[NSFW] Apparently a grown woman sexually abusing a male child doesn't violate Facebook's community standards.

Aqualser · 2017-02-11T20:30:54+00:00

That's disgusting, I'm glad I don't use Facebook anymore.

D-Jon · 2017-02-11T21:43:12+00:00

hey op, could you do us a favor and throw a blur or black box over that? That image is downright disturbing, and possibly even illegal in some jurisdictions. It's a good thing to bring this to the communities attention, but the uncensored image is just as inappropriate here as it is on facebook.

sneakercops · 2017-02-11T23:45:46+00:00

If I posted a drawing of the genders vice versa it would be taken down in a heart beat

-redditardation- · 2017-02-11T20:12:17+00:00

It is an illustration. Illustrations tends to be governed by completely different guidelines to actual photographs/video.

This does depend on the nation but essentially it falls under art which in turn falls under freedom of expression. This is why you will see many paintings that essentially depict child abuse or sexual activities with minors around.

If you ban such things you would also by extension ban any fictional novel, poem, book etc. that might feature child abuse. It wouldn't quite be thought police but it would come pretty close.

Now whether this is a case of FaceBook choosing to selectively enforce its own community guidelines is another story but I am discussing this under a more general context.

zangerinus · 2017-02-12T00:23:11+00:00

true, but its just a shitty corporation no surprise here. as long as its within the law.;

FreedDrugsTinyGuns · 2017-02-12T02:44:51+00:00

What would I do? Call the fucking police! Something I hope every parent/adult would do in this situation.

ThePigmanAgain · 2017-02-12T01:06:41+00:00

Eeew. Only explanation i can think of for this not "violating their standards" is that Facebook is run by pedos who want to normalize this kind of thing.

HeForeverBleeds · 2017-02-11T22:51:36+00:00

It's atrocious enough that they're apparently fine with this picture in the first place, but even worse considering how they removed AVfM's page for "violating community standards" https://www.avoiceformen.com/a-voice-for-men/facebook-removes-avfms-page/

It really says something about that website that a page attempting to raise awareness about the issues of men and boys (including things like sexual abuse) is considered unacceptable to them, but apparently graphic depictions of women raping boy children is perfectly fine

bishnu13 · 2017-02-12T02:34:54+00:00

I can guarantee this should have been removed. FB has a variety of people who look at the content and make the call to remove it. In this case, they most likely made the wrong call. This does not represent FB policy. Not each rando person represents the policy perfectly. Also the reporting flow uses a variety of automated image processing. So it could have been lost in some corner case of an algorithm. If you reported this has child sexuality it would be removed and most likely removed immediately.

mwobuddy · 2017-02-12T06:32:20+00:00

what were the comments like?

CurtisAxelmania · 2017-02-12T05:15:38+00:00

These are fictional characters not real people. I personallt have no problem with Facebook allowing this.

More so with the hypocrisy in that if you flipped the genders and showed a girl engaging in sexual acts against a receptive man they would take it down in an instant.

maniclurker · 2017-02-11T23:20:57+00:00

Probably because a grown woman isn't abusing a male child.

Besides, is this any different than what's in your porn stash, OP?

Title	[NSFW] Apparently a grown woman sexually abusing a male child doesn't violate Facebook's community standards.
Author	[deleted]
Upvotes	140
Comments	72
Date	February 11, 2017 8:03 PM UTC (9 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/5th6b0/nsfw_apparently_a_grown_woman_sexually_abusing_a/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/nsfw-apparently-a-grown-woman-sexually-abusing-a.932122 https://theredarchive.com/post/932122

Comments