There seems to be a disconnect between the TRP and TBP sides when it comes to the term LMR (last minute resistance), meaning that during a situation that had been escalating towards sex, one person (the woman, for the sake of this discussion) halts the escalation.

From my understanding, TRP's opinion is that LMR is a result of societal pressure, and that while the woman is consenting and wants the sex, she worries about being labeled as a slut or simply feeling like one in a negative way. The man should then convince her that sex is great and she has nothing to worry about and then the sex commences.

TBP seems to view the term LMR as problematic from a feminist point of view, where it's believed that consent can be revoked at any time for any reason, and that when a woman says "no" it's not necessarily because of societal pressure, it could be for any reason, and that should be respected.

It seems to me like those of a BP mindset consider language like LMR to be "rapey", which TRP takes offense to as they don't believe it is, thus making discussion on the subject touchy. So I know I'm in murky waters here.

So here's what I'm looking to discuss: If "LMR" in a given instance really is the result of societal pressure, and is overcome with sex-positive language, it seems sort of disingenuous given the TRP opinion that "slutty" women are somehow less than women who don't sleep around. I mean, if the woman wasn't going to sleep with you for fear of acting "slutty" until she was convinced you don't consider the hook-up to be a negative thing, would you then hold that act of casual sex against her later down the line? I know questions of this nature have come up before and the answer is usually "We don't hate sluts, we love sluts! Just don't wanna marry them!" but I want to dig deeper than that.

Thoughts?