be That Guy” poster campaign, which puts the responsibility on men not to rape, rather than women not to get raped.
Pretty classic misrepresentation going on there. What the "Don't Be That Guy" campaign does is promote the notion that ALL MEN ARE RAPISTS it makes no claims either way as to who is responsible.
[–]Freddulz5 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Contemporary literary study features Feminist theory heavily. Some courses may feature Marxist, Structuralist, or Colonialist theory on occasion - but there will undoubtedly be a critical component that requires the use of Feminist theory. I dare say it's almost impossible for anyone go through a introductory level literature or rhetoric course without having to examine a piece from a feminist perspective.
[–]Snowdens_BTC_Wallet1 point 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Die, educated S.C.U.M.
[–]cri_nge22 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I find it highly amusing that rainn just had a bit about denouncing rape culture hysteria right around the same time as this incident. Their argument was literally "Gathering to discuss men's issues promotes rape culture" and that's specifically the attitude denounced by the most well funded rape advocacy group in the US.
http://time.com/30545/its-time-to-end-rape-culture-hysteria/ if anyone wants the source to what I'm talking about.
[–]edtastic5 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
RAINN was smart to denounce this mad propaganda power play by radical feminists trying to use phony rape culture hysteria to force others to do their bidding. Bigots using fear mongering to marginalize innate groups is nothing new.
[–]Bla3411221 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
“Ratification does not mean we endorse the views of the club but they align with the policies of the AMS and are not in violation of our constitution,” Olver stated at Assembly.
Following the motion’s failure, co-organizer of the opposition group Ashley Burnie said she was disappointed in the AMS, accusing it of acting in accordance with “systemic oppression.”
“It’s built into the institution itself, so it’s not surprising,” she said. “It’s not outside of that oppression.”
Again.. lol.
[–]-Fender-21 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
"Them not blindly allowing us to oppress them and shut them down means we're being oppressed! Down with Patriarchy<sup>TM</sup> !"
[–]Bla3411216 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Lol...
You don't get to critique creationism! You don't even have a degree in truthology!!
[–]edtastic7 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You don't need a background in anti male sexism to see the wrong in advancing the ideology promoting it.
[–]Sebatron216 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
At Assembly, members argued that it would set a dangerous precedent to de-ratify a club on ideological grounds, while others argued that it would be premature to de-ratify the club based on future actions.
At least there were people smart enough to see that at the Assembly.
Edit: Forgot a word.
[–]Noel_S_Jytemotiv15 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Why isn't "rape culture" properly in quotes?
[–]zyk0s26 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Because the article has a clear feminist bias. Look:
Again, replace men and women by blacks and whites, and rape by theft, and you know the author of the article would not have used this phrasing.
[–][deleted]9 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Good eye.
[–]Unenjoyed14 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
...further perpetuated rape culture...
Gosh, I don't think they should have a rape culture, at all.
;)
further perpetuated rape culture.
I find it interesting that the people most often claiming what perpetuates rape culture are the ones defining it and using it to justify policies that benefit them.
Couldn't be a conflict of interest there at all. /s
We have 17 comments here and 5 on that article. Your voices need to be heard by those outside this forum.
[–]IS442 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Consider it done.
It's always fun to see someone, on every single comment chain, attempting to say, "Well, I was in r/MR for two minutes, and clearly, they are ban-happy and intolerant of opposing views!"
[–]YetAnotherCommenter4 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Fiamengo and a men's group promoting rape culture?
Really?
Criticizing a probably-ineffective "anti-rape" campaign which, as the Lisak study showed, only addresses 10% of rapes (i.e. rapes which are caused by misconceptions about consent) is hardly being in favor of rape culture.
Being against collectively blaming men or 'male culture' for a crime perpetrated by a very small minority of sociopaths is hardly being in favor of rape culture.
Meanwhile, our society's most explicit and unchallenged rape culture encourages the rape of men. "Erections are consent," "sure, she was 29 and he was 15 but WOW she was a minx! Lucky boy!," and "being raped in prison is part of the punishment" are almost never seriously challenged.
And, of course, "its not rape if she rapes you by envelopment" is actively promoted by certain feminists.
Yes, there are some myths and tropes and expectations in our culture which can, even if unintentionally, make life easier for rapists or blur the lines of consent/non-consent. Some of these still effect women, but these are all consistently challenged.
A lot of these myths and tropes and expectations effect men. But the 'rape culture' discourse doesn't care for male rape victims.
[–]Xsinthis3 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I went to college in Kingston, I'm actually really surprised that there is a Men's Group in Queens (I did not go to Queens).
Then again, considering the supposed gender ratio there, maybe it's not that much of a surprise...
Ahem:
“We claim that the falsifying of rape culture, which says that certain people are disproportionately attacked and are rape victims, and whether intentionally or not, is harmful,” Nawal, ArtSci ’14, told the Journal.
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]murphtaf48 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]zyk0s30 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]demiurgency19 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TracyMorganFreeman9 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]greenlightideas21 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]IrideTheDirt13 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]AnotherDAM8 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Freddulz5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Snowdens_BTC_Wallet1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]cri_nge22 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]edtastic5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Bla3411221 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]-Fender-21 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Bla3411216 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Bla3411216 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]edtastic7 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Sebatron216 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Noel_S_Jytemotiv15 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]zyk0s26 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted]9 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Unenjoyed14 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TracyMorganFreeman9 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]edtastic5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]IS442 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]YetAnotherCommenter4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Xsinthis3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Snowdens_BTC_Wallet1 point [recovered] | Copy Link