I have been reading Fascinating Womanhood and have looked into Laura Doyle (listened to podcasts but haven't read her books yet), and the one thing that I'm struggling to reconcile is if it's possible to be truely authentic to your partner if you're following the advice laid out.

My husband and I greatly value honesty and the truth and are authentic with one another. I've seen there is a lot of wisdom in the RPW philosophy but there are a few things I've come across that don't sit quite right with me. One example is with Laura Doyle suggesting to manifest outcomes you want by telling your husband "white lies" (an example she gives is telling her husband he was a great provider even though she didn't fully believe it). As far as I can see, a white lie is a lie and is a firm boundary in my relationship with my husband. And example from Fascinating Womanhood is suggesting not to do better than your husband in a male-dominated sport as it will harm his pride. Does this mean pretending you aren't as capable as you are? That just seems inauthentic and dishonest if you're giving the impression you did as well as you could when you didn't.

To be clear, I'm not suggesting for a moment that looking to improve yourself or change your behaviour is being inauthentic to yourself, and every other element of the philosophy I've come across so far has seemed spot on.

I'm wondering if anyone else has come up against this, and how you may have managed it. I'm also looking for general guidance in this respect. Can the "white" lies, feigning incompetence and other general inauthenticity not be incorporated in a RPW relationship successfully? Or is this a vital element in achieving success?