Oklahoma Man Ordered To Pay Child Support Despite Not Being The Father

Tmomp · 2017-01-13T14:44:23+00:00

Allow me to translate the story into how the mainstream and law see it:

Oklahoma ATM Ordered To Pay Child Support Despite Not Being Father

TULSA (KFSM) — An automatic teller machine (ATM) in Oklahoma is hoping to change the law after it has to continue to pay child support for a baby that is not his, according to our affiliate KOTV.

When the ATM's high school girlfriend got pregnant, it married her. Five months later she had a little boy and it believed it had a son, but their marriage fell apart.

The ATM decided to take a paternity test when the boy was three years old.

“It comes back zero percent. I was in my office and I saw that. I should’ve expected it but I didn’t and it hit me. I’m telling my co-worker how shocked I am that someone could do this to someone,” it said.

The judge ordered the ATM to take another DNA test and it got the same result. The judge first ruled that the ATM was off the hook financially, but then reversed the decision because Oklahoma law says ATMs must question paternity within two years of the child’s birth.

The ATM said that it had no reason to question it before it did, but, because it missed the deadline, the judge withdrew from the ATM around $500 a month in child support and nearly $15,000 in back support – for a child that is not its.

“I wish I was telling a lie,” it said. “I wish it wasn’t the truth but it is. That’s what makes it so crazy. Everyone I talk to about this can’t believe where the court system is coming from.”

The ATM wants lawmakers to change the law. It said it believes DNA matters regardless of when an ATM learns it’s not the father of a child.

“At this point, there’s really nothing I can do to get out of the $15,000 or get out of the child support, it’s done, it’s the law,” it said.

BDMR_lurker · 2017-01-13T09:34:58+00:00

Because justice stops where government expenses threaten to start.

Missing_Links · 2017-01-13T17:39:33+00:00

Tests like this usually range from $150-500. Not a substantial increase in the cost of neonatal care. Genetic sequencing should just be standard for both parents and the child at birth as part of building up a genetic bank of hospital records both to avoid issues like this and to make it easier to detect and treat nearly every condition as genomic science continues to make advances in medicine

JoelTLoUisBadass · 2017-01-14T01:58:24+00:00

If I was this guy I would use every resource I have to find the real dad, then I will put a gun to his head and tell him to sign the fucking birth certificate.

No but seriously I will a do DNA test on every kid that's "mine" before signing the birth certificate, I won't fall for all the "Don't you trust me" guilting bullshit.

MagicTampon · 2017-01-14T08:31:48+00:00

,7U>zcpWcDP1AKA:Mo8)]L%m@4NJ+)xwA(])SHo3vri

5:fDK;8>:Cls#heT0a0)Kti#@a-uV5V4y7yzlDrJrHlAVyQ

rVHvf~lSRK*R]EZL&l$,p&&w&%(PH

Wasteland_Whisperer · 2017-01-13T16:39:59+00:00

How is this not fraud on her part? Serious question.

autotldr · 2017-01-14T17:21:10+00:00

This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 65%. (I'm a bot)

TULSA - A man in Oklahoma is hoping to change the law after he has to continue to pay child support for a baby that is not his, according to our affiliate KOTV. When Thomas' high school girlfriend got pregnant, he married her.

Thomas said that he had no reason to question it before he did because he missed the deadline, the judge ordered him to pay around $500 a month in child support and nearly $15,000 in back support - for a child that is not his.

He said he believes DNA matters regardless of when a man learns he's not the father of a child.

Extended Summary | FAQ | Theory | Feedback | Top keywords: child^#1 Thomas^#2 support^#3 believe^#4 judge^#5

NeonDisease · 2017-01-14T22:40:40+00:00

TIL that any random woman could write my name on her child's birth certificate and I'd be legally obligated to pay child support.

greenyashiro · 2017-01-13T13:34:05+00:00

If he was married to her and they had a child then that is his son. (DNA non-withstanding). Legally, he is the father?! His name on the birth certificate? etc

I mean, if they legally adopted a child and then got divorced, he would still be the "father"...

Stupid system in many ways, but it is what it is.

Most important in the equation is the child, imo.

White_Russian_Hacker · 2017-01-13T09:43:43+00:00

White people are already paying for black peoples children, so why not just take it all the way, right?

Just make all white men cuckolds, that have to pay for slutty cunts children. That seems fair, right?

The Left is at war against white men.

Title	Oklahoma Man Ordered To Pay Child Support Despite Not Being The Father
Author	[deleted]
Upvotes	94
Comments	41
Date	January 13, 2017 9:33 AM UTC (9 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/5nppt5/oklahoma_man_ordered_to_pay_child_support_despite/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/oklahoma-man-ordered-to-pay-child-support-despite.934136 https://theredarchive.com/post/934136

Comments